PC GPU Power: Now measured in terms of Xbox Ones

#1 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

Here's a listing of AMD GPUs and their Xbox One's worth of power (http://i.imgur.com/5RoUDJ8.png)

I'm sitting at around 2 Xbox Ones. How about you?

#2 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (16266 posts) -

MS must be getting sick of having their wounds treated with salt.

edit: picture isn't blowing up for me :(.

#3 Posted by MonsieurX (31715 posts) -

No listing for Nvidia :(

#4 Posted by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@MonsieurX said:

No listing for Nvidia :(

yeah, you'll have to do a rough conversion

#5 Posted by CyberLips (1824 posts) -

I can't tell with that image

#6 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

And for all you playstation haters out there: Nvidia 700 series and AMD 200 series in terms of PS4

#7 Posted by Indicud (745 posts) -

Just LOL.

#8 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@CyberLips said:

I can't tell with that image

click the image and then open in new tab

or: http://i.imgur.com/5RoUDJ8.png

#9 Edited by Indicud (745 posts) -

RAdeon R925= 6.23PS4's and 8.8 Xbox Ones.

#10 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (16266 posts) -

Damn the ps4 whips my 580. Although with all the exclusive high range titles coming to Ps4, I'm struggling to find reasons to upgrade.

#11 Posted by R3FURBISHED (10846 posts) -

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

#12 Edited by melonfarmerz (1283 posts) -

But PC doesn't have GOTY obviously. Therefore all other arguments favouring PC, about every other factor that has to do with gaming, is invalid. Power, value, community, competitive, skill, mods, exclusives, all don't matter because the only thing I care about in gaming is playing games that are deemed the best of the year by console centric new sites. Even though articles were just published stating that PC gaming has completely eclipsed all consoles combined, PC gaming is dying cause no GOTY hurhurhur console Caesars. Carry on Citizen

#13 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (16266 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

#14 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

about a 7970

#15 Edited by melonfarmerz (1283 posts) -

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

The 680 is the same as a 770 in terms of power. You know what actually is obsolete though? Consoles tech...

#16 Posted by ReadingRainbow4 (16266 posts) -

@melonfarmerz said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

The 680 is the same as a 770 in terms of power. You know what actually is obsolete though? Consoles tech...

You guys beg for way more games than that, lol.

#17 Posted by AppleBeatsPC (50 posts) -

@melonfarmerz: valid point, but the X1 has dominated so far, and I expect nothing less for years to come. PC game is a dying breed, while Mac has dominated app downloads, and the X1 revolutionizes console gaming.

#18 Edited by R3FURBISHED (10846 posts) -

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

And yet my card has a faster core clock than a 780ti (1084MHz vs 876MHz) and 1GB more dedicated RAM (4GB vs 3GB)....

#19 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@melonfarmerz said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

The 680 is the same as a 770 in terms of power. You know what actually is obsolete though? Consoles tech...

You guys beg for way more games than that, lol.

...your response doesn't seem to make much sense to what he said

#20 Posted by LanceX2 (312 posts) -

3.3 X1s for me :D 7970 Ghz

#21 Edited by ReadingRainbow4 (16266 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@melonfarmerz said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

We're not even on the list. It starts at 700+

Already obsolete.

The 680 is the same as a 770 in terms of power. You know what actually is obsolete though? Consoles tech...

You guys beg for way more games than that, lol.

...your response doesn't seem to make much sense to what he said

That's because he edited it out at the last minute.

it was some nonsense about gta.

#22 Edited by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@applebeatspc said:

@melonfarmerz: valid point, but the X1 has dominated so far, and I expect nothing less for years to come. PC game is a dying breed, while Mac has dominated app downloads, and the X1 revolutionizes console gaming.

at least out some effort into your trolling

#23 Edited by CyberLips (1824 posts) -

@applebeatspc said:

@melonfarmerz: valid point, but the X1 has dominated so far, and I expect nothing less for years to come. PC game is a dying breed, while Mac has dominated app downloads, and the X1 revolutionizes console gaming.

#24 Edited by 04dcarraher (20594 posts) -
@lostrib said:

@R3FURBISHED said:

I have a GTX 680 FTW+, so......?

about a 7970

GTX 670= stock 7970 , so a GTX 680 would comparing to a 7970ghz or 280x

#25 Edited by hoosier7 (3981 posts) -

Is that right? I thought the R9 280X was a rebadge of the 7970 GHz edition so should be 3.2 not 3.1? The chart @04dcarraher posts seems to back that up.

Either way i'll be picking one up soon and it still stomps the next gen consoles :P

#26 Edited by 04dcarraher (20594 posts) -
@lostrib said:

And for all you playstation haters out there: Nvidia 700 series and AMD 200 series in terms of PS4

This is only going by the TFLOPS performance if you look at pixel rates and texel rates many of those gpu's are 2x or more faster in one or both those areas.

For example my OC'ed GTX 760 has a texture rate of 112 vs PS4's 57 texture rate nearly 2x faster, then pixel rate of 37 vs PS4 25.6 a 31% difference.

Also you cant directly compare Nvidia FLOPS vs AMD's gpu's FLOPS,for example R 280x is a 4.1 TFLOP while GTX 770 is 3.2 TFLOP but yet 770 beats the 280x.

So many of those gpu's are actually faster then the chart is showing

#27 Edited by _Matt_ (9443 posts) -

I'm at just over 4 PS4s worth, 6 XBOX Ones.

#28 Edited by foxhound_fox (90820 posts) -

Radeon HD 7640G

Approximately 1 Xbox One (?)*

* note: It doesn't seem to be listed.

#29 Posted by TwistedShade (3138 posts) -

I'm at 2.1x the power of the PS4

#30 Edited by Pray_to_me (3102 posts) -

Yet when you plug one of those cards into a wall it doesn't do shit it just makes a fart noise. After you buy the gpu you still have to worry about the rest of the PC.

$400 PS4 you take out the box boom ready to go. No assembling shit; No big ugly electricity guzzling tower; No petition signing for late ports.

PC gaming is bootleg. The "booming" "PC gaming" industry is Farmville and other no name bottom of the barrel garbage. The best games last gen never even made it to PC and this gen will be more of the same.

#31 Posted by lostrib (42875 posts) -
@Pray_to_me said:

Yet when you plug one of those cards into a wall it doesn't do shit it just makes a fart noise. After you buy the gpu you still have to worry about the rest of the PC.

$400 PS4 you take out the box boom ready to go. No assembling shit; No big ugly electricity guzzling tower; No petition signing for late ports.

PC gaming is bootleg. The "booming" "PC gaming" industry is Farmville and other no name bottom of the barrel garbage. The best games last gen never even made it to PC and this gen will be more of the same.

lol, cry more noob

#32 Edited by osan0 (13031 posts) -

i have a 780M. in desktop terms thats around a 660ti (though the 780M has 4GB of Vram).

against the PS4 it loses out in memory bandwidth (160 GB/s on the 780M vs 176GB/s on the PS4). i cant dig up official figures for the gflops of the 780M which is odd. the 660ti has around 2.4Tflops. the 780M has more cores but is clocked lower so its probably around the same as that. that beats the PS4s 1.84 terraflops.

so on the GPU side im probably packing around 1.2 PS4s or 1.6 xbox ones.

Not bad for something thats also smaller than the consoles. costs a bloody fortune though :P.

#34 Edited by Blabadon (28502 posts) -

And how many Wii Us is each?

#35 Edited by MiiiiV (535 posts) -

@lostrib said:

And for all you playstation haters out there: Nvidia 700 series and AMD 200 series in terms of PS4

It seems that someone has only taken the flops into account which is really only accurate comparing gpus with the same architecture. Cause the R9 280x is certainly not better than the GTX 780. I think there is a more accurate graph comparing Nvidia gpus to the ps4, but I cant seem to find it.

#36 Edited by kuu2 (7971 posts) -

Where did this chart come from TC? No link just an image.

#37 Posted by Postosuchus (382 posts) -

@Blabadon said:

And how many Wii Us is each?

Not enough horizontal space to show that.

#38 Posted by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@kuu2 said:

Where did this chart come from TC? No link just an image.

someone made it. It's based on FLOPS

#39 Edited by Heil68 (47265 posts) -

2.6 for me. Have you taken into account the 32X boost the Xbone will get with DX12?

#40 Posted by silversix_ (16237 posts) -

WOW im actually surprised some1 has FINALLY fund a reason for Xbone to exist. Thank you Microsoft.

#41 Edited by speedfreak48t5p (9539 posts) -

@Blabadon said:

And how many Wii Us is each?

A billion.

#42 Edited by Kinthalis (5340 posts) -
@Heil68 said:

2.6 for me. Have you taken into account the 32X boost the Xbone will get with DX12?

Plus the other 100x boost from the cloud.

#43 Posted by lunar1122 (687 posts) -

@lostrib said:

Here's a listing of AMD GPUs and their Xbox One's worth of power (http://i.imgur.com/5RoUDJ8.png)

I'm sitting at around 2 Xbox Ones. How about you?

at 3.7 bones. man the bone is pure weak sauce .. low res and bad framerates i feel sorry for lemming die hards..

#44 Edited by wis3boi (32013 posts) -

yay three and a half xbones

#45 Posted by RyviusARC (4908 posts) -

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Damn the ps4 whips my 580. Although with all the exclusive high range titles coming to Ps4, I'm struggling to find reasons to upgrade.

Actually your 580 is more powerful than the PS4.

#46 Edited by PS4hasNOgames (2354 posts) -

@lostrib: why don't you go measure the shitty third rate games released on pc lol. you sure are getting a lot out of your rig counting bits haha!

ALL THE BEST GAMES ARE ON CONSOLES.

#47 Edited by MiiiiV (535 posts) -

@lostrib said:

Here's a listing of AMD GPUs and their Xbox One's worth of power (http://i.imgur.com/5RoUDJ8.png)

I'm sitting at around 2 Xbox Ones. How about you?

I'm at 6.3 xbones, the 8990 is an oem version of the 7990, it seems.

#48 Posted by lostrib (42875 posts) -

@ps4hasnogames said:

@lostrib: why don't you go measure the shitty third rate games released on pc lol. you sure are getting a lot out of your rig counting bits haha!

ALL THE BEST GAMES ARE ON CONSOLES.

Lol, stay mad

#49 Edited by intotheminx (888 posts) -

What I learned from this thread and my own research is that if you have anything less than a r9 270x you might as well buy a console and save yourself the trouble. Even then, multiplats will be a problem due to optimization.

#50 Posted by hrt_rulz01 (7172 posts) -

It's funny how some PC gamers keep trying to compare their rigs' power to consoles... Like they have to prove how powerful their expensive rigs are. Wow! Good for you!