Did anyone actually think consoles were capable of this:
Well Ubi shouldn't put this shit out there.
Did anyone actually think consoles were capable of this:
Well Ubi shouldn't put this shit out there.
@melonfarmerz: Do you know why I ignore PS3/360 sales? Because despite the fact the have about 8x the install base they still outperform the old Consoles in software sales. You don't wanna count laptop and tablet gamers? And you say I cherry pick my argument? That's funny because whenever there's an article about how the PC brings in more money then any platform you can't wait to count those gamers.
And yes let's compare the kids on steam who most would consider core gamers. Only to see about 90% of there pcs are weaker then the PS4.
Not surprising. Consoles have been holding back pc gaming for a decade. Console kids are happy with mediocrity, so that's what they get.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Consoles exclusives exist because MS and Sony pay for them. Name one big budget game develop exclusively for 1 console alone that wasn't made by a 1st party studio or paied/had an association with the console manufacturers. Unlike the era of the PS1, and probably 2.
The closest thing PC would egt would be Nvidia or Intel or some other component manufacturer paying to exclusivity attached to their hardware in order to sell it. Just like consoles.
BTW, did you miss how even Sony admited it's starting to not get viable to make AAA exclusives anymore?
@deathlordcrime: I didn't downplay SC it's simply not out yet. And you can post hudless shots of any high end next gen title and it's going to look impressive.
Coming from a guy who think AC Unity is somehow on par, and no really you don't say right surly they look good with the hud. BTW we can already play Star Citizen and it looks damn good.
@AM-Gamer: I literally just explained why I did what I did and you question it? Dude. Are you illiterate? Your argument is fundamentally flawed and everyone here disagree's with you. Your arguments are literally lowering my IQ so let's just agree to end it here.
Also, the games I count in those articles are LoL, DOTA, and various Valve games. Actual games. Not low end tablet games.
And you're actually going to use Steam Survey's? Every time they're brought up, someone explains why they're wrong and you continue to use them. I actually can't...
Not surprising. Consoles have been holding back pc gaming for a decade. Console kids are happy with mediocrity, so that's what they get.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Consoles exclusives exist because MS and Sony pay for them. Name one big budget game develop exclusively for 1 console alone that wasn't made by a 1st party studio or paied/had an association with the console manufacturers. Unlike the era of the PS1, and probably 2.
The closest thing PC would egt would be Nvidia or Intel or some other component manufacturer paying to exclusivity attached to their hardware in order to sell it. Just like consoles.
BTW, did you miss how even Sony admited it's starting to not get viable to make AAA exclusives anymore?
You used a lot of words to agree with me. Thanks
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
@chikenfriedrice: You're right, they shouldn't. But, when those pictures came out last year, I knew damn well next gen consoles weren't going to be able to handle an open world game that looked that good. I don't even think my R9 290 could handle that at 60fps
@melonfarmerz: Everyone disagrees me? You mean butthurt hermits that are mad there platform can't support technically impressive exclusives and actually blame console makers on some ridiculous conspiracy theory. You can't even come up with a logical debate so you just randomly babbled about how dumb a argument is.
And those games you count on those articles prove my point. LOL can run on a pc made 10 years ago. And the fact pc gamers are stupid enough to pay $20 for a fucking skin is laughable. And yes some of those 12 year olds that play farmville also play LOL. It has a mix of competitive and casual players like any game with a massive install base. If anything consoles gamers should bitch about how this F2p Shit that did so well on pc is trying to infect consoles.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Only the one. Interesting. Guess his statement was incorrect then or at best missleading.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Only the one. Interesting. Guess his statement was incorrect then or at best missleading.
@chikenfriedrice: You're right, they shouldn't. But, when those pictures came out last year, I knew damn well next gen consoles weren't going to be able to handle an open world game that looked that good. I don't even think my R9 290 could handle that at 60fps
I was hoping it would look that good but after the release of these consoles and seeing their limitations, yeah hell no. What sucks is the PC versions could look like that and should, very disappointed in this "next" gen so far.
@CrownKingArthur: You do make me wonder about something.
If platform parity isn't a thing, because most console gamers are casual players who probably don't even know about this stuff, why are MS and Sony so god damm obsessed with 1080p and 60fps? Along with better gfx, these 3 point to the main technical ways to tell the platfomrs apart via multiplats.
So if graphics aren't downgraded because of PC, why was Sony, for example, so quick to post that Watch Dogs was "1080p/60fps". I guess i could see tehr esolutiongate abit, why the frames then?
Really makes me wonder.
i'm not sure what was happening when sony broadcast watch dogs being 1080p60 on ps4. it's possible some non-technical marketing team put that out, and the mistake wasn't caught until later. i'd assume it was an innocent mistake by sony.
and yeah, from my experience on the internet of late, it certainly seems that the resolution buzzwords are used as a metric of console quality. all they need is the biggest number in front of the p.
it seems to be marketing one console well.
@highking_kallor: Hey you decided to show up again! Where's your PC?
Not gonna post anything because of privacy issues. Get over it.
@highking_kallor: Hey you decided to show up again! Where's your PC?
Not gonna post anything because of privacy issues. Get over it.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Only the one. Interesting. Guess his statement was incorrect then or at best missleading.
2 and counting. Now anything that isnt a crappy empty space shooter?
@highking_kallor: Hey you decided to show up again! Where's your PC?
Not gonna post anything because of privacy issues. Get over it.
Dude how did you know? I love Hitler.
@highking_kallor: Hey you decided to show up again! Where's your PC?
Not gonna post anything because of privacy issues. Get over it.
Dude how did you know? I love Hitler.
mmm yes i knew you'd appreciate that.
Angry Joe had an interview and specifically played it saying it looked as good as the footage shown.
Angry Joe had an interview and specifically played it saying it looked as good as the footage shown.
Completely reliable source. No amount of money would change this guys opinion. /sarcasm
My freind, if you bother watching the other interviews he outright tells the Battlefield Hardline developers Battlefield 4 was shit and outright tells the Call Of Duty developers they have been making copy pasted games with 4 hour sp games. This man is a hero we should all admire.
Lol.. I never took the so called "Master Race" as being the gullible type.
Ubisoft set a standard (supposedly) for certain games that they could not met with a finished product. So now they're (supposedly) blaming consoles for their bait and switch move.. And what do Herm pirates do? Fall for it hook, line and sinker.
Bottom Line:
@Motokid6: Would like me to explain to you how corporate structure works? And how a company looks at overall profit margins by a platform to decide the types of titles it will get? When things like LOL do far better then the original Crysis, you can expect to get more f2p Shit that's not very technically demanding.
1. LoL got a 9.0 here, is played by more than anyone on consoles combined, and has a higher skill-cap than any console released in the history of games.
"F2p Shit"
2. PC has the best gfx atm, in arma3, crysis3, and wd w/ mods. Soon Star Ctiizen , Dreadnaught, and Elite:Dangerous will be on that list. You guys will never have top gfx. You never have.
the majority of your pc gamers own significantly weaker hardware then the PS4 and Xbox one.
You do know that even 15% of PC gamers is still far more than PS4/XBOX ONE gamers....right?
Someone even did the math in another one of your threads and owned you, you stopped replying after that post.
Getting real tired of Ubisoft misleading us with these show demos.
..that's ALL it is. Misrepresentation of a product.
Even WITH the so called embedded features within Watch Dogs it STILL doesn't look as good as the E3 demo. Yet Hermits are cool with that.. I figured you guys would be more pissed than anyone.. I mean isn't it the Modder's who are changing things up?
If only PC gaming could support it's own games. Then it could stop bitching at consoles all day.
PC gaming supports its own exclusives just fine. Look at the massive profit on LoL, DOTA, CS, SC, ect. It's multiplats that consoles are holding PC's back on.
...you're not helping your argument
All of those games you listed (LoL, DOTA, CS, SC, etc) are relatively low-end PC games designed to run on the vast majority of computers, even those with stock graphics cards or accelerated graphics.
Hell, the PAST generation consoles could probably run those games just fine.
PC gamers are delusional if they believe that if consoles disappeared, PC developers would suddenly spring to life and start pumping out AAA-budget titles aimed solely at high-end rigs. Star Citizen is the exception because it is a crowd-funded game which doesn't expose investors/publishers to any risk. The high-end "hardcore" PC gaming community simply isn't large enough to justify AAA budget titles...which is why you don't see any.
Day 1 for me on either ps4 or xbox one. While people are running around talking about how its been downgraded i'll be enjoying it. Kind of like Watch Dogs.
Not surprising. Consoles have been holding back pc gaming for a decade. Console kids are happy with mediocrity, so that's what they get.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Oh didn't you know that Goat simulator is held back by consoles.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Only the one. Interesting. Guess his statement was incorrect then or at best missleading.
2 and counting. Now anything that isnt a crappy empty space shooter?
One doesn't even take place in space and you seem to think there only space
If only PC gaming could support it's own games. Then it could stop bitching at consoles all day.
PC gaming supports its own exclusives just fine. Look at the massive profit on LoL, DOTA, CS, SC, ect. It's multiplats that consoles are holding PC's back on.
...you're not helping your argument
All of those games you listed (LoL, DOTA, CS, SC, etc) are relatively low-end PC games designed to run on the vast majority of computers, even those with stock graphics cards or accelerated graphics.
Hell, the PAST generation consoles could probably run those games just fine.
PC gamers are delusional if they believe that if consoles disappeared, PC developers would suddenly spring to life and start pumping out AAA-budget titles aimed solely at high-end rigs. Star Citizen is the exception because it is a crowd-funded game which doesn't expose investors/publishers to any risk. The high-end "hardcore" PC gaming community simply isn't large enough to justify AAA budget titles...which is why you don't see any.
Yes because he didn't list out games like Arma
@Jankarcop: Nobody owned me Lmao. Look at your argument troll. If there's so many high end pcs where's your big budget exclusives? 15% of those surveyed had more powerful rigs. That fool assumed that means 15% of all steam had more powerful rigs which is absolutely not true.
@Jankarcop:
1. Lol has a higher skill cap? LMAO. It's requires four hotkeys for **** sakes. The game is all team work and yes it's played by so many pc gamers because about any PC within the past 10 years can run it. Thanks for proving my point.
2. Neither Crysis 3 nor Arma are the graphics king. You are fucking delusional but we already knew that. Beg for something to push your rig when $400 prebuilt boxes are producing visuals that dump all over pc. All because the Only games that make money on your platform is F2P Shit.
So no PC exclusives confirmed? Or are they held back by consoles also?
Only the one. Interesting. Guess his statement was incorrect then or at best missleading.
2 and counting. Now anything that isnt a crappy empty space shooter?
One doesn't even take place in space and you seem to think there only space
Atleast post something relevant that I would actually care about.
@Jankarcop:
1. Lol has a higher skill cap? LMAO. It's requires four hotkeys for **** sakes. The game is all team work and yes it's played by so many pc gamers because about any PC within the past 10 years can run it. Thanks for proving my point.
2. Neither Crysis 3 nor Arma are the graphics king. You are fucking delusional but we already knew that. Beg for something to push your rig when $400 prebuilt boxes are producing visuals that dump all over pc. All because the Only games that make money on your platform is F2P Shit.
I'm assuming you have conclusive evidence to back up that last statement?
2 and counting. Now anything that isnt a crappy empty space shooter?
etc.
And many more you've never heard of and will likely never play while continuing to repeat ignorant peasant lies.
2 and counting. Now anything that isnt a crappy empty space shooter?
etc.
And many more you've never heard of and will never be able to play.
Why cant I play them? My PC craps all over the new consoles. Cant wait for War of the Overworld to be honest. Big Dungeon Keeper fan. Love all Bullfrog games.
@soulitane: LOL is the most profitable game on the pc platform, it's closest competition Is DOTA2. Look it up.
that's not answering his question
@soulitane: LOL is the most profitable game on the pc platform, it's closest competition Is DOTA2. Look it up.
that's not answering his question
My thoughts exactly. Either he has a problem with being able to read, or he's trying to not answer my question.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment