@Jag85 said:
@kaealy said:
@toast_burner said:
Her cheating on her boy friend has absolutely nothing to do with her career.
... she did it to further her career, sleeping with talents inside the industry for positive exposure of her projects.
I can't see how that doesn't have anything to do with her career and it would be something to write about when a reviewers bias is in question thanks to bribes aka sex.
The guy she allegedly slept with never reviewed her game...
http://kotaku.com/in-recent-days-ive-been-asked-several-times-about-a-pos-1624707346
If you're going to slander someone, at least do some research and look at the actual evidence, before making yourself look like yet another irrational misogynistic fool.
The first thing you said is true, he didn't review her game. But that changes nothing.
Nepotism (be it family, friendship, money or sex driven nepotism) renders influence over more than just the one position the person has, because the person itself does more than just put out the product of his work (in this case, articles). He talks to and interacts with other people in the industry and in his working place, influencing and potentially altering bias.
Read Ivory Oasis' (another indie dev) posts in the Internet Aristocrat video, and you'll see one in which she's unknowingly admitting that:
"Lol you MRA's are hilarious. Trying to slut shame someone for having a relationship?
(...)
And, actually, those relationships....are how the industry works! How you get into meetings to get funding! How you get support for projects! How you get advice! And yes, how journalists even hear about you or cover you (since they go "hay, that guy I met at pax...he was pretty cool, and his game was pretty cool....yea, I guess I'll pass it along to readers").
This is an industry made to create cool stuff around other people passionate about the same stuff (games). Yea, it is a small community...and we know each other (and, again, even sex happens sometimes).
(...)
The above is no justification, it's acknowledging the nepotism. Obs. I didn't quote everything she said above because most of it is just offensive name calling on the guys she's answering to, but you can easily see that comment there, it's one of her first replies to those answering her own original comment.
What about this Robin Arnott's article: Game_JAM and the Power of Integrity. Quinn is described as such an epitome of ethics and responsibility... by one of the guys involved in the 5 guys scandal (apparently). Now, how can we simply trust what he said here after knowing about what happened in the backstage (after so many confirming or even admitting it)?
There's also the question of her having an affair with her boss. It doesn't matter if he or she were in a relationship at the time... the cheating aspect is the one we shouldn't dive into, but except for that one aspect of it, it's a violation of meritocracy, efficiency, working ethics, etc. Something that may eventually damage even the company's image and whatnot.
There's no reason to flip the conflict of interests issue, which is the important one, into the other unimportant ones related her personal sexual and moral choices. I see no reason to restrict and silence those legitimately commenting the developments of such acts. It would only be in the interest of those that wants the industry to keep stimulating the conflict of interest, because it surely works on someone's favor, and it's certainly not the consumers'.
Log in to comment