do you guys consider the Game Boy Color its own stand alone piece of nintendo handheld history, or should it be lumped into the Game Boy category like Nintendo does when reporting sales of GBC?
was it a new console? or merely an extension of the GB brand name, a redesign.
Game Boy Color was a handheld update to the black and white displays of the original GB, putting it more on Par with the NES, it wasn't initially spoke of as a new console, just going to play your old GB games in color! and it would get some cool GBC only games
and then it got alot of GBC only games, which 50-80 million GB owners couldn't play. the GBC doubled the CPU clock speed of GB (4Mhz vs 8mhz), quadrupled the RAM and Video RAM (32kb RAM vs 8kb RAM, 16kb VRAM vs 4kb VRAM) it displayed games in NES color quality, but the resolution of the screen was the exact same as the original Game Boy, that being 160x144
DSi follows a similar pattern, it has exclusive retail games announced, exclusive downloadable games, a plethora of new features like a camera, a re designed UI, bigger screens, improved WiFi only usable in DSi software, a SDHC card slot, web browsing, firmware updates, and others
it too, doubles DS's clock speed, and quadruples the system RAM, albeit having the exact same screen resolution of 256x192
so i ask you, do you look back and remember the Game Boy Color, with its good selection of GBC only games, and its improvements over GB, and see it as a stand alone console in nintendos history? and do you see DSi working out the same way? its easy to say the resolution won't produce better 2d graphics on DSi, but it, combined with the bigger screen should make a good difference with 3D charcaters.
so is GBC its own little handheld, or another GB?
Log in to comment