PS4 vs. Xbox One vs. PC new comparison

xsrr11 · 2013-11-14 05:03:56

PS41) Naughty dog, Sony Santa Monica, Quantic dream, Insomniac2) Lower price3) 50 % more powerful GPU4) The structure , which reduces the time during which the data is overwritten back from the cache memory to the graphics processor .5) The structure, which allows to set priorities in multiple layers on arithmetic and graphic processes.6) A function that causes the CPU to take on pre-treatment processes GPU.7) hUMA8) The structure that realizes high-speed transfer of data between the central (CPU) and graphics (GPU) processors.9) A high-speed memory10) The headphone jack in controller11) Support Second-hand GamesXbox One:1) The mythical esram that can not be stored up to 6 GB of tile resources , 6Gb RAM anyway will be needed, and the pumping speed is negligible for data streaming .Everyone who works with eSRAM xboxone to speak in one voice that the whole system is made very, very bad, but on paper it looked good.PS4 is much better designed, it is a fact .eSRAM thing of the past , the main vector of development is aimed at the unification of memory, the shared address space , etc., and not in the segmentation , as in xboxone.Another purpose of this eSRAM frame buffer , as to him most applications because of slow DDR3. And as the size is very small, the MSAA is not fit, and low resolution . It places tiled resources almost not (and how to plant , and generally do not ) .So Crytek, making exclusive Ryse, do not use DX11.2, but remained on the DX11.1Microsoft simply repeated the old trick eSRAM, and just needed to make DDR5 and rejoice. The trick failed , slow DDR3 + 32Mb eSRAM not be compared even with 256bit DDR5, what there talking about 512bit. Developers can not even say that will slow xboxone more , the lack of power or gpu memory lane .cons PCPoor optimization and bugs due to the high fragmentation of ironGame developers write games for the PC in a high- api , which reduces performance by 5 times.No optimization of iron and accurate listsBaud rendering commands from CPU to GPU approximately 2.5-3 times lower than the outgoing generation consoles , but in comparison with nekstgenom 20-30 times , at times it may reduce performance especially in multi-core systemsThere is no shared memorySound CPU costs . CPU load even if it is 100% sound not only able to reach the level of the console , as for the audio it is not highly effective.All of this causes each year apgredit PC. And normal pc game goes for $ 2000And for the money to settle for multiplatform with poor sound and bugs . And no high-budget exclusives.

49 results
1
2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Edited By BSC14

Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

I want to add one more thing here. I recently hooked up my PC to two different TVs...a 50" SHARP LED and 46" Samsung LED with HDMI. I don't care what anyone says about sitting on a couch or big screen bs....a decent 27" monitor is miles better than using a big tv. It's sharper, more responsive and the overall quality is just better for gaming. I was really disappointed.

TC you have to be the biggest, most closed minded, biased fanboy I have ever seen.

And by the way I'm not a PC fanboy...I'm just a fanboy of what offers the best experience...and it's not consoles.

10 years ago