Should gamespot score Titanfall down for poor graphics?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Edited 1 year, 19 days ago

Poll: Should gamespot score Titanfall down for poor graphics? (11 votes)

Titanfall should be rightly scored down for poor graphics 55%
Graphics aren't important 45%

(Can't make poll in official thread)

From the current visuals shown, Titanfalls visuals are... questionable.

Whenever I read comments on gaming forums regarding the source engine (Titanfall runs on it) I see the comments "oh it's so outdated, valve engine sucks" e.t.c.... (which I don't agree with btw)

So, when the title is released and assuming the visuals do not remain up to scratch (and it is shaping up that way) should Titanfall be called out on it?

For comparison, this is a high res Titanfall screenshot from eurogamer.

Click me

And this is a screenshot from Black Mesa, running on an old version of source.

Vote please. Thank you.

#1 Edited by uninspiredcup (10113 posts) -

Titanfall.

#2 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17297 posts) -

Black Mesa was free, Titanfall is not.

#3 Edited by uninspiredcup (10113 posts) -

@R4gn4r0k said:

Black Mesa was free, Titanfall is not.

Exactly. Even worse.

#4 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17297 posts) -

@uninspiredcup said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

Black Mesa was free, Titanfall is not.

Exactly. Even worse.

I saw a Valve/Ea comparison today, so allow me to make one myself:

If valve was EA they would've sold Black Mesa and released the last part as paid DLC.