New sales numbers in... HOLY SMOKES!... Vita has FLOPPED!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts
It's official. Sony will have to make a pact with Satan (aka. Bobby Kotick) and put Call of Duty on Vita.nervmeister
Both sony and nintnedo have already done that in the past cod was on psp and ds
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

I don't understand why people would be happy with this. Dedicated game machines will probably cease to exist in 5 years time. Notyourbuddy

That will never happen.

As long as there are casuals who don't know any better and children who need a virtual babysitter, there will always be dedicated game consoles.

Maybe not for the hardcore audience, though.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#103 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7156 Posts
Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........
Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

Can't say I'm surprised.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

I don't really see any negative in this for Sony, for all we know they shipped out 100k second and week and sold 70k to consumers.

If thats they case a lot of posters in this thread will be looking more stupid than usual.

Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

I don't really see any negative in this for Sony, for all we know they shipped out 100k second and week and sold 70k to consumers.

If thats they case a lot of posters in this thread will be looking more stupid than usual.

rasengan2552

It's impossible to track the exact amount sold to consumers.

Companies only have a record of the number shipped, and honestly that's all that matters to Sony.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

I think PS Vita did have incredible potential, it's just put down by these incredibly stupid design decisions and price points.

Avatar image for Chris_Williams
Chris_Williams

14882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 Chris_Williams
Member since 2009 • 14882 Posts

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

Avatar image for Notyourbuddy
Notyourbuddy

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Notyourbuddy
Member since 2011 • 55 Posts

[QUOTE="Notyourbuddy"]I don't understand why people would be happy with this. Dedicated game machines will probably cease to exist in 5 years time. peterw007

That will never happen.

As long as their are casuals who don't know any better and children who need a virtual babysitter, there will always be dedicated game consoles.

Maybe not for the hardcore audience, though.

Those children will probably get an ipod touch or a cheap smartphone, less expensive and the games only cost a dollar! That generation will grow up with casual games and won't know any better.
Avatar image for Kaszilla
Kaszilla

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Kaszilla
Member since 2011 • 1841 Posts

Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........AtariKidX
You can't spell or not sound like a robot for ****

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#111 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
why can't people post things on their main account
Avatar image for commonfate
commonfate

13320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 commonfate
Member since 2010 • 13320 Posts

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

Chris_Williams

Agreed but keep in mind that Vita can't reasonable drop in price like the 3DS did.

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#113 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........AtariKidX
3DS did 371,326 in its first two days. In the next 7 days, the 3DS did 206,087. That's a total of 577,413 in 9 days. 3DS - 577,413 PSV - 393,886 Let it sink.
Avatar image for Kaze_no_Mirai
Kaze_no_Mirai

11763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Kaze_no_Mirai
Member since 2004 • 11763 Posts

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........Kaszilla

You can't spell or not sound like a robot for ****

yes yes very good
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
[QUOTE="peterw007"]

[QUOTE="Notyourbuddy"]I don't understand why people would be happy with this. Dedicated game machines will probably cease to exist in 5 years time. Notyourbuddy

That will never happen.

As long as their are casuals who don't know any better and children who need a virtual babysitter, there will always be dedicated game consoles.

Maybe not for the hardcore audience, though.

Those children will probably get an ipod touch or a cheap smartphone, less expensive and the games only cost a dollar! That generation will grow up with casual games and won't know any better.

How will they buy those $1 games, though?
Avatar image for commonfate
commonfate

13320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 commonfate
Member since 2010 • 13320 Posts

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........Kaszilla

You can't spell or not sound like a robot for ****

For a second language his English isn't bad bro.

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

commonfate

Agreed but keep in mind that Vita can't reasonable drop in price like the 3DS did.

So I take it that means 3DS dropped to $169 a week after it originally launched?
Avatar image for Slashless
Slashless

9534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#118 Slashless
Member since 2011 • 9534 Posts

[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

commonfate

Agreed but keep in mind that Vita can't reasonable drop in price like the 3DS did.

*looks at sig* Link Naow :evil:
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

[QUOTE="peterw007"]

[QUOTE="Notyourbuddy"]I don't understand why people would be happy with this. Dedicated game machines will probably cease to exist in 5 years time. Notyourbuddy

That will never happen.

As long as their are casuals who don't know any better and children who need a virtual babysitter, there will always be dedicated game consoles.

Maybe not for the hardcore audience, though.

Those children will probably get an ipod touch or a cheap smartphone, less expensive and the games only cost a dollar! That generation will grow up with casual games and won't know any better.

You have to remember that children have incredibly short attention spans.

Cheap smartphone games might divert them for a couple of minutes, but sooner or later they will get bored of it.

More full-fledged experiences -- games that last you 20+ hours on a dedicated gaming console -- consume more of the child's attention, so they're more useful both in the eyes of the parents and the kids.

I know little kids who have played Pokemon Black and White for hundreds of hours. I don't know anyone who plays Angry Birds for even a mere fraction of that time.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
why can't people post things on their main accountDiviniuz
The person who made this thread is posting in this thread under their main as well. He/she thinks that we can't tell though.
Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8474 Posts

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

I don't really see any negative in this for Sony, for all we know they shipped out 100k second and week and sold 70k to consumers.

If thats they case a lot of posters in this thread will be looking more stupid than usual.

peterw007

It's impossible to track the exact amount sold to consumers.

Companies only have a record of the number shipped, and honestly that's all that matters to Sony.

I do not know if Sony does or not but they are able to track how much the stores sell in general. Also they do care how many systems customers buy because if they do not buy them then the stores will not order more. Not only that but if no one buys systems then no one is buying games so of course Sony cares about that more then just how much they sell to stores.
Avatar image for Kaszilla
Kaszilla

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Kaszilla
Member since 2011 • 1841 Posts
[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]Those PSVita sales are very good for start......and it looks that PS Vita first week sales beat 3DS first week sales.PSVita have sell 321,407 units in first two days of release + Week sales 72,479....and we have 393,886 in first week.3DS have sell 371,326 in first weak.PS Vita first week sales have beat 3DS first week sales.That is very good for start.........Kaze_no_Mirai

You can't spell or not sound like a robot for ****

yes yes very good

Good sales very good for psvita
Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

[QUOTE="Notyourbuddy"][QUOTE="peterw007"]

That will never happen.

As long as their are casuals who don't know any better and children who need a virtual babysitter, there will always be dedicated game consoles.

Maybe not for the hardcore audience, though.PurpleMan5000

Those children will probably get an ipod touch or a cheap smartphone, less expensive and the games only cost a dollar! That generation will grow up with casual games and won't know any better.

How will they buy those $1 games, though?

with a freaking itunes card ... a chimp can use one.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#124 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14495 Posts

Holy doom and gloom, Batman! So much negativity in one thread makes me wanna slit my wrists.

Chill out, last i checked Nintendo didn't start selling 3DS' until they decided to throw a billion dollars at it. Vita will have its day.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

Chris_Williams
Only before the price was slashed like $80 which sheep like to forget with a passion.
Avatar image for RandomWinner
RandomWinner

3751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 RandomWinner
Member since 2010 • 3751 Posts

Those numbers are terrible!

But its Japan, as if that's an indicator over how something will do here. For example, the Xbox.

Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

[QUOTE="peterw007"]

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

I don't really see any negative in this for Sony, for all we know they shipped out 100k second and week and sold 70k to consumers.

If thats they case a lot of posters in this thread will be looking more stupid than usual.

CanYouDiglt

It's impossible to track the exact amount sold to consumers.

Companies only have a record of the number shipped, and honestly that's all that matters to Sony.

I do not know if Sony does or not but they are able to track how much the stores sell in general. Also they do care how many systems customers buy because if they do not buy them then the stores will not order more. Not only that but if no one buys systems then no one is buying games so of course Sony cares about that more then just how much they sell to stores.

Let's say Sony ships 5000 systems to Amazon, 20000 to Best Buy, and 50000 to Gamestop.

Sony gets their profit from those orders regardless if they actually sell to consumers or not.

-

But if they don't sell, the distributors will order less systems in the future, which may result in less yearly profits for Sony.

Units sold does matter to an extent, but what really matters is the distributors and how much they buy.

It's all about keeping the distributors happy...not how much actually sells to consumers.

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#128 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

Crossel777
Only before the price was slashed like $80 which sheep like to forget with a passion.

3DS is selling better than the Vita at the same pricepoint. Or so it seems. Nice to know consumers aren't fooled by Sony's memory card tactics.
Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
[QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

Crossel777
Only before the price was slashed like $80 which sheep like to forget with a passion.

Thats what Im saying, the thing launched at $250 and its already $150 at some retail stores.
Avatar image for TheManofTin
TheManofTin

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#130 TheManofTin
Member since 2011 • 395 Posts
Why are companies releasing consoles too early these days? It's stupid. They release consoles with no decent games and slap a super huge price on it and expect us to buy it. No wonder I-Phone games are dominating. At least those games are affordable, innovative, and easy to pick up and play. Now we have all this stupid patches, DLC, and update nonsense. Every single company has released a console too early. Nintendo: 3DS, why the hell would they release a console in Spring? Why would you buy a console in spring? IF they released this christmas, that whole drought of games wouldn't be there and certain games would be ready for release. All they had were Super Street Fighter 4 and Pilotwings for the first 3 months. And everyone had there hopes up for Zelda OOT and Star fox which are remakes I might add and not even new games. We had to wait almost a whole year for some games and that was Super Mario 3D Land which SHOULD have been a launch title and Mario Kart 7 too. Why didn't they just release Pokemon Black and White on the 3DS. I could garuntee you if they did, the 3DS would sell like hot cakes. Sony: Vita, as you mentioned. Also the PS3. It took like 2 years for some actual games! And they expected us to pay over half a thousand dollars! that is such bull! Microsoft: Xbox 360, while the 360 is now a really good console, but they rushed it out the door and it ended up being plagued with errors like the red ring which took 4 years to finally fix! Also, Perfect Dark Zero was the launch title...if you read my review of that game, you'll know how much I despise it.
Avatar image for Kaszilla
Kaszilla

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Kaszilla
Member since 2011 • 1841 Posts

Holy doom and gloom, Batman! So much negativity in one thread makes me wanna slit my wrists.

Chill out, last i checked Nintendo didn't start selling 3DS' until they decided to throw a billion dollars at it. Vita will have its day.

Basinboy
The 3DS was selling better at this point in its life...... Vita just isn't selling as well as 3DS. PERIOD.
Avatar image for El_Zo1212o
El_Zo1212o

6057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 El_Zo1212o
Member since 2009 • 6057 Posts

Playstation Family beats Wii60 once again.

Nike_Air
Great comment there, pard! never mind the fact that the sales figures for the 4 Playstations on that list combined equal just over HALF the sales of the 3DS alone. Tool.
Avatar image for Kaszilla
Kaszilla

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Kaszilla
Member since 2011 • 1841 Posts
[QUOTE="Crossel777"][QUOTE="Chris_Williams"]

didn't 3ds have super slow sales, so how about we wait

rasengan2552
Only before the price was slashed like $80 which sheep like to forget with a passion.

Thats what Im saying, the thing launched at $250 and its already $150 at some retail stores.

The 3DS sold more at launch than the vita even with its $250 price tag.
Avatar image for LP4EVA2005
LP4EVA2005

8585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 LP4EVA2005
Member since 2004 • 8585 Posts
i think this is actually a good thing. maybe now sony will lower the Vita price to $179 within a couple months like nintendo did
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts
[QUOTE="TheManofTin"]Why are companies releasing consoles too early these days? It's stupid. They release consoles with no decent games and slap a super huge price on it and expect us to buy it. No wonder I-Phone games are dominating. At least those games are affordable, innovative, and easy to pick up and play. Now we have all this stupid patches, DLC, and update nonsense. Every single company has released a console too early. Nintendo: 3DS, why the hell would they release a console in Spring? Why would you buy a console in spring? IF they released this christmas, that whole drought of games wouldn't be there and certain games would be ready for release. All they had were Super Street Fighter 4 and Pilotwings for the first 3 months. And everyone had there hopes up for Zelda OOT and Star fox which are remakes I might add and not even new games. We had to wait almost a whole year for some games and that was Super Mario 3D Land which SHOULD have been a launch title and Mario Kart 7 too. Why didn't they just release Pokemon Black and White on the 3DS. I could garuntee you if they did, the 3DS would sell like hot cakes. Sony: Vita, as you mentioned. Also the PS3. It took like 2 years for some actual games! And they expected us to pay over half a thousand dollars! that is such bull! Microsoft: Xbox 360, while the 360 is now a really good console, but they rushed it out the door and it ended up being plagued with errors like the red ring which took 4 years to finally fix! Also, Perfect Dark Zero was the launch title...if you read my review of that game, you'll know how much I despise it.

People release their consoles early because it just doesn't make fiscal sense to make a game and then not sell it for several months after it is finished. The company needs to recoup the losses from the development of their games. Nintendo's strategy is really paying off now because they have a solid library to compete with the Vita's launch library. If they would have waited, they would have less games right now and they probably would have gotten less sales for the Christmas holiday.
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

i think this is actually a good thing. maybe now sony will lower the Vita price to $179 within a couple months like nintendo didLP4EVA2005

But Sony's already taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.

The last thing they can do is drop the price...then Sony would be bleeding money.

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#137 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

Let's say Sony ships 5000 systems to Amazon, 20000 to Best Buy, and 50000 to Gamestop.

Sony gets their profit from those orders regardless if they actually sell to consumers or not.

-

But if they don't sell, the distributors will order less systems in the future, which may result in less yearly profits for Sony.

Units sold does matter to an extent, but what really matters is the distributors and how much they buy.

It's all about keeping the distributors happy...not how much actually sells to consumers.

peterw007
Yes, shipped numbers are ultimately the most important thing for Sony, but that doesn't mean consumer sales don't matter. That would be like saying your grades are important to you, but you won't do your homework or you won't study for your exam or you won't listen in class. Your grades are pretty much a reflection on how well you did those things, and that's the same for shipped and sold.
Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts
[QUOTE="Kaszilla"][QUOTE="rasengan2552"][QUOTE="Crossel777"] Only before the price was slashed like $80 which sheep like to forget with a passion.

Thats what Im saying, the thing launched at $250 and its already $150 at some retail stores.

The 3DS sold more at launch than the vita even with its $250 price tag.

and what transpired after launch ? it had no games and sales went down the toilet. It wasn't until the huge price cut and additions to library that 3DS was relived of the "lost cause" title.
Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="LP4EVA2005"]i think this is actually a good thing. maybe now sony will lower the Vita price to $179 within a couple months like nintendo didpeterw007

But Sony's already taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.

The last thing they can do is drop the price...then Sony would be bleeding money.

Yeah, the best thing they can do at this point is gear up a strong ad campaign and hope for the best when they release in the west.
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

[QUOTE="peterw007"]

Let's say Sony ships 5000 systems to Amazon, 20000 to Best Buy, and 50000 to Gamestop.

Sony gets their profit from those orders regardless if they actually sell to consumers or not.

-

But if they don't sell, the distributors will order less systems in the future, which may result in less yearly profits for Sony.

Units sold does matter to an extent, but what really matters is the distributors and how much they buy.

It's all about keeping the distributors happy...not how much actually sells to consumers.

Eponique

Yes, shipped numbers are ultimately the most important thing for Sony, but that doesn't mean consumer sales don't matter. That would be like saying your grades are important to you, but you won't do your homework or you won't study for your exam or you won't listen in class. Your grades are pretty much a reflection on how well you did those things, and that's the same for shipped and sold.

My point with that comment is that Sony only cares about shipped numbers and doesn't bother to track the number sold to consumers (if that even is somehow possible).

They use the number of orders that distributors send as a reflection of how the market is doing.

If the distributors order less, then something is wrong. If the distributors order more, then they're doing things right.

Sony themselves doesn't really care about the number sold to consumers...because that's not how they make their money.

That's what I'm trying to say.

Avatar image for woodenfork21
woodenfork21

454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 woodenfork21
Member since 2011 • 454 Posts

>.> How bout we wait? mrmusicman247

lol...wait for what? the sales are horrible. and the thing just launched. yea maybe they might reach a hundred thousand next month but the thing is doing terrible out the gate. there's no excuse for that...wait for what lol? it's bombing...the FN PSP beat it in sales...WAIT FOR WHAT?? lol

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="peterw007"]

It's impossible to track the exact amount sold to consumers.

Companies only have a record of the number shipped, and honestly that's all that matters to Sony.

peterw007

I do not know if Sony does or not but they are able to track how much the stores sell in general. Also they do care how many systems customers buy because if they do not buy them then the stores will not order more. Not only that but if no one buys systems then no one is buying games so of course Sony cares about that more then just how much they sell to stores.

Let's say Sony ships 5000 systems to Amazon, 20000 to Best Buy, and 50000 to Gamestop.

Sony gets their profit from those orders regardless if they actually sell to consumers or not.

-

But if they don't sell, the distributors will order less systems in the future, which may result in less yearly profits for Sony.

Units sold does matter to an extent, but what really matters is the distributors and how much they buy.

It's all about keeping the distributors happy...not how much actually sells to consumers.

I would imagine the only number they pay attention to other than profits is making sure there is enough product in the market to sell(shortages)
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#144 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

[QUOTE="Eponique"][QUOTE="peterw007"]

Let's say Sony ships 5000 systems to Amazon, 20000 to Best Buy, and 50000 to Gamestop.

Sony gets their profit from those orders regardless if they actually sell to consumers or not.

-

But if they don't sell, the distributors will order less systems in the future, which may result in less yearly profits for Sony.

Units sold does matter to an extent, but what really matters is the distributors and how much they buy.

It's all about keeping the distributors happy...not how much actually sells to consumers.

peterw007

Yes, shipped numbers are ultimately the most important thing for Sony, but that doesn't mean consumer sales don't matter. That would be like saying your grades are important to you, but you won't do your homework or you won't study for your exam or you won't listen in class. Your grades are pretty much a reflection on how well you did those things, and that's the same for shipped and sold.

My point with that comment is that Sony only cares about shipped numbers and doesn't bother to track the number sold to consumers (if that even is somehow possible).

They use the number of orders that distributors send as a reflection of how the market is doing.

If the distributors order less, then something is wrong. If the distributors order more, then they're doing things right.

Sony themselves doesn't really care about the number sold to consumers...because that's not how they make their money.

That's what I'm trying to say.

They only show shipped numbers because they want to look good. What's more impressive, 52 million PS3s sold or 60 million PS3s "sold" (*cough* to distributors *cough*). Sony is well aware of their sold numbers. NPD, Media Create/Enterbrain, the various European trackers all have hardware sales data sold to consumers. Even Sony knows that selling to consumers is most important. Shipped numbers are only to keep investors happy.
Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#145 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7156 Posts

[QUOTE="LP4EVA2005"]i think this is actually a good thing. maybe now sony will lower the Vita price to $179 within a couple months like nintendo didpeterw007

But Sony's already taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.

The last thing they can do is drop the price...then Sony would be bleeding money.

Sony don't taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.Sony Can Afford to Lower the Price of Vita.... http://kotaku.com/5870916/this-week-in-the-business-sony-can-afford-to-lower-the-price-of-vita
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#146 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
It's pretty easy to see why it's flopping .3ds is cheaper and you don't need to buy a proprietary memory stick for it .3ds already has 2 big killer aps (3 in japan) .the price is still too damn high (3ds had this problem out of the gate, but nintendo got their asses in gear with the price cut) hopefully the vita will pick up steam in the near future. Competition is always good for gaming, especially when it motovates devs to give it their all.
Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts
[QUOTE="TheManofTin"]Why are companies releasing consoles too early these days? It's stupid. They release consoles with no decent games and slap a super huge price on it and expect us to buy it. No wonder I-Phone games are dominating. At least those games are affordable, innovative, and easy to pick up and play. Now we have all this stupid patches, DLC, and update nonsense. Every single company has released a console too early. Nintendo: 3DS, why the hell would they release a console in Spring? Why would you buy a console in spring? IF they released this christmas, that whole drought of games wouldn't be there and certain games would be ready for release. All they had were Super Street Fighter 4 and Pilotwings for the first 3 months. And everyone had there hopes up for Zelda OOT and Star fox which are remakes I might add and not even new games. We had to wait almost a whole year for some games and that was Super Mario 3D Land which SHOULD have been a launch title and Mario Kart 7 too. Why didn't they just release Pokemon Black and White on the 3DS. I could garuntee you if they did, the 3DS would sell like hot cakes. Sony: Vita, as you mentioned. Also the PS3. It took like 2 years for some actual games! And they expected us to pay over half a thousand dollars! that is such bull! Microsoft: Xbox 360, while the 360 is now a really good console, but they rushed it out the door and it ended up being plagued with errors like the red ring which took 4 years to finally fix! Also, Perfect Dark Zero was the launch title...if you read my review of that game, you'll know how much I despise it.

They have to start somewhere. If they had a launch list of 50-60 AAA titles, they just won't sell, as consumers don't have the funds. The publishers only have certain budgets to work with, they have to space out their work. The only mistakes really are pricing, even though the PS3 wasn't overpriced, they was losing money. People didn't buy as they aren't willing to pay $600 for a console. Sony maybe should have been more careful and gone for cheaper parts, to allow for a cheaper console. The iphone requires quite a big sum of money over its life, mobile contracts are very expensive. The iOS store is also filled with a lot of cheap games, which are easier and quicker to develop. I don't even know what the launch apps were for the iPhone,so not sure about that. It isn't fair to compare the iphone store which is 4 years old to the vita line up which has been out just over a week. Microsoft made a mistake with the crappy hardware at launch, that definitely shouldn't happen.
Avatar image for peterw007
peterw007

3653

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 peterw007
Member since 2005 • 3653 Posts

[QUOTE="peterw007"]

[QUOTE="Eponique"] Yes, shipped numbers are ultimately the most important thing for Sony, but that doesn't mean consumer sales don't matter. That would be like saying your grades are important to you, but you won't do your homework or you won't study for your exam or you won't listen in class. Your grades are pretty much a reflection on how well you did those things, and that's the same for shipped and sold.Eponique

My point with that comment is that Sony only cares about shipped numbers and doesn't bother to track the number sold to consumers (if that even is somehow possible).

They use the number of orders that distributors send as a reflection of how the market is doing.

If the distributors order less, then something is wrong. If the distributors order more, then they're doing things right.

Sony themselves doesn't really care about the number sold to consumers...because that's not how they make their money.

That's what I'm trying to say.

They only show shipped numbers because they want to look good. What's more impressive, 52 million PS3s sold or 60 million PS3s "sold" (*cough* to distributors *cough*). Sony is well aware of their sold numbers. NPD, Media Create/Enterbrain, the various European trackers all have hardware sales data sold to consumers. Even Sony knows that selling to consumers is most important. Shipped numbers are only to keep investors happy.

NPD / Media Create / etc. are fundamentally flawed when you take into account all of the outlets that NPD / Media Create / etc. doesn't bother to track, primarily the entire digital distribution market.

They're more like "guesstimates," instead of being a 100% accurate reflection on how many units are actually sold to customers.

Only individual retailers know how much of their inventory they sell...and I believe that's something they don't share publicly (I could be wrong).

But isn't the purpose of any publicly traded company is to keep its investors happy?

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#149 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41528 Posts
[QUOTE="peterw007"]

[QUOTE="LP4EVA2005"]i think this is actually a good thing. maybe now sony will lower the Vita price to $179 within a couple months like nintendo didAtariKidX

But Sony's already taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.

The last thing they can do is drop the price...then Sony would be bleeding money.

Sony don't taking a loss with every Vita unit sold.Sony Can Afford to Lower the Price of Vita.... http://kotaku.com/5870916/this-week-in-the-business-sony-can-afford-to-lower-the-price-of-vita

So just because analysts say so makes it true?
Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#150 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14495 Posts
Has a Sony handheld ever sold as good or better than a Nintendo one? The DS to PSP lifetime was a near two-to-one but it's not like the PSP did poorly. And how much better was the 3DS selling, 50k in its launch week? Not a big deal, especially since we're talking about Japan only and how Nintendo didnt have to debut its handheld against the most popular game (arguably, Monster Hunter) on your competitors platform exclusively. To me, couldn't care less about Sony beating Nintendo, handheld gaming aint my scene but it kills me how quick people write off any possible outcomes. Nobody has touched a Vita here so once they do, then they can make their opinions valid. Til then, meh.