Mist Of Pandaria Cinematic vs Cyberpunk 2077 trailer: Production Quality

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

your pic here

That hair

V3rciS

That skin.. that eyes

Ooh, the damage control has already begun. princeofshapeir

Lol of course it's so convenient to compare the budget of a multinational EMPIRE to a small Polish studio with a small fixed budget available!

This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.UCF_Knight

Hair is a lot more difficult to render. Oh, didn't I forget to say that the hair actually moved? Realistic CGI images are not rare anymore. The difficulty lies in rendering them under complex conditions.

Ravenshout

You make it sound as if they tried to make the most realistic CG ever and failed. Theys aet out to make a CG trailer for the game and the idea for the trailer was to have static models, they didn't leave them static for lack of technical ability or money. It's intended to be that way

There is so much pointlessness in this thread

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

your pic here

That hair

V3rciS

[ That skin.. that eyes

Ooh, the damage control has already begun. princeofshapeir

Lol of course it's so convenient to compare the budget of a multinational EMPIRE to a small Polish studio with a small fixed budget available!

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.Ravenshout

No, you just want everyone else to agree with you

This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.UCF_Knight

Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. princeofshapeir

OR they could have done it that way because that's how they wanted to do it :?

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.Ravenshout

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.princeofshapeir

I haven't even seen anyone say differently. Ravenshout just makes it sound like that's what people are saying. Blizzard definitely have some of the best CG in the industry

[QUOTE="Ravenshout"]

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.seanmcloughlin

No, you just want everyone else to agree with you

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.princeofshapeir

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Ravenshout"] You are blind. I just want to insist on the truth.

Ravenshout

No, you just want everyone else to agree with you

I have accepted that. I have never said anything to the contrary in all the times you've brought this up. In fact I've said this exact post several times. No one else said they're better than Blizzard or Square either, you just keep imagining that they do when they say they like the Cyberpunk trailer.

Point out where I said they did better CG than Blizzard or Square, I would really like to see it

why are we discussing the quality of CGI?BrunoBRS

Because Ravenshout is terribly insecure about it

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.seanmcloughlin

I haven't even seen anyone say differently. Ravenshout just makes it sound like that's what people are saying. Blizzard definitely have some of the best CG in the industry

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. seanmcloughlin

OR they could have done it that way because that's how they wanted to do it :?

Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. princeofshapeir

Nope what I actually say is... If you think what CD projekt achieved with such a limited budget is if not better than MoP cinematic, then at least a decent rival... it's already way too impressive rather than millions thrown by Blizzard only for the purpose of CGI rendering. If I had that amount of money I could also recruit the best artist and get the best machines to create the ultimate CGI movie. SO FUKING WHAT?

Look what they did with a limited budget.... that's what's so impressive about it.

Anyway I think there's no point in discussing here... 1 is the Cyberpunk hate/basher the other one is Blizzard fanboy/wanker. QQ some more. Also kiddo I was playing Blizzard games long before you discovered the controller.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. princeofshapeir

OR they could have done it that way because that's how they wanted to do it :?

Yeah I know it is, I agreed to that. Why do you people keep making it sound like I didn't? :?

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="UCF_Knight"]This thread is nice. Blizzard fanboys needed a sanctuary to protect each other from the rest of System Wars.UCF_Knight

Anyway I think there's no point in discussing here... 1 is the Cyberpunk hate/basher the other one is Blizzard fanboy/wanker. QQ some more. Also kiddo I was playing Blizzard games long before you discovered the controller.

V3rciS

Aaaand that's all I got out of your post.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. seanmcloughlin

OR they could have done it that way because that's how they wanted to do it :?

Either way it's clear that the MoP one is technically superior. I don't know why people try to prolong this with conspiracy theories about why it is inferior technically when the answer is already there.

I never called anyone an idiot. It's just apparent that the MoP cinematic is technically superior to the Cyberpunk teaser, and most of the people in this thread who say otherwise are WoW/Blizzard haters. princeofshapeir

[QUOTE="V3rciS"]

Anyway I think there's no point in discussing here... 1 is the Cyberpunk hate/basher the other one is Blizzard fanboy/wanker. QQ some more. Also kiddo I was playing Blizzard games long before you discovered the controller.

princeofshapeir

Aaaand that's all I got out of your post.

Still you're wanking on Blizzard products...

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="V3rciS"]

Anyway I think there's no point in discussing here... 1 is the Cyberpunk hate/basher the other one is Blizzard fanboy/wanker. QQ some more. Also kiddo I was playing Blizzard games long before you discovered the controller.

V3rciS

Aaaand that's all I got out of your post.

Still you're wanking on Blizzard products...

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="V3rciS"]

Anyway I think there's no point in discussing here... 1 is the Cyberpunk hate/basher the other one is Blizzard fanboy/wanker. QQ some more. Also kiddo I was playing Blizzard games long before you discovered the controller.

V3rciS

Aaaand that's all I got out of your post.

Still you're wanking on Blizzard products...

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Two things: first, the entirety of the teaser was a slow-motion sequence with the girl sitting in the exact same position the entire time. It was like they purposely chose such a scenario because their budget wasn't big enough for a much more exciting trailer and instead had to rely on smoke and mirrors to make the cinematic seem much more than it really was. Second, you're already reverting to the excuse that CDPR is far smaller than Blizzard while maintaining the argument that the Cyberpunk teaser looks better than the MoP cinematic. You're already conceding that the Cyberpunk trailer isn't as technically astonishing by pointing that out. glez13

OR they could have done it that way because that's how they wanted to do it :?

Either way it's clear that the MoP one is technically superior. I don't know why people try to prolong this with conspiracy theories about why it is inferior technically when the answer is already there.

Of course it's technically superior. Everyone told TC that two or three threads ago