@FoxbatAlpha said:
The power is in the experience. Everyone I give a tour to, on my XBOX ONE, goes out and buys one. Some are even Sony fanboys who I watch make the fanboy switch right before my eyes.
Hardware wise the XBOX is only getting better. Destiny right on par with the PS4 as far as 1080p/30fps. I said it would happen and there is only more to come.
The PS4 still is a PS3 just version 2.0
Thats nothing every one i give a tour on my PS4 goes and buy 2,they say it is to good to just have 1.
Yeah just like Sniper Elite is on par right just because both games are 1080p doesn't mean they are on par,Tomb Raider and Sniper Elite 3 are a testament to that,they run much faster and look better on PS4.lol
That last bold part is silly because if the xbox one was a little weaker it would not even qualify as an xbox 360 2.0..hahahaha
It was running some games at the same resolution the 360 was on 2005..lol
@HalcyonScarlet said:
There's nothing valid about it. It's like when you're at school and someone giving you two stupid ultimatums and you HAD to pick. No, I am going with the best one I have access to.
Even if I did own both consoles, then I'd STILL have a capable PC because I need it for other stuff, so I'm getting the PC version. Let's say you have a PC and PS4, then what your going with the better one. We can circle the parameters all day long. But you can't discount the PC version just for the sake of it.
Last gen when the lems mocked the cows about multiplats, the cows said they'd get the PC version, so why is the card off the table this time?
I get the superior PC version,now was that hard to admit.? should i have dance 100 times like you and the others are doing.? So basically you answer his question you would go for the superior version,now since you claim to own a PC now we all know you are a die hard lemming that is just heart broken by MS weak specs,now you will get the PC version,i hope i don't hear you say that you got and inferior version for an xbox one because is fun making time.
Now not every one has a gaming PC,and there is a console market that is completely separate from PC which mean that they will chose from the PS4,xbox one and wii u,so fallowing that bold like in your argument since we establish that many millions of gamers will not go for PC or have one for gaming,they will have to chose between the PS4 and xbox one and by your own argument they should chose the superior PS4 one,because that is what you did on PC.
@scottpsfan14 said:
Prove that I'm a Playstation supporter? I am. Check my post history.
As of tediousness, I mean how you keep on talking about framerates and GPU's you got online that aren't as powerful as PS4 etc. It's the same old is all.
And I'm not an alter account. Why do you automatically assume so? lol.
What posting history fool you don't have 7 months here..hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Again don't like arguments and people saying the same.? Boy you are on the wrong place go to the PS or xbox sites because here is all argument all the time the same sh** every time,is systems wars.
@sts106mat said:
because he used an "alter account" himself with his "Eltormo" account, something he denied for years, but everyone knew due to him being stupid enough to post samples of his handwriting from both accounts......that was just gravy, the real proof was his obvious posting style.
Hypocritical Tormentos is fun for this forum, still arguing about AA batteries, 8 years later.....what's not to love
My Tormentso account is old than my eltormo account was..lol
And i forgot the email i had with my tormentos account which i may add is older than yours.
@StormyJoe said:
The XBox was 200% (some say as high as 400%) more powerful than PS2.
Sorry, but you are wrong.
No that is what MS claimed,compare NG to God of war 2,of GT4 to Forza,tekken 5 vs DOA and tell me the xbox was 2x more powerful,400% is a total joke of epic proportions,the units was 125 million polygons per second,the PS2 was 66 million polygons,the xbox had double memory,better texture filtering,the PS2 had a superior pixel fill rate to the xbox as well,which showed on games like MGS2 rain part where the xbox choke on that scene and had slow down,for that reason which you lemming accuse Kujima of favoring the PS2..lol
400% is an freaking joke,but there was something where the PS2 was 1000% superior games..
Which is why people didn't even care for the xbox or Halo,this gen the xbox doesn't have the power,doesn't have the games,and doesn't have the sales either is behind in everything.
When it comes to image quality and character models, you'd be hard pressed to find a better looking PlayStation 2 game than this. Tekken 5 looks simply astounding--way above and beyond what you would think the PlayStation 2 is capable of. The character models are smooth and lifelike, with skin tones and textures that make them look alive, as opposed to the plastic-looking fighters found in some other games. The backgrounds are widely varied, and some of them are even breathtaking. Again, it's the sort of stuff you'd expect from a high-end Xbox title or a great-looking PC game--not something you'd expect from the PlayStation 2 hardware.
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/tekken-5-review/1900-6119171/
Case in point Tekken 5 gamespot review..
The PS2 was also more difficult to make games than the xbox as well.
@sts106mat said:
Incoming -
"No is not moot stormytroll....hahaha.. is a fact PS3 was teh bigger power machine on launch without aa batteries and teh rippoff of pay for multiplayer. i will not do it i have say if a thousan times to you and other lem trolls on this site.
360 hass RORRD and canot be consider a true gen of console teh multiplats dont look any better and 360 cannot ever show a candle to ps3 exclusives like last og us, heavnely sowrd and teh unfactered.
oh wait......Ms gimped teh xb1 so you shold just give up already"
Forza 4 1280x720p 60FPS no weather,no dynamic day to nigh changes.
GT6 1280x1080p 60FPs with drops into the 40,Dynamic weather,Dynamic day to night changes.
If you ran Forza at 1280x1080p it would not be steady 60FPS period,there is a reason is not higher,that without even mention day to nigh and weather which turn 10 avoided in favor of PERFORMING 60FPS.
So yeah the PS3 could do more,hell Wipeout is 1080p 60FPS,when things get hot the resolutions drops dynamic to 1280x1080p still higher than Forza while not dropping a frame,oh and on Wipeout there are projectiles and things like that also add on the engine and still deliver.
Uncharted 3 > Gears 3.
Killzone 3 > every Halo on xbox 360.
Multiplatforms is another thing the xbox 360 was easier,and was the lead platforms almost always,still some were superior on PS3 to.
The PS3 could do more.
@sts106mat said:
funniest thing is, i could have probably gone on for at least another 160 lines with that mumbo jumbo and it would still make as much sense as your average Eltormo post.
haha. he knows we love him
That hypocrisy lemming oh wait you own a Ps4 that mean you are not a lemming right.? I guess last gen i wasn't a cow either since i owned every system while you only played a 360.? lol
@Snugenz said:
They're only relevant to fanboys such as yourself who are continually insecure about which corporation they obsess over and if they're better than the others. Just FYI to anyone who isn't a fanboy, your post just comes across as desperate justification.
I'm closeted about nothing buddy, i think cows are scum, you being one of the scummiest of them, which in no way makes me a lemming, if you were talking the same shite about Nintendo i'd be just as likely to call you out. The vast majority of your posts are anti-ms so me replying to your anti-MS posts is purely coincidental.
And lastly, the second portion of my post added to the discussion just fine, i even labelled it "On topic".
This coming from you is a total joke specially with your anti PS agenda,stop your sorry ass damage control bro.
Log in to comment