So, there you go Sony fanboys. Have your crappy game.
hum... wut? Ya do kno MGSV is on the xbox, dont ya?
Any multiplat that has some sort of negativity associated with it (Tomb Raider DE, Ground Zeroes) is only on PS4 now.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
So, there you go Sony fanboys. Have your crappy game.
hum... wut? Ya do kno MGSV is on the xbox, dont ya?
Any multiplat that has some sort of negativity associated with it (Tomb Raider DE, Ground Zeroes) is only on PS4 now.
These length complaints are strange.
Let me get this straight: MGS IV, a game that, if you're going to take total actual "gameplay" into the equation, amounted to a few hours. Through the whole game. And this was linear. All the rest was comprised of poorly edited, poorly written cutscenes that were excruciating to sit through.
Priced at $59. Score: 10s across the board.
GZ, a game that, if you're going to take gameplay into account, varies dependent on the player's choices, approach, and pacing in an open, non-linear construct. No cutscenes to suffer through. It's conducive to experimental play and various different approaches.
Priced $29. Yet is getting criticized up the ass for length. Right.
These criticisms hold zero (uh, pun intended, I guess?) weight considering the joke IV was in actual play time, and the nature of that play. I already know that GZ alone will be more of an actual game than IV ever was or will be, and I'll get more out of it. For cheaper.
Bring on tomorrow.
Sony bribing Kojima held this game back. Instead of Kojima making gameplay better he was focused on making the PS4 version look just slight prettier. I hope he learned from this mistake on the next game.
This is why I hate Xbox fanboys...
Sony bribing Kojima held this game back. Instead of Kojima making gameplay better he was focused on making the PS4 version look just slight prettier. I hope he learned from this mistake on the next game.
I hope this is sarcasm.
So there you go Ninten-- oh wait.
That's what I was thinking. I cancelled my pre-order for various reasons. Price, content, Hideo dumbass comments and a bunch of other stuff that helped me to put my wallet back in my pants. I'll use the preorder money toward Infamous SS instead.
http://translate.google.fr/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamekyo.com%2Freview10714_metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes.html
Generally, it is said that the price should not play on the assessment of a product. But there are limits. And these limits have clearly been taken here with just what looks like a too questionable practice to be acceptable. Experience suggests good things for the rest of the program but how not to think that without content "bonus" not necessarily the most useful, the prologue would be nothing other than a little thicker than the demo average offering 30mn to 2h gameplay by our desire to snoop such MGS2 demo at the time already offered hunting Dogs Tags wait for the fan.
RATING: 4 OUT OF 10
Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes (PS4/PS3/360) – 10/9/9/10
38/40 Famitsu score..lol
http://nintendoeverything.com/famitsu-review-scores-31114/
Another thread by you that backfire..lol
Well, let just take a look at Tormentos favorite site for ownage and see what it has to say.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes
What?!?!? 73!! Oh oh!! Looks like someone comments backfired. LMAO!! Yikes a 4.1 User Score for a PS4 game?
Please damage control for us now Tormentos. Please!!! I need a good laugh. Better yet, go ahead and change the subject like all cows do when they don't have an intelligent rebuttal.
If I need to use a translator to read a review, I don't give a shit what they have to say. I've never ever heard of that site and nor do I want to. Anyways only place I go for reviews are Gamespot and Angry Joe on Youtube, been a long time since I've played a crappy game thanks to them.
lmao lemming damage control.
A $20 demo is getting better reviews and consumer reaction than a $60 MP-only game. Must really chap your asses. :)
lmao lemming damage control.
A $20 demo is getting better reviews and consumer reaction than a $60 MP-only game. Must really chap your asses. :)
And it's the best game on the PS4. Also what consumer reaction? No one can find a **** to give lol.
So, there you Microsoft fanboys. Have your crappy game.
Last good Metal Gear Solid game was MGS3. Only MGS4 snow level was good but everything else meh. Mostly Sony fanboys are waiting this game.
MGS4 is rated 10/10, and the best game ever made, you tool.
Snake Eater is an amazing AAA, but not as good.
So, there you Microsoft fanboys. Have your crappy game.
Last good Metal Gear Solid game was MGS3. Only MGS4 snow level was good but everything else meh. Mostly Sony fanboys are waiting this game.
MGS4 is rated 10/10, and the best game ever made, you tool.
Snake Eater is an amazing AAA, but not as good.
Metal Gear Solid 4 was great when it came out, but it's hardly best game ever material.
So, there you Microsoft fanboys. Have your crappy game.
Last good Metal Gear Solid game was MGS3. Only MGS4 snow level was good but everything else meh. Mostly Sony fanboys are waiting this game.
MGS4 is rated 10/10, and the best game ever made, you tool.
Snake Eater is an amazing AAA, but not as good.
In fact, the original Snake Eater technically wasn't AAA.
he rated the game low because it's basically a very limited paid demo. He even mentions that he has played demos with more content. lol
Bravely Default demo had what...15 hours of play in it?
30 bucks for 25 minute demo is down right unjustifiable. But I have feeling The Phantom Pain is going to be a masterpiece. I like the new direction the series is taking. And to be honest I always thought the previous games had mediocre gameplay, now that the gameplay is improved I have feeling it's going to be one of the best games of all time.
We all get that the game is short but the times people are throwing around are a little nutty. 30 mins, an hour, two hours, one review said all the content gave her about 8 hours worth of playtime from the game.
Can we get a consistent time on this thing?
http://translate.google.fr/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamekyo.com%2Freview10714_metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes.html
Generally, it is said that the price should not play on the assessment of a product. But there are limits. And these limits have clearly been taken here with just what looks like a too questionable practice to be acceptable. Experience suggests good things for the rest of the program but how not to think that without content "bonus" not necessarily the most useful, the prologue would be nothing other than a little thicker than the demo average offering 30mn to 2h gameplay by our desire to snoop such MGS2 demo at the time already offered hunting Dogs Tags wait for the fan.
RATING: 4 OUT OF 10
Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes (PS4/PS3/360) – 10/9/9/10
38/40 Famitsu score..lol
http://nintendoeverything.com/famitsu-review-scores-31114/
Another thread by you that backfire..lol
Well, let just take a look at Tormentos favorite site for ownage and see what it has to say.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes
What?!?!? 73!! Oh oh!! Looks like someone comments backfired. LMAO!! Yikes a 4.1 User Score for a PS4 game?
Please damage control for us now Tormentos. Please!!! I need a good laugh. Better yet, go ahead and change the subject like all cows do when they don't have an intelligent rebuttal.
Its AA here
So, there you Microsoft fanboys. Have your crappy game.
Last good Metal Gear Solid game was MGS3. Only MGS4 snow level was good but everything else meh. Mostly Sony fanboys are waiting this game.
Sony fanboys are waiting for this game? Microsoft OPENED their inaugural Xbox One focused E3 in 2013 with Metal Gear Solid 5. WTF are you talking about?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment