PC game that is superior on PS4

  • 144 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#51 Posted by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -

PSJohn ftw

So sad that I wasn't a part of that thread.

#52 Edited by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -
#53 Edited by darkangel115 (1505 posts) -

@darkangel115 said:

Is this thread saying that a machine with inferior hardware could have better graphics? Doesn't that in the same sense, completely ruin every cow argument on here for the past 8 months?

that is a very, very good point.

should breathe new life into the 'ForeverWar: subjective graphics debate'.

only if there were enough unbiased and rational people to discuss it. Which is hardly the case here. Double standards are the standard of system wars

#54 Posted by bobbetybob (19174 posts) -

lol, lack of effort confirmed. Its not hard to allow the assets , settings and options for the people that have the hardware to match and surpass the PS4.

Exactly, unless the game uses different assets on PS4 it's literally impossible for it to look better than it would look maxed out on a PC.

#55 Posted by HaloinventedFPS (4713 posts) -

Yeah & Tomb Raider looked way better on PS4 & Crysis looked better on PS3

#56 Posted by ButDuuude (418 posts) -

Haha PC game.

#57 Posted by StormyJoe (4889 posts) -

@Gue1 said:

When asked about the graphics differences between PC and PS4 versions in an interview with 2P, Lee stated:

”A little hard to tell you right now because if the PC users know, they will be very angry. PS4 has much better graphics. PS4 graphics quality will be much better and higher than the PC version.”

http://gamingbolt.com/kingdom-under-fire-ii-ps4-graphics-better-and-higher-than-pc-version#4P1pc4debmUiHgGK.99

The only way for this to come to fruition is if the developer purposefully toned down the PC version. No console is as powerful as a high-end PC.

#58 Posted by Krelian-co (10368 posts) -

only dumb people would believe this is true for any reason other than laziness or incompetence.

#59 Posted by SrgtSaggy101 (1863 posts) -

@SrgtSaggy101: How is PS4 struggling if it is 1080p 60fps? Wouldn't that mean it's full speed at 60fps?

They have had to lower the res below 1080p in some games, and other settings. cause it couldn't handle it, thought that was well known.

#60 Posted by MK-Professor (3713 posts) -

This can only be possible if they done it on purpose(not incompetence). However this does not make any sense (except if sony pay to sabotage the pc version), so this guy is just trolling, and the ps4 version is going to look and perform similar to a HD7850, just like every other multiplat.

#61 Edited by SrgtSaggy101 (1863 posts) -

lol cows suddenly care about graphics again, and think their tablet cpu and mid range quality graphics card can take on a high end pc.

#62 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -

Never heard of the game before and I see no reason to care that a dev was too lazy to take advantage of the extra power PC offers.

#63 Edited by uninspiredcup (7831 posts) -

Sounds like a shitty dev.

#64 Posted by Silent-Assasin7 (1496 posts) -

Since anyone who isn't mentally handicapped knows that PCs have the potential for far greater power, and so better settings, than the consoles, this means the devs purposely gimped the PC version. Idiots.

#65 Posted by remiks00 (1705 posts) -

@lawlessx said:

@Vaasman said:

@lundy86_4 said:

@xboxdone74 said:

@lostrib: meltdown confirmed. B-)

Bro, you have to be the worst troll. Learn from some of the greats, like Saolin... Actually, he was pretty bad as well.

Remember when trolls actually had to be clever or amusing to avoid bans? Those were the good old system wars days....

the days before the TOS change were the best. Now being a troll here is almost encouraged

I miss @CallOfDutyRulez and Brofist, Their posts always cracked me up.

#66 Edited by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -

@remiks00 said:

I miss @CallOfDutyRulez and Brofist, Their posts always cracked me up.

Pretty sure Brofists is still around. I forget his current name.

#67 Edited by Pray_to_me (2834 posts) -

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

#68 Edited by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

#69 Posted by glez13 (8672 posts) -

FIFA 14?

#70 Edited by clyde46 (44900 posts) -

@Spartan070 said:

PSJohn ftw

So sad that I wasn't a part of that thread.

Even ShadowMoses was better.

#71 Posted by lawlessx (46542 posts) -

@Pray_to_me said:

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

you have to admit what he said was pretty funny.

#72 Posted by lundy86_4 (43009 posts) -

@lawlessx said:

@lundy86_4 said:

@Pray_to_me said:

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

you have to admit what he said was pretty funny.

Kinda, I guess... I didn't chuckle.

#73 Posted by melonfarmerz (1120 posts) -

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

Yeah & Tomb Raider looked way better on PS4 & Crysis looked better on PS3

This is satire right? Please tell me you guys are joking. Please? Pretty please?

#74 Posted by tormentos (17092 posts) -

@nyzma23 said:

@tormentos said:

This will enrage some hermits with fragile ego's and strong PC's..hahahaha

why you even don't have ps4

So i need a PS4 so that hermit get rage.?

Hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

I am telling you that excuse of you don't own this will come back to hunt you lemmings...lol

@darkangel115 said:

Is this thread saying that a machine with inferior hardware could have better graphics? Doesn't that in the same sense, completely ruin every cow argument on here for the past 8 months?

that is a very, very good point.

should breathe new life into the 'ForeverWar: subjective graphics debate'.

Sure it is...hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

#75 Posted by blangenakker (2220 posts) -

K.

#76 Posted by tormentos (17092 posts) -

@CrownKingArthur said:
@darkangel115 said:

Is this thread saying that a machine with inferior hardware could have better graphics? Doesn't that in the same sense, completely ruin every cow argument on here for the past 8 months?

that is a very, very good point.

should breathe new life into the 'ForeverWar: subjective graphics debate'.

only if there were enough unbiased and rational people to discuss it. Which is hardly the case here. Double standards are the standard of system wars

You can't discus what you don't know...

Outside the whole joke thread he is just trolling hermits and he knows it,now lemmings on the other hand actually believe the xbox one will catch the PS4 hell some actually believe it will surpass it..lol

The only way the xbox one can have a superior version of a game is if the developers gimp it on PS4,much like this case here..

#77 Edited by CrownKingArthur (4420 posts) -

@CrownKingArthur said:
@darkangel115 said:

Is this thread saying that a machine with inferior hardware could have better graphics? Doesn't that in the same sense, completely ruin every cow argument on here for the past 8 months?

that is a very, very good point.

should breathe new life into the 'ForeverWar: subjective graphics debate'.

Sure it is...hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

why are you laughing? DA's got a point.

i see his point. basically, there's a model of predictive utility. from the tech specs, we can predict performance. therefore graphics should go

"Gaming PC" > PS4 > XB1 > Wii U (my crude estimate)

examples like this game, and games like fifa 14 are the exception to the rule - but i acknowledge their existence. ps4 is weaker than a proper gaming pc, but it is the world's most powerful gaming console.

#78 Edited by CrownKingArthur (4420 posts) -

oh right its a ps4 xb1 thing. no worries Tormentos, have yourself a peachy day.

#79 Posted by thehig1 (1388 posts) -

Yeah & Tomb Raider looked way better on PS4 & Crysis looked better on PS3

Tomb Raider looks almost identical on PC/PS4, and Crysis looks far better on PC its not even close. PS3 is like Crysis on Medium Settings.

Why would a developer say this anyway, all he's achieved is alienation of PC gamers (7 Million +) he's basically said we have not spent any time or resource on the PC port.

Even if that the case you shouldn't pubically say it, thats vad business.

#80 Edited by ChristianGmr14 (155 posts) -

Bad ports have been known to happen on all platforms. It's just lazy development. However that being said IMO the vast majority of console ports are better than the PC version simply because I prefer console gaming. I have a gaming PC too but to each his own.

#81 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -

@thehig1 said:

@HaloinventedFPS said:

Yeah & Tomb Raider looked way better on PS4 & Crysis looked better on PS3

Tomb Raider looks almost identical on PC/PS4, and Crysis looks far better on PC its not even close. PS3 is like Crysis on low Settings.

Fixed.

#82 Posted by silversix_ (14066 posts) -

That just can't be true unless there's one person working on the pc version and 100 on ps4

#83 Posted by Masculus (2830 posts) -

I thought this was vaporware, suprised for this project to be still alive.

#84 Edited by Liquid_ (2439 posts) -

99% > 1%

PC wins

#86 Posted by scatteh316 (4848 posts) -

So PS4 can run at 2560x1440 and above now :S

#87 Edited by JangoWuzHere (16116 posts) -

This game is still coming out? I thought it was suppose to be released like 6 years ago?

#88 Edited by GiantAssPanda (1605 posts) -

@Pray_to_me said:

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

Haha.. oh wow. Genius.

#89 Posted by kozzy1234 (35153 posts) -

So he means they did a crap job porting it to a less powerful gaming system?

#90 Posted by Caseytappy (2131 posts) -

Yes hello Cows,

This game will run better on average/ mid spec PC hardware in a small box called PS4 then on a top specced monster PC .

Please believe because it sounds logical , right ?

#91 Posted by dommeus (9234 posts) -

weird

#92 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4034 posts) -

Maybe the dev should try their hand at mobile games if they cant handle the PC.

#93 Posted by scottpsfan14 (3773 posts) -
#94 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4034 posts) -

@Pray_to_me said:

PC doesn't quite have the ram to compete with PS4 you see. The most expensive graphics card on the market costs 2.5X what the PS4 costs and yet only has 75% the ram. That's Why PC excels at linear on rails shooters like Crysis 3 but struggles to play open world games like GTA 5.

I lol'd

#95 Posted by tormentos (17092 posts) -

So PS4 can run at 2560x1440 and above now :S

Yes it can the 7850 can run at that resolution and still keep 30 FPS on games like BF3.

But what purpose it will serve most TV out there would not support that resolution.

#96 Edited by kalipekona (2296 posts) -

lol, lack of effort confirmed. Its not hard to allow the assets , settings and options for the people that have the hardware to match and surpass the PS4.

Exactly. I highly doubt this is true, but if it somehow did end up being true it would only be due to the devs intentionally withholding graphical features from the PC version. There are millions of gamers with high end rigs that could run it at settings better than the PS4 version. If those settings aren't in the game it's just because the devs purposely did something stupid.

#97 Edited by FoxbatAlpha (6140 posts) -

Cows always take what devs say as gospel and turn it into a damn written law. Later when devs retract their statement, cows still go on believing it.

The bottom feeders of SW.

#98 Posted by kalipekona (2296 posts) -

Bad ports have been known to happen on all platforms. It's just lazy development. However that being said IMO the vast majority of console ports are better than the PC version simply because I prefer console gaming. I have a gaming PC too but to each his own.

Yeah, and the vast majority of VHS movies are better than the Blu-ray versions because I simply prefer VHS movies.

See how silly that sounds? You can prefer a lower quality thing if you like, but that doesn't change the fact that it is lower quality.

#99 Posted by Butcer2 (62 posts) -

@Gue1 said:

When asked about the graphics differences between PC and PS4 versions in an interview with 2P, Lee stated:

”A little hard to tell you right now because if the PC users know, they will be very angry. PS4 has much better graphics. PS4 graphics quality will be much better and higher than the PC version.”

http://gamingbolt.com/kingdom-under-fire-ii-ps4-graphics-better-and-higher-than-pc-version#4P1pc4debmUiHgGK.99

Does not matter , just because a system has better graphics does not make it good if it lacks good games , and latly pc have been getting crappy ports and major releases delayed or not even released on the pc. So yes pc has alot of slection of older games ,i

the 3do and atari jaugar were lightyears ahead of its competion at its time in hardware but utterlyh failed because lack of games.

#100 Posted by kalipekona (2296 posts) -

@Butcer2 said:

@Gue1 said:

When asked about the graphics differences between PC and PS4 versions in an interview with 2P, Lee stated:

”A little hard to tell you right now because if the PC users know, they will be very angry. PS4 has much better graphics. PS4 graphics quality will be much better and higher than the PC version.”

http://gamingbolt.com/kingdom-under-fire-ii-ps4-graphics-better-and-higher-than-pc-version#4P1pc4debmUiHgGK.99

Does not matter , just because a system has better graphics does not make it good if it lacks good games , and latly pc have been getting crappy ports and major releases delayed or not even released on the pc. So yes pc has alot of slection of older games ,i

the 3do and atari jaugar were lightyears ahead of its competion at its time in hardware but utterlyh failed because lack of games.

The PC gets more games than any other platform. And I'm talking high quality games. For instance, every year GameInformer does their top 50 games of the year and more of those games are on the PC than any other platform.

The vast majority of games are multiplatform and those games look and play a lot better on PC.

The PC has its own exclusives as well, of course. The fact the PC misses out on a game here or there means nothing, because all systems miss out on certain games. I could give you a long list of games that you can play on PC and Xbox or PC and PS3/PS4 that you can't play on the other console.