Ps4 is already dated! (UE4: Ps4 vs GTX 680).

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#101 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -
So what else is new.? The PS3 was dated when it came out on 2006,already there were stronger GPU on 2006.. The RSX was a 7800 with 7600 bandwidth,7600 ROP's and 256MB of ram the 7800 had a 512MB version.. By the end of 2006 the 8000 series was already out so was the 7900 and the X1900 and so on..
#102 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -
[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Really? Cos there's proof for what I just said, where's your proof for what you just said? 

Tessellation

 

he is just one of those butthurt mad cows who were screaming "teh powah of teh 8GBDDR5!!!!!!!!!!!"

yeah the old lazy devs excuse now is ''they haven't optimized'' he thinks that epic has been sitting and staring at the PS4 dev kits since they showed the engine at the sony event..this tech demo probably is a current version.

Your an idiot not even Epic mark rein knew sony would use 8GB of GDDR5 even him was surprise,the had what every one else had non final dev kits,you fake hermit now go out and cheer for the 720 even more crapstactic GPU...
#103 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -

[QUOTE="osirisx3"]

some of the texture looks really muddy on ps4. I am kinda on the fence if i should get a pc or ps4 for next gen. If i have to pay for online that will be the deal breaker for me. But hardware wise i am not sure if the ps4 will stand up to pcs in the future.

NFJSupreme

 

that shouldn't be what drives your purchase and if that is what drives your purchase then get a PC.  Consoles will never stand up to PC from a technical standpoint. 

Just like PC will never stand out vs console on support for hardware and price.. Still 8 years latter the xbox 360 got crysis 3,go run it on a 7800GTX..
#104 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

So what else is new.? The PS3 was dated when it came out on 2006,already there were stronger GPU on 2006.. The RSX was a 7800 with 7600 bandwidth,7600 ROP's and 256MB of ram the 7800 had a 512MB version.. By the end of 2006 the 8000 series was already out so was the 7900 and the X1900 and so on..tormentos

 

SW has been bombarded with threads and posts about how the PS4 will be as powerful as a high end PC from mad cows.  When people told them this was fantasy they were quickly shouted down as being "butthurt" and "jelly."  Now we have video proof that the mad cows were indeed mad and we should just ignore it?  No I think not.  Just like when BF4 came out and put KZ:SF to shame we should be able to discuss this new video comparison.  Its only fair.  This is system wars after all right?  If this hard gut punch of truth and reality is too much for you to handle maybe you should stay out of this thread.  

#105 Posted by cfisher2833 (1720 posts) -

some of the texture looks really muddy on ps4. I am kinda on the fence if i should get a pc or ps4 for next gen. If i have to pay for online that will be the deal breaker for me. But hardware wise i am not sure if the ps4 will stand up to pcs in the future.

osirisx3

 

yeah, I am assuming that's the result of crappy devs though. Even though the whole 8gb of GDDR5 is completely overblown, it will at least allow for very high resolution textures if nothing else. As for whether or not to get a PC or PS4, just wait until you know more. There's still 9 months to go until the new consoles even get released, and buying a PC at this point with the intention of competing against the next gen consoles is premature. Nvidia, AMD, Intel, and all the other hardware manufacturers will come out with new tech by the end of the year. That's what you should use to compare. 

 

Also, it would be best to wait until you see the system requirements for games like Thief 4 or BF4 (god, now we're gonna have nothing but 4s all the time). They might be less demanding than we're assuming. 

#106 Posted by ZoomZoom2490 (3943 posts) -
consoles dictate how pc games end up looking, so enjoy your $2k gaming rigs for no reason.
#107 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

[QUOTE="osirisx3"]

some of the texture looks really muddy on ps4. I am kinda on the fence if i should get a pc or ps4 for next gen. If i have to pay for online that will be the deal breaker for me. But hardware wise i am not sure if the ps4 will stand up to pcs in the future.

cfisher2833

 

yeah, I am assuming that's the result of crappy devs though. Even though the whole 8gb of GDDR5 is completely overblown, it will at least allow for very high resolution textures if nothing else. As for whether or not to get a PC or PS4, just wait until you know more. There's still 9 months to go until the new consoles even get released, and buying a PC at this point with the intention of competing against the next gen consoles is premature. Nvidia, AMD, Intel, and all the other hardware manufacturers will come out with new tech by the end of the year. That's what you should use to compare. 

 

Also, it would be best to wait until you see the system requirements for games like Thief 4 or BF4 (god, now we're gonna have nothing but 4s all the time). They might be less demanding than we're assuming. 

 

BF4 will be less demanding than what many think.  DICE are WIZARDS of PC optimization.  BF3 was extremely scalable.  I expect the same quality and performance from BF4.  DICE doesn't play when it comes to battlefield on PC.  

#108 Posted by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -
Nice to see the early devkits of PS4 running it. Thing s will only get better from here on out. :cool: PS4 will definitely be pumping out some sweet looking UE4 powered games in the future.
#109 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

consoles dictate how pc games end up looking, so enjoy your $2k gaming rigs for no reason.ZoomZoom2490

 

silly consolite.  I'll just quote what I said earlier in the thread.

 

"Let me explain how it works to you mad cows one more time.  PC sets the bar.  A new console comes out attempting to achieve the bar PREVIOSLY set by PC.  PC raises the bar.  During the life span of the new console through high optimization and learning to maxmize the effeciency of all the tools available on the console, consoles attempt to keep up with the new bar set by PC (this is how console extends their lifespans).  Then PC RAISES the bar AGAIN and the what was once new console cannot compete and its time for a new console to emerge.  This is how it works.  The sooner you mad cows accept this the sooner we can have REAL discussion on system wars." 

#110 Posted by mitu123 (154227 posts) -

consoles dictate how pc games end up looking, so enjoy your $2k gaming rigs for no reason.ZoomZoom2490
You can't be serious.O_o

#111 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -

[QUOTE="tormentos"]So what else is new.? The PS3 was dated when it came out on 2006,already there were stronger GPU on 2006.. The RSX was a 7800 with 7600 bandwidth,7600 ROP's and 256MB of ram the 7800 had a 512MB version.. By the end of 2006 the 8000 series was already out so was the 7900 and the X1900 and so on..NFJSupreme

 

SW has been bombarded with threads and posts about how the PS4 will be as powerful as a high end PC from mad cows.  When people told them this was fantasy they were quickly shouted down as being "butthurt" and "jelly."  Now we have video proof that the mad cows were indeed mad and we should just ignore it?  No I think not.  Just like when BF4 came out and put KZ:SF to shame we should be able to discuss this new video comparison.  Its only fair.  This is system wars after all right?  If this hard gut punch of truth and reality is too much for you to handle maybe you should stay out of this thread.  

SW has been bombarded with stupid thread like this one,i guess you dd not saw those ones,.. The PS4 will not beat a 7970,that doesn't mean the 7970 will actually look a generation ahead of the PS4 that is just ridiculous and stupid,when on BF3 on 2560x1600 the 7970 just has 21 more frames per second while delivering the same quality over the 7850 which is weaker than the PS4. At 1080p the difference is nothing but frames the quality is the same.. I hope you are not talking about Unreal engine crap video because that was basically a movie,even on real time it was a scripted movie with no AI or gameplay at all..It was basically on rails everything with not a single drop of gameplay.
#112 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (16679 posts) -

PS4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNuIzOxOfn8

PC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY20pxEQM-A

PS4 is already dated. No way around it.

loco145

My current PC is more dated than the PS4. Oh well.

#113 Posted by cfisher2833 (1720 posts) -

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]So what else is new.? The PS3 was dated when it came out on 2006,already there were stronger GPU on 2006.. The RSX was a 7800 with 7600 bandwidth,7600 ROP's and 256MB of ram the 7800 had a 512MB version.. By the end of 2006 the 8000 series was already out so was the 7900 and the X1900 and so on..tormentos

 

SW has been bombarded with threads and posts about how the PS4 will be as powerful as a high end PC from mad cows.  When people told them this was fantasy they were quickly shouted down as being "butthurt" and "jelly."  Now we have video proof that the mad cows were indeed mad and we should just ignore it?  No I think not.  Just like when BF4 came out and put KZ:SF to shame we should be able to discuss this new video comparison.  Its only fair.  This is system wars after all right?  If this hard gut punch of truth and reality is too much for you to handle maybe you should stay out of this thread.  

SW has been bombarded with stupid thread like this one,i guess you dd not saw those ones,.. The PS4 will not beat a 7970,that doesn't mean the 7970 will actually look a generation ahead of the PS4 that is just ridiculous and stupid,when on BF3 on 2560x1600 the 7970 just has 21 more frames per second while delivering the same quality over the 7850 which is weaker than the PS4. At 1080p the difference is nothing but frames the quality is the same.. I hope you are not talking about Unreal engine crap video because that was basically a movie,even on real time it was a scripted movie with no AI or gameplay at all..It was basically on rails everything with not a single drop of gameplay.

 

Frames matter though. At least for me, going back to 30fps just isn't gonna happen. I've grown far too accustomed to 60fps, and I don't plan on changing.

#114 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]So what else is new.? The PS3 was dated when it came out on 2006,already there were stronger GPU on 2006.. The RSX was a 7800 with 7600 bandwidth,7600 ROP's and 256MB of ram the 7800 had a 512MB version.. By the end of 2006 the 8000 series was already out so was the 7900 and the X1900 and so on..tormentos

 

SW has been bombarded with threads and posts about how the PS4 will be as powerful as a high end PC from mad cows.  When people told them this was fantasy they were quickly shouted down as being "butthurt" and "jelly."  Now we have video proof that the mad cows were indeed mad and we should just ignore it?  No I think not.  Just like when BF4 came out and put KZ:SF to shame we should be able to discuss this new video comparison.  Its only fair.  This is system wars after all right?  If this hard gut punch of truth and reality is too much for you to handle maybe you should stay out of this thread.  

SW has been bombarded with stupid thread like this one,i guess you dd not saw those ones,.. The PS4 will not beat a 7970,that doesn't mean the 7970 will actually look a generation ahead of the PS4 that is just ridiculous and stupid,when on BF3 on 2560x1600 the 7970 just has 21 more frames per second while delivering the same quality over the 7850 which is weaker than the PS4. At 1080p the difference is nothing but frames the quality is the same.. I hope you are not talking about Unreal engine crap video because that was basically a movie,even on real time it was a scripted movie with no AI or gameplay at all..It was basically on rails everything with not a single drop of gameplay.

 

I never said PC will look a generation ahead.  But this thread is just as legit as all the 8GBDDR5 threads.  I'm not really trying to argue with you.  You seem reasonable from I gather from most of your posts but the point is PC will always be a step ahead of consoles.  Apperently not everyone gets this.  Just look at the guy I quoted before you just posted talking about how consoles dictate how games will look on PC.  Its delusion like that that makes threads like this legit.

 

The PS4 is an impressive piece of tech and you will be amazed what devs can do with it cpu+7850.5 APU combination for years to come. As of now its the most balanced and best console ever build at least until we find out more about the nextbox.  I will probably have one in my living room.  But its not as powerful as my computer.  And during its mid and late life when devs are squeezing the living daylight out of it, maximizing every core and ever bit of RAM available it will not outperform my PC which would have since been upgraded.  The games will still look amazing and I will still be happy to play exclusives on it but my PC will still be superior. That is all. You realize this but please don't act like others don't.  Or like system wars isn't the place for giving delusional consolites the beat down. 

#115 Posted by Tessellation (8803 posts) -
[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

 

he is just one of those butthurt mad cows who were screaming "teh powah of teh 8GBDDR5!!!!!!!!!!!"

tormentos
yeah the old lazy devs excuse now is ''they haven't optimized'' he thinks that epic has been sitting and staring at the PS4 dev kits since they showed the engine at the sony event..this tech demo probably is a current version.

Your an idiot not even Epic mark rein knew sony would use 8GB of GDDR5 even him was surprise,the had what every one else had non final dev kits,you fake hermit now go out and cheer for the 720 even more crapstactic GPU...

lol the butthurt rage comeback :lol: ..so much butthurt that you need to bring up the 720 to de discussion..getting under your skin is so easy :cool:
#116 Posted by darkhadou (647 posts) -
Quite honestly, the graphics leap between last gen (Wii U, PS3, X360) and (X360, PS4) is nothing to brag/scream about. I'm actually quite unimpressed, especially with games like MGS5 looking as crisp as it does.
#117 Posted by cfisher2833 (1720 posts) -

Quite honestly, the graphics leap between last gen (Wii U, PS3, X360) and (X360, PS4) is nothing to brag/scream about. I'm actually quite unimpressed, especially with games like MGS5 looking as crisp as it does.darkhadou

 

Didn't Kojima confirm that it will be coming to PS4? If so, they're definitely showing that version. 

#118 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]consoles dictate how pc games end up looking, so enjoy your $2k gaming rigs for no reason.NFJSupreme

 

silly consolite.  I'll just quote what I said earlier in the thread.

 

"Let me explain how it works to you mad cows one more time.  PC sets the bar.  A new console comes out attempting to achieve the bar PREVIOSLY set by PC.  PC raises the bar.  During the life span of the new console through high optimization and learning to maxmize the effeciency of all the tools available on the console, consoles attempt to keep up with the new bar set by PC (this is how console extends their lifespans).  Then PC RAISES the bar AGAIN and the what was once new console cannot compete and its time for a new console to emerge.  This is how it works.  The sooner you mad cows accept this the sooner we can have REAL discussion on system wars." 

let me explain this to you,we don't give a fu** we don't pay $1,000 for stupid over priced crap,and we still play the same games.. Those extra $ hundreds go for games... look at example one the 680GTX is what from $459 to almost $600.? http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&N=-1&isNodeId=1&Description=680GTX&x=0&y=0 To get what at 1080p more than the 7850.? More frames because with the same settings you will not get better quality,at 1920x1200 on BF3 the 7850 get some 50 FPS on ultra the 680GTX does close to 100,the quality is the same regardless of the frame difference and more than 30FPS on consoles is hardly use. So once again you waste your money on something that you will not see a real benefit other than more frames basically.. And the 690GTX is even worst $1,000 dollars for a GPU that can be match by 2 $300 dollars ones. PC gamers are the dumbest gamers ever.
#119 Posted by IgGy621985 (4842 posts) -

Considering how Epic "loves" PC gaming, Elemental and Infiltrator demos are probably from console exclusives that will never appear on PC. The same happened with the first Unreal Engine 3 screenshots and demos. Only later it was discovered those demos were Gears of War.

#120 Posted by tormentos (18846 posts) -
[QUOTE="Tessellation"] lol the butthurt rage comeback :lol: ..so much butthurt that you need to bring up the 720 to de discussion..getting under your skin is so easy :cool:

The only buthurt fanboy is you and i don't pretend to be anything i am not, fake hermit.. Now go defend the crappy 720 GPU..Oh Kotaku and Superdae will save you...:lol:
#121 Posted by mastershake575 (8357 posts) -
Quite honestly, the graphics leap between last gen (Wii U, PS3, X360) and (X360, PS4) is nothing to brag/scream about. I'm actually quite unimpressed, especially with games like MGS5 looking as crisp as it does.darkhadou
To be fair people where saying the same thing when Call of duty 2 came out launch day for the 360 (and look what happened......)
#122 Posted by Promised_Trini (3628 posts) -

that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(KarateeeChop

:lol: your always repeating yourself starting to sound like a broken record.

#123 Posted by Tessellation (8803 posts) -
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] lol the butthurt rage comeback :lol: ..so much butthurt that you need to bring up the 720 to de discussion..getting under your skin is so easy :cool:

The only buthurt fanboy is you and i don't pretend to be anything i am not, fake hermit.. Now go defend the crappy 720 GPU..Oh Kotaku and Superdae will save you...:lol:

the fact that you bring up another system to the discussion means you're totally butthurt.. no faking anything you're just mad that you can't afford a gaming rig..now keep crying eltormo :cool:
#124 Posted by Tessellation (8803 posts) -

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(Promised_Trini

:lol: your always repeating yourself starting to sound like a broken record.

you're having hard-ons with karateeechop comments
#125 Posted by gamecubepad (6143 posts) -

 

I never said PC will look a generation ahead.  But this thread is just as legit as all the 8GBDDR5 threads.  I'm not really trying to argue with you.  You seem reasonable from what I gather...

NFJSupreme

F*cking lol.

#126 Posted by rocoswav (804 posts) -

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

 

he is just one of those butthurt mad cows who were screaming "teh powah of teh 8GBDDR5!!!!!!!!!!!"

tormentos

yeah the old lazy devs excuse now is ''they haven't optimized'' he thinks that epic has been sitting and staring at the PS4 dev kits since they showed the engine at the sony event..this tech demo probably is a current version.

Your an idiot not even Epic mark rein knew sony would use 8GB of GDDR5 even him was surprise,the had what every one else had non final dev kits,you fake hermit now go out and cheer for the 720 even more crapstactic GPU...

i actually wanted to say the same thing, but they will just label it as damage control,  even sonys first party studios didn't know that that they doubled the ram.  hermits think the PS4 has already been maxed out with this demo :lol:.  seriously guys this is new architecture give the devs a break

#127 Posted by Promised_Trini (3628 posts) -

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(Tessellation

:lol: your always repeating yourself starting to sound like a broken record.

you're having hard-ons with karateeechop comments

Wah this is first time I have actually quoted this fail of a troll.

#128 Posted by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -
:lol: I see Tessellation is pretending to be a hermit again. :lol: Wild lemmings like him have abandoned Xbox now that MS seems to be abandoning them, and they are now hiding behind PCs. Pathetic lol.
#129 Posted by Tessellation (8803 posts) -

:lol: I see Tessellation is pretending to be a hermit again. :lol: Wild lemmings like him have abandoned Xbox now that MS seems to be abandoning them, and they are now hiding behind PCs. Pathetic lol.I_can_haz
another dedication post? look how butthurt i made you :cool: not my fault that you game at low settings with that garbage GTX 650M

#130 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -
that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(KarateeeChop
Then you must really think Microsoft is a joke considering all info rumor or not point to the PS4 being the most power console next gen.
#131 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]consoles dictate how pc games end up looking, so enjoy your $2k gaming rigs for no reason.tormentos

 

silly consolite.  I'll just quote what I said earlier in the thread.

 

"Let me explain how it works to you mad cows one more time.  PC sets the bar.  A new console comes out attempting to achieve the bar PREVIOSLY set by PC.  PC raises the bar.  During the life span of the new console through high optimization and learning to maxmize the effeciency of all the tools available on the console, consoles attempt to keep up with the new bar set by PC (this is how console extends their lifespans).  Then PC RAISES the bar AGAIN and the what was once new console cannot compete and its time for a new console to emerge.  This is how it works.  The sooner you mad cows accept this the sooner we can have REAL discussion on system wars." 

let me explain this to you,we don't give a fu** we don't pay $1,000 for stupid over priced crap,and we still play the same games.. Those extra $ hundreds go for games... look at example one the 680GTX is what from $459 to almost $600.? http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&N=-1&isNodeId=1&Description=680GTX&x=0&y=0 To get what at 1080p more than the 7850.? More frames because with the same settings you will not get better quality,at 1920x1200 on BF3 the 7850 get some 50 FPS on ultra the 680GTX does close to 100,the quality is the same regardless of the frame difference and more than 30FPS on consoles is hardly use. So once again you waste your money on something that you will not see a real benefit other than more frames basically.. And the 690GTX is even worst $1,000 dollars for a GPU that can be match by 2 $300 dollars ones. PC gamers are the dumbest gamers ever.

OK i thought you were reasonable but you are just another one of the butthurt mad cows.  Todays ownage seems to be getting to you.

1)PC has options.  You are free to get what ever range of GPU you like.  There is not "enthusiest" option for consoles.  If there was guess what?  You would probably get one.  There are cards for everyone on PC.  Me, I like a good solid entry level high end card.  Something around 300 to 350. Maybe 380 if the price per dollar is right.  Now there are enthusiest with deep pockets who just love to be on the cutting edge of tech.  They will spend top dollar to get the best of the best available.  They will even sometimes get two or even THREE of these $1,000 cards.  That is their parogotive.  A lot of people who get these set ups use them for more than just gaming.  There are some really impressive calculations you can do with a graphics cards since unlike regular cpus they have hundreds or even thousands of cores.  Earlier this month a professor broke the record for Pi calculation using 690s, 680s, and a bunch of 570s to do the calculations.  http://www.karrels.org/pi/  There are numerous reasons someone would want a super GPU and a lot of it is just not gaming.

 

2)There are effects on PC that just aren't possible on console.  Things like extreme tessalation, tressfx, PhysX, a plethora of AntiAlliasing options, the list goes on.  You don'g get these effects on console now.  And when the new consoles get them there will be newer effects that come out that will again only be for PC (which makes me laugh at that guy who said consoles dictate how PC games look. I mean seriously dude?)  This is why we pay for the tech so we can get all the latest effects that are available for gaming.   These effects don't come to consoles till the next generation.  Some people like to be on the cutting edge others don't.  To each his own.

 

I like to look at PC gamers as the power users of gamers.  We build rigs.  We configure specs. We research what the latest tech is.  We generally have more knowledge of the whats at the forefront of the gaming industry.  Just because you don't see value in all this doesn't mean others don't.  The money is irrelavent.  I get just as much satisfaction building a $450 rig that can play all the latest games as I do when I built my rig that cost me $1100.  Its all part of the fun to me.  I have friends who hit me up all the time wanting to build a rig.  They give me a budget and I cookk something up.  Its what I like to do.  A lot of PC gamer are the same.  We like to talk tech. 

 

Anyway you seem a little butthurt.  Clearly todays dose of reality cut you deep.  Its OK, your console will still be great.  No need to cry about my PC being better.

#132 Posted by smokedopedie (291 posts) -

I could care about graphics these days since gameplay hasnt evolved instead taken steps back in evolution.

#133 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

 

I never said PC will look a generation ahead.  But this thread is just as legit as all the 8GBDDR5 threads.  I'm not really trying to argue with you.  You seem reasonable from what I gather...

gamecubepad

F*cking lol.

 

I know right.  Clearly he is just another butthurt cow who was crushed by this thread.  His tears of unfathomable sorrow provided the necessary sustenance I needed to get me through another day on SW.

#134 Posted by TheWalkingGhost (5518 posts) -
[QUOTE="lostrib"]

Old news, sleeping beauty

loco145
I don't care. Need as much publicity as it can get.

STFU troll. Nobody that isn't a fanboy cares.
#135 Posted by smokedopedie (291 posts) -

Call of duty has amazing graphics compared to quake....but it's still a casual game in comparison.

 

gameplay>graphics

#136 Posted by smokedopedie (291 posts) -

Even when quake had the best graphics on the market the gameplay still owned the graphics lol.

#137 Posted by gamecubepad (6143 posts) -

 

I know right.  Clearly he is just another butthurt cow who was crushed by this thread.  His tears of unfathomable sorrow provided the necessary sustenance I needed to get me through another day on SW.

NFJSupreme

:P

If you deal with him, get ready for the spin cycle. 

#138 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (5237 posts) -

that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(KarateeeChop
You should be more worried about Microsoft delaying the announcement of the weakest next gen console... or should I say TV box?

#139 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (5237 posts) -

KZ:SF looks better than both and MGS5 looks better than the PS4 tech demo. Lol @ TC desperate hermit "the news must be spread!"

 

PC is always more powerful you dunce. Problem is, 99% of PC gamers use 2005 hardware.

#140 Posted by NFJSupreme (5380 posts) -

KZ:SF looks better than both and MGS5 looks better than the PS4 tech demo. Lol @ TC desperate hermit "the news must be spread!"

 

PC is always more powerful you dunce. Problem is, 99% of PC gamers use 2005 hardware.

Douevenlift_bro

 

Yep that's right ease your pain by convincing yourself that 99% of PC gamers are using 2005 hardware (ok I confess, my keyboard is from 2005 damn PS/2).  While you are at it, you should pretend that we don't also have consoles and still play the exclussive games you hold true to your heart.  Yep all this should make you feel better.

#141 Posted by mitu123 (154227 posts) -

PC gamers are the dumbest gamers ever.tormentos
That's not nice.

#142 Posted by PC_Otter (1623 posts) -
[QUOTE="PC_Otter"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

LOL moron. I really hope you are trolling and not that stupid...

Mozelleple112
Actually the 5870 has more GFLOPS, but the tessellation performance and sheer efficiency of GCN over VLIW5 makes up for it by far.

I have a 5870 and I certainly hope the PS4 will out perform it :L

I'm still rocking a 5850 myself. The 7850 or 70 looks like a decent upgrade for tessellation intense games, but a 7900 would be the only "real" upgrade.
#143 Posted by ronvalencia (15170 posts) -

PS4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNuIzOxOfn8

PC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY20pxEQM-A

PS4 is already dated. No way around it.

loco145
It's too bad it's not running with AMD's Forward_Plus+GI.
#144 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38217 posts) -

KZ:SF looks better than both and MGS5 looks better than the PS4 tech demo. Lol @ TC desperate hermit "the news must be spread!"

 

PC is always more powerful you dunce. Problem is, 99% of PC gamers use 2005 hardware.

Douevenlift_bro

Funny you mention MGSV, cos that was running on a PC. 

#145 Posted by ronvalencia (15170 posts) -

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

lol

That card will still be more the more expensive option when the PS4 comes out. Sorry.

MK-Professor

by the time the ps4 release the GTX680(or equivalent) will be mid range card, so it will be cheap. last year bought 2 HD7950(and OC them to 1200Mhz) for £460 both, and this gpu set up is around 2 times more powerfull than a single GTX680 and around 4 times more powerfull than ps4, so the point is that ps4 is 4 times weaker than a gpu setup that cost $460 and it will be almost 22 months old by the time ps4 hit the shelf.

From "7870 XT" model number, AMD Tahiti LE is already in mid-range and it beats 7870 Ghz Edition.

#146 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (5237 posts) -

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

KZ:SF looks better than both and MGS5 looks better than the PS4 tech demo. Lol @ TC desperate hermit "the news must be spread!"

 

PC is always more powerful you dunce. Problem is, 99% of PC gamers use 2005 hardware.

seanmcloughlin

Funny you mention MGSV, cos that was running on a PC. 

Exatly. Which makes this tech demo even less impressive.

#147 Posted by KarateeeChop (4662 posts) -

[QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]that's pretty bad. idk what sony was thinking announcing an already outdated piece of tech. :(Tessellation

:lol: your always repeating yourself starting to sound like a broken record.

you're having hard-ons with karateeechop comments

i didn't even know it was possible to constantly get so offended over someone else's opinion on a plastic box. how do these guys do it? :lol:

#148 Posted by Douevenlift_bro (5237 posts) -

[QUOTE="Douevenlift_bro"]

KZ:SF looks better than both and MGS5 looks better than the PS4 tech demo. Lol @ TC desperate hermit "the news must be spread!"

 

PC is always more powerful you dunce. Problem is, 99% of PC gamers use 2005 hardware.

NFJSupreme

 

Yep that's right ease your pain by convincing yourself that 99% of PC gamers are using 2005 hardware (ok I confess, my keyboard is from 2005 damn PS/2).  While you are at it, you should pretend that we don't also have consoles and still play the exclussive games you hold true to your heart.  Yep all this should make you feel better.

Steam numbers show it for fact. Convince myself? I only care about console exclusives. You can keep your RTS and 2005 keyboard buddy lol

#149 Posted by xboxiphoneps3 (2384 posts) -

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] :lol: BF4 stomps them both and wasn't even the final build.. lol at deep down that was a tech demo and running on PC. :cool:Tessellation

Actually Capcom representative them selfs said it was running on the PS4 right before they showed it, and it was actually confirmed that it was in gameplay... Plus PS4 will be able to run BF4 at 1080p at 30 fps with the same graphical detail as they showed .

links? :lol: any console can run a tech demo and we know how that ends up, BF4 on consoles is rumored to be 720p at 60fps...you talk like you're a developer but know sh!t about it :cool:

Considering a Hd7850 gets 35-40 fps on Ultra on 1080p in Battlefield 3 Consoles get 2x more performance when compared to a similarily specced PC
#150 Posted by Tessellation (8803 posts) -

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="Promised_Trini"]

:lol: your always repeating yourself starting to sound like a broken record.

KarateeeChop

you're having hard-ons with karateeechop comments

i didn't even know it was possible to constantly get so offended over someone else's opinion on a plastic box. how do these guys do it? :lol:

too much basement exposure :cool: