PS3 vs PC graphics (56K nope)

  • 190 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#51 Posted by Masenkoe (4888 posts) -

[QUOTE="ClassicRockFTW"]

Thats Crysis 2 on the Xbox.

It was designed for the xbox the xbox might not have more speed than a PC but it has a better processing for better textures and polygons

lundy86_4

The 360 runs Crysis 2 at 1080p?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL oh my sides. OP just kidding you're not funny go home.

#52 Posted by Master_ShakeXXX (13361 posts) -

92717_hardreset_2011-09-18_19-46-36-50.j

NoodleFighter

What game is that?

#54 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38216 posts) -

Jesus people learn to quote without having ALL the damn pics in the post again.

#55 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38216 posts) -

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

Master_ShakeXXX

What game is that?

Hard Reset

#56 Posted by Riadon2 (1609 posts) -

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

92717_hardreset_2011-09-18_19-46-36-50.j

Master_ShakeXXX

What game is that?

Hard Reset

#57 Posted by lundy86_4 (43526 posts) -

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="ClassicRockFTW"]

Thats Crysis 2 on the Xbox.

It was designed for the xbox the xbox might not have more speed than a PC but it has a better processing for better textures and polygons

Masenkoe

The 360 runs Crysis 2 at 1080p?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL oh my sides. OP just kidding you're not funny go home.

Are you telling me that OP is kidding?

#58 Posted by BlbecekBobecek (2689 posts) -

You are using HALF SIZE SCREENSHOTS, mother of god when will console boys learn what resolution means. Compare full size 1080p shots and then you will see the difference between PC and PS3. I can make Minecraft look good in 720p size screenshots.

iamrob7

Those PS3 games actually run in 720p :|:D

#59 Posted by Master_ShakeXXX (13361 posts) -

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

seanmcloughlin

What game is that?

Hard Reset

Oh sh*t, I have that on steam and haven't even played it yet :lol:

I didn't know it looked that good :o

#60 Posted by MaskedPlayer (979 posts) -

Isnt tc a pc gamer?

http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29296039/best-brand-for-hd-7850?page=0

#62 Posted by Riadon2 (1609 posts) -

1440p, 60 fps, 4xMSAA/SGSSAA, dx11, large draw distance and good LOD, 2k/4k textures, high-res shadowmaps and good filtering, good lighting

Vs.

720p, 20-30 fps and screen-tearing, FXAA, dx9, laughable draw distance and filthy LOD, 256/512 textures, pathetic shadowing, bad lighting, bloomfest & lensflare

Hmmm.... option 2 is clearly better.

#63 Posted by clyde46 (46597 posts) -

[QUOTE="Masenkoe"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

The 360 runs Crysis 2 at 1080p?

lundy86_4

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL oh my sides. OP just kidding you're not funny go home.

Are you telling me that OP is kidding?

#64 Posted by iamrob7 (2138 posts) -

6c9Fz.jpg

Can I break these pictures up and give them their own slider? (No apparently not)

NZOJF.jpg

Above is an actual accurate comparison unlike all the others in this thread.

The problem with posting graphical comparisons on gamespot forums is that they default to a smaller size, so the huge disparity in resolution between the PC and consoles i.e. the twice as many pixels or more, are not noticeable in any of these comparisons. Seeing as the resolution is the biggest source of graphical improvement from PC's to consoles, I'd say this renders all comparisons on these forums pointless in these type shots, you need to compare sections of full size shots.

Which is exactly what I'm going to do here. Here is how it works, PC shots are default 1080p, console shots are 720p and all come from being posted here by people lauding the graphics. I've bicubicly upscaled the console shots as they would be on your 1080p television (if you have a 720p television they would look even worse as you'd just be making the pixels bigger without the smoothing). Then I've taken a section of each comparison freehand of roughly the right size so this forum won't downsize them.

Here are the results of an actual comparison between the quality of PC graphics and console graphics, bear in mind the PC can actually do better than this, this is 1080p, the PC can go well above that now.

Hmm might make a thread about this when I can be bothered to do it for the Xbox too.

#65 Posted by Master_ShakeXXX (13361 posts) -

Isnt tc a pc gamer?

http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29296039/best-brand-for-hd-7850?page=0

MaskedPlayer

That thread is hilarious.

#66 Posted by IgGy621985 (4817 posts) -

PS3 wins obviously, no contest. It has 1080p HD games.

Why don't we hear anywhere about PC having HD games?

PC is for losers.

#67 Posted by freedomfreak (40918 posts) -

Jesus people learn to quote without having ALL the damn pics in the post again.

seanmcloughlin
I know. It's annoying as hell.
#68 Posted by DarkLink77 (31697 posts) -

a bunch of rubbishClassicRockFTW

jacksparrowrun.gif

#69 Posted by Bikouchu35 (7452 posts) -

ps3 > Pc, exclusives, dying platform with mostly old hags driving rolls royce playing, too complex, cell cpu >>>> all cpu in existance, ps3 controller > mouse+kb they are for grown ups who do work instead of pwning nubz on black ops 2 with le dualshock3, blue screen of death, full 1080p > 24 inch losary screen.

#70 Posted by Amster_G (4290 posts) -

ClassicTrollFTW.

Oh great, I have a PC signature.

/tehbias

#71 Posted by LordRork (2690 posts) -

I love the way PS3 players feel they have to compete with 5 year old PC games. It brings a tear of nostalgia to my eye.

#72 Posted by Peredith (2310 posts) -

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

What game is that?

Master_ShakeXXX

Hard Reset

Oh sh*t, I have that on steam and haven't even played it yet :lol:

I didn't know it looked that good :o

Hard Reset looks amazing. :)

#73 Posted by Peredith (2310 posts) -

izB8mAtdkkalJ.gif.

#74 Posted by wis3boi (31465 posts) -

NOPE.gif+_3fd907eafaa86c3c82c9b963e28cab.

#75 Posted by lostrib (37634 posts) -

Actually that's a thousand dollar GPU

#76 Posted by lostrib (37634 posts) -

iVmxtrY0QJ13N.jpg

iICBqgqKZfKid.jpg

i2WpttvRmCzXT.jpg

iY0kprd6fU9r0.jpg

iE8VxwgJLvXUr.jpg

iNEw3XSTY0NAI.jpg

ibfRh5yvTEbHmx.jpg

ib20cXL7WgT3Sd.jpg

iGAxzaBFAwqcy.jpg

iuM7SNDvGb0ZG.jpg

iDpXlemQMiOMx.jpg.

Peredith

I could never get crysis 2 to look this good. I assume it's the most recent maldo hd?

#77 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (16345 posts) -

Do you guys make a thread like this every month?

MaskedPlayer

Actually, I haven't seen a thread like this in months.

#78 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -
TC=foolish clueless moron. My 6 year old PC has better graphics than the PS3.
#79 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (16345 posts) -

Let's see. PS3 vs PC...... I don't have that many PS3 game screenshots I can show easily. So..... what I'm playing on PS3 and PC at the moment:

I'm actually past the Village in UC2. But, this is my favorite UC2 screenshot. :lol:

uc2temple1.jpg

I finally made it to the Brass City in UC3:

sdeception20.png

I had to start Hard Reset over. Fine by me. I love the game:

hardreset20120111233802.jpg

hardreset20120111233053.jpg

I can't remember if this has Maldo 4.0. Probably not. On second thought, it has. The barrel is shiny and reflective.

crysis22012111419075695.jpg

This one has Maldo 4.0

crysis22012120216240169.jpg

I love the little things fixed in Maldo 4.0:

crysis22012101423165535.jpg

crysis22012101617092843.jpg

#80 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -

Lmaoo...... Half Life 2 on low? Is that the best flame bait you got? :lol:

#81 Posted by jimmyrussle117 (774 posts) -

6c9Fz.jpg

Can I break these pictures up and give them their own slider? (No apparently not)

NZOJF.jpg

Above is an actual accurate comparison unlike all the others in this thread.

The problem with posting graphical comparisons on gamespot forums is that they default to a smaller size, so the huge disparity in resolution between the PC and consoles i.e. the twice as many pixels or more, are not noticeable in any of these comparisons. Seeing as the resolution is the biggest source of graphical improvement from PC's to consoles, I'd say this renders all comparisons on these forums pointless in these type shots, you need to compare sections of full size shots.

Which is exactly what I'm going to do here. Here is how it works, PC shots are default 1080p, console shots are 720p and all come from being posted here by people lauding the graphics. I've bicubicly upscaled the console shots as they would be on your 1080p television (if you have a 720p television they would look even worse as you'd just be making the pixels bigger without the smoothing). Then I've taken a section of each comparison freehand of roughly the right size so this forum won't downsize them.

Here are the results of an actual comparison between the quality of PC graphics and console graphics, bear in mind the PC can actually do better than this, this is 1080p, the PC can go well above that now.

Hmm might make a thread about this when I can be bothered to do it for the Xbox too.

iamrob7

/thread

#82 Posted by delta3074 (18412 posts) -
Hmm might make a thread about this when I can be bothered to do it for the Xbox too.iamrob7
Not much point, Loosing ends was the only Lem on here Stupid enough to believe that the 360 could even come close to a high end PC.
#83 Posted by TheDidact (3981 posts) -

Pointless.

For comparisons, it's very important to use high quality and legit pictures. Very important. Many users in this forum fail to do this.

Also, try to look for PC pictures that are taken at max settings.

GamerwillzPS
I don't think you understand the joke. :P
#84 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (16345 posts) -

I also like flight sims. I'll have to buy Aerofly FS once the holidays are over.....

Someone else's screenies. Looks good to me.

full-585-40544-aerofly_fs_2012_08_24_13_

full-585-40481-aerofly_fs_2012_08_23_18_

full-585-40479-aerofly_fs_2012_08_23_18_

#85 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -

Troll post is troll post.

Wasdie
These are allowed now?
#86 Posted by Amster_G (4290 posts) -

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Troll post is troll post.

C_Rule

These are allowed now?

Considering this is the System Wars forum, I guess so.

#87 Posted by mems_1224 (47254 posts) -
Shadowmoses alt confirmed
#88 Posted by mitu123 (153911 posts) -
Shadowmoses alt confirmed mems_1224
I wonder where that guy is as well.
#89 Posted by Riadon2 (1609 posts) -

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Shadowmoses alt confirmed mitu123
I wonder where that guy is as well.

He was being a silly Jew in offtopic yesterday.

Hopefully he stays there.

#90 Posted by mems_1224 (47254 posts) -
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Shadowmoses alt confirmed mitu123
I wonder where that guy is as well.

Last time I saw him was when I made him cry because I asked him to show proof he plays games on PC. :lol:
#91 Posted by Rocker6 (13358 posts) -

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]Shadowmoses alt confirmed mems_1224
I wonder where that guy is as well.

Last time I saw him was when I made him cry because I asked him to show proof he plays games on PC. :lol:

I'm already starting to miss his ramblings... :(

#92 Posted by ronvalencia (15129 posts) -

ps3 > Pc, exclusives, dying platform with mostly old hags driving rolls royce playing, too complex, cell cpu >>>> all cpu in existance, ps3 controller > mouse+kb they are for grown ups who do work instead of pwning nubz on black ops 2 with le dualshock3, blue screen of death, full 1080p > 24 inch losary screen.

Bikouchu35

AMD "Fusion" APU > IBM CELL.

PS4: new kits shipping now, AMD A10 APU used as base h ttp://www.vg247.com/2012/11/01/ps4_details_playstation_4/

According to IBM's David Shippy, CELL is a heterogeneous processor. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/132297/processing_the_truth_an_interview_.php?page=3

According to AMD, "Fusion" APUs are also heterogeneous processor. http://blogs.amd.com/developer/tag/heterogeneous-computing/

AMD GCN processing CPU workloads http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLCCGS5vUx4&feature=player_detailpage#t=90s

AMD_GCN_VirtMemory_689.jpg

More PS4 rumors http://www.psx-sense.nl/89207/exclusief-talloze-informatie-over-de-playstation-4-inclusief-specificaties/

AMD Fusion APU - Code name 'Liverpool'

  • Quad Core AMD x86 at 3.2 GHz
  • ATI r10xx (3rd generation) at 800 MHz and 1843 GFLOPS - Codename "Tahiti"
  • Unified Memory 2GB (still uncertain, it can be 4GB)
  • Blu-ray
  • HDMI 1.4 - 1080p output
  • 320GB+ HDD
  • 16GB Flash Memory

img_4f745f73ab00a.jpg

PS; 1800 GFLOPs AMD Tahiti is more or less equals AMD Radeon HD 7850.

AMDRadeonHD7850_Hero-574W.jpg

#93 Posted by Warhawk_ (1497 posts) -

Ah come on PC gamers you know this was a troll baiter. Did you guys really have to prove to him that games on PC look and run better then the PS3 can?

#94 Posted by TheDidact (3981 posts) -

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="mitu123"] I wonder where that guy is as well.Rocker6

Last time I saw him was when I made him cry because I asked him to show proof he plays games on PC. :lol:

I'm already starting to miss his ramblings... :(

Is he banned? :o
#95 Posted by Jankarcop (9618 posts) -

Ah come on PC gamers you know this was a troll baiter. Did you guys really have to prove to him that games on PC look and run better then the PS3 can?

Warhawk_

You'd be surprised. There is this ugly old man name Giovela going around thinking otherwise.

#96 Posted by the_bi99man (11047 posts) -

[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Shadowmoses alt confirmed mitu123
I wonder where that guy is as well.

Hopefully going to school. Learning what upscaling is, and that it is real.

#97 Posted by CaseyWegner (70104 posts) -

legitimate thread by a less than level 10 user - locked

this thread - still going

problem found.

#98 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -
glad TC pick some games i never seen on pc but picked AAA+ titles for ps3...
#99 Posted by wis3boi (31465 posts) -

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]Shadowmoses alt confirmed the_bi99man

I wonder where that guy is as well.

Hopefully going to school. Learning what upscaling is, and that it is real.

http://www.gamespot.com/users/ShadowMoses900/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=m-100-25998932

#100 Posted by mitu123 (153911 posts) -