Mario Maker has sharing, don't edit my posts Super.

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
#51 Posted by foxhound_fox (95256 posts) -

There are hurdles on a Nintendo platform that a Sony one doesn't suffer from:

The under age 10 demographic.

I'm sure a huge part of this "consideration" is how they can integrate a feature without upsetting parents of young children.

Avatar image for bbkkristian
#52 Posted by bbkkristian (14971 posts) -

They do realize that without online sharing, this game will bomb, right? Word of mouth is powerful, and that was a feature naturally assumed to be in.

Avatar image for Gue1
#53 Edited by Gue1 (12171 posts) -

Always thought it had no sharing feature or online component anyway, which is why I always said it was shit. If it had it they would have mentioned it at E3 but they did not. I mean, this is Nintendo we are talking about you know... This will most likely not stop the game from scoring a gazillion of 10/10's though.

Avatar image for 93BlackHawk93
#55 Posted by 93BlackHawk93 (7925 posts) -

GS desperate for dem clicks.

@bbkkristian said:

They do realize that without online sharing, this game will bomb, right? Word of mouth is powerful, and that was a feature naturally assumed to be in.

@Gue1 said:

Always thought it had no sharing feature or online component anyway, which is why I always said it was shit. If it had it they would have mentioned it at E3 but they did not.

Read madsnake and Champ's posts.

Avatar image for sHaDyCuBe321
#56 Posted by sHaDyCuBe321 (5038 posts) -

@bbkkristian said:

They do realize that without online sharing, this game will bomb, right? Word of mouth is powerful, and that was a feature naturally assumed to be in.

@Gue1 said:

Always thought it had no sharing feature or online component anyway, which is why I always said it was shit. If it had it they would have mentioned it at E3 but they did not.

This was already addressed in the thread many times. The game does have online sharing. Gamespot took his quotes out of context for clickbait. Read the actual article:

"Of course, it's nice to have rankings and the like, but we're trying to think of ways to ensure that everybody's creations get seen by someone. That's what I'm working on now"

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
#57 Edited by KungfuKitten (23073 posts) -

Never mind, apparently it was out of context.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
#58 Edited by Demonjoe93 (9869 posts) -

What the ****...this should have been one of the first things they should have discussed in the conceptual stage of this game's development. Jesus, Nintendo.

EDIT: Just read Champ's post. Nice journalism, GameSpot.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#59 Posted by nintendoboy16 (31378 posts) -

@Demonjoe93 said:

What the ****...this should have been one of the first things they should have discussed in the conceptual stage of this game's development. Jesus, Nintendo.

madsnake and Champ's posts. PRONTO.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
#60 Posted by Demonjoe93 (9869 posts) -

@nintendoboy16 said:

@Demonjoe93 said:

What the ****...this should have been one of the first things they should have discussed in the conceptual stage of this game's development. Jesus, Nintendo.

madsnake and Champ's posts. PRONTO.

Yeah, I read it after I made that post and edited my post. Wonderful journalism on GameSpot's part. Maybe if they focused on fixing this forum and their Web site up the way they focus on making click-bait articles, this site would be in better shape.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
#61 Posted by Shewgenja (16164 posts) -

I couldn't even fathom this game without an online sharing mechanism. Like, what would be the point?

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#62 Posted by nintendoboy16 (31378 posts) -

@Demonjoe93 said:

Yeah, I read it after I made that post and edited my post. Wonderful journalism on GameSpot's part. Maybe if they focused on fixing this forum and their Web site up the way they focus on making click-bait articles, this site would be in better shape.

No kidding. Some GS writers just love unnecessary rage for the sake of it.

I expected this to happen though after madsnake made his post though.

Avatar image for princessgomez92
#65 Posted by PrincessGomez92 (4549 posts) -

Gamespot is a joke.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
#66 Posted by aroxx_ab (12651 posts) -

This is Nintendont, nothing surprising.

Avatar image for nini200
#67 Posted by nini200 (11477 posts) -

So they allowed Online Level Sharing in Smash Bros Brawl but in a game about creating levels, they have to consider it?

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#68 Posted by nintendoboy16 (31378 posts) -

@nini200 said:

So they allowed Online Level Sharing in Smash Bros Brawl but in a game about creating levels, they have to consider it?

Check the USGamer article. madsnake and Champ posted it.

DSS, do you think you can post what they said in the OP?

Avatar image for darkspineslayer
#69 Posted by darkspineslayer (21807 posts) -

@nintendoboy16 said:

@nini200 said:

So they allowed Online Level Sharing in Smash Bros Brawl but in a game about creating levels, they have to consider it?

Check the USGamer article. madsnake and Champ posted it.

DSS, do you think you can post what they said in the OP?

Yeah, finally got around to it. I don't post from a PC often, and i can't edit from a tablet.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#70 Posted by nintendoboy16 (31378 posts) -

@darkspineslayer said:

Yeah, finally got around to it. I don't post from a PC often, and i can't edit from a tablet.

Thanks. :)

Avatar image for smashed_pinata
#71 Posted by smashed_pinata (3403 posts) -

@topgunmv said:

@charizard1605 said:

@Heirren said:

@charizard1605:

In all honesty this was probably conceptualized in the 90s.

And they didn't realize that selling this without online play in this day and age is... the most redundant thing of all thing?

I think I heard on the giantbombcast that the levels you can make are fairly limited too, as in you won't be able to reproduce 1-1 in it.

Nah, they were talking about the demo from e3, meaning it was a striped down chunk of the game with less features. I am 100% sure you will be able to create 1-1 when the full game releases.

Avatar image for ladyblue
#72 Posted by LadyBlue (4942 posts) -

Just plain dumb. I'd ignore it if thats the case. They need to learn a thing or two from MM's masterpiece, LBP.

Avatar image for darkspineslayer
#73 Posted by darkspineslayer (21807 posts) -

Who the **** decided to edit my post? Get out of here Super.

Avatar image for cainetao11
#74 Edited by cainetao11 (28214 posts) -

I don't understand. I just assumed at this point with LBP doing it well, and Project Spark going to do the sharing thing, that its a given. This is shocking.

OK, GS why did you report it as such?

Avatar image for Wanderer5
#75 Posted by Wanderer5 (25727 posts) -

Bravo GS, bravo.:|

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
#76 Posted by madsnakehhh (16076 posts) -

@aroxx_ab said:

This is Nintendont, nothing surprising.

Nop, this is Gamespot click bait, nothing surprising with their news staff.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
#77 Posted by nintendoboy16 (31378 posts) -

@ladyblue said:

Just plain dumb. I'd ignore it if thats the case. They need to learn a thing or two from MM's masterpiece, LBP.

*not impressed*

Avatar image for yokofox33
#78 Posted by yokofox33 (30774 posts) -

Ok, so I overreacted... Stupid, GS.

Avatar image for ladyblue
#79 Posted by LadyBlue (4942 posts) -

@nintendoboy16 said:

@ladyblue said:

Just plain dumb. I'd ignore it if thats the case. They need to learn a thing or two from MM's masterpiece, LBP.

*not impressed*

I'd hope so. Stating my opinion, which isn't outlandish since LBP is MM's masterpiece. Unless you think Tearaway is better(haven't played it). They also have a much better track record when it comes to games with creation tools/level editor.

So again, don't see how you or anyone would get "impressed" over something that's well known.