Rainbow six patriots is E3 2014 WINNER

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
#1 Edited by FreedomFreeLife (3948 posts) -

Everyone who played SWAT 4 should know that Rainbow Six Siege is clear winner. It´s not about running in and shooting random stuff. (Like Battlefield, Call of Duty, Counter Strike, Killzone, Halo, Destiny). This time it´s all about team tactic. You die, you dead. You can´t respawn. Every time game is different because hostage is every game at different places, there are different ways to go in. Also it depends do Terrorist team split or stay all in 1 room? Also terrorists can set up different traps at different places and stuff like that. First time we have game where we can play SWAT vs. Terrorits.

BEST OF ALL, YOU CAN´T TAKE COVER AND SEE THIRD PERSON VIEW. ITS ALL FULLY FIRST PERSON!!

Avatar image for Jebus213
#2 Posted by Jebus213 (8963 posts) -

Even this game looks too complicated for the average console player.

Avatar image for Nick3306
#3 Edited by Nick3306 (2841 posts) -

@Jebus213 said:

Even this game looks too complicated for the average console player.

Lol that's what I was thinking.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#4 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

Splitscreen ?

Avatar image for Bigboi500
#5 Posted by Bigboi500 (35550 posts) -

Meh.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
#6 Posted by R3FURBISHED (11361 posts) -

Nice blog, I'm glad there was a game at E3 that you enjoyed seeing. :)

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
#7 Posted by FreedomFreeLife (3948 posts) -

@Jebus213 said:

Even this game looks too complicated for the average console player.

And those people are going to say: "meh"

Let´s see how many people say it´s bad. Mostly console gamers. They hate all hardcore games.

Avatar image for Sollet
#8 Posted by Sollet (8000 posts) -

Nah not really, it looked alright.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
#9 Posted by Bigboi500 (35550 posts) -

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@Jebus213 said:

Even this game looks too complicated for the average console player.

And those people are going to say: "meh"

Let´s see how many people say it´s bad. Mostly console gamers. They hate all hardcore games.

You're so hardcore.

Avatar image for Jebus213
#10 Edited by Jebus213 (8963 posts) -
@Bigboi500 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

@Jebus213 said:

Even this game looks too complicated for the average console player.

And those people are going to say: "meh"

Let´s see how many people say it´s bad. Mostly console gamers. They hate all hardcore games.

You're so hardcore.

Are you really expecting casual 15 year old console players to play like PC gamers in Swat 4 and Rainbow Six 3?

Avatar image for Shmiity
#11 Posted by Shmiity (5841 posts) -

**** all of you guys, I'm just happy we're getting a new Rainbow. It's been like 6 years. I almost don't care what it is, I am happy.

Avatar image for funkmaster1233
#12 Posted by funkmaster1233 (706 posts) -

Awesome.

Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
#13 Edited by ShoTTyMcNaDeS (2767 posts) -

The CoD and BF kids wont understand how to play a game like this. There wont be Apache's, massive killstreaks or tanks! I used to love Rainbow Six on the XBOX and loved Vegas 1 and 2 and I can't wait for this game to come out!

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
#14 Posted by uninspiredcup (19497 posts) -

Basically a casual counterstrike.

Well done? I guess.

Avatar image for amazonangry
#15 Posted by AmazonAngry (968 posts) -

Lol! Not even close.

No, we all know either Bloodborne or Uncharted were the winners.

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
#16 Posted by FoxbatAlpha (10669 posts) -

This actually was a nice surprise from UBI. I am pretty pumped for this game. Still looks like it has that old Vegas feel.

Avatar image for Suppaman100
#17 Posted by Suppaman100 (5250 posts) -

One of the best new announcements indeed.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
#18 Posted by MonsieurX (34996 posts) -

Far from it.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#19 Posted by NFJSupreme (6283 posts) -

ubisoft game which means is that even what the final game will look like? Why to early in development for a Ubisoft game to get excited.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
#20 Posted by uninspiredcup (19497 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

ubisoft game which means is that even what the final game will look like? Why to early in development for a Ubisoft game to get excited.

The Graphics aren't that great to begin with.

Avatar image for padaporra
#21 Edited by padaporra (3491 posts) -

Can't see what was good about this game.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#23 Posted by NFJSupreme (6283 posts) -

@uninspiredcup said:

@NFJSupreme said:

ubisoft game which means is that even what the final game will look like? Why to early in development for a Ubisoft game to get excited.

The Graphics aren't that great to begin with.

doesn't mean things wont change as far as presentation. It's ubisoft. This early in developments means things will most likely change from what we just saw.

Avatar image for scraper2k
#24 Posted by scraper2k (51 posts) -

FPS games have become more easy for gamers from when i was playing ghost recon etc, you had to aim in them days and didn't get a slight assist that you do now. This game looks epic and tactical!

CoD players will be screwed!

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#25 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

@scraper2k

I don't use Aim Assists.

Avatar image for scraper2k
#26 Posted by scraper2k (51 posts) -

@Lulu_Lulu: Most FPS come with it built in now. CoD has a wider hit target...

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
#27 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (19564 posts) -

@scraper2k

I stopped using them because sometimes it misses when my aim was dead on..... I get much more accurate headshots with it turned off.

Avatar image for napo_sp
#28 Posted by napo_sp (590 posts) -

too arcade... pass.

Avatar image for silversix_
#29 Edited by silversix_ (22604 posts) -

I find it funny that people think this is real gameplay