Rainbow Six Siege is amazing

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2
#1 Posted by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

1)No cover system

2)No Regenerating Health

3)No radar

4)Very limited ammo and flash

Gameplay video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz46vAY-Ssk

If you no voice chat then you don´t even know what other team players are going to do or where are you going. No team work = you lose game.

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

#2 Posted by Blabadon (28917 posts) -

Meh.

#3 Posted by uninspiredcup (13534 posts) -
@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

My friend. No.

#4 Edited by delete-SimplyFatal (1122 posts) -

omg that console framerate. I'm sorry but I need fps games to be 60+. I'm still deciding if i should give ubisoft any of my money. Been going strong for 3-4 years.

EDIT: Nvm its PC. i just self-owned myself

#5 Posted by clyde46 (47816 posts) -

Women being used as a hostage. Not buying.

#6 Edited by silversix_ (16552 posts) -

It must be mediocre times if no cover/no health regen/no radar is what makes a game amazing

#7 Edited by clyde46 (47816 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

It must be mediocre times if no cover/no health regen/no radar is what makes a game amazing

Such is modern gaming.

#8 Posted by BldgIrsh (3011 posts) -

Sounds like counter strike...

#9 Posted by cfisher2833 (2150 posts) -

I'll get hyped when I see some single player with open levels, slower gameplay, and a team that I can issue numerous, complex orders to. Until then, I won't believe for a second that Ubisoft is investing millions of dollars into the development of what's now considered a fairly niche genre (tactical FPSs).

#10 Edited by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

meh. looks pretty bad. very linear game. and it looks NOTHING like classic Rainbow six games.

Did you see red big arrow showing enemies attacking you??

#11 Posted by MrYaotubo (2798 posts) -

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

#12 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

maybe he mean since long time. but i dont agree with it.

Siege looks crap like any modern "tactical" shooter.

#13 Posted by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

So, taking cover and waiting till enemy comes and you take him down with unlimited ammo and regain health is Rainbow Six game? Oldest Rainbow Six games did not have any radar or cover system. I played those old games unlike you who played only "modern casual rainbow six game" where you can take cover and see enemy too without worring that he sees you.

NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY CONSOLE GAMER

#14 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

So, taking cover and waiting till enemy comes and you take him down with unlimited ammo and regain health is Rainbow Six game? Oldest Rainbow Six games did not have any radar or cover system. I played those old games unlike you who played only "modern casual rainbow six game" where you can take cover and see enemy too without worring that he sees you.

NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY CONSOLE GAMER

but this is also casual rainbow six game. game is primilary design with xbox controller in mind. they showcase game running on xbox one with xbox controller.

#15 Posted by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

@system-reboot said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

So, taking cover and waiting till enemy comes and you take him down with unlimited ammo and regain health is Rainbow Six game? Oldest Rainbow Six games did not have any radar or cover system. I played those old games unlike you who played only "modern casual rainbow six game" where you can take cover and see enemy too without worring that he sees you.

NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY CONSOLE GAMER

but this is also casual rainbow six game. game is primilary design with xbox controller in mind. they showcase game running on xbox one with xbox controller.

Behind PC??? This game is about tactic. You can´t go attack from roof or plant bombs or know where to go when you don´t communate with people. You can´t see where is your other 4 players when you don´t write or use voice chat. No radar, limited ammo, limited health, NO COVER SYSTEM.

99% shooters uses now cover system. Old classic games not.

#16 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@system-reboot said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

So, taking cover and waiting till enemy comes and you take him down with unlimited ammo and regain health is Rainbow Six game? Oldest Rainbow Six games did not have any radar or cover system. I played those old games unlike you who played only "modern casual rainbow six game" where you can take cover and see enemy too without worring that he sees you.

NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY CONSOLE GAMER

but this is also casual rainbow six game. game is primilary design with xbox controller in mind. they showcase game running on xbox one with xbox controller.

Behind PC??? This game is about tactic. You can´t go attack from roof or plant bombs or know where to go when you don´t communate with people. You can´t see where is your other 4 players when you don´t write or use voice chat. No radar, limited ammo, limited health, NO COVER SYSTEM.

99% shooters uses now cover system. Old classic games not.

so why they are heavy focusing on MP? cant they make a decent AI?

and judging by footage it was extremely linear. tiny map design.

#17 Posted by Promised_Trini (3637 posts) -

I am going to wait and see how this game comes along.

#18 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

#19 Posted by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

@system-reboot said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@system-reboot said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@MrYaotubo said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Finally first Rainbow Six game that it based on tactic, not just cover and shoot.

Shows how much you know about Rainbow Six.

So, taking cover and waiting till enemy comes and you take him down with unlimited ammo and regain health is Rainbow Six game? Oldest Rainbow Six games did not have any radar or cover system. I played those old games unlike you who played only "modern casual rainbow six game" where you can take cover and see enemy too without worring that he sees you.

NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY CONSOLE GAMER

but this is also casual rainbow six game. game is primilary design with xbox controller in mind. they showcase game running on xbox one with xbox controller.

Behind PC??? This game is about tactic. You can´t go attack from roof or plant bombs or know where to go when you don´t communate with people. You can´t see where is your other 4 players when you don´t write or use voice chat. No radar, limited ammo, limited health, NO COVER SYSTEM.

99% shooters uses now cover system. Old classic games not.

so why they are heavy focusing on MP? cant they make a decent AI?

and judging by footage it was extremely linear. tiny map design.

CO-OP games are for single-player or for multiplayer?

You saying that Left 4 Dead should be SinglePlayer game than multiplayer game. This is what you are saying.

Linear? It was 1 map. Other maps can be big. This is awesome map because you can destroy all walls, floors, doors and stuff like that(even in Battlefield you could not destroy so much). Also this is realistic to have house like that and have hostage situation.

Other Rainbow Six Siege maps will have "more destruction", take place in "international locations" and remain small: "we're never going to go super large scale".

If you watched demo, in fact there were 2 houses where you could go with hostage and map was large. Counter-Strike the office map is not large, in fact it´s smaller than this demo map

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

You hate realism.

#20 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@FreedomFreeLife said:

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

You hate realism.

And you're a wife beater.

#21 Edited by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@FreedomFreeLife said:

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

You hate realism.

And you're a wife beater.

Elite people do not beat their wife like me. If i was wife beater then she would go away.

Open your eyes. Come to reality. Don´t live in dream world you communist who can´t survive in capitalism world. No wonder why you such a poor SLAVE.

#22 Edited by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

Stop acting like feminists.

#23 Posted by AdolescentDon (9081 posts) -

I don't think the game looks that great, i didn't get the feeling like the team were playing effectively together.

#24 Posted by FoxbatAlpha (9439 posts) -

Will they bring back the "Elite" rank? I still have my rubber bands.

#25 Edited by HitmanActual (429 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@FreedomFreeLife said:

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

You hate realism.

And you're a wife beater.

#26 Edited by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

Stop acting like feminists.

Stop acting like sniper.

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Elite people do not beat their wife like me. If i was wife beater then she would go away.

Open your eyes. Come to reality. Don´t live in dream world you communist who can´t survive in capitalism world. No wonder why you such a poor SLAVE.

@hitmanactual said:

This. Exactly this. Men are pathetic.

#27 Edited by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:

This. Exactly this. Men are pathetic.

We men are also humans and want equal rights as women.

#28 Edited by Gue1 (11596 posts) -

what? No cover system? The game went from anticipated to not giving a fuck. What will it be then? Another twitchy FPS game like Call of Duty but with some crappy destruction and no regen health? Meh.

In fact, this looks very COD like. Right at the beginning 2 get killed, so it seems this is designed to be beatable by one guy alone. =/

Blow up teh floor, the walls, the doors, kill everything that moves, run with hostage = win. OMG so tactical! The enemies can't even see the freaking camera running around in front of them.. Enemies are marked with arrow. They don't hear you breaking through the windows either. It's been a while since the last time I've seen this much fail in a game. Even MGSV with them body counts seems to be more tactical than this shit.

I know the E3 demo was staged as fuck but actual gameplay looks nothing like that.

Loading Video...

#29 Posted by airshocker (31210 posts) -

I'll be getting this game for quite a few reasons. The most important being I enjoy team shooters and I particularly like playing with a good team. I have four other friends who play these types of games so I won't need to rely on pubbies to do anything. I also prefer multiplayer games, and this game seems like it's going to be all MP. I don't need a tacked on SP that won't do anything but take time away from designing MP.

#30 Edited by FreedomFreeLife (3186 posts) -

@Gue1 said:

what? No cover system? The game went from anticipated to not giving a fuck. What will it be then? Another twitchy FPS game like Call of Duty but with some crappy destruction and no regen health? Meh.

So you are noob. NOOB. NOOB CASUAL NOOB. LEARN TO PLAY.

#31 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

We men are also humans and want equal rights as women.

You gots all the rights you need. Where's the female in Assailant's Creed: Unity?

Equal, my hiney.

#32 Posted by parkurtommo (28026 posts) -

Who cares if there is no regen or cover, it's still a fucking shooter.

Yeah, I'll probably buy it eventually. But god damn it doesn't deserve any hype at all.

#33 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@system-reboot said:

We men are also humans and want equal rights as women.

You gots all the rights you need. Where's the female in Assailant's Creed: Unity?

Equal, my hiney.

AC is casual game. theres plenty of female supporting character even jade raymon creator of franchise is female. what else more you need?

gaming is man's hobby and its not going to change.

#34 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6256 posts) -

I'll wait for single player gameplay before I start getting excited. Hopefully it'll be something closer to classic Rainbow Six.

#35 Posted by parkurtommo (28026 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:

Considering how it objectifies women, hell no.

This game shouldn't be allowed to be sold.

I'm sorry freedom but that's just pure irony.

I can't tell if any of your posts are serious these days. Then again, it's hard to take SW seriously isn't it lol

#36 Edited by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

AC is casual game. theres plenty of female supporting character even jade raymon creator of franchise is female. what else more you need?

gaming is man's hobby and its not going to change.

Oh, I see. Females just there for supporting. Not much else. Just hanging out in the background until the man needs something.
And her name is Jade Rayman, you sicko.

I'm not even going to touch that last part of your post, because I might just flip mah shit. And SW knows what happens when fweadum flips his/her shit.

#37 Edited by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@parkurtommo said:

I'm sorry freedom but that's just pure irony.

I can't tell if any of your posts are serious these days. Then again, it's hard to take SW seriously isn't it lol

You're so beautiful.

#38 Posted by blangenakker (2641 posts) -

Well I suppose consoles don't get that many games like it.

#39 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:

@system-reboot said:

AC is casual game. theres plenty of female supporting character even jade raymon creator of franchise is female. what else more you need?

gaming is man's hobby and its not going to change.

Oh, I see. Females just there for supporting. Not much else. Just hanging out in the background until the man needs something.

And her name is Jade Rayman, you sicko.

I'm not even going to touch that last part of your post, because I might just flip mah shit. And SW knows what happens when fweadum flips his/her shit.

so you want every game to have female main character? even Doom guy?

#40 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

so you want every game to have female main character? even Doom guy?

Every shingle game. That's equality. Doom Guy would be Doom Gal. It would bring Doom narrative to a whole new level.

#41 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@system-reboot said:

so you want every game to have female main character? even Doom guy?

Every shingle game. That's equality. Doom Guy would be Doom Gal. It would bring Doom narrative to a whole new level.

i will quit gaming if it will happen. thankfully developers are not listening to feminists.

i mean really Doom is one badass game. you pick shotgun fast paced blow up demon head.

why dont you play final fantasy if you want girly type games?

#42 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

i will quit gaming if it will happen. thankfully developers are not listening to feminists.

i mean really Doom is one badass game. you pick shotgun fast paced blow up demon head.

why dont you play final fantasy if you want girly type games?

Pick up shotgun and fast paced blow up demon head is so last year.

I play Final Fantasy because the girls have nice tits and are always hot looking.

#43 Posted by TheEroica (14617 posts) -

I refuse to play a game that shows women in dangerous situations where feelings could be hurt because Tom told me I should be offended... sorry guys. Let me know how it is.... :(

#44 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -
@freedomfreak said:?

Pick up shotgun and fast paced blow up demon head is so last year.

I

i know. last year's best game was shadow warrior. would not you say Lo wang was badass?

#45 Edited by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

i know. last year's best game was shadow warrior. would not you say Lo wang was badass?

I looked up Lo Wang, and this is what I got. What kinda game is Lo wang was badass?

#46 Edited by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -
@freedomfreak said:

I looked up Lo Wang, and this is what I got. What kinda game is Lo wang was badass?

you look up wrong.

lo wang even make bioshock infinite 10 times better. i mean look up on youtube lo wang invade bioshock infinite.

no one can mess with lo wang.

#47 Posted by freedomfreak (44524 posts) -
@system-reboot said:

you look up wrong.

lo wang even make bioshock infinite 10 times better. i mean look up on youtube lo wang invade bioshock infinite.

no one can mess with lo wang.

I look up Lo wang. ohmygod I just watched that video. I was laughing all the way through it. Very funny. Uber nitro.

Ja, although there's Chell from Portal. The only way you can see her is if you create a super portal deluxe dimension loop. It's almost poetic.

#48 Posted by ShoTTyMcNaDeS (2751 posts) -

CoD bro dudes and 9 year olds won't go for this as they can't lie on a pile of rocks or in a bush with their guillie suit or corner camp/ corner spray in this game.

Tactical FPS that demands teamwork?? Yes please!!!!

#49 Edited by Cranler (8809 posts) -

A tactical shooter with no cover system? It must have leaning then right? Shouldn't only arcadey shooter like Serious Sam not have cover systems?

#50 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (658 posts) -

@Cranler said:

A tactical shooter with no cover system? It must have leaning then right? Shouldn't only arcadey shooter like Serious Sam not have cover systems?

No game should have cover system. NONE.

tactical shooter should have lean. arcadey shooter should be fast paced.