The most embarassing thing for consoles

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

Is NOT when the $700 780Ti walks over the PS4....

Its when the maxwell 850GTX at 100$ does it....

MS/Sony went Nintendo on consolites' asses....and the pain is not far....

#2 Posted by Suppaman100 (3777 posts) -

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

#3 Posted by danabo (2474 posts) -

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

#4 Edited by silversix_ (14076 posts) -

who said a 850 will be more powerful than a 7850-7870?

#5 Posted by Suppaman100 (3777 posts) -

@danabo: Strong pic, even the Xbone 720p supports higher reso pics.

#6 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

I dare you to run this indie exclusive maxed on a weak graphics card...

#7 Posted by silversix_ (14076 posts) -

who said a 850 will be more powerful than a 7850-7870?

@danabo said:

@Suppaman100 said:

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

Was this posted from an xbone? Nice next gen resolution

#8 Posted by danabo (2474 posts) -

@danabo: Strong pic, even the Xbone 720p supports higher reso pics.

Image size: 1050 x 2550

#9 Posted by Suppaman100 (3777 posts) -

@Suppaman100 said:

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

I dare you to run this indie exclusive maxed on a weak graphics card...

Rome 2?

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

#10 Edited by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

@True_Gamer_ said:

@Suppaman100 said:

Sucks PC gamers only have good indie exclusives and therefore don't need expensive graphic cards.

I dare you to run this indie exclusive maxed on a weak graphics card...

Rome 2?

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

I still dare you....what are you a chicken Mcfly?

#11 Posted by Suppaman100 (3777 posts) -

@danabo said:

@Suppaman100 said:

@danabo: Strong pic, even the Xbone 720p supports higher reso pics.

Image size: 1050 x 2550

Image size =/= resolution where you can actually read the words

Is that picture maid with a potato?

#12 Edited by danabo (2474 posts) -

@Suppaman100 said:

@danabo said:

@Suppaman100 said:

@danabo: Strong pic, even the Xbone 720p supports higher reso pics.

Image size: 1050 x 2550

Image size =/= resolution where you can actually read the words

Is that picture maid with a potato?

lolwat? That image is 1050 pixels x 2550 pixels. Open it in a new tab/window.

EDIT: Casual gamers, kek.

#13 Edited by Suppaman100 (3777 posts) -

@True_Gamer_: The question is not if one can run this game with a low-end graphics card.

The question is...WHY THE **** would anyone want to play that buggy crap?

#14 Posted by psymon100 (6138 posts) -

@danabo said:

@Suppaman100 said:

@danabo said:

@Suppaman100 said:

@danabo: Strong pic, even the Xbone 720p supports higher reso pics.

Image size: 1050 x 2550

Image size =/= resolution where you can actually read the words

Is that picture maid with a potato?

lolwat? That image is 1050 pixels x 2550 pixels. Open it in a new tab/window.

There is nothing wrong with the image.

Just the abilities of some posters to use a computer.

#15 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38214 posts) -

There is nothing wrong with the image.

Just the abilities of some posters to use a computer.

This

#16 Posted by PinkiePirate (2086 posts) -

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

#17 Edited by ronvalencia (15109 posts) -

@True_Gamer_ said:

Is NOT when the $700 780Ti walks over the PS4....

Its when the maxwell 850GTX at 100$ does it....

MS/Sony went Nintendo on consolites' asses....and the pain is not far....

$170 Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition does it and this is before AMD Mantle's performance improvements. http://pcpartpicker.com/part/sapphire-video-card-1003523l

#18 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

@PinkiePirate:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

Is "insert opinion preference" comin to "insert platform"? Whats that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for not blogging your opinion.

#19 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

@True_Gamer_: The question is not if one can run this game with a low-end graphics card.

The question is...WHY THE **** would anyone want to play that buggy crap?

You remind me of Microsoft....backpedalling galore...

#20 Posted by MBirdy88 (7706 posts) -

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

your paying for £350 or £420 for one game? yeeesh.

#21 Posted by PinkiePirate (2086 posts) -

@PinkiePirate said:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

Is "insert opinion preference" comin to "insert platform"? Whats that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for not blogging your opinion.

Well excuse me for stating my preference in System Wars.

Thanks for being rude.

#22 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

@True_Gamer_ said:
@PinkiePirate said:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

Is "insert opinion preference" comin to "insert platform"? Whats that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for not blogging your opinion.

Well excuse me for stating my preference in System Wars.

Thanks for being rude.

My post has nothing to do with prefernce just the FACT that MS/Sony went Nintendo on consolites rears....

#23 Posted by PinkiePirate (2086 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@PinkiePirate said:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

your paying for £350 or £420 for one game? yeeesh.

Hey, guess what?

I got a PS3 back in '06 expecting Kingdom Hearts 3 to land on that. Instead, I got a ton of great games from Sony's amazingly talented first party studios. I buy PlayStation not for the hardware, but because Sony owns some of the largest, most talented studios in the entire game industry.

And Sony has a number of game industry veterans that can only be matched by Nintendo.

#24 Edited by MBirdy88 (7706 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@PinkiePirate said:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

your paying for £350 or £420 for one game? yeeesh.

Hey, guess what?

I got a PS3 back in '06 expecting Kingdom Hearts 3 to land on that. Instead, I got a ton of great games from Sony's amazingly talented first party studios. I buy PlayStation not for the hardware, but because Sony owns some of the largest, most talented studios in the entire game industry.

And Sony has a number of game industry veterans that can only be matched by Nintendo.

oh my bad, a £350 system for a handful of franchises.

#25 Posted by marinko123 (412 posts) -

Herms mad because all they've been getting lately are buggy console ports. Hell even their exclusives like total war 2 had technical issues and such. Meanwhile console exclusives have been winning goty's left and right and are some of the most praised, highest scoring and most talked about games. How total war 2 standing in the goty race? Oh... yeah, well at least you can then play gtaV and tlou.. oh, sorry again!

#26 Edited by lostrib (34524 posts) -

Herms mad because all they've been getting lately are buggy console ports. Hell even their exclusives like total war 2 had technical issues and such. Meanwhile console exclusives have been winning goty's left and right and are some of the most praised, highest scoring and most talked about games. How total war 2 standing in the goty race? Oh... yeah, well at least you can then play gtaV and tlou.. oh, sorry again!

So awards determine how great/enjoyable something is?

#27 Posted by Jankarcop (8976 posts) -

Consolites get wrecked with facts.

Post nerd pictures and how 4-5 major genres (most played competitively with the highets skill cap for gaming known to man) don't count.

#28 Posted by adamosmaki (9449 posts) -

@True_Gamer_: The question is not if one can run this game with a low-end graphics card.

The question is...WHY THE **** would anyone want to play that buggy crap?

and yet it outscored KZ on both MC and GS.

#29 Posted by Jankarcop (8976 posts) -

PC wins again

#30 Posted by adamosmaki (9449 posts) -

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

What a stupid logic.

Is civilization coming to consoles ?What's that? Did I hear a no?

See i can do that with great pc exclusives as well

#31 Posted by -RPGamer- (34283 posts) -

My post has nothing to do with prefernce just the FACT that MS/Sony went Nintendo on consolites rears....

What does that even mean? You've said it twice and not once explained what you meant by it.

#32 Posted by lglz1337 (3136 posts) -

never argue with girls if that's really you

#33 Posted by Jankarcop (8976 posts) -

@PinkiePirate said:

Is Kingdom Hearts 3 coming to PC? What's that? Did I hear a no?

Thanks for playing.

What a stupid logic.

Is civilization coming to consoles ?What's that? Did I hear a no?

See i can do that with great pc exclusives as well

He's going off topic because the OP posted a fact that a $100 video card outdoes a $600 system. (not including $300 online fees of 1 gen)

#34 Posted by marinko123 (412 posts) -

@lostrib said:

So awards determine how great/enjoyable something is?

Of course everything is subjective but mostly console exclusives have been winning readers and staff goty's for the past couple of years and console exclusives are some of the most talked about and praised games and herms are missing out on them and you just can't ignore that and say public opinion doesn't matter. You can't ignore titles like rdr, gtaV, tlou, gears/god of war series, zelda, mario etc. and think platforms are equal because you threw in a bunch of no-name pc titles like from that pic a couple of posts ago.

#35 Edited by GioVela2010 (4018 posts) -

850 won't be $100 lol

And lol "just wait"

#36 Edited by -RPGamer- (34283 posts) -

He's going off topic because the OP posted a fact that a $100 video card outdoes a $600 system. (not including $300 online fees of 1 gen)

If a console was just a graphics card than this comparison would make sense. However, a console is a package that lets you plug and play. If you just bought a graphics card, it would do nothing.

#37 Posted by Spartan070 (16333 posts) -

Everyon'se fussing over stats and numbers, I'm just over here gaming...

Killer Instinct and BF4 have been very fun. Am I having any less fun due to the X1s performance limitations when compared to a PC?

#38 Posted by Jankarcop (8976 posts) -

@Jankarcop said:

He's going off topic because the OP posted a fact that a $100 video card outdoes a $600 system. (not including $300 online fees of 1 gen)

If a console was just a graphics card than this comparison would make sense. However, a console is a package that lets you plug and play. If you just bought a graphics card, it would do nothing.

Console kids suggest you need 3 SLI ($3000) in video cards to beat console video cards.

It only takes $100. A 600-800$ pc beats new consoles easily. This bodes badly for rest of the gen as thsi gap will widen (as every gen so far)

#39 Posted by -RPGamer- (34283 posts) -

@-RPGamer- said:

If a console was just a graphics card than this comparison would make sense. However, a console is a package that lets you plug and play. If you just bought a graphics card, it would do nothing.

Console kids suggest you need 3 SLI ($3000) in video cards to beat console video cards.

It only takes $100. A 600-800$ pc beats new consoles easily. This bodes badly for rest of the gen as thsi gap will widen (as every gen so far)

Countering one ridiculous exaggeration with another is not make for a valid argument.

This gap and difference in power has always existed. If you are a fan of PC gaming, you should pray the gap is not too large.

#40 Posted by Jankarcop (8976 posts) -

@Jankarcop said:

@-RPGamer- said:

If a console was just a graphics card than this comparison would make sense. However, a console is a package that lets you plug and play. If you just bought a graphics card, it would do nothing.

Console kids suggest you need 3 SLI ($3000) in video cards to beat console video cards.

It only takes $100. A 600-800$ pc beats new consoles easily. This bodes badly for rest of the gen as thsi gap will widen (as every gen so far)

Countering one ridiculous exaggeration with another is not make for a valid argument.

This gap and difference in power has always existed. If you are a fan of PC gaming, you should pray the gap is not too large.

The OP's link does show $100 is not an exaggeration. Stop lying. Also the gap is not large at the start of the gen, it starts smal then becoems large. every1 kinows.

#41 Posted by -RPGamer- (34283 posts) -

The OP's link does show $100 is not an exaggeration. Stop lying. Also the gap is not large at the start of the gen, it starts smal then becoems large. every1 kinows.

I hate repeating myself, but alas. A $100 graphics card by itself does nothing. I'm not lying, go buy a graphics card and see what it does without the rest of a PC. A console is a convenience, an all inclusive package. I shouldn't have to explain the simplistic concept of a consoles.

I'm still saying you should not hope for a large gap if you're a PC gamer. The larger the gap the less meaningful all the extra power the PC becomes for a large portion of games.

#42 Posted by Jamex1987 (2186 posts) -

Half of those games on that list will be junk and playable on every single person with a modern computer.

#43 Edited by wis3boi (31117 posts) -

@psymon100 said:

There is nothing wrong with the image.

Just the abilities of some posters to use a computer.

This

It's why they feel the need to cry over pc gaming, because they cant wrap their head around anything :D

#44 Posted by treedoor (7648 posts) -

The most embarrassing thing is that Nintendo, MS, and Sony are multi-billion dollar companies that, through their combined efforts across all their systems (Xbox 360, Xbox One, PS3, PS Vita, PS4, 3DS, and Wii U) could not provide more high-rated games than the PC has gotten this year.

PC takes on 7 systems by itself, and demolishes them all. 7 AAAe games, and 25 AAe games in 2013 without hundreds of millions of dollars being pumped into the platform by a huge company.

PC is quite amazing, and it gets better every year.

#45 Posted by Zophar87 (4346 posts) -

OP delivers.

#46 Posted by Zassimick (6343 posts) -

I don't really care for graphics cards, I just want to play games I enjoy. No embarrassment there.

#47 Posted by True_Gamer_ (5991 posts) -

@True_Gamer_ said:

My post has nothing to do with prefernce just the FACT that MS/Sony went Nintendo on consolites rears....

What does that even mean? You've said it twice and not once explained what you meant by it.

Look at what was the 360 in November 2005 compared to gaming PCs and what are the Bone and PS4 to gaming PCs in November 2013....With this trend the Xtwo and PS5 will be dead weak....