Sony UK: Nintendo failing could be BAD news for the industry

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#1 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41532 Posts

GoNintendo, Trusted Reviews

"[The decline of Nintendo] could be detrimental to the market, unless people like us raise our game and help tap into the younger consumer group that they serve rather well. That is the challenge to us. We need to bring maybe more family-friendly, more casual experiences into the market. I think there’s a big market segment there that we should take the challenge to engage and I see lots of potential to do that.”

Well, good to see it's not just Yoshida who wants them alive.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

Agreed. It'd be sad to see Nintendo go. Not as sad as it was to see Sega go, but still very sad.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#4  Edited By nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41532 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Good luck convincing this to some cows, especially "that guy" (if you know who I mean).

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Eh, I still play Nintendo games even now. I've actually been playing on Sony consoles longer than I have Nintendo consoles. I don't think I played a Nintendo game until I was six years old and first tried out either Ocarina of Time or GoldenEye (I can't remember which it was, as both of them were the first two N64 games I had), whereas I first played Crash Bandicoot and Tekken when I was, like, four or five.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

I disagree. Nintendo needs to learn a lesson. First of all, they should be punished for the Wii U. How dare they release a console with 7 year old hardware, a worthless tablet controller, with no games. The Wii had outdated hardware too but had the Wiimote and awesome games to compensate for it. The Wii U is an INSULT to gamers and Nintendo needs punishment for it. I mean:

- Nintendo was ill prepared for HD development. WTF? Come on Nintendo, hire people who know what they are doing!

- Nintendo Network STILL sucks. It's 2014 and Nintendo still believes "Gamers do not want online." Bye bye Nintendo, you won't be missed.

- They keep releasing the same games over and over again. Nothing new. Since the SNES, they have had very few new flagship console franchises: Animal Crossing, Pikmin, and Wii Series. The problem is Nintendo games don't get the hype they used to.

- The naming of the console was just.... dumb. Period.

Nintendo needs to just focus on handhelds now. The Wii was great from 2006-2010 but after that just no.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Good luck convincing this to some cows, especially "that guy" (if you know who I mean).

Way to go ruining a good thread with your idiotic generalizations and personal fanboy bias. There are no Sony fans who don't understand and or appreciate Nintendo's presence in the gaming market.

People bashed nintendo because they got the big head with the wii and wanted to keep cheaping their way through generations when they had more than enough ability to produce something more competitive.

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

gaming tastes have changes. wait i just got a new thread idea

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

@Demonjoe93 said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Eh, I still play Nintendo games even now. I've actually been playing on Sony consoles longer than I have Nintendo consoles. I don't think I played a Nintendo game until I was six years old and first tried out either Ocarina of Time or GoldenEye (I can't remember which it was, as both of them were the first two N64 games I had), whereas I first played Crash Bandicoot and Tekken when I was, like, four or five.

I don't mean to imply that people stop playing Nintendo games once they start playing PlayStation, I mean Nintendo serves as a gateway drug to gaming.

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yes, and this would explain why you want them to go third party so badly. No wait, it wouldn't. If no one wants Nintendo games, then why the **** do you want them to go third party so bad?

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

What? What about those over 100 million vtech and lepforg product owners? and the fact most of the slightly older kid demographic have PS3's and Xbox 360's and Ouyas anyway?

If they fall it will be pretty much identical to Sega. Just more suicides.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

Honestly, I just think nintendo got lazy.

This all happened when Sega stopped being a console provider in the gaming market. When Sega was a console provider Nintendo was a much more competitive and aggressive competitor.

They need something to kick them in the ass so they actually try. Nintendo could be the number one gaming company if they stopped thinking people supporting them and buying their games was privilege instead of a reward for producing the best products.

I am reminded of when Sega came out with Genesis16bit "blast processing" then Nintendo hit back with SNES, a more powerful system and an unstoppable amazing catalog of exclusive games (not just for kids).

Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4159 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@Demonjoe93 said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Eh, I still play Nintendo games even now. I've actually been playing on Sony consoles longer than I have Nintendo consoles. I don't think I played a Nintendo game until I was six years old and first tried out either Ocarina of Time or GoldenEye (I can't remember which it was, as both of them were the first two N64 games I had), whereas I first played Crash Bandicoot and Tekken when I was, like, four or five.

I don't mean to imply that people stop playing Nintendo games once they start playing PlayStation, I mean Nintendo serves as a gateway drug to gaming.

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yes, and this would explain why you want them to go third party so badly. No wait, it wouldn't. If no one wants Nintendo games, then why the **** do you want them to go third party so bad?

It sounds like fanboy drivel, but I'm seeing it unfold in real life. 10 year olds don't want Mario, all they want is watch_dogs, GTA or Minecraft.
Mario used to be cool at age 12, but then I grew up and started liking games like Deus ex (original), stuff Nintendo always feared to venture in, adult themes and narratives (not to be confused with violence). Nintendo must evolve or die.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yes, and this would explain why you want them to go third party so badly. No wait, it wouldn't. If no one wants Nintendo games, then why the **** do you want them to go third party so bad?

My point was to their consoles. I have stated many times their games would sell 10-20 millions as multiplatform. it's just not worth buying their console for 1-2 IPs with the occasional new one. Not to mention they can't market for shit. Their main demographic is children, they market towards children but most of their sales are to teens and adults

Their best exposure would be as a multiplatform developer. I don't know why it's so hard for you sheep to understand that

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

I do agree, Nintendo has the potential to bring great things to the industry but with Iwata running the show and his "I don't give a crap about competition." attitude. It doesn't look like a very bright future for them.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20248 Posts

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

You don't even know what your talking about

Avatar image for betamaxx83
betamaxx83

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#17 betamaxx83
Member since 2013 • 360 Posts

I know plenty of kids who didn't grow up on Nintendo, they grew up on PlayStation or Xbox. In fact I hear them all the time in game lobbies. Spoiled little kids who began swearing at the age of 5.

Nintendo leaving the industry would be bad, Microsoft or Sony leaving would be bad. I'd rather have all three in the game. 3 sounds better than 2.

Avatar image for Boddicker
Boddicker

4458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Boddicker
Member since 2012 • 4458 Posts

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

I gotta agree with Couth on this one. I grew up in the 80's and had an NES like every other kid. Hell, I was loyal enough to Nintendo for so many years I even bought a N64. After that I jumped on the PS1 boat and never looked back.

The PS1 had plenty of kid friendly titles and even games mature enough to keep adults interested. That tradition to keeping a decidedly kid friendly approach mixed in with more mature games for adults has been kept alive today, though I doubt it's as kid friendly as the PS1 was.

I love Nintendo, but they've been out of touch for so long..............

I kinda feel guilty saying this, but how many people that grew up in the late 70's and early 80's had similar strong feelings about Atari? We didn't have the internet back then so we'll never know.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

@FireEmblem_Man said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

You don't even know what your talking about

Says the guy with his head permanently lodged in his ass. I don't know that I was playing PlayStation since 6-7?.. Or that Children don't want xbox or playstation??

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21064 Posts

Sony would have no one to steal from.

Avatar image for kittennose
KittenNose

2470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#21 KittenNose
Member since 2014 • 2470 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

I think this is wrong, and why Nintendo is having such problems. This used to be true, it isn't anymore.

These days every cell phone company subsidizes a hand held gaming device. Give a kid a cell phone and they can play angry birds. It really is just that easy. Besides, at the end of the day it wasn't Mario that got me into gaming, it was extremely hard core strategy games like the first X-com. Before X-com I thought video games were better then TV but ultimately kind of dumb. When I was eleven and first watched my dad play X-com my mind was blown, and I became a life long gamer.

Cell phone companies introduced the bulk of society to the concept of playing games every day as an entertaining distraction. Larger and more in death games, everything from Xcom to your hallway shooter of choice, turn those people into gamers. Nintendo no longer bridges any gaps in that transition.

Finally, I work in customer support in gaming. You would be astonished about how many calls I get from parents of pre-teens who's kids spent money buying GTA in game cash. Current perception of gaming is so immature that CoD, BF, GTA, and so forth are viewed as kid games, and I haven't run across an eleven year old who would rather be playing Mario.

Nintendo is the kid's console for helicopter moms in suburbia. For most of the rest of America at least, all games are kid games. Nintendo is obsolete, and only beloved IP even keeps us talking about them.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20248 Posts

@Couth_ said:

@FireEmblem_Man said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

You don't even know what your talking about

Says the guy with his head permanently lodged in his ass. I don't know that I was playing PlayStation since 5 years old? (Got my own at 6 or 7).. Or that Children don't want xbox or playstation??

I'm referring to your childrens claim dipshit, also stick to weightlifting

Avatar image for no-scope-AK47
no-scope-AK47

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 no-scope-AK47
Member since 2012 • 3755 Posts

Sounds like Sony is making a play for Nintendo's market share and or getting Nintendo games on the ps5 in the future.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
Lulu_Lulu

19564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Lulu_Lulu
Member since 2013 • 19564 Posts

Actually it seems like Sony is saying they wana take a shot at Nintendos demograph. Which is cool, so long as they add Local Features (Splitscreen, two controllers as Standard, bro fist leather gloves etc) you know, things more valuable to the person sitting next to you instead of the disembodied voice in your headset. Ofcourse its wishfull thinking, Sony doesn't value people who prefer human interaction. Thats just post 6th Generation gaming 101.

Avatar image for trollop_scat
trollop_scat

2656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 trollop_scat
Member since 2006 • 2656 Posts

Nintendo dug their own grave when they didn't bother making any games for the Wii despite it's success. Hope they die in it soon...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yourself =/= other kids.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#27 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41532 Posts

@trollop_scat said:

Nintendo dug their own grave when they didn't bother making any games for the Wii despite it's success. Hope they die in it soon...

You mean games that don't appeal to YOU?

Avatar image for schu
schu

10191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By schu
Member since 2003 • 10191 Posts

More casual experiences? hahaha

Avatar image for Ratchet_Fan8
Ratchet_Fan8

5574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 Ratchet_Fan8
Member since 2008 • 5574 Posts

@casharmy said:

Honestly, I just think nintendo got lazy.

This all happened when Sega stopped being a console provider in the gaming market. When Sega was a console provider Nintendo was a much more competitive and aggressive competitor.

They need something to kick them in the ass so they actually try. Nintendo could be the number one gaming company if they stopped thinking people supporting them and buying their games was privilege instead of a reward for producing the best products.

I am reminded of when Sega came out with Genesis16bit "blast processing" then Nintendo hit back with SNES, a more powerful system and an unstoppable amazing catalog of exclusive games (not just for kids).

yes,Sony really blew Nintendo out the water. They found a new competitor in MS.

Avatar image for edwardecl
edwardecl

2240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 edwardecl
Member since 2005 • 2240 Posts

Does this mean we will get another Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon?

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yourself =/= other kids.

That doesn't make what I said invalid. I didn't say he was wrong either, I said I disagree. And I think the evidence would be in my favor

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

@Couth_ said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yourself =/= other kids.

That doesn't make what I said invalid. I didn't say he was wrong either, I said I disagree. And I think the evidence would be in my favor

Since you didn't get it....speak for yourself....not others. I know plenty of parents that have Nintendo products for their children...and no Xbox nor Playstation.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#33 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

@edwardecl said:

Does this mean we will get another Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon?

No, I think Activision still owns both franchises, unfortunately.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Couth_ said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Couth_ said:
@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Disagree.. I had already 'graduated' to PlayStation since I was like 6 or 7 years old.. Children even at a young age want Xbox and PlayStation. This is just more proof that Nintendo is for children, but even children don't want Nintendo

Yourself =/= other kids.

That doesn't make what I said invalid. I didn't say he was wrong either, I said I disagree. And I think the evidence would be in my favor

Since you didn't get it....speak for yourself....not others. I know plenty of parents that have Nintendo products for their children...and no Xbox nor Playstation.

Speak for yourself...not others. I know plenty of parents that have Xbox and PlayStation products for their children, and no nintendo

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

Well this is an already established notion that Nintendo has been the incubator for new age of home video gamers, however that is not to say they are not replaceable. Just maybe it would be difficult for any of the present incumbents to fit in the role that they occupied

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

@megaspiderweb09 said:

Well this is an already established notion that Nintendo has been the incubator for new age of home video gamers, however that is not to say they are not replaceable. Just maybe it would be difficult for any of the present incumbents to fit in the role that they occupied

I dont see why Playstation and Xbox couldn't fill the void especially if Nintendo makes games for them. Make a marketing campaign that PS/Xbox are family friendly as well, i think PS/XBox have a reputation of being shooter consoles and that scares alot of parents away.

With that being said, i would rather Nintendo stick around, There's to much that could go wrong if they stop making hardware.

Avatar image for no-scope-AK47
no-scope-AK47

3755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 no-scope-AK47
Member since 2012 • 3755 Posts

@crimsonman1245 said:

@megaspiderweb09 said:

Well this is an already established notion that Nintendo has been the incubator for new age of home video gamers, however that is not to say they are not replaceable. Just maybe it would be difficult for any of the present incumbents to fit in the role that they occupied

I dont see why Playstation and Xbox couldn't fill the void especially if Nintendo makes games for them. Make a marketing campaign that PS/Xbox are family friendly as well, i think PS/XBox have a reputation of being shooter consoles and that scares alot of parents away.

With that being said, i would rather Nintendo stick around, There's to much that could go wrong if they stop making hardware.

Like what ??

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44560 Posts

at worst they'll make a shit load of money on making third party titles for MS and Sony consoles, and PC

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#39  Edited By nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41532 Posts

@casharmy said:

@nintendoboy16 said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

Good luck convincing this to some cows, especially "that guy" (if you know who I mean).

Way to go ruining a good thread with your idiotic generalizations and personal fanboy bias. There are no Sony fans who don't understand and or appreciate Nintendo's presence in the gaming market.

People bashed nintendo because they got the big head with the wii and wanted to keep cheaping their way through generations when they had more than enough ability to produce something more competitive.

I really don't believe that due to some of the stuff I've seen and read around. Also, in that last post I said "SOME". Meaning, I acknowledge that there are fans of rival systems that honor Nintendo's presence in gaming, but I also acknowledge that there are those who DON'T.

Avatar image for edidili
edidili

3449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 edidili
Member since 2004 • 3449 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:

GoNintendo, Trusted Reviews

"[The decline of Nintendo] could be detrimental to the market, unless people like us raise our game and help tap into the younger consumer group that they serve rather well.

What I got from this, is bad for Nintendo only, we will get their userbase.

Avatar image for lunar1122
lunar1122

784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By lunar1122
Member since 2012 • 784 Posts

nintendo needs to reinvent themselfs, or they will die off in the console market.. I dont see how even if they released another console on how that thing is going to sell...

The real reason nintendo consoles arent selling, Isnt because they arent any games.. Thats b.s. Lots of big title wii u games have came out.. The reason people arent buying nintendo consoles is two fold.

1) Bad experience from the first wii. The Wii was an awful console, I dont care what anyone says,, the gimmick lasted all but 1 hour .. The wii was a dust collector.. It was only purchased because it was cheap.. So many people had wii's and never played them.

2) So many years of nintendo just rehasing the same old games with slightly new additions and calling it new.. I dont care for another smash bros, I dont care for another zelda, I dont care for another donkey kong, I dont care for another mario... I do not care for another mario kart

To much junk , ..Mainly for kiddies.. The kiddies that they once served have grown up, moved onto a more "m" rated platform...

Overall nintendo needs to get a new image or they will die.

My suggestions.. Just accept wii u is a failure, Put out some games to not disappoint the wii u customers . Start focusing on the next console cause this one is a flop.

Call it Super Nintendo 2... Super nintendo was their best.. Super Nintendo 2 would mean nintendo means business and not screwing around this time.

Start releasing lots of games, Make sure the hardware is powerful, Focus on online and get the 3rd parties to at least multiplat..

Bring back classics like Battletoads, Double Dragon. Create a new mascott for the franchise... Do a 3d world donkey kong instead of a platformer version. What nintendo really needs is a hit FPS to draw the U.S.A crowd.. Chances of that happening is slim to none.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17657 Posts

@casharmy said:

Honestly, I just think Nintendo got lazy.

This all happened when Sega stopped being a console provider in the gaming market. When Sega was a console provider Nintendo was a much more competitive and aggressive competitor.

They need something to kick them in the ass so they actually try. Nintendo could be the number one gaming company if they stopped thinking people supporting them and buying their games was privilege instead of a reward for producing the best products.

I am reminded of when Sega came out with Genesis 16bit "blast processing" then Nintendo hit back with SNES, a more powerful system and an unstoppable amazing catalog of exclusive games (not just for kids).

Good post. Someone on another forum summed up my feelings quite nicely:

"I also see this transition as yet another coward attitude from Nintendo -> which translates into weakness from their management, no matter how we look at it. Looking at the past 10 years, I get the feeling they're unable to stand their own whenever they find competition, whatever the market is. They find competition in the high-end console business, they run away and create a low-end console business (Wii). They keep going at the low-end console business hoping it might work forever (Wii U, 3DS) but they find competition from smartphones/tablets and it fails. Then they run away and create a health console business. Where will they run away to, when they find competition there? They're showing that they're incapable of standing their ground, again and again."

Sad. Nintendo was competitive (viciously so) back in the Sega days because of Yamauchi. Say what people will about his harsh monopolistic actions, that guy was a hard ass with a serious fighting spirit and drive. Iwata lacks this, and that's a terrible thing to lack if you're a CEO. He's completely phobic of competition, which sucks for us, as a company is at their best when they're fighting to be #1. Look at this recent quote of his:

"[Nintendo] will actively expand our character licensing business, including proactively finding appropriate partners. Also, we will be flexible about forming licensing relationships in areas we did not license in the past, such as digital fields, provided we are not in direct competitionand we can form win-win relationships.

I mean, Heaven forbid you may actually have to COMPETE when running a business, Iwata.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts
@kittennose said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

I think this is wrong, and why Nintendo is having such problems. This used to be true, it isn't anymore.

These days every cell phone company subsidizes a hand held gaming device. Give a kid a cell phone and they can play angry birds. It really is just that easy. Besides, at the end of the day it wasn't Mario that got me into gaming, it was extremely hard core strategy games like the first X-com. Before X-com I thought video games were better then TV but ultimately kind of dumb. When I was eleven and first watched my dad play X-com my mind was blown, and I became a life long gamer.

Cell phone companies introduced the bulk of society to the concept of playing games every day as an entertaining distraction. Larger and more in death games, everything from Xcom to your hallway shooter of choice, turn those people into gamers. Nintendo no longer bridges any gaps in that transition.

Finally, I work in customer support in gaming. You would be astonished about how many calls I get from parents of pre-teens who's kids spent money buying GTA in game cash. Current perception of gaming is so immature that CoD, BF, GTA, and so forth are viewed as kid games, and I haven't run across an eleven year old who would rather be playing Mario.

Nintendo is the kid's console for helicopter moms in suburbia. For most of the rest of America at least, all games are kid games. Nintendo is obsolete, and only beloved IP even keeps us talking about them.

The X-COM comparison makes no sense. It may have sold well on consoles & PC, but it certainly doesn't seem like the kind of game that would appeal to casual mobile phone users. Also, if your dad was a hardcore PC strategy gamer, then that kind of makes you more of an exception rather than the norm.

Anyway, an important point I think you may have missed is that Sony and Microsoft are console manufacturers, and much of their audiences are gamers who grew up playing on Nintendo or Sega consoles. And the Wii's success helped introduce even more gamers to consoles for Sony and Microsoft to capitalize on.

If kids prefer playing kid-friendly casual games on mobile phones instead of kid-friendly core games on consoles, then that would be bad news for console manufacturers like Sony and Microsoft. They need Nintendo to introduce kids to core console gaming. Casual mobile games like Angry Birds and Candy Crush are no replacements for kid-friendly hardcore console games like Mario and Zelda, and won't benefit Sony or Microsoft in the long run... unless, of course, one of them decides to fill that void themselves (which Sony seems to be hinting at above).

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

@Couth_ said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@Couth_ said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

Yourself =/= other kids.

That doesn't make what I said invalid. I didn't say he was wrong either, I said I disagree. And I think the evidence would be in my favor

Since you didn't get it....speak for yourself....not others. I know plenty of parents that have Nintendo products for their children...and no Xbox nor Playstation.

Speak for yourself...not others. I know plenty of parents that have Xbox and PlayStation products for their children, and no nintendo

Wow......did you even bother reading my posts? I wasn't speaking for myself. And I never said parents don't have the other two systems. YOU said children don't play Nintendo anymore....and that is wrong. Your post did nothing to address that. But I'm sure in your mind the fact that you didn't respond to what I actually said doesn't matter....you think you had a point. El Oh El.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#45 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:

@casharmy said:

Honestly, I just think Nintendo got lazy.

This all happened when Sega stopped being a console provider in the gaming market. When Sega was a console provider Nintendo was a much more competitive and aggressive competitor.

They need something to kick them in the ass so they actually try. Nintendo could be the number one gaming company if they stopped thinking people supporting them and buying their games was privilege instead of a reward for producing the best products.

I am reminded of when Sega came out with Genesis 16bit "blast processing" then Nintendo hit back with SNES, a more powerful system and an unstoppable amazing catalog of exclusive games (not just for kids).

Good post. Someone on another forum summed up my feelings quite nicely:

"I also see this transition as yet another coward attitude from Nintendo -> which translates into weakness from their management, no matter how we look at it. Looking at the past 10 years, I get the feeling they're unable to stand their own whenever they find competition, whatever the market is. They find competition in the high-end console business, they run away and create a low-end console business (Wii). They keep going at the low-end console business hoping it might work forever (Wii U, 3DS) but they find competition from smartphones/tablets and it fails. Then they run away and create a health console business. Where will they run away to, when they find competition there? They're showing that they're incapable of standing their ground, again and again."

Sad. Nintendo was competitive (viciously so) back in the Sega days because of Yamauchi. Say what people will about his harsh monopolistic actions, that guy was a hard ass with a serious fighting spirit and drive. Iwata lacks this, and that's a terrible thing to lack if you're a CEO. He's completely phobic of competition, which sucks for us, as a company is at their best when they're fighting to be #1. Look at this recent quote of his:

"[Nintendo] will actively expand our character licensing business, including proactively finding appropriate partners. Also, we will be flexible about forming licensing relationships in areas we did not license in the past, such as digital fields, provided we are not in direct competitionand we can form win-win relationships.

I mean, Heaven forbid you may actually have to COMPETE when running a business, Iwata.

Iwata lacks the ruthlessness of Yamauchi. Instead of taking the competition head on, Iwata instead prefers to shy away from the competition and look for a "blue ocean" where there's no competition. And this worked wonders last gen, but that blue ocean he found has already been filled. And now, once again, he's going after another "blue ocean" with the healthcare market...

Yamauchi, on the other hand, always took the competition head-on, even if it meant eliminating the competition by any means necessary (not too surprising considering Ninendo's former Yakuza connections). Even though Yamauchi never played a video game in his life up until the day he died, what mattered was that he knew how to do business, and did it well enough to establish a multi-billion dollar corporation.

Iwata seems like a nice guy, but if he's always going to be so timid, then maybe he isn't the right man to lead a multi-billion dollar corporation...

Avatar image for j2zon2591
j2zon2591

3571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 j2zon2591
Member since 2005 • 3571 Posts

Sony has said this twice publicly at this point. I agree.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts

This statement coming from the company that stabbed Nintendo in the back and wanting their demise? Typical Sony.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#48 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41532 Posts

@FoxbatAlpha said:

This statement coming from the company that stabbed Nintendo in the back and wanting their demise? Typical Sony.

Actually, Nintendo did that. But they had a reason.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

@FoxbatAlpha said:

This statement coming from the company that stabbed Nintendo in the back and wanting their demise? Typical Sony.

That's a little backwards dude......other way around.

Avatar image for Articuno76
Articuno76

19799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#50 Articuno76
Member since 2004 • 19799 Posts

@kittennose said:

@charizard1605 said:

I mean, it's true. Nintendo does have an irreplaceable place in the market, where they introduce newer customers to games (mostly by tapping into the younger demographic), who go on to 'graduate' to Sony and Microsoft's consoles.

Nintendo's decline in this case would be pretty detrimental to the industry at large; glad to see Sony recognizes and understands that.

I think this is wrong, and why Nintendo is having such problems. This used to be true, it isn't anymore.

These days every cell phone company subsidizes a hand held gaming device. Give a kid a cell phone and they can play angry birds. It really is just that easy. Besides, at the end of the day it wasn't Mario that got me into gaming, it was extremely hard core strategy games like the first X-com. Before X-com I thought video games were better then TV but ultimately kind of dumb. When I was eleven and first watched my dad play X-com my mind was blown, and I became a life long gamer.

Cell phone companies introduced the bulk of society to the concept of playing games every day as an entertaining distraction. Larger and more in death games, everything from Xcom to your hallway shooter of choice, turn those people into gamers. Nintendo no longer bridges any gaps in that transition.

Finally, I work in customer support in gaming. You would be astonished about how many calls I get from parents of pre-teens who's kids spent money buying GTA in game cash. Current perception of gaming is so immature that CoD, BF, GTA, and so forth are viewed as kid games, and I haven't run across an eleven year old who would rather be playing Mario.

Nintendo is the kid's console for helicopter moms in suburbia. For most of the rest of America at least, all games are kid games. Nintendo is obsolete, and only beloved IP even keeps us talking about them.

Not sure if I agree with this because I'm a bit disconnected from what kids play. But I think it makes some good points.

And, I love the term 'helicopter moms'.