Ahh, only slightly less naked feeling now...
Ok, sig writing not accepting hyperlinks really annoys me.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Ahh, only slightly less naked feeling now...
Ok, sig writing not accepting hyperlinks really annoys me.
The new site seems slower, clunkier and smaller, all for the sake of being a bit fancier (which it barely is)
Actually it was for the sake of making a site that doesn't break every 2 months and that let's you post a message without completely buggering up the formatting which they've achieved.
Just posting to see if my new sig shows up.
** HUZZAH!! :D
You're the only one it shows up for. We can see our own sigs, but not the sigs of anyone else (at least not the images).
@AdobeArtist: Nobody else can see it, unfortunately. I put work into mine too, but nobody can see it.
I cried a little watching davekeeh's video :(
He cant go :'(
Hi sweenix. nice cute avatar. too bad sigs are disable. cuz anime sigs perfectly fits you.
Sigs are only disabled if you want them to be, as set in your user options. Otherwise, all sigs are visible. They only now restricted the size to 125x600px.
Sigs are only disabled if you want them to be, as set in your user options. Otherwise, all sigs are visible. They only now restricted the size to 125x600px.
...tall sig right there.
You can still see peoples sigs (if you're desperate to see Adobe's new masterpiece as I'm sure you are) by going to their profile:
Sigs are only disabled if you want them to be, as set in your user options. Otherwise, all sigs are visible. They only now restricted the size to 125x600px.
...tall sig right there.
Tall? It's 75px shorter than all my sigs used to be :P
And sweet new avy ya got there now. It's about damn time you updated, lol :)
Sigs are only disabled if you want them to be, as set in your user options. Otherwise, all sigs are visible. They only now restricted the size to 125x600px.
...tall sig right there.
Tall? It's 75px shorter than all my sigs used to be :P
And sweet new avy ya got there now. It's about damn time you updated, lol :)
Hey thanks, I considered it ages ago but never got around to it.
Also I don't think you quite get my comment. My computer's screen resolution is 2560x1440, not 1440x2560. That would be a pretty tall screen. Get it? ;)
@inb4uall: Pathetic that GS posted a second opinion about a game? The horror.
What's pathetic is that they decided months after the original review to post a 2nd review that completely flies in the face of the original. At the very least this should have been applied to future games, not retroactively to old games. Suppose I was just a random person who wanted to buy a game. Gamespot is telling me, not only that the game great, but also that's it's garbage. If Tom felt so strongly that Bioshock Infinite was a poor game then he should have come forward months ago. Not now, after everyone who is going to buy the game already has and the review is practically worthless. The only explanation for such a review is that Gamespot is obviously fishing for hits. Go ahead though. Prove to gamespot that you deserve your new mod tags and try to shove more of your pathetic PR down our throats. Tell us all once again why it's all not as bad as it seems.
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
Tall? It's 75px shorter than all my sigs used to be :P
And sweet new avy ya got there now. It's about damn time you updated, lol :)
Hey thanks, I considered it ages ago but never got around to it.
Also I don't think you quite get my comment. My computer's screen resolution is 2560x1440, not 1440x2560. That would be a pretty tall screen. Get it? ;)
ahhhh, haha, I see now, should have said 600x125 >_>
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
IT'S NEW AND DIFFERENT EVERYBODY PANIC!! AHHHH AHHHHH!!
ahhhh, haha, I see now, should have said 600x125 >_>
Twas me just nitpicking it twas.
I'm quite fond of the new site, quite fond of it, indeed. Once the wrinkles are ironed out and it's as speedy as it's intended to be, we'll all be in wonderful shape.
ahhhh, haha, I see now, should have said 600x125 >_>
Twas me just nitpicking it twas.
I'm quite fond of the new site, quite fond of it, indeed. Once the wrinkles are ironed out and it's as speedy as it's intended to be, we'll all be in wonderful shape.
So much to get used to. Like where's the indicator of posts I read, didn't read (the color dots), which ones I posted in, and all that which helps me quickly sort through the forum listings for threads I'm looking for? And damn I want emoticons back.
So much to get used to. Like where's the indicator of posts I read, didn't read (the color dots), which ones I posted in, and all that which helps me quickly sort through the forum listings for threads I'm looking for? And damn I want emoticons back.
I don't care so much about those things, because this update brought with it a Notifications feature (top right by your profile pic on every page), plus two genius links -- Favorite Boards and Watched Topics. Totally reinvented how I browse the threads. I wish those links, along with your favorited forums, would follow you down to the bottom of a page along the right hand column. It's pretty barren on the right side at this moment, especially on these long threads.
@inb4uall: Pathetic that GS posted a second opinion about a game? The horror.
What's pathetic is that they decided months after the original review to post a 2nd review that completely flies in the face of the original. At the very least this should have been applied to future games, not retroactively to old games. Suppose I was just a random person who wanted to buy a game. Gamespot is telling me, not only that the game great, but also that's it's garbage. If Tom felt so strongly that Bioshock Infinite was a poor game then he should have come forward months ago. Not now, after everyone who is going to buy the game already has and the review is practically worthless. The only explanation for such a review is that Gamespot is obviously fishing for hits. Go ahead though. Prove to gamespot that you deserve your new mod tags and try to shove more of your pathetic PR down our throats. Tell us all once again why it's all not as bad as it seems.
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
That's a completely different comparison though, the original LoL review was based on a boxed product released 4 years ago, the game is completely different now, so different in fact, that they've swapped out the new review for the old one, making Van Ord's review the second opinion.
The problem with the Bioshock review, as jon says, is that it looks mighty confusing to anyone just reading the reviews, it would be like asking two friends, "Hey is Bioshock Infinite good?" only to have one reply "Yeah, it's amazing" and the other say "No, it's shit". It's completely useless, especially with a game like Bioshock where story plays such a big part, how can you tell which review to trust, the one saying the story is great, or the one saying it isn't? You just don't know until you play the game.
I find it hilarious that the moderators mock anyone that points out legitimate problem with gamespot's actions. The staff certainly have you on short leashes to be sure.
You'd go along with it too if you got whipped every time you stepped out of order. It's tougher being a mod than you think. Takes dedication.
I find it hilarious that the moderators mock anyone that points out legitimate problem with gamespot's actions. The staff certainly have you on short leashes to be sure.
Like freaking out over review scores because they didn't get the "right" score?
@AdobeArtist: Unfortunately, there's a bug where it only shows up for you and not everyone else when they upload a picture.
Though I still got to get to resizing my sig (that you made of course).
@inb4uall: If you need a group of users to objectify, you've chosen the right group - we tend to have thicker skins than your average GS member. It's just your character on display, after all. Present yourself how you will.
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
IT'S NEW AND DIFFERENT EVERYBODY PANIC!! AHHHH AHHHHH!!
There's a difference between disliking something because it's different and disliking it because it's just bad. Personally, I think the forum layout is a downgrade, but I'm getting used to it. Some of you people seem to just label anyone that criticizes it as being simply against change.
There's a difference between disliking something because it's different and disliking it because it's just bad. Personally, I think the forum layout is a downgrade, but I'm getting used to it. Some of you people seem to just label anyone that criticizes it as being simply against change.
@inb4uall: Pathetic that GS posted a second opinion about a game? The horror.
What's pathetic is that they decided months after the original review to post a 2nd review that completely flies in the face of the original. At the very least this should have been applied to future games, not retroactively to old games. Suppose I was just a random person who wanted to buy a game. Gamespot is telling me, not only that the game great, but also that's it's garbage. If Tom felt so strongly that Bioshock Infinite was a poor game then he should have come forward months ago. Not now, after everyone who is going to buy the game already has and the review is practically worthless. The only explanation for such a review is that Gamespot is obviously fishing for hits. Go ahead though. Prove to gamespot that you deserve your new mod tags and try to shove more of your pathetic PR down our throats. Tell us all once again why it's all not as bad as it seems.
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
So far it seems that they are choosing reviews or reviewers so as to have nearly completely opposite opinions so as to garner hits, and please just stop stevo you know this stuff is to garner hits they've been trying to do it for the past year garner hits with all sorts of stunts.
@inb4uall: Pathetic that GS posted a second opinion about a game? The horror.
What's pathetic is that they decided months after the original review to post a 2nd review that completely flies in the face of the original. At the very least this should have been applied to future games, not retroactively to old games. Suppose I was just a random person who wanted to buy a game. Gamespot is telling me, not only that the game great, but also that's it's garbage. If Tom felt so strongly that Bioshock Infinite was a poor game then he should have come forward months ago. Not now, after everyone who is going to buy the game already has and the review is practically worthless. The only explanation for such a review is that Gamespot is obviously fishing for hits. Go ahead though. Prove to gamespot that you deserve your new mod tags and try to shove more of your pathetic PR down our throats. Tell us all once again why it's all not as bad as it seems.
Is it also pathetic that Gamespot posted a second review on League of Legends that flies in the face of the original? It's a second opinion, I fail to see the problem here.
So far it seems that they are choosing reviews or reviewers so as to have nearly completely opposite opinions so as to garner hits, and please just stop stevo you know this stuff is to garner hits they've been trying to do it for the past year garner hits with all sorts of stunts.
the way the forums are going, they are going to need all the professional troll-hits they can get
Why must the 3DS be region locked?
because nintendo likes being mean? I mean seriously. when tecmo handed over fatal frame to them, they decided to stop releasing the games outside of of japan :|
Though the FF II remake made it here in Europe.
On the matter of region encoding, at least some Nintendo staff hate it.
Why must the 3DS be region locked?
because nintendo likes being mean? I mean seriously. when tecmo handed over fatal frame to them, they decided to stop releasing the games outside of of japan :|
Though the FF II remake made it here in Europe.
On the matter of region encoding, at least some Nintendo staff hate it.
I'm in NA, I miss out on a ton of things unless I spend lots of monies
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment