Sony should buy and make KINECT INSTEAD !!!

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for iwasgood2u
iwasgood2u

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 iwasgood2u
Member since 2009 • 831 Posts

The only company who will be able to save the kinect is babys r us. Turn it into something that a baby can interact with. Babies doesnt complain about lag and ugly graphics. They will giggle whenever they see cute animations and sound. Or have the porn industry buy it lol. It will be very useful imagine the many possibilities with it.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

No.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#53 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44503 Posts

PS had the Eye, they should keep an updated limited version of it, it can be used specifically with dance games, and video chat, but to try to sell it as anything more would be wrong.

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

No, the technology right now is rubbish, and to make it good enough, they would have to make expensive hardware for both the Kinect itself, and console. More powerfull hardware. Right now, people want great games that looks good, and runs smooth, add Kinect, and the games are ruined.

Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#55 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13717 Posts

im sorry but death to motion gaming...seriously

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56  Edited By FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@jsmoke03 said:

im sorry but death to motion gaming...seriously

So, death to Wii and Wii U then. Good to hear

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@jsmoke03 said:

im sorry but death to motion gaming...seriously

So, death to Wii and Wii U then. Good to hear

Pretty sure he means kinect

Avatar image for bezza2011
bezza2011

2729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 bezza2011
Member since 2006 • 2729 Posts

I agree. I mean the PS camera is only 720p, I think Sony would benefit with the Kinect and move, I mean honestly they should of made the camera completely 1080p why go low why??? and if they dedicated teams onto it, then it could work the problem with all these devices is the fact it was never supported fully it was a half arse effort, it's so annoying, there all at it, o you need this it does this this and that, you need it, and when you get any of it, there like o well move on.

Avatar image for draign
Draign

1824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59  Edited By Draign
Member since 2013 • 1824 Posts

@pimphand_gamer said:

My wife loves Kinect. I had some fun with Wii cause of the games and would love Kinect to be more robust for more variety of games. But because it makes fat lazy kids get up and do something besides twiddle their sausage fingers on rotatable dildo's, it lost it's originally planned potential by MS.

Dance Central + Women = : )

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts

Translation: "I like Kinect but won't get it because it's on another console"

I think Kinect is great for PC modifying and Motion Tracking but terrible for most genres of gaming.

Avatar image for doozie78
Doozie78

1123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#61  Edited By Doozie78
Member since 2014 • 1123 Posts

@Gamerno6666 said:

@freedomfreak said:

No.

No.

Avatar image for Bishop1310
Bishop1310

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Bishop1310
Member since 2007 • 1274 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Before anyone says "ah Kinect.. lol" ; "Kinect ruins gaming" blablablabla...

First, Sony has more game studios than Microsoft. Because Playstation 4 is more powerful, has more video game developers support, then Sony should re-create Sony PS eye and create Kinect.

PS Move was just confusing. Having Kinect on PS4 could work very well. I mean Sony has better hardware team who can make Kinect more accurate with same price, plus you can have games that not having any lag or anything like that. This would boosts PS4 sell.

Having Kinect on PS4 DOES NOT CHANGE SONY PRIORITY AND MAKING ALL KINECT GAMES. NO, KINECT IS JUST EXTRA.

The thing is, PS4 outselling Xbox One and Kinect is dead on Microsoft side. Sony meanwhile sells PS4 crazy and why not steal Kinect, make it better and have profit? Sony don´t have to even force game developers make Kinect games. When you already outselling Xbox One and Wii U, then having PS Eye stronger than Microsoft Kinect can make Sony monopoly.

It can totally work.

This is an awful idea.

Sony has hardware, no doubt about it, that's where they succeed right now.. They also have god awful software support programmers. Kinect is a piece of hardware that benefits from amazing software and that's where Microsoft succeeds. Since launch sony has had to patch the PS4 for stability reasons alone, just finally we're getting some features in the system.

Microsoft gimped the x1 with the GPU - yes that's a fact, but kinect would not benefit from better hardware.. the system (X1) on the other hand would.

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@Bishop1310 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Before anyone says "ah Kinect.. lol" ; "Kinect ruins gaming" blablablabla...

First, Sony has more game studios than Microsoft. Because Playstation 4 is more powerful, has more video game developers support, then Sony should re-create Sony PS eye and create Kinect.

PS Move was just confusing. Having Kinect on PS4 could work very well. I mean Sony has better hardware team who can make Kinect more accurate with same price, plus you can have games that not having any lag or anything like that. This would boosts PS4 sell.

Having Kinect on PS4 DOES NOT CHANGE SONY PRIORITY AND MAKING ALL KINECT GAMES. NO, KINECT IS JUST EXTRA.

The thing is, PS4 outselling Xbox One and Kinect is dead on Microsoft side. Sony meanwhile sells PS4 crazy and why not steal Kinect, make it better and have profit? Sony don´t have to even force game developers make Kinect games. When you already outselling Xbox One and Wii U, then having PS Eye stronger than Microsoft Kinect can make Sony monopoly.

It can totally work.

This is an awful idea.

Sony has hardware, no doubt about it, that's where they succeed right now.. They also have god awful software support programmers. Kinect is a piece of hardware that benefits from amazing software and that's where Microsoft succeeds. Since launch sony has had to patch the PS4 for stability reasons alone, just finally we're getting some features in the system.

Microsoft gimped the x1 with the GPU - yes that's a fact, but kinect would not benefit from better hardware.. the system (X1) on the other hand would.

So, you telling to "**** off" for party games and same for Wii U. WOW

Avatar image for Bishop1310
Bishop1310

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Bishop1310
Member since 2007 • 1274 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@Bishop1310 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Before anyone says "ah Kinect.. lol" ; "Kinect ruins gaming" blablablabla...

First, Sony has more game studios than Microsoft. Because Playstation 4 is more powerful, has more video game developers support, then Sony should re-create Sony PS eye and create Kinect.

PS Move was just confusing. Having Kinect on PS4 could work very well. I mean Sony has better hardware team who can make Kinect more accurate with same price, plus you can have games that not having any lag or anything like that. This would boosts PS4 sell.

Having Kinect on PS4 DOES NOT CHANGE SONY PRIORITY AND MAKING ALL KINECT GAMES. NO, KINECT IS JUST EXTRA.

The thing is, PS4 outselling Xbox One and Kinect is dead on Microsoft side. Sony meanwhile sells PS4 crazy and why not steal Kinect, make it better and have profit? Sony don´t have to even force game developers make Kinect games. When you already outselling Xbox One and Wii U, then having PS Eye stronger than Microsoft Kinect can make Sony monopoly.

It can totally work.

This is an awful idea.

Sony has hardware, no doubt about it, that's where they succeed right now.. They also have god awful software support programmers. Kinect is a piece of hardware that benefits from amazing software and that's where Microsoft succeeds. Since launch sony has had to patch the PS4 for stability reasons alone, just finally we're getting some features in the system.

Microsoft gimped the x1 with the GPU - yes that's a fact, but kinect would not benefit from better hardware.. the system (X1) on the other hand would.

So, you telling to "**** off" for party games and same for Wii U. WOW

what?.......

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60681 Posts

Kinect(lol), the joke of the industry and what MS dropped core to go upwards of 65% casual in 2009 for.

lolno

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9716 Posts

No.

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Kinect has a lot quality games.

and no.