Titanfall looks just incredible. HD gif inside!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#201 Posted by Ben-Buja (2788 posts) -

[QUOTE="crusadernm"]

I can't believe how good it looks.  I've been looking at compressed videos all this time.  Titanfall looks awesome.

  titan1.gif

Geminon

dude... it doesnt look THAT great.... i have played PC games a year ago that look as good or better... i mean, crysis 2 looked just as good and that was a few years ago....

Crysis 2 looks much better in Vanilla DX11

With Maldo 4.0 it's on a whole different level:

#202 Posted by call_of_duty_10 (4954 posts) -

[QUOTE="Geminon"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]

I can't believe how good it looks.  I've been looking at compressed videos all this time.  Titanfall looks awesome.

  titan1.gif

Ben-Buja

dude... it doesnt look THAT great.... i have played PC games a year ago that look as good or better... i mean, crysis 2 looked just as good and that was a few years ago....

Crysis 2 looks much better in Vanilla DX11

With Maldo 4.0 it's on a whole different level:

BEN! I am glad you are online! Hey,I am downloading maldoHD 4 right now,but the links on the blog for the 2 fixes are dead. If you have them on your hdd...Can you upload them somewhere?Only if you have the time,of course! I couldn't find them anywhere.
#203 Posted by zeta (1189 posts) -

[QUOTE="Geminon"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]

I can't believe how good it looks.  I've been looking at compressed videos all this time.  Titanfall looks awesome.

  titan1.gif

Ben-Buja

dude... it doesnt look THAT great.... i have played PC games a year ago that look as good or better... i mean, crysis 2 looked just as good and that was a few years ago....

Crysis 2 looks much better in Vanilla DX11

With Maldo 4.0 it's on a whole different level:

inb4 "mods don't count!" :lol:
#204 Posted by realguitarhero5 (3903 posts) -

The gif is encoded in 15fps for the sake of bandwidth you fool. The actual game runs at 30fps locked.Phazevariance
30fps? Lets all bow down to PS4 hardware!

#205 Posted by ramonnl (769 posts) -

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"] The gif is encoded in 15fps for the sake of bandwidth you fool. The actual game runs at 30fps locked.realguitarhero5

30fps? Lets all bow down to PS4 hardware!

 

Better than the 15 fps of dead rising 3!

#206 Posted by Ballroompirate (23745 posts) -

I heard Titanfail has Killstreaks like that one FPS.

#207 Posted by DJ_Headshot (6292 posts) -

Looks good source engine can still pump out out some nice looking games hopefully its is fun to play and balanced as well.

#208 Posted by Derpenberg (7 posts) -
look at dem hd graphics
#209 Posted by uninspiredcup (12882 posts) -

Titanfall: ^^

Titanfall.jpg

ramonnl

 

This looks bad even for a source powered game. I'v seen better looking Halflife 2 mods.

#210 Posted by xboxiphoneps3 (2619 posts) -

[QUOTE="Geminon"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]

I can't believe how good it looks.  I've been looking at compressed videos all this time.  Titanfall looks awesome.

  titan1.gif

Ben-Buja

dude... it doesnt look THAT great.... i have played PC games a year ago that look as good or better... i mean, crysis 2 looked just as good and that was a few years ago....

Crysis 2 looks much better in Vanilla DX11

With Maldo 4.0 it's on a whole different level:

tbh Titanfall looks like a upgraded CoD, same old musty "green environment feeling" with low res textures and appearance like CoD
#211 Posted by xboxiphoneps3 (2619 posts) -

[QUOTE="ramonnl"]

Titanfall: ^^

Titanfall.jpg

uninspiredcup

 

This looks bad even for a source powered game. I'v seen better looking Halflife 2 mods.

...it really does look quite awful... btw whats that in your sig? Trackmania? looks sick
#212 Posted by faizan_faizan (7868 posts) -

[QUOTE="ramonnl"]

Titanfall: ^^

Titanfall.jpg

uninspiredcup

 

This looks bad even for a source powered game. I'v seen better looking Halflife 2 mods.

That looks like FEAR, I'm not even exaggerating LOL.
#213 Posted by uninspiredcup (12882 posts) -

...it really does look quite awful... btw whats that in your sig? Trackmania? looks sickxboxiphoneps3

 

Trackmania 2. Cheap as hell on steam and awsome. Trackmania United is also on steam and it's free. No reason you cant play it unless you have a shitty tablet that cant run tetris.

#214 Posted by parkurtommo (27732 posts) -

"HD gif"

>not even 720p

#215 Posted by Kaz_Son (1389 posts) -

[QUOTE="ramonnl"]

Titanfall: ^^

Titanfall.jpg

uninspiredcup

 

This looks bad even for a source powered game. I'v seen better looking Halflife 2 mods.

:lol: Damn, look at those 2004 Source Engine textures. Kinda looks like FEAR in that screenshot. Those textures are shameful for a supposed next gen console, lemmings really shouldn't be hyping this game's graphics.
#216 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17523 posts) -

That looks like FEAR, I'm not even exaggerating LOL.faizan_faizan

You are not. That looks good by 2004-2005 standards. But for next gen, that looks really bad.

"HD gif"

>not even 720p

parkurtommo

It's not even SD resolution LMAO

#217 Posted by xboxiphoneps3 (2619 posts) -

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] ...it really does look quite awful... btw whats that in your sig? Trackmania? looks sickuninspiredcup

 

Trackmania 2. Cheap as hell on steam and awsome. Trackmania United is also on steam and it's free. No reason you cant play it unless you have a shitty tablet that cant run tetris.

Yeah my dell PC can play it it still performs decently well with games today, obviously not really the newer games but its a i7 920 with a hd 4850... Its okay... I was thinking maybe to get a 7790 in there but i may be limited by the psu in it. I played first Trackmania that was fun
#218 Posted by GOGOGOGURT (4470 posts) -

Doesn't look as pretty as CoD Ghosts though.

Michael0134567

 

Everything about you pisses me off.  And you're an internet personality.  Good job.

#219 Posted by OneInchMan99 (1248 posts) -

Yea thats looks quite nice.Shame its a multiplayer only bro-fest shooter(with mechs).:(

#220 Posted by silversix_ (16237 posts) -

I heard Titanfail has Killstreaks like that one FPS.

Ballroompirate

which one? tell me tell me!!!

#221 Posted by youngmurk911 (3892 posts) -
This is supposed to be a next-gen game?princeofshapeir
realism
#222 Posted by AMD655 (4494 posts) -

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

#223 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17523 posts) -

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

AMD655

I wonder if it'll look better on PC, aside from higher resolutions.

#224 Posted by AMD655 (4494 posts) -

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

R4gn4r0k

I wonder if it'll look better on PC, aside from higher resolutions.

 

More than likely will, PC hardware... well my hardware is well ahead of X1 :P

#225 Posted by GeoffZak (3715 posts) -

is it me or does it kinda remind you of COD. 

Ribnarak

Kinda reminds me of Killzone as well.

And Resistance.

And Gears of War.

And Halo.

And..Well you get the idea.

#226 Posted by silversix_ (16237 posts) -

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

R4gn4r0k

I wonder if it'll look better on PC, aside from higher resolutions.

if game looked good it would've looked good on 1080p screenshots which isn't the case. the game isn't even average looking, its plain ugly... i dunno what Respawn was thinking, do they trying to copy CoD to the point of using old ass engine and release ugly games just because brofist gamers 'like' bad looking games or what. Makes no sense for a game considered next gen

#227 Posted by parkurtommo (27732 posts) -

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

R4gn4r0k

I wonder if it'll look better on PC, aside from higher resolutions.

Depends on what they do with textures and environment complexity... .I'd like to see more physics, better textures, more grass and stuff like that. But you know.... ports...
#228 Posted by AMD655 (4494 posts) -

Here is console ports i played recently (one is not even on PC)

Using Dolphin emulator because my GCN is region locked, and will not read my copy of Biohazard 0.

 

Biohazard 0 and Tomb Raider II

 

LL

LL

 

LL

 

 

LL

 

LL

 

LL

#229 Posted by silversix_ (16237 posts) -

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

Not sure of graphics, but i will get this for PC.

parkurtommo

I wonder if it'll look better on PC, aside from higher resolutions.

Depends on what they do with textures and environment complexity... .I'd like to see more physics, better textures, more grass and stuff like that. But you know.... ports...

If they can't achieve good looking graphics on a new console using bad gpu but still one that should handle outdated engine such as Source, i don't think pc version will look any better. The funny thing is, the game is a 7v7, not something crazy which requires graphical downgrade lol 7v7 and look THAT bad

#230 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17523 posts) -

More than likely will, PC hardware... well my hardware is well ahead of X1 :P

AMD655

Yeah but this game doesn't seem to be pushing Xbone hardware either :P

if game looked good it would've looked good on 1080p screenshots which isn't the case. the game isn't even average looking, its plain ugly... i dunno what Respawn was thinking, do they trying to copy CoD to the point of using old ass engine and release ugly games just because brofist gamers 'like' bad looking games or what. Makes no sense for a game considered next gen

silversix_

Especially when EA has got a perfect in-house engine that they could use that looks way better: Frostbite.

#231 Posted by MBirdy88 (9051 posts) -
CoD with Mechs, boring characters, boring aesthetic, boring everything. Bring back the real arena shooters. Hell BF2142 was a 10x better concept that this.
#232 Posted by realguitarhero5 (3903 posts) -

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

More than likely will, PC hardware... well my hardware is well ahead of X1 :P

R4gn4r0k

Yeah but this game doesn't seem to be pushing Xbone hardware either :P

if game looked good it would've looked good on 1080p screenshots which isn't the case. the game isn't even average looking, its plain ugly... i dunno what Respawn was thinking, do they trying to copy CoD to the point of using old ass engine and release ugly games just because brofist gamers 'like' bad looking games or what. Makes no sense for a game considered next gen

silversix_

Especially when EA has got a perfect in-house engine that they could use that looks way better: Frostbite.

I don't think you can judge yet. The game is a long way out, yes, but all of the shots I have seen have also been pulled from YouTube videos.
#233 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17523 posts) -

I don't think you can judge yet. The game is a long way out, yes, but all of the shots I have seen have also been pulled from YouTube videos.realguitarhero5

True, there is a big difference from seeing something in a compressed youtube video, a picture or a gif and seeing it being played on a screen in front of you.

However, there is only so much that can be done with the Source engine. This game won't win any graphics awards. Especially with games like Crysis 3, Metro Last Light, BF4, Killzone, etc... as its competition.

#234 Posted by faizan_faizan (7868 posts) -

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]That looks like FEAR, I'm not even exaggerating LOL.R4gn4r0k

You are not. That looks good by 2004-2005 standards. But for next gen, that looks really bad.

Bad indeed.

#235 Posted by mitu123 (154649 posts) -

The TC clearly has seen Titan Fall!