[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
Uncharted 3 still looks better. The Last of Us is going to be the real graphics king next year.
But it looks good in graphics, however I would not get too excited. The only draw of the game is big battles, like 600 people or whatever. This is means the game will get boring, MAG was the same way, it was just a gimmick with it's big battle idea.
Planet Side 2 doesn't even have a campaign, so it's an instant fail. You should just buy Black Ops 2 when it comes out.
ShadowMoses900
You know nothing about what sets Planetside 2 apart from the rest of the games out there. Comparing it to MAG is laughable. I can't even begin to explain why you are wrong.
Uncharted 3 does not look better, not in a million years. Unlike you, I actually play both games. Even on my beautiful HDTV Uncharted 3 does not look better. The only area where Uncharted 3 beats Planetside 2 is in the textures and small details. However, the guys at SOE have confirmed several times that the renderer for PS2 is only running on their "medium" settings. Yes, that's "medium", not high or very high (the next two options). Even moreso, the artists of SoE have confirmed that the majority of the textures are placeholders as they are working on the final versions for launch sometime later.
But, I don't expect you to agree. You'll be an ignorant cow until the day Sony goes under (which is coming up pretty soon).
Uncharted 3 looks better. Maybe your bias is getting the best of you, but it's clearly the graphics king still.
I like you Wasdie, and I'm not just saying that because you are a mod. However PS3 can do great graphics to despite what Hermits say. Uncharted 3 is the graphics king, and if you think these look great you should see The Last of Us. It looks EVEN better!
Wow, posting down-resedbullshots. That's crap posting even by your standards. Anybody who played it KNOW the game didn't look like that. Stop fooling yourself.
Uncharted 3 looked good, it looked damn good. But it's outclassed. There are many games that look better when actually rendered in real time, not just stills taken from the game, extra post processing added, and then downsized to hide the obvious aliasing that was going on throughout the entire game.
Noticed how I posted 1080p shots? The JPG compression of FRAPs actually really hurts the image quality. I can assure you the game looks quite a bit more sharp when rendered at 60fps on my monitor. Though it often dips to 40fps thanks to the horrible optimization of the engine right now.
The only person you're fooling is yourself at this point.
Log in to comment