Ultimate PS3 vs 360 Battle Revival 80+Metacritic Library Duel to the Death.

I noticed Dance Central 2 , but not Dance Central , Singstar , Buzz Quiz World , Buzz Quiz TV.

You included collections.

Wait a minute, you're this prick? You're a bandodger :lol:

waltefmoney

TC :lol:

I noticed Dance Central 2 , but not Dance Central , Singstar , Buzz Quiz World , Buzz Quiz TV.

Nike_Air

Go 360 !

• Call of Duty 2
• Guita Hero II
• Hitman Blood Money
• King Kong
• Tomb Raider Legend
• WWE 2007
• Dance Central
• Test Drive Unlimited

-

• Singstar
• Buzz Quiz World
• Buzz Quiz TV
• GT5 Prologue

Why do people here use scores to say which is better than what? Never had a proper opinion?

No PSN Titles. No Arcade Titles.Eddie-Vedder

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]No PSN Titles. No Arcade Titles.foxhound_fox

360 is making a huge comeback in light of recent events. I demand a new thread and a new poll !

Go 360 !

• Call of Duty 2
• Guita Hero II
• Hitman Blood Money
• King Kong
• Tomb Raider Legend
• WWE 2007
• Dance Central
• Test Drive Unlimited

-

• Singstar
• Buzz Quiz World
• Buzz Quiz TV
• GT5 Prologue

Nike_Air

Hate to throw you under the bus Eddie , but you dun goofed. Cows owning cows on SW , mass hysteria. Sony is doomed.

Hate to throw you under the bus Eddie , but you dun goofed. Cows owning cows on SW , mass hysteria. Sony is doomed.

Nike_Air

Guys with functioning brain cells knows that PS3 is winning this generation.

Guys with functioning brain cells knows that PS3 is winning this generation.

GamerwillzPS

It's like I always say...

Games that are playable via BC I won't add, cause that's against the whole point of the threadEddie-Vedder

The ICO and Shadow of the Colossus Collection 91 - 2011
God of War Collection 91 - 2009
The Sly Collection 85 - 2011
Jak and Daxter Collection 81 - 2012
Prince of Persia ****c Trilogy HD 81 - 2011

Eddie-Vedder

odd that...and if we take those away....the ps3 is left with 38...odd that items that you refuse to add for the 360 are okay to add for the ps3...

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Zombie thread.Desmonic

lol, masturbation continuation.

when even devoted fanboys can only fudge the numbers enough to get a 3 game victory you know without a doubt the ps3 was kind of a joke this gen.

can you even imagine what this list would look like if it was a crazy 360 fanboy doing the lists and manipulating the count in an attempt to make the 360 look good by doing things like including games on 360 but not on ps3?

hey sw lets not count a shytload of games on 360 because there are pc versions that nobody bought! :lol:

Oh look, it's this thread again.

Judging the value of a game based on a Metacritic score is a very limited way of thinking. Just stick with what you feel is best for you, and you'll always win.

lol, masturbation continuation.

when even devoted fanboys can only fudge the numbers enough to get a 3 game victory you know without a doubt the ps3 was kind of a joke this gen.

can you even imagine what this list would look like if it was a crazy 360 fanboy doing the lists and manipulating the count in an attempt to make the 360 look good by doing things like including games on 360 but not on ps3?

hey sw lets not count a shytload of games on 360 because there are pc versions that nobody bought! :lol:

Riverwolf007

Lol, you fail. Lems gonna lem...

Oh look, it's this thread again.

Judging the value of a game based on a Metacritic score is a very limited way of thinking. Just stick with what you feel is best for you, and you'll always win.

DraugenCP

Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.

lol, masturbation continuation.

when even devoted fanboys can only fudge the numbers enough to get a 3 game victory you know without a doubt the ps3 was kind of a joke this gen.

can you even imagine what this list would look like if it was a crazy 360 fanboy doing the lists and manipulating the count in an attempt to make the 360 look good by doing things like including games on 360 but not on ps3?

hey sw lets not count a shytload of games on 360 because there are pc versions that nobody bought! :lol:

Riverwolf007

heh, i struck a nerve because firstly even with shamelessly fudging the numbers in this topic there is only a 3 game difference and secondly if you only count games playable on either ps3 or 360 only and leave out the rest of the hardware required to play 360 games the ps3 library looks like the red headed step child of the generation.

why isn't Tomb Raider legend on the 360 list?rilpas

[QUOTE="rilpas"]why isn't Tomb Raider legend on the 360 list?freedomfreak

[QUOTE="DraugenCP"]

Oh look, it's this thread again.

Judging the value of a game based on a Metacritic score is a very limited way of thinking. Just stick with what you feel is best for you, and you'll always win.

GamerwillzPS

Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.

Oh yeah I'm sure....

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="rilpas"]why isn't Tomb Raider legend on the 360 list?rilpas

[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] Why would it?freedomfreak

*facepalms* I just remembered I have the platinum trophy for the PS3 version of that game :P

The PS3 has been better since about 2008 this is coming from someone who owns both. Anyone who doesnt admit that either doesnt own a ps3 or somehow fell in love with the Kinect.

Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.GamerwillzPS

Metacritic is a decent way of getting an indication of a game's overall quality. It doesn't say anything conclusive. A collection of opinions, no matter how 'professional' they may be, is still a collection of opinions and not facts. And that's not even mentioning that video game journalism is relatively immature and unprofessional, and under the influence of publisher money and marketing hype.

And I don't even own a 360, never have. You don't need to be a lemming to see how moronic these arguments are. Anyone who sees Metacritic as the final authority on a game's quality is either a rabid fanboy or very insecure about his own opinions.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.DraugenCP

Metacritic is a decent way of getting an indication of a game's overall quality. It doesn't say anything conclusive. A collection of opinions, no matter how 'professional' they may be, is still a collection of opinions and not facts. And that's not even mentioning that video game journalism is relatively immature and unprofessional, and under the influence of publisher money and marketing hype.

And I don't even own a 360, never have. You don't need to be a lemming to see how moronic these arguments are. Anyone who sees Metacritic as the final authority on a game's quality is either a rabid fanboy or very insecure about his own opinions.

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.DraugenCP

Metacritic is a decent way of getting an indication of a game's overall quality. It doesn't say anything conclusive. A collection of opinions, no matter how 'professional' they may be, is still a collection of opinions and not facts. And that's not even mentioning that video game journalism is relatively immature and unprofessional, and under the influence of publisher money and marketing hype.

And I don't even own a 360, never have. You don't need to be a lemming to see how moronic these arguments are. Anyone who sees Metacritic as the final authority on a game's quality is either a rabid fanboy or very insecure about his own opinions.

A GameSpot review is written by a person who is entitled to his/her opinion. That means 1 opinion.

Metacritic consists many more than 1 opinion. A lot more.

Which would you trust?

Great thread, I'm thoroughly impressed! :D

[QUOTE="DraugenCP"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Metacritic is the best way to judge the value of games. All reviews from professional companies and users are merged together to make a score. How is that a bad thing? :|

Again, Lems gonna lem.GamerwillzPS

Metacritic is a decent way of getting an indication of a game's overall quality. It doesn't say anything conclusive. A collection of opinions, no matter how 'professional' they may be, is still a collection of opinions and not facts. And that's not even mentioning that video game journalism is relatively immature and unprofessional, and under the influence of publisher money and marketing hype.

And I don't even own a 360, never have. You don't need to be a lemming to see how moronic these arguments are. Anyone who sees Metacritic as the final authority on a game's quality is either a rabid fanboy or very insecure about his own opinions.

A GameSpot review is written by a person who is entitled to his/her opinion. That means 1 opinion.

Metacritic consists many more than 1 opinion. A lot more.

Which would you trust?

On this board, gamespot is law therefore for the sake of this board gamespot.

Check the survival guide, its like that for a reason.

It's no final authority but what's the alternative? GS scores? Metacritic games scores should be effected less by publisher money and bias towards a system, game series or game genre than GS scores and there's only really those two ways for the people here to objectively compare games.hoosier7

What I'm saying is that Metacritic only serves to get a global indication on a game's quality. There is no final authority (except maybe yourself) because it is impossible to get an objective answer to a subjective question.

A GameSpot review is written by a person who is entitled to his/her opinion. That means 1 opinion.

Metacritic consists many more than 1 opinion. A lot more.

Which would you trust?

My own judgment. More opinions equals a better indication, but no matter how many opinions, it doesn't change the fact that we're dealing with a collection of opinions and not a collection of facts. Ideally, well-formulated opinions grounded in reasonable arguments, but still opinions.

The PS3 has been better since about 2008 this is coming from someone who owns both. Anyone who doesnt admit that either doesnt own a ps3 or somehow fell in love with the Kinect.

AM-Gamer

The PS3 has been better since about 2008 this is coming from someone who owns both. Anyone who doesnt admit that either doesnt own a ps3 or somehow fell in love with the Kinect.

AM-Gamer

*Raises hand*

Me too. I own both too and I prefer the PS3 because of awesome games. The 360 literally has no games.

I think anyone with common sense knows that the PS3 is the better system to go to for high quality games. I don't think this thread was nesseccary.

I think anyone with common sense knows that the PS3 is the better system to go to for high quality games. I don't think this thread was nesseccary.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I think anyone with common sense knows that the PS3 is the better system to go to for high quality games. I don't think this thread was nesseccary.

freedomfreak

In the minds of GamerwillzPS, ShadowMoses900, ispeakfact, arkephonic, themajormayor and kuraimen, it's a fact.

All of those guys rocks and have fully functioning brain cells, and that's also the fact.