Damn lems showing their ignorance once again, i guess it is a pre requisite for being a lem that you have to be ignorant and/or dumb.
Sort of like your sentence structure? Proper structure would have used a period rather than a comma, as you already had your group and subject defined. The next is a hypothesis of your first statement.
aw how cute, you don't have any argument so you are going to talk bs about commas and points, go on.
No different than you and your spelling insults.
hahaha oh man you must be dumber than i thought. Grasping at straws. Not my fault that lems show to be so incredibly ignorant
By all means enlighten me. What "argument" did you make by insulting that user's misuse of the term parity?
Don't worry about him. Its been corrected hours ago and he completely dodged the whole point of the thread anyway. let him celebrate his "win"
what win i just pointed out you don't know what parity is because you are an ignorant guy talking about stuff he doesn't have a clue about.