This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm glad I don't have ridiculous standards. I just like a good game and to have fun. The other shit is whatever.
1080p is ridiculous standards now.
Consolites truley have low standards.
So you have low standards? or do you just not game at all, since you're not a PC gamer:
Two separate things
PS4 couldn't handle 1080p resolution, probably because they would have to sacrifice effects or couldn't iron out the problems enough. So they kept it at 900p
FPS 1 or 2 more on PS4 so they kept them both at 30fps. GPU can take some load of CPU hence the increase in 1 or 2 frames. But the whole setup isnt large enough to create 60fps so rather than have varied fps they locked it.
Console owners should be glad they not running at 1080p as it should equal better effects and graphics overall. This is what it should be like going forward.
The shit about keeping PC the same is just wrong though.
1-No not when the PS4 has 560Gflops of extra power,it has been proven already,in fact AC black flag is 1080p on PS4 900p on xbox one and has better AA on PS4 to.
Games like Shadow Of Mordor has higher resolution,better shadows,and more foliage,while beating the xbox one version 1080p to 900p.In fact they could lock both version at 30FPS and 900p,since the PS4 has extra power instead of running mid low setting it will be running mid high setting or even high setting no matter what the extra power was there.
That is if you believe that bullshit every fru**ing benchmark out there show the contrary when the fu** an R265 has been just 2 frames faster than an R250x.? Or a 7850 2 frames faster than a 7770.?
That is total bullshit and go against UBIsoft own fu**ing benchmark which showed that if they moved NPC to GPU compute the PS4 would have destroy the xbox one version,they performance they where getting on PS4 was double of the xbox one.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1127?vs=1126
2 frames my ass.
Pay attention to the test on the end as well the ones about GPU compute,see how the difference is like 30% more but on PS4 by ubi test the difference was 100% that is because the PS4 is modify to take advantage of compute which the xbox one isn't the PS4 isn't a mighty power house of a console but is not hard to see it is stronger than the xbox one and that UBI fu** up and are damage controlling left and right.
That is funny because that is what UBI did with the PS4 version because of a deal with MS.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
Link?
The proof is in the pudding, so to say: If you are going to sit there and tell me that on a console connected to a TV, you can see some big difference between 900p and 1080p, I have one thing to say to you: You're a goddamned liar.
Sorry for being so blunt, but truth is truth, and I am tired of the fallacies being spread by cows on this subject.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
Link?
The proof is in the pudding, so to say: If you are going to sit there and tell me that on a console connected to a TV, you can see some big difference between 900p and 1080p, I have one thing to say to you: You're a goddamned liar.
Sorry for being so blunt, but truth is truth, and I am tired of the fallacies being spread by cows on this subject.
http://gdcvault.com/play/1020939/Efficient-Usage-of-Compute-Shaders%20%20Reply
Granted this goes beyond just resolution, having that much a lead for gpu power is not a small difference.
But just to humor you, as a pc gamer you bet I can tell the difference between something like 1600X900 vs 1080p, it comes down to clarity.
Why you guys feel the need to constantly defend the bones meager GPU I'll never understand.
It's definitely not small.
It should also be pointed out that those numbers in the graph are Ubisoft's own figures from testing the machines...since this is a Ubisoft thread after all.
I'm posting for others who may ask where that graph came from, not to you per se.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
Link?
The proof is in the pudding, so to say: If you are going to sit there and tell me that on a console connected to a TV, you can see some big difference between 900p and 1080p, I have one thing to say to you: You're a goddamned liar.
Sorry for being so blunt, but truth is truth, and I am tired of the fallacies being spread by cows on this subject.
http://gdcvault.com/play/1020939/Efficient-Usage-of-Compute-Shaders%20%20Reply
Granted this goes beyond just resolution, having that much a lead for gpu power is not a small difference.
But just to humor you, as a pc gamer you bet I can tell the difference between something like 1600X900 vs 1080p, it comes down to clarity.
Why you guys feel the need to constantly defend the bones meager GPU I'll never understand.
I hthink you missed the point of that presentation. It was about shifting the shaders to the GPU to improve performance in DX 11. That final chart is shader performance on the GPU using Ubisoft's technique. It represents a specific area of performance for a specific task, and is not attempting to generalize a performance difference between the two. The article does offer one generalization - the PS4's GPU is 34% more powerful than XB1's. In the computer world, that's really not that much (slides 16 & 18).
As for "telling the difference", I clearly stated "consoles with a TV", and explained why someone would more easily see the difference on a PC. If you are going to comment on my post, please read all of my posts.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
Link?
The proof is in the pudding, so to say: If you are going to sit there and tell me that on a console connected to a TV, you can see some big difference between 900p and 1080p, I have one thing to say to you: You're a goddamned liar.
Sorry for being so blunt, but truth is truth, and I am tired of the fallacies being spread by cows on this subject.
http://gdcvault.com/play/1020939/Efficient-Usage-of-Compute-Shaders%20%20Reply
Granted this goes beyond just resolution, having that much a lead for gpu power is not a small difference.
But just to humor you, as a pc gamer you bet I can tell the difference between something like 1600X900 vs 1080p, it comes down to clarity.
Why you guys feel the need to constantly defend the bones meager GPU I'll never understand.
As for "telling the difference", I clearly stated "consoles with a TV", and explained why someone would more easily see the difference on a PC. If you are going to comment on my post, please read all of my posts.
Dude, I play everything on my 1080p tv, what difference would that make from a monitor. A higher resolution is a higher resolution.
When parity achieved between PS3 and Xbox 360, lems don't scream around. When parity achieved between PS4 and XboxOne, cows scream around.
That's because PS3 had the advantage of being the more capable machine. It was just harder to get results from. X1 has no advantage and is much weaker than PS4 ..... How is that the same to you...
No matter how much you scream "There is a huge difference", that does not make it so.
It's definitely not small.
Link?
The proof is in the pudding, so to say: If you are going to sit there and tell me that on a console connected to a TV, you can see some big difference between 900p and 1080p, I have one thing to say to you: You're a goddamned liar.
Sorry for being so blunt, but truth is truth, and I am tired of the fallacies being spread by cows on this subject.
http://gdcvault.com/play/1020939/Efficient-Usage-of-Compute-Shaders%20%20Reply
Granted this goes beyond just resolution, having that much a lead for gpu power is not a small difference.
But just to humor you, as a pc gamer you bet I can tell the difference between something like 1600X900 vs 1080p, it comes down to clarity.
Why you guys feel the need to constantly defend the bones meager GPU I'll never understand.
As for "telling the difference", I clearly stated "consoles with a TV", and explained why someone would more easily see the difference on a PC. If you are going to comment on my post, please read all of my posts.
Dude, I play everything on my 1080p tv, what difference would that make from a monitor. A higher resolution is a higher resolution.
Because on a monitor your eyes are 18" from the screen. Seriously, do you guys just look at numbers and say "one is bigger, so it's obviously better"? There are caveats to almost everything.
Log in to comment