n
@handssss said:
@Shewgenja said:
@StrongDeadlift said:
A library doesnt "peak". A library "exists".
The PS3 had one of the worst starts in console history, and for the first 3 years the console was shit. Now, all the more power to Sony for falling over themselves this gen trying to rectify that, but just because the PS3 finally has games does not make the 360's library dissapear.
You dont get to retroactively isolate a specific period of time when comparing the Xbox360 and PS3's libraries. That is not how it works. The "no games" moniker is not retroactive. The PS3 ACTUALLY didnt have a killer app during its first few years. The PS3 no longer being a "Shit console" does not retroactively make the Xbox 360 become a "Shit console".
In the same respect that Microsoft changing things about the Xbox One, doesnt make the PS4 become a shit console.
This thread just sounds like a cow, that is bitter that people trashed the PS3 (when it deserved to be trashed), and now want "revenge".
You sound like a grandstanding Lem who is just myopic and delusional enough to think you have a leg to stand on trumpeting a warcry from 2006/2007. It's a new day, homie. Get with the times.
He has a point in that the library just doesn't disappear, but he fails for forgetting the 2nd half of the problem. Microsoft STARTED strong and then all but abandoned their core audience after those first few years. No, yearly Halo, Forza, Gears isn't good enough. Especially when at least one of those franchises has already fallen flat on its face and is going to go on hiatus for an undetermined amount of time due to lack of interest and success in the last installment.
Just a quick fyi,
StrongDeadLift is one of the most rabbid menatlly ill xbots ive ever known here. He is right up there with other delusional xbots such as Abonsabo, XxR3m1xInHDn3D, XBOunity, Miketheman83, kingtito, SonofK, Harmless_Rage, Superclocked, rolvenvencia etc
But yeah, he is wrong on all accounts here. No suprise lol.
A majority of the 360's early "exclusives" later apprared on the PS3 or PC anyway.
... Like Bioshock,Mass Effect, Dead Rising, Full Auto,Lost Planet, Gears 1, Alan Wake ect....
And the 360's back catalog is also inflated by old PS2 ports from early this gen, old sports titles from early this gen, and a grip of xbl titles and kinect titles that not even the most delusional of lemmings would care about!
Also, over 80% of the games in the 360's library(multi plats) are ALSO available on the PS3
The PS3 has so many more and better core games that matter to core gamers, then the 360, that its not even funny. The PS3's catalogue isn't about numbers, like the library of the 360 is, its about substance and quality. In 2011 and 2013 alone the PS3 CRUSHED the 360 in quantity of exclusives AND especially in quality of exclusives.
Hell, he even says that the PS3 had no games for its first 3 years and that is just patently FALSE (typical delusional xbot talk)
Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, WarHawk, Ratchet and Clank ect - all released within ONE year of the PS3's launch. That's the reality of it...
And in all actuality, The PS3 received more exclusives within the first year of its release, then the 360 did within the first year of its release.
And the PS3 from late 2006( when it launched) to late 2007, still had much more games back then the 360 has games NOW- -more games back then the 360 had games for the year of 2012, 2011 or even for the year of 2010 too.
Under NO MEASURE did the 360 have a better library...
And no spinning changes the fact that the 360's library consisted of literally nothing but the same old boring repetitive lackluster Gears,Halo Forza,Fable sequels year in and year out ect.
Sony and their stellar first parties kept pouring on the amazing exclusives -at much more variety and quality until the very end of this gen, mean while Microsoft dropped support half way into the gen like thye always do etc.
Microsoft's transaparent Gears/Halo/Forza yearly rehash startegy + multi plat strartegy should never be forgiven.
And its not going to work his time for Microsoft, because on top of Sony already having the much better exclusive library and exclusive developers, the PS4 will now 100% get the better multi plats too, and the differences will be much bigger then the differences were between 360 and PS3 multi plats.
There really is NO reason for a GAMER to get an xbone.
Never mind PS4 is 100$ cheaper 50% more powerful. The PS4 has every possible advantage you can think of over the xbone, and by significant margins...it really does lol. Its PS4 all the way!
You also win the race by how you finish and Sony are the strongest finishers in gaming while Microsoft is the weakest. All the more reason Playstation>>>>>xbox.
All that stuff NEEDS to be taken into account. Its much more important then blindly buying a console for its launch. When has a launch game ever been one of the best of that gen(except for Mario 64)
Even then, the PS4 still does have the better launch. Killzone alone>>>>>any xbone launch game....but the thing is you know Sony has better developers, better exclusive library, takes more risks, and will support the PS4 much better and much longer with much better games, and at more variety, and all of that is much more important
To conclude, like has been said many times by me and by many others, PS4>>xbone in every way.
(The PS4 is the gamers console; made by gamers for gamers. The xbone is an under-powered, over-priced, less supported, anti-consumer "machine" being used as a trojan horse to SPY with the spycam known as Kinect)
Log in to comment