Sony: No More Original AAA Content on PS Vita

  • 144 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#101 Posted by Heil68 (45080 posts) -

@darkspineslayer said:

Chaz thread.

Nothing but overhype and conspiracy to see here folks.

And super600 talking smack..lol

#102 Posted by charizard1605 (58073 posts) -

@2Chalupas said:

@chessmaster1989 said:

Sad the Vita never took off, it just isn't worth getting relative to the 3DS. Not surprised Sony's abandoning it.

It's too bad. It's crazy how much better little system the Vita is than the 3DS. The market (what's left of the handheld market) totally got that one wrong.

There is not really much else Sony could have done with this one, although they did seem to give up on it pretty quick

The market didn't get anything wrong. There's only so much that superior hardware will do. The 3DS had better software, and that's why it did so well.

#103 Posted by PS4hasNOgames (1771 posts) -

@Wasdie said:

Have mobile titles ever really been AAA budgeted?

I always thought AAA means high scoring games like 9 and above, I never thought it had something to do with the budget because resident evil 6 got terrible scores but they had a huge budget.

#104 Edited by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

#105 Posted by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

#106 Posted by charizard1605 (58073 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

Yes, playing ports of console games tethered to battery sucking Wifi on your couch on a tiny screen next to your fifty inch TV which can play those same games is a much better thing than the loads of original new games the 3DS gets.

#107 Edited by Ghost120x (3909 posts) -

It seems he is talking from a western development perspective. Damn. I would love to see more games like batman, assassins creed,Street fighter. I would love to see smaller, well developed games of larger franchises like rockstar did with the psp gta games. I was hoping to one day see things like dead space, and mass effect (with interactive comic like cut scenes)

I wish the things were the other way around. I wish the vita got the (western) support that psp had. The psp got gta, metal of honor, metal gear, Castlevaina, Soul calibur,splinter cell, rainbow 6 and tekken ect,

Edit: some of those games are from namco but you get the point.

#108 Edited by StrongBlackVine (8418 posts) -

Should be clear by now that neither Sony nor Nintendo have the resources to support a handheld and console at the same time.

#109 Edited by mems_1224 (47225 posts) -

lol where there ever original AAA games on the vita?

#110 Edited by 2Chalupas (5151 posts) -

@Ghost120x said:

It seems he is talking from a western development perspective. Damn. I would love to see more games like batman, assassins creed,Street fighter. I would love to see smaller, well developed games of larger franchises like rockstar did with the psp gta games. I was hoping to one day see things like dead space, and mass effect (with interactive comic like cut scenes)

I wish the things were the other way around. I wish the vita got the (western) support that psp had. The psp got gta, metal of honor, metal gear, Castlevaina, Soul calibur,splinter cell, rainbow 6 and tekken ect,

Edit: some of those games are from namco but you get the point.

Well, Vita did get CoD (sucky version though), Assassin's Creed Liberation (and was originally an exclusive version), Killzone: Mercenaries, Resistance, Unit 13, Uncharted, Playstation All-Stars, Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3, Mortal Kombat, Street Fighter x Tekken, Batman Origins Blackgate, Injustice, Tearaway, Little Big Planet, Persona 4, Soul Sacrifice, Dragon's Crown, Modnation Racers, Need for Speed...and alot more. All these are retail titles without even going into digital, Vita definitely excels on the digital front.

Honestly, the lineup for Vita is not a problem. Or shouldn't have been. Plenty of western games in there. (or if they aren't western, they are mainstream enough for any westerner to buy)... only recently has it really started to rely almost entirely on Japanese games, and the Japanese games seem far more "niche". It also seems like the Vita had a crazy amount of fighting games ported to it for some reason.

I agree it would have been nice to see a few more western games that were totally exclusive to Vita, especially something like a Rockstar game to put it over the top. But for the 1st year or two of Vita, it was not that bad. You can understand why western developers are dropping off now. But reality is this, 3DS doesn't have much western support either.

#111 Edited by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

Yes, playing ports of console games tethered to battery sucking Wifi on your couch on a tiny screen next to your fifty inch TV which can play those same games is a much better thing than the loads of original new games the 3DS gets.

"loads..." oh please........ don't try to pull the wool over a 3DS owner's eyes... it gets a few good games a year.

battery lasts 5 hours... never a problem for me.... EVER. that tiny screen is still 10x better than the crap 2 screen idea nintendo still try to plug as useful.

don't get the point though.... I've used remote play for my home home adress while my PS4 is active in my flat.... and it works fine (got good internet on both ends)..

3ds "loads of original good games" bwhhahahaha talk about far fetched....

#112 Posted by RR360DD (11976 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

#113 Edited by super600 (30709 posts) -

@TheTruthIsREAL said:

@super600 said:

SCEA has mostly been ignoring the vita lately.I know they published some vita games last year, but a lot of them were not AAA handheld games.I do not think SCEA thinks it's economically viable to create AAA handheld games for the vita. They should be supporting the vita more anyway since it builds confidence for the vita and shows the consumers that sony (or SCEA in this case) actually cares about the vita and will support it even if it's not selling that well.

Or be more conservative with their money. Sony is not that thriving company it used to be.

SCEA should at least be developing original games for the vita, but they can make sure that the development costs for the games they develop is low so that they can make back the money they may lose from developing these games.Some people don't want a vita because SCEA is not that confident in the product they helped to bring to the US market.Instead of publishing original games for the console(like Nintendo is doing with the WiiU) they are pretty much promoting indie games and ports which can mostly be played on other platforms. Some potential vita owners don't want to play these games on the Vita. I'm not saying that indie games and ports are bad. SCEA barely markets the Vita in the first place. I get that sony is having money issues right now,but they really don't need to spend a lot of money to create original games for the vita if they plan out the amount they want to spend on these games.The vita will sell to more than 2200 people per week according to last month's NDP numbers if SCEA actually cared about, but sadly the vita will continue to sell as low as 10k per month in the US if SCEA keeps on ignoring it.

#114 Posted by TrappedInABox91 (719 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

Yes, playing ports of console games tethered to battery sucking Wifi on your couch on a tiny screen next to your fifty inch TV which can play those same games is a much better thing than the loads of original new games the 3DS gets.

"loads..." oh please........ don't try to pull the wool over a 3DS owner's eyes... it gets a few good games a year.

battery lasts 5 hours... never a problem for me.... EVER. that tiny screen is still 10x better than the crap 2 screen idea nintendo still try to plug as useful.

don't get the point though.... I've used remote play for my home home adress while my PS4 is active in my flat.... and it works fine (got good internet on both ends)..

3ds "loads of original good games" bwhhahahaha talk about far fetched....

Butt hurt are we? Theres a damn good reason why the 3DS has like 40 million sales more than the Vita.

Believing in the Vita is far fetched at this point.

#115 Edited by SolidGame_basic (17884 posts) -

@TrappedInABox91 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

Yes, playing ports of console games tethered to battery sucking Wifi on your couch on a tiny screen next to your fifty inch TV which can play those same games is a much better thing than the loads of original new games the 3DS gets.

"loads..." oh please........ don't try to pull the wool over a 3DS owner's eyes... it gets a few good games a year.

battery lasts 5 hours... never a problem for me.... EVER. that tiny screen is still 10x better than the crap 2 screen idea nintendo still try to plug as useful.

don't get the point though.... I've used remote play for my home home adress while my PS4 is active in my flat.... and it works fine (got good internet on both ends)..

3ds "loads of original good games" bwhhahahaha talk about far fetched....

Butt hurt are we? Theres a damn good reason why the 3DS has like 40 million sales more than the Vita.

Believing in the Vita is far fetched at this point.

Sales don't mean it's a better system. They are aimed at two different markets. 3DS is a much more casual device that appeals to people of all ages. Many parents by these systems for their young kids. If you don't believe just look at the types of games that come out or look at the commercials. Very different market. The PSP/Vita was created for older more hardcore gamers. I own both systems, and I found myself playing my Vita just because most 3DS games are too casual for me. It also doesn't help that I've played those same Nintendo franchises ever since I've been gaming.

#116 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

I think gamers are starting to see portable gaming for the gimmick it truly is, hence the failure of the Vita. Mind you that I don't know how well its competition is doing and am just speaking out of my anus.

#117 Edited by onewiththegame (4248 posts) -

By gamers for gamers eh Sony

#118 Edited by B4X (5074 posts) -

Sony must just hate money. Who says this shit? The gods of the PR fools?

Here's to 5 more years of quarterly billion dollar loses.

#119 Edited by Kjranu (1029 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

I think gamers are starting to see portable gaming for the gimmick it truly is, hence the failure of the Vita. Mind you that I don't know how well its competition is doing and am just speaking out of my anus.

It's been a gimmick since GameGear and Lynx but Nintendo has been the only one who's pulled it off.

#120 Edited by Salt_The_Fries (8971 posts) -

So now Vita is relegated to being a glorified companion piece to PS4. Which was probably Sony's plan all along!

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

#121 Edited by santoron (7769 posts) -

If the releases we've had so far this year and announced for the rest of 2014 are indicative of the terrible future Char is on about then count me as more than satisfied.

#122 Edited by cainetao11 (17691 posts) -

@finalfantasy94 said:

I dont agree with the users post calling something like uncharted vita just decent.It was actually a nice job of getting uncharted on the handheld and making it work.To be honest iv been busy with my vita mainly thanks to jpn devs.Im playing coneption 2 right now and still have demon gaze and others down the line.

Yeah I liked Uncharted vita as well.

#123 Edited by SolidGame_basic (17884 posts) -

@cainetao11 said:

@finalfantasy94 said:

I dont agree with the users post calling something like uncharted vita just decent.It was actually a nice job of getting uncharted on the handheld and making it work.To be honest iv been busy with my vita mainly thanks to jpn devs.Im playing coneption 2 right now and still have demon gaze and others down the line.

Yeah I liked Uncharted vita as well.

The Vita had a much better launch lineup than the 3DS did. I got the notion that people prejudged games like Uncharted Golden Abyss, LBP, Wipeout 2048, Super Stardust, etc, just because they share the same name as their console counter part. But they are actually good games. Also, about the japanese/western AAA thing - what Western games have come to 3DS? At least we had some with Tearaway, Killzone, LBP, etc. All great games. And then there's indie which is fantastic on Vita.

#124 Posted by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

Nice cop out.... you know what other genres has insane replayability, lots of new content every other month? the MMO... what console company is so pathetic that they don't allow cross-platform services? when cows can play FFXIV: ARR AND Titanfall what pathetic comeback will you have then?

"Cows are for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales" ..... says the guy with the console with ironically less games and a company out of touch with reality.... and has literally nothing coming this year even remasters because as a company they have squat.

#125 Edited by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@TrappedInABox91 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@charizard1605 said:

So, when asked point blank about whether Sony would even bother putting original big games on the Vita anymore, they flat out said no, because there is no point.

Their words:

So, it sounds like the Vita is doomed to being a PS Now/Remote Play/multiplat-port-indie trash receptacle for you all. I am sure the people who spent the money on buying it with the promise of a high end handheld experience are very happy with this.

you make this sound like a bad thing.... when in reality what he says makes it in the long term, by far the best handheld device.

f*ck smash bros 0.5 edition... mario kart 13948712938712 and the one or 2 good game on 3DS ... this now has a backlog of amazing games old and new.

Yes, playing ports of console games tethered to battery sucking Wifi on your couch on a tiny screen next to your fifty inch TV which can play those same games is a much better thing than the loads of original new games the 3DS gets.

"loads..." oh please........ don't try to pull the wool over a 3DS owner's eyes... it gets a few good games a year.

battery lasts 5 hours... never a problem for me.... EVER. that tiny screen is still 10x better than the crap 2 screen idea nintendo still try to plug as useful.

don't get the point though.... I've used remote play for my home home adress while my PS4 is active in my flat.... and it works fine (got good internet on both ends)..

3ds "loads of original good games" bwhhahahaha talk about far fetched....

Butt hurt are we? Theres a damn good reason why the 3DS has like 40 million sales more than the Vita.

Believing in the Vita is far fetched at this point.

damn good reasons? there are damn good reasons for both. pokemon is outdated gameplay crapness.... I felt like I was playing a 5 year olds game I breezed through without a damn loss.

The first party, fire emblem, bravely default... fantastic. now what?

just wait another year for 1 maybe 2 more great games.... to collect dust because the device is so dated it lags on pokemon in 3D mode...

PS Vita is so much nicer to use.

Obviously it won't win sales now, but its a damn better device that will be able to ironically play more games... and more varied genres....

not my fault people like crap dual screen plastic. Nintendo sucks at hardware... completely. and if your not w*nking yourself crazy to the same old first party... I can see why a portable "modern gaming" multiplat machine could be the better choice.

if it was all about exclusives I would agree... but for a handheld... I see far more value in the Vita.

#126 Edited by Big_Pecks (5345 posts) -

This is all that the Vita has even appeared to be, but it's kind of sad that they're giving up.

#127 Posted by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@b4x said:

Sony must just hate money. Who says this shit? The gods of the PR fools?

Here's to 5 more years of quarterly billion dollar loses.

replace this with an x1 or wii u and the same can be said for them.

say that to any big microsoft product at the moment and the truth woudl apply.

#128 Edited by cainetao11 (17691 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic said:

@cainetao11 said:

@finalfantasy94 said:

I dont agree with the users post calling something like uncharted vita just decent.It was actually a nice job of getting uncharted on the handheld and making it work.To be honest iv been busy with my vita mainly thanks to jpn devs.Im playing coneption 2 right now and still have demon gaze and others down the line.

Yeah I liked Uncharted vita as well.

The Vita had a much better launch lineup than the 3DS did. I got the notion that people prejudged games like Uncharted Golden Abyss, LBP, Wipeout 2048, Super Stardust, etc, just because they share the same name as their console counter part. But they are actually good games. Also, about the japanese/western AAA thing - what Western games have come to 3DS? At least we had some with Tearaway, Killzone, LBP, etc. All great games. And then there's indie which is fantastic on Vita.

Agree. I was a huge fan of KZ Mercenary. Game and the online were fun. I love my vita, and hope there are more non Japanese titles for it. But I do have a slew of games non the less, and I never get tired of MGS on it.

#129 Posted by RR360DD (11976 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

Nice cop out.... you know what other genres has insane replayability, lots of new content every other month? the MMO... what console company is so pathetic that they don't allow cross-platform services? when cows can play FFXIV: ARR AND Titanfall what pathetic comeback will you have then?

"Cows are for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales" ..... says the guy with the console with ironically less games and a company out of touch with reality.... and has literally nothing coming this year even remasters because as a company they have squat.

How about the fact i can play FFXIV and Titanfall as well.

Are you trying to be hilariously stupid on purpose?

"has literally nothing coming this year"

Yeah nice try. You've just fallen flat on your face.

#130 Edited by Warlord_Irochi (1270 posts) -

You only need to come to the "system wars" forums to remember why half society sees gamers as childs, and the other half as a bunch of loosers. Clicking that link to this post was a bad idea indeed...

Fanboys, bunch of moronic zealots loyal to a piece of plastic and silicon... what a disgrace.

Going back to play games, you keep going with your pointless arguments if you think that is going to be worth something in your lifes.

#131 Posted by Cyberdot (3538 posts) -

Gaming on handhelds and mobiles is never a good experience apart from sitting on the toilet, so you wouldn't get good games on those devices.

(hell, who plays handhelds and mobiles these days?)

#132 Edited by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

Nice cop out.... you know what other genres has insane replayability, lots of new content every other month? the MMO... what console company is so pathetic that they don't allow cross-platform services? when cows can play FFXIV: ARR AND Titanfall what pathetic comeback will you have then?

"Cows are for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales" ..... says the guy with the console with ironically less games and a company out of touch with reality.... and has literally nothing coming this year even remasters because as a company they have squat.

How about the fact i can play FFXIV and Titanfall as well.

Are you trying to be hilariously stupid on purpose?

"has literally nothing coming this year"

Yeah nice try. You've just fallen flat on your face.

bringing pc into it?

What is coming this year unique to x1? unshown halo title? that awful looking tps shooter... whatever its called.

#133 Posted by Blabadon (26544 posts) -

@Cyberdot said:

Gaming on handhelds and mobiles is never a good experience apart from sitting on the toilet, so you wouldn't get good games on those devices.

(hell, who plays handhelds and mobiles these days?)

lol ignorance and CyberDot, it's amazing how often these two come together.

#134 Edited by fgjnfgh (2630 posts) -

as long as I get Ys and other Japanese games then I am totally fine.

#135 Posted by trugs26 (5549 posts) -

#VitaMeansLife

#136 Posted by SolidGame_basic (17884 posts) -

@cainetao11 said:

@SolidGame_basic said:

@cainetao11 said:

@finalfantasy94 said:

I dont agree with the users post calling something like uncharted vita just decent.It was actually a nice job of getting uncharted on the handheld and making it work.To be honest iv been busy with my vita mainly thanks to jpn devs.Im playing coneption 2 right now and still have demon gaze and others down the line.

Yeah I liked Uncharted vita as well.

The Vita had a much better launch lineup than the 3DS did. I got the notion that people prejudged games like Uncharted Golden Abyss, LBP, Wipeout 2048, Super Stardust, etc, just because they share the same name as their console counter part. But they are actually good games. Also, about the japanese/western AAA thing - what Western games have come to 3DS? At least we had some with Tearaway, Killzone, LBP, etc. All great games. And then there's indie which is fantastic on Vita.

Agree. I was a huge fan of KZ Mercenary. Game and the online were fun. I love my vita, and hope there are more non Japanese titles for it. But I do have a slew of games non the less, and I never get tired of MGS on it.

I'm sure there will be more non-Japanese games like KZ Mercenary and Uncharted. The system is way too early in the cycle to not throw it a bone here and there.

#137 Posted by lundy86_4 (43511 posts) -

@Cyberdot said:

Gaming on handhelds and mobiles is never a good experience apart from sitting on the toilet, so you wouldn't get good games on those devices.

(hell, who plays handhelds and mobiles these days?)

I use my Vita and 3DS, as there are some great titles on both systems.

#138 Edited by cainetao11 (17691 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic: vita was a god send on field training in the army. Used power off 3k generator and play uncharted or ngs on it.

#139 Posted by Locutus_Picard (3981 posts) -

I'd rather be a Vita-bro than a 20-30 y/o still clingin on to Nintendo.

#140 Posted by RR360DD (11976 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

Nice cop out.... you know what other genres has insane replayability, lots of new content every other month? the MMO... what console company is so pathetic that they don't allow cross-platform services? when cows can play FFXIV: ARR AND Titanfall what pathetic comeback will you have then?

"Cows are for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales" ..... says the guy with the console with ironically less games and a company out of touch with reality.... and has literally nothing coming this year even remasters because as a company they have squat.

How about the fact i can play FFXIV and Titanfall as well.

Are you trying to be hilariously stupid on purpose?

"has literally nothing coming this year"

Yeah nice try. You've just fallen flat on your face.

bringing pc into it?

What is coming this year unique to x1? unshown halo title? that awful looking tps shooter... whatever its called.

Didn't you just bring the PC into it by saying cows can play FF and Titanfall? Or are you another one still holding hope it will one day launch on the latestation4?

Halo. Sunset Overdrive. Quantum Break. Versus DelayClub and The Order from some PSP developer.

Or how about whats released so far. Ryse. Forza. Killer Instinct. Dead Rising 3. Versus Knack, Flopfamous and Clownzone.

inb4 lolryse or you start talking about quality ... Knack and Clownzone are garbage as well. At least the XOne has an AAAE.

#141 Edited by MBirdy88 (8308 posts) -

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

Just like the PS4 then.

Cows are in for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales.

as apposed to you with nothing new to play other than an EA multiplat shooter that will end up on PS4.

You mean Titanfall with fantastic replayability that I still play daily and enjoy tremendously?

Yeah you're totally right. Once (if it ever does) end up on the PS4 I just won't be able to enjoy it on my XOne at all. In fact I'll probably bin it.

Nice cop out.... you know what other genres has insane replayability, lots of new content every other month? the MMO... what console company is so pathetic that they don't allow cross-platform services? when cows can play FFXIV: ARR AND Titanfall what pathetic comeback will you have then?

"Cows are for a tough gen once they realise you can't play sales" ..... says the guy with the console with ironically less games and a company out of touch with reality.... and has literally nothing coming this year even remasters because as a company they have squat.

How about the fact i can play FFXIV and Titanfall as well.

Are you trying to be hilariously stupid on purpose?

"has literally nothing coming this year"

Yeah nice try. You've just fallen flat on your face.

bringing pc into it?

What is coming this year unique to x1? unshown halo title? that awful looking tps shooter... whatever its called.

Didn't you just bring the PC into it by saying cows can play FF and Titanfall? Or are you another one still holding hope it will one day launch on the latestation4?

Halo. Sunset Overdrive. Quantum Break. Versus DelayClub and The Order from some PSP developer.

Or how about whats released so far. Ryse. Forza. Killer Instinct. Dead Rising 3. Versus Knack, Flopfamous and Clownzone.

inb4 lolryse or you start talking about quality ... Knack and Clownzone are garbage as well. At least the XOne has an AAAE.

no? I said IF titanfall loses its non-PS4 status they can play both... which is looking highly likely....

Halo won't release this year... and its become so irrelavant its funny. Quantum break won't be out this year I bet either...

funny how you say psp developer when friggin sunset overdrive devs are crap too.

#142 Posted by RR360DD (11976 posts) -

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

@MBirdy88 said:

@RR360DD said:

How about the fact i can play FFXIV and Titanfall as well.

Are you trying to be hilariously stupid on purpose?

"has literally nothing coming this year"

Yeah nice try. You've just fallen flat on your face.

bringing pc into it?

What is coming this year unique to x1? unshown halo title? that awful looking tps shooter... whatever its called.

Didn't you just bring the PC into it by saying cows can play FF and Titanfall? Or are you another one still holding hope it will one day launch on the latestation4?

Halo. Sunset Overdrive. Quantum Break. Versus DelayClub and The Order from some PSP developer.

Or how about whats released so far. Ryse. Forza. Killer Instinct. Dead Rising 3. Versus Knack, Flopfamous and Clownzone.

inb4 lolryse or you start talking about quality ... Knack and Clownzone are garbage as well. At least the XOne has an AAAE.

no? I said IF titanfall loses its non-PS4 status they can play both... which is looking highly likely....

Halo won't release this year... and its become so irrelavant its funny. Quantum break won't be out this year I bet either...

funny how you say psp developer when friggin sunset overdrive devs are crap too.

Who knows if / when that will happen. Meanwhile XOne is getting the next Final Fantasy installment confirmed. So I still don't see your point.

Halo will release this year (probably halo 2 anniversary). Its been confirmed so many times is not even funny anymore. Quantum Break was announced at E3 as a year one title. Maybe its been delayed (remedylol) but nothings been said about it yet.

Insomniac are great devs, they just need to stick to what they know. Resistance games were total garbage and I don't even know what the hell Fuse was but their ratchet and clank games have always been awesome.

#143 Posted by ShadowDeathX (10671 posts) -

I'm going to go against all of System Wars, but I see that as good thing. I didn't buy a PS Vita to play more super big budget, blockbuster, HUGE marketed games. I actually prefer indies, smaller and medium budget games to fuel the handhelds, PS Vita and 3DS.

Keep all that AAA blockbuster, multi-million dollar software on the home consoles and PC.

Thank You :)

#144 Edited by LadyBlue (3929 posts) -

It's all a ploy. They will surprise everyone at e3.

#145 Posted by bezza2011 (2548 posts) -

@charizard1605 said:

@bezza2011 said:

It's called the system ain't selling so they can't afford to develop for PS4 and Vita, I mean the system should be alright with third party and remote play and ps+ games, it should be

It's called 'you are supposed to support your own system with games no matter what its sales are like, or you risk losing consumer confidence.'

I'm pretty sure they just cannot afford to anymore, they need to put there resources into what's selling to gain some money back and at the moment that's PS4, your not supposed to do anything it's there business not ours.