[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]
[QUOTE="fernandmondego_"] Are they not profitable these days? You really think they care that some are butthurt because they decided against throwing away money to publish non profitable game? There mistakes were made back when they divided the company into essentially three second-party and instead of going full on third party.fernandmondego_
What and mishandling their mascot franchise and false-flagging people over ONE GAME (on a dead console, known as the Saturn) weren't mistakes? Those happened WHEN they went third party.Whether or not they didn't want to publish Bayonetta 2 (or canned it because the first game didn't make them much money), they still took a hit for it regardless, so it still counts.
Look, they are not compatible. Nintendo is well off, if they want to burn through their cash reserves they could go ahead and do that. They took a loss last year, expect to take another loss this year and by the looks of the WiiU will probably end up taking their biggest loss next year. If they want to try to turns things around than so be it. Maybe they'll be able to do it.SEGA on the other hand was strapped for cash when they went third party. On top of that they divided their developers and franchises into 3 and made all their games exclusive to their consoles instead of making them multiplatform across the board. Sonic should have been on all 3 consoles but was exclusive to the GC (the worse selling of the three). They would sold many more copies and made much more money if Sonic was not exclusive. Games like Panzer Dragoon, JSRF and SEGA GT might have seen better results if they were on all three consoels and maybe we would have gotten sequels.
After those mistakes Sammy came along and they sold off VC and took appart and destroyed their developers (Smilebit:cry: ). If Nintendo was to go 3rd party all they would have to do is keep doing what they are doing, just do it on other platforms. There are not enough people willing to buy a console for their franchises alone but I'd bet the PS, Xbox and PC userbase would eat up their games if they make them available. They would have a bigger userbase to sell to, along with their hand held.
Obviously it's up to them, we'll have to wait and see what happens.
Sonic WASN'T GameCube exclusive. Heroes, Shadow, Riders, and Mega Collection were also on PS2 and XBOX. Regardless of the GameCube's placement though, Sonic remained as one of the best selling third party franchises on there. And on the Wii, it still was (see: Sonic Colors on Wii and DS selling two million), hence why little to no controversy about Colors being Wii/DS exclusive erupted (also due to the fact that SEGA was still getting flak for how they were handling his series, which, again, is one of the reasons why a lot of their own fans hate them)Here's the other problem, Nintendo's teams are normally suited to working on one platform, each in two categories, both their own. Working on more than one system in the SAME CATEGORY would add to the pressure and help kill their quality, especially with hardware that isn't their own. And no, Nintendo's handhelds would have to die too, because there is no way in HELL Nintendo can survive on just that, even if it is better selling.
Not to mention, PlayStation, XBOX, and PC don't have the same audience Nintendo does so expect Mario/Zelda/Pokemon/Donkey Kong/Kirby games to sell even less than what they did with Nintendo's own systems (ex: Mario and Pokemon would sell 200,000 and Kirby would sell like 50,000)
Log in to comment