And no I'm not going to link it, **** you.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well...shall I remember that they gave a 8 to TLOU becuase the main character was kinda morally grey.
**** Polygon.
I'm still getting it.
that is the spirit!
And beside, a 6 shouldn't be representation of an awful game anyway. I remember Megaman X4 getting wrecked on reviews and to me that's the best game in the series. People that enjoy a series or genre shouldn't be persuaded by shitty scores, especially one coming from a social justice website like polygon full of pretentious hipsters.
Although I must admit that FFXIII took me by surprise. The game had the scores, I loved the series and genre too but that game was... Don't even want to talk about. It was shit.
And this is what happens when we let them patronise us to this degree. Does anyone think this is good writing? That anyone cares about your hurt feelings?
After Gamersgate, I stopped reading shit from Polygon, Kotaku, etc. I already disliked Polygon before Gamersgate, but Gamersgate gave me the push I needed to just never go back. Reviews like this are clearly a joke and I won't support them with any clicks.
BTW: I heard about this review awhile back. I cringed then.
Shouldn't a review take into account the vision of the developer rather than some preconceived notion of what the reviewer thinks it should be? Next up, Goat Simulator didn't have enough character development for me to truly care about the characters.
From what i heard the reviewer doesnt actually do the rating, the staff read the reviews and puts ratings to keep consistency.
Since when was it ever designed to be mature? F*ck me journalists are getting pathetic.
They are not journalists, they dont have a clue what journalism is. They are bloggers and casuals who started playing games in 2005. Thats the problem with the industry.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment