n64 didnt need cds and the 360 doesnt need hd dvd or blue ray

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bomberkid100
bomberkid100

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bomberkid100
Member since 2004 • 841 Posts

The n64 did not need cds to survive. Sony insisted that cds were required but werent for that gen. n64 games were longer, had better graphics and no LOADING screens.

Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
N64 flopped. Besides I love cd gaming in the 16bit days.
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts

The n64 did not need cds to survive. Sony insisted that cds were required but werent for that gen. n64 games were longer, had better graphics and no LOADING screens.

bomberkid100
That may be true, but the PS1 slaughtered it in terms of sales and Nintendo lost their position at the top of the gaming world.
Avatar image for Javy03
Javy03

6886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Javy03
Member since 2006 • 6886 Posts

The n64 did not need cds to survive. Sony insisted that cds were required but werent for that gen. n64 games were longer, had better graphics and no LOADING screens.

bomberkid100
If you don't know the N64 lacked lots of great 3rd party support because of its choice and limitations of its choice format. Final Fantasy left Nintendo and joined the Sony camp as well as many other games that helped keep Sony king of console with a bigger lead then ever before for 2 generations.
Avatar image for Truth-slayer
Truth-slayer

2510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Truth-slayer
Member since 2004 • 2510 Posts
I liked N64 games better than PS1 games. Then again I was a kid when it came out.
Avatar image for Cycloptis
Cycloptis

18249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 Cycloptis
Member since 2004 • 18249 Posts
The key difference here being that CDs were used to quite an extent and that they were cheaper to produce than cartridges.
Avatar image for jachichorro
jachichorro

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jachichorro
Member since 2004 • 3058 Posts
CD was a major improvement because it was easier to produce games for it then for cartridges. The same can't be said about DVD vs. HD-DVD/Blu-Ray.
Avatar image for 16bitkevin
16bitkevin

3962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 16bitkevin
Member since 2005 • 3962 Posts
N64 didn't need CDs, but it would've helped. We would've seen FF7 and MGS on N64.
Avatar image for christmashobo
christmashobo

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 christmashobo
Member since 2004 • 28 Posts
what are you talking about about? thats one of the reason n64 lost out to ps1, n64s games cost more to make, cost more to buy, had horrible sound quality, and anything pre-rendered look horrible, I mean I loved my n64 but that was a big error on nintendos part and they paid for it.
Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
Laserdisc was a bigger improvement, but wasnt really used in consoles. I do see the leap from carts to cds bigger then any other format jump aftewards. At the end of the day dvd, hdvds and blu-rays are just larger discs. Cd isnt a large cart.
Avatar image for GsSanAndreas
GsSanAndreas

3075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 GsSanAndreas
Member since 2004 • 3075 Posts
the n64 lost.