Metro Redux was downgraded to hit 1080p/60fps on PS4

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2
#51 Posted by MK-Professor (3825 posts) -

The same is also true for a PC with HD7850(or equivalent), if you want 1080p/60fps in metro you have to pay the price, and that is lowering the graphics settings.

1.84 TFlops can only do so much...

#52 Posted by NoodleFighter (7065 posts) -
@MK-Professor said:

The same is also true for a PC with HD7850(or equivalent), if you want 1080p/60fps in metro you have to pay the price, and that is lowering the graphics settings.

1.84 TFlops can only do so much...

Bu bu but 8GB GDDR5!!!!!!

#53 Posted by Shewgenja (9302 posts) -

@walloftruth said:

@Kinthalis said:

@Shewgenja said:

This game totally belongs to PC. Hell, I wish Destiny was coming to PC (or at least, an announced release date).

It's coming. It's not like the publisher isn't familiar with the success of online only games on the PC. My guess is that the only reason it's not on PC to start is probably some deal with Sony and or MS.

It's a matter of when, not if. I'm ok with that. Unlike the new consoles, we don't have a no games issue. Too many games is our issue!

Don't worry, you're not missing much, the beta was pretty meh, I didn't see anything that was truly outstanding or impressive. I'll probably pick it up for $10 on Steam in a few years.

Speak for yourself. I played the beta almost obsessively and even almost had half a set of level 10 blue gear set aside by the time they closed the beta. It was pure gaming nirvana in my opinion!

#54 Posted by Mr-Powers (336 posts) -

@Kinthalis said:

@Shewgenja said:

This game totally belongs to PC. Hell, I wish Destiny was coming to PC (or at least, an announced release date).

It's coming. It's not like the publisher isn't familiar with the success of online only games on the PC. My guess is that the only reason it's not on PC to start is probably some deal with Sony and or MS.

It's a matter of when, not if. I'm ok with that. Unlike the new consoles, we don't have a no games issue. Too many games is our issue!

Yes, it's a massive conspiracy between two console makers and a big developer to keep the game off of PC(lol).

Meanwhile, back in reality, they know they are going to get filthy rich off of the console releases and PC is a second thought to the big devs, as usual. 4 console releases before a PC version is even announced, el oh el.

Keep begging though.

#55 Posted by Kinthalis (5317 posts) -

@mr-powers said:

@Kinthalis said:

@Shewgenja said:

This game totally belongs to PC. Hell, I wish Destiny was coming to PC (or at least, an announced release date).

It's coming. It's not like the publisher isn't familiar with the success of online only games on the PC. My guess is that the only reason it's not on PC to start is probably some deal with Sony and or MS.

It's a matter of when, not if. I'm ok with that. Unlike the new consoles, we don't have a no games issue. Too many games is our issue!

Yes, it's a massive conspiracy between two console makers and a big developer to keep the game off of PC(lol).

Meanwhile, back in reality, they know they are going to get filthy rich off of the console releases and PC is a second thought to the big devs, as usual. 4 console releases before a PC version is even announced, el oh el.

Keep begging though.

???

Who said anyting about conspiracy? Deals between publishers and consoel manufacturers are done all the time.

Lol, grow up kiddie.

#56 Posted by Mr-Powers (336 posts) -

@Kinthalis said:

@mr-powers said:

@Kinthalis said:

@Shewgenja said:

This game totally belongs to PC. Hell, I wish Destiny was coming to PC (or at least, an announced release date).

It's coming. It's not like the publisher isn't familiar with the success of online only games on the PC. My guess is that the only reason it's not on PC to start is probably some deal with Sony and or MS.

It's a matter of when, not if. I'm ok with that. Unlike the new consoles, we don't have a no games issue. Too many games is our issue!

Yes, it's a massive conspiracy between two console makers and a big developer to keep the game off of PC(lol).

Meanwhile, back in reality, they know they are going to get filthy rich off of the console releases and PC is a second thought to the big devs, as usual. 4 console releases before a PC version is even announced, el oh el.

Keep begging though.

???

Who said anyting about conspiracy? Deals between publishers and consoel manufacturers are done all the time.

Lol, grow up kiddie.

They did a deal with both console makers to keep the game off PC? Nobody said they don't do deals, like for the timed DLC sony is getting or the deals with MS on timed DLC for COD. You have no evidence for the sort of deal you suggested, however. And, it doesn't make any logical sense.

Reality is, console is priority for the blockbuster, record-breaking games like Destiny, GTA5. Steam sale and pirate culture don't cut it compared to the history-making money they earn on playstation/xbox.

#57 Edited by Kinthalis (5317 posts) -

@mr-powers said:

@Kinthalis said:

@mr-powers said:

@Kinthalis said:

@Shewgenja said:

This game totally belongs to PC. Hell, I wish Destiny was coming to PC (or at least, an announced release date).

It's coming. It's not like the publisher isn't familiar with the success of online only games on the PC. My guess is that the only reason it's not on PC to start is probably some deal with Sony and or MS.

It's a matter of when, not if. I'm ok with that. Unlike the new consoles, we don't have a no games issue. Too many games is our issue!

Yes, it's a massive conspiracy between two console makers and a big developer to keep the game off of PC(lol).

Meanwhile, back in reality, they know they are going to get filthy rich off of the console releases and PC is a second thought to the big devs, as usual. 4 console releases before a PC version is even announced, el oh el.

Keep begging though.

???

Who said anyting about conspiracy? Deals between publishers and consoel manufacturers are done all the time.

Lol, grow up kiddie.

They did a deal with both console makers to keep the game off PC? Nobody said they don't do deals, like for the timed DLC sony is getting or the deals with MS on timed DLC for COD. You have no evidence for the sort of deal you suggested, however. And, it doesn't make any logical sense.

Reality is, console is priority for the blockbuster, record-breaking games like Destiny, GTA5. Steam sale and pirate culture don't cut it compared to the history-making money they earn on playstation/xbox.

Lol, the game that has made activision/Blizzard the most money is a PC exclusive online only game. Get your head out of your ass.

Pirating online only games... What an idiot.

Go back to playing your mediocre, dumbed down ports on your outdated, wishes as hell it wasn't a low end PC from 2010, toy.

#58 Posted by cfisher2833 (1704 posts) -

Huh, no wonder it seemed like Metro 2033 looked better in some parts than the redone version (before this patch) in that one comparison video gamespot put up (or was it gamespot?). Sucks that the console versions don't have tessellation--Metro has always done an amazing job with tessellation. I am surprised they didn't just bring it down to 30fps to put those features in though.

#59 Posted by Maddie_Larkin (6521 posts) -

Although depressive that the PS4 needed those cutbacks, I would still say keeping it at 60 fps is the right call pretty much every single time in an FPS game.

#60 Posted by donalbane (16347 posts) -

Also, Metro games have features that are NVIDIA specific, meaning neither of the new consoles could replicate everything on an NVIDIA-based PC no matter how much power they had. The Digital Foundry interview said that the console version offer settings between medium and high if I recall correctly. Considering how nice the game looks, I think that's impressive for a $400 console. My video card alone cost more than that.

#61 Posted by bigblunt537 (6868 posts) -

I still find the console version to be a better option for most. I know my PC struggled with it and I have a GTX 760 and a laptop with a GTX 660m. Desktop can play at high, but definitely not at a consistent 60fps and my laptop can play at a mix of medium/high. I applaud them for optimizing the console versions to be able to play at 1080p 60fps.

#62 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4437 posts) -

@Krelian-co said:

Are consolites still arguing that their pos outdated consoles can still compete in any way to high end gaming pcs?

Also lol at TC just using the ps4, if that is on ps4 i can't imagine how bad it is on the xbone.

True, but we already know this, it's a bit redundant calling out the X1 for being weaker, bit like the Wii U, what's the point. It's the PS4 that's touted as teh powah house.

#63 Posted by Mr-Powers (336 posts) -

@Kinthalis said:

@mr-powers said:

???

Who said anyting about conspiracy? Deals between publishers and consoel manufacturers are done all the time.

Lol, grow up kiddie.

They did a deal with both console makers to keep the game off PC? Nobody said they don't do deals, like for the timed DLC sony is getting or the deals with MS on timed DLC for COD. You have no evidence for the sort of deal you suggested, however. And, it doesn't make any logical sense.

Reality is, console is priority for the blockbuster, record-breaking games like Destiny, GTA5. Steam sale and pirate culture don't cut it compared to the history-making money they earn on playstation/xbox.

Lol, the game that has made activision/Blizzard the most money is a PC exclusive online only game. Get your head out of your ass.

Pirating online only games... What an idiot.

Go back to playing your mediocre, dumbed down ports on your outdated, wishes as hell it wasn't a low end PC from 2010, toy.

Haha. Not only you mad, you went full rtard. Steam sale and pirate culture are well documented on PC, and is the main reason you have to wait for console ports. GTA5 had a record breaking release, and Destiny has record breaking pre orders. Stay bitter hermie.

Oh, and you totally bailed on your conspiracy theory... dat ownage. Consoles breaking sales records, PC breaking beg petition records.

#64 Posted by RoboCopISJesus (1408 posts) -

@mr-powers said:

Haha. Not only you mad, you went full rtard. Steam sale and pirate culture are well documented on PC, and is the main reason you have to wait for console ports. GTA5 had a record breaking release, and Destiny has record breaking pre orders. Stay bitter hermie.

Oh, and you totally bailed on your conspiracy theory... dat ownage. Consoles breaking sales records, PC breaking beg petition records.

1. You're the only one mad, you're upset that Metro Redux , like all other multiplats, looks and runs vastly better on PC. This is why you derailed the thread. Fact.

2. Waiting for ports, oh you mean like the inferior versions of Crysis, Witcher2, MineCraft, Diablo3, RoS, Ethan Carter, Planet Side 2, EQ:Next, ESO, etc. At least when WE wait for ports, they are almost always vastly superior. Thx for beta testing. Can't wait for GTA V better than playstation 3 and playstation 4 versions! Hey maybe one day a Sony product will get the superior multiplats. Not this gen buddy.

3. PC has more sales revenue than all 6 consoles put together. Stay salty.

#65 Edited by DeathLordCrime (212 posts) -

@mr-powers:

Considering their IP World of warcraft is the highest grossing game of all time yea PC already number one.

#66 Edited by dakan45 (18614 posts) -

and who is suprised here?

Anyway scott seems to be in denial...becuase hey when halo 3 came out in x360 it totally blew everything away graphics wise? Or did you miss how sunset overdrive hit 22 fps at the gameplay shown?

Obviously if you make a game from scratch on the new hardawre it will use newer graphics technology but they will always have to tone down stuff. Too bad exlusives dont have a pc vesrion so they can be exposed as well.

As for the tomb raider legend excuse...did we got from 720p to 1080p last gen? Nope, we wont now either, halo is not gonna be 1080p unless its graphically unimpressive.

#67 Posted by sirrektsalot (8 posts) -

Lol Why are PC gamers so snobby and self important? Positively pathetic and no better (worse in most cases) than the console gamers. Both give gamers a bad name. Maybe it's just the forum tough guys.

#68 Posted by clyde46 (46326 posts) -

@sirrektsalot said:

Lol Why are PC gamers so snobby and self important? Positively pathetic and no better (worse in most cases) than the console gamers. Both give gamers a bad name. Maybe it's just the forum tough guys.

Why are console gamers such whiny hypocrites? Also, lol dead thread bump.

#69 Edited by lamprey263 (23985 posts) -

people should celebrate Metro Redux because it's a good game, PS3 never got 2033, and they made upgrades to 2033 to improve it's original flaws

I don't think I've seen anybody going around saying PS4 is better than PC's potential

#70 Posted by sirrektsalot (8 posts) -

@clyde46 said:

@sirrektsalot said:

Lol Why are PC gamers so snobby and self important? Positively pathetic and no better (worse in most cases) than the console gamers. Both give gamers a bad name. Maybe it's just the forum tough guys.

Why are console gamers such whiny hypocrites? Also, lol dead thread bump.

If you didn't notice I was speaking out against both as I play both PC an Console. Don't try to be a pretentious cunt just because you're behind a computer screen lol I bump what I want

#71 Posted by clyde46 (46326 posts) -

@sirrektsalot said:

@clyde46 said:

@sirrektsalot said:

Lol Why are PC gamers so snobby and self important? Positively pathetic and no better (worse in most cases) than the console gamers. Both give gamers a bad name. Maybe it's just the forum tough guys.

Why are console gamers such whiny hypocrites? Also, lol dead thread bump.

If you didn't notice I was speaking out against both as I play both PC an Console. Don't try to be a pretentious cunt just because you're behind a computer screen lol I bump what I want

You're the one that started this buddy. Don't start acting tough, unless you are living in the same town as me I'm never going to see you.

#72 Posted by hrt_rulz01 (6118 posts) -

Yawn.

#73 Posted by farrell2k (6192 posts) -

Not surprising. The PS4, while a great console is much weaker than my $400 PC. I doubt PS4 fans will really care anyway.

#74 Posted by Halo2-Best-FPS (472 posts) -

@hrt_rulz01 said:

Yawn.

This. the game is better on PS4.

#75 Posted by gpuking (2875 posts) -

Plenty of better looking games on PS4 both released and upcoming. Besides, it's not like PS4 couldn't do them in 1080p/30 and then some.

#76 Posted by getyeryayasout (7538 posts) -

Looks great and plays even better on PS4. What's the issue?

#77 Edited by comptonst88 (284 posts) -

The volumetric lighting looks nice in some areas but looks overdone in other areas. Either way, Redux looks great on PS4 and thats all that needs to be said.

#78 Posted by AM-Gamer (3941 posts) -

@farrell2k: Lol I call bullshit

#79 Posted by tonyleo01 (1254 posts) -

Probably runs better on consoles than most people's PC.

#80 Posted by sukraj (22861 posts) -

I'm playing Metro 2033 on the Xbox One and the game has been improved alot more than the 360 version.