The Witcher 3 Runs At 900p/30fps on PS4, On Low.

  • 133 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#1 Posted by loco145 (10775 posts) -

The PS4 version will run at 900p/30fps while the Xbox One version will run at 720p/30fps. What’s also interesting is that the console versions of the game will meet the minimum graphics settings of the PC version.Source.

#2 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

I believe you missed a keyword: "Rumor"

#3 Posted by highking_kallor (524 posts) -

@loco145 said:

The PS4 version will run at 900p/30fps while the Xbox One version will run at 720p/30fps. What’s also interesting is that the console versions of the game will meet the minimum graphics settings of the PC version.Source.

Loco by name loco by nature.

#4 Posted by Joedgabe (5114 posts) -

not really much to consider. A game like the Witcher probably still looks great on low settings. So for console standards that's good.

#5 Edited by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

rumor

and still better than Xbone

your point ?

#6 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

rumor

and still better than Xbone

your point ?

consoles=low settings=weak PoS

#7 Posted by loco145 (10775 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

rumor

and still better than Xbone

your point ?

Ps4 is weak.

#8 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (14418 posts) -

Infamous still deep in that ass I see.

#9 Posted by Xaero_Gravity (8756 posts) -

Considering we're a little under a year away from release, I won't be putting any stock into this rumor. Hell, even the PC requirements mentioned in the rumor seem ridiculous.

#10 Posted by Opus_Rea-333 (985 posts) -

Damn, thats a low blow for the so called "Next-gen" consoles.

#11 Posted by SummerParadise (160 posts) -

Well Battlefield 4 was 900p on PS4 and settings were low.

The Witcher 3 takes twice more than Battlefield 4. So its true. PS4 fails

#12 Edited by Opus_Rea-333 (985 posts) -

@summerparadise said:

Well Battlefield 4 was 900p on PS4 and settings were low.

The Witcher 3 takes twice more than Battlefield 4. So its true. PS4 fails

Definitely not low more like a combination of Med-High settings maybe a bit more not sure.

But still PC version looks/runs better in person.

#13 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@summerparadise said:

Well Battlefield 4 was 900p on PS4 and settings were low.

The Witcher 3 takes twice more than Battlefield 4. So its true. PS4 fails

You fail

#14 Posted by Vecna (3394 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

rumor

and still better than Xbone

your point ?

Still sucks on consoles sounds about right.

#15 Edited by SummerParadise (160 posts) -

VS PLAYSTATION 4 ASSASSINS CREED(EVEN LINEAR GAME)

#16 Posted by wis3boi (31461 posts) -

welcome to next gen

#17 Edited by blamix (204 posts) -

@loco145: yup but stronger than the xbone though, lol..

#18 Edited by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

@lostrib: and Xbone is weaker

and infamous looks better

#19 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@lostrib: and Xbone is weaker

don't think that was his point

#20 Posted by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

@lostrib: still infamous looks better

#21 Posted by Joedgabe (5114 posts) -

@summerparadise: That's a very dumb comparison. If you're gonna compare AC4 on the PS4 you do it with the PC version... I sure hope you don't go to law school. You might need lawyers to double check your papers too.... might make invalid points with available resource or common sense.. you know ?

#22 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@lostrib: still infamous looks better

than what?

#23 Posted by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

@lostrib: the witcher

#24 Edited by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@lostrib: the witcher

Well the witcher came out like 7 years ago so it's not really surprising

#25 Edited by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

@lostrib: for the record infamous SS looks better that the witcher 3 all in 1080p

#26 Posted by lostrib (37592 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@lostrib: for the record infamous SS looks better that the witcher 3 all in 1080p

How can you say that when the Witcher 3 hasn't even been released?

The game wont be out for almost a year

#27 Posted by JangoWuzHere (16562 posts) -

Sounds like bad optimization if that's the case.

#28 Edited by SummerParadise (160 posts) -

@Joedgabe said:

@summerparadise: That's a very dumb comparison. If you're gonna compare AC4 on the PS4 you do it with the PC version... I sure hope you don't go to law school. You might need lawyers to double check your papers too.... might make invalid points with available resource or common sense.. you know ?

lol why would i need to do it with PC version? PS4 had problems running Assassins Creed.

The Witcher is 10 time bigger than Assassins Creed.

#29 Edited by santoron (7774 posts) -

We'll know soon enough.

#30 Posted by lglz1337 (3854 posts) -

@lostrib: true we should all wait and see things can change over the months also this is a unconfirmed source.

#31 Posted by m3dude1 (1362 posts) -

So much fail in that article. i dont believe for a second a single 780ti will run witcher 3 maxed with 8xaa at a framerate that high. i also dont believe for a second witcher 3 will look like witcher 2 on pc. LOL at that sorry ass claim.

#32 Edited by SummerParadise (160 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@lostrib: for the record infamous SS looks better that the witcher 3 all in 1080p

VS

#33 Posted by stationplay_4 (443 posts) -

so ps4 is the better version compared to xbone? yes we knew that already and yes we know pc's are better.

#34 Edited by m3dude1 (1362 posts) -

the witcher 3 still shows some signs of its witcher 2 heritage unfortunately. the lighting has that harsh video gamey look. its very apparent that they arent using physically based shading which is unfortunate.

#35 Edited by GiantAssPanda (1606 posts) -

Wouldn't be surprising after the gorgeous VGX trailer.

Well no matter, I'll be upgrading my PC this winter/next spring. Bring it on :)

#37 Edited by m3dude1 (1362 posts) -

they need to be more consistent with their art design. some of it looks great and some not so much. this is going to be the biggest differentiator going further along into the generation. rendering tech is mostly going to converge with physically based shading and proper math.

#38 Edited by BattleSpectre (6220 posts) -

I'd be willing to give someone my life savings, if this rumour is indeed true. Wasn't there an article the other day here on Gamespot from the actual Developers saying the PC and next-gen consoles allow them to go balls out with the game?

I'm thinking more like 1080p 30FPS on PS4 and 900p on Xbox One. I also find it really hard to believe the console versions will be equivalent to PC's minimum specs.

#39 Posted by Shewgenja (9613 posts) -

Not really unexpected. The difference in performance between PS4 and a high end PC is pretty vast. People are deluding themselves if they think consoles are going to be able to run stuff like Witcher with max settings at full res. The good news to take away from all of this is that even if the rumor is true, it's not THAT far below 1080p and well above 720p. It should still look really good. PC is definitely the way to go for games like this, if you have the option.

#40 Edited by m3dude1 (1362 posts) -

@Shewgenja said:

Not really unexpected. The difference in performance between PS4 and a high end PC is pretty vast. People are deluding themselves if they think consoles are going to be able to run stuff like Witcher with max settings at full res. The good news to take away from all of this is that even if the rumor is true, it's not THAT far below 1080p and well above 720p. It should still look really good. PC is definitely the way to go for games like this, if you have the option.

the pc version will obviously look better, but i expect the only big difference to be AA if your gpu is fast enough. the rest will be minor lod, shadow quality and precision improvements. If they support TXAA tho it will be a very big improvement, especially with all the vegetation and fine detail the images so far display. this will be a very shimmer heavy game.

#41 Posted by silversix_ (14785 posts) -

"we're pushing next gen to their limits", "there's virtually no difference between next gen consoles and pc", "next gen versions will look as good as released screenshots" game is low/900p on ps4 and low/720p on xbone. Cool.

#42 Edited by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -

Still a rumor. I'll wait for confirmation but still I have no interest in this game.

#43 Posted by m3dude1 (1362 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

"we're pushing next gen to their limits", "there's virtually no difference between next gen consoles and pc", "next gen versions will look as good as released screenshots" game is low/900p on ps4 and low/720p on xbone. Cool.

most of the screen shots are downsampled from resolutions in excess of 4k so even pc wont look as good as the screenshots.

#44 Posted by cfisher2833 (1709 posts) -

I'd be surprised if it's really that demanding, especially with stuff like the Nvidia PhysX fur turned off. The Witcher 2 was pretty easy to run with ubersampling turned off, and the Witcher 3 isn't that huge of an upgrade. We'll have to see how well they managed to get the Red Engine multithreaded, because if we get CPU bottlenecks, the game could be a bitch to run.

#45 Edited by Epic-gamerz (196 posts) -

900p 30fps on PS4. Sounds better than what the majority of PC gamers will be playing The Witcher 3 on

#46 Posted by Shewgenja (9613 posts) -

@epic-gamerz said:

900p 30fps on PS4. Sounds better than what the majority of PC gamers will be playing The Witcher 3 on

That is also a pretty good point.

#47 Posted by remiks00 (1911 posts) -

the word "rumor" really needs to be on this topic title lol.

#48 Posted by freedomfreak (40901 posts) -

1. Rumor.

2. I sure hope not, because anything under 1080P is unplayable.

#49 Posted by GiantAssPanda (1606 posts) -

@epic-gamerz said:

900p 30fps on PS4. Sounds better than what the majority of PC gamers will be playing The Witcher 3 on

But the majority of PC gamers from this forum will most likely still play it 1080p/1440p :)

#50 Posted by HitmanActual (385 posts) -

Xboners hit with the 720 stick once again. The DC will be spectacular.

I hope Kinect was worth it.