Last of Us Graphics Comparison of PS3 vs PS4 Not Very Major

Avatar image for I_can_haz
I_can_haz

6511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 I_can_haz
Member since 2013 • 6511 Posts
@GTSaiyanjin2 said:

PS3 version actually looks good... gamespot did something to make the PS3 version look bad

take a look http://67.227.255.239/forum/showpost.php?p=116167016&postcount=265

Yep, I own the game on PS3 and it doesn't look like that GS video.

GS's video is fishy as hell.

Avatar image for lglz1337
lglz1337

4959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#52  Edited By lglz1337
Member since 2013 • 4959 Posts

i will double dip TC nice try!

this is a game that got ported and using gamespot video player silly TC, don't expect it to push the console this game is not build from the ground

TLOU GOTY! stay mad

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52426 Posts
@finalstar2007 said:

This collection

Avatar image for deadline-zero0
DEadliNE-Zero0

6607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#54 DEadliNE-Zero0
Member since 2014 • 6607 Posts

@I_can_haz said:
@GTSaiyanjin2 said:

PS3 version actually looks good... gamespot did something to make the PS3 version look bad

take a look http://67.227.255.239/forum/showpost.php?p=116167016&postcount=265

Yep, I own the game on PS3 and it doesn't look like that GS video.

GS's video is fishy as hell.

Can't believe i'm agreeing with you, but yes, when i played it aswell, it didn't look this blurry. That PS3 versions looks sub-HD, and apparently TLOU was 720p on the PS3.

Hell, if someone had told me the PS4 version was the original, i'd buy it, because that much blurr is weird.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

Clarity is so obvious along with shadows and lighting. They just didnt overdo it , they could easily do so but what to ? It was already a good looking game.

Running on 1080p and 60fps with this kind of clarity is awesome .... X1 couldnt even run it like this at 720p so for lems to be so offensive towards this .... really lems ? 1080p/60fps and looks way more crispy , what the heck did you expect ? A new game ? What can you show better at that res/fps ?

Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

The whole point is that the cutscene models are now ingame so basically TLOU remastered shits on Crysis 3

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

I think it's funny how so many of you bad mouth rereleases on the new consoles. It's not a cash grab. It's the developer making the game accessible to those that maybe didn't have one of the previous consoles. In the case of The Last of Us, lots of people own PS4s that never owned a PS3.

If you're so against it, don't buy it. No one is twisting your arm.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@b4x said:

Yeah that looks like it's worth 50 bones...lmfao.

EDIT: People actually justified this money grab for 10 pages in a thread I made......That shit is weak sauce.

Same exact game....with less blur. The POWER!!!!

That's 50 dollars of power baby!!

Shit should be backwards compatible with that weak ass money grab showing...scums.

At least is a 2013 game that happen with Tomb Raider and several other games that arrived before the PS4 was here,how about Halo recycle crap that is on all xbox platforms.

You don't like recycle games do what i do don't buy them.

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

On paper, it is big. But when you look at it, it isn't realy impressive.

Avatar image for stizzal13
stizzal13

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 stizzal13
Member since 2013 • 609 Posts

@ShepardCommandr said:

50 bucks for this? Are they mental?

I think it is aimed at people who haven't played the game, yet. But, if you played the game, then it is not worth it. Unless, they added a bunch of content I am not aware of.

Anyways, the improvements look good. Hopefully, the PS4 can hold a solid 60fps, but I have my doubts.

Avatar image for handssss
handssss

1907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 handssss
Member since 2013 • 1907 Posts

@stizzal13 said:

@ShepardCommandr said:

50 bucks for this? Are they mental?

I think it is aimed at people who haven't played the game, yet. But, if you played the game, then it is not worth it. Unless, they added a bunch of content I am not aware of.

Anyways, the improvements look good. Hopefully, the PS4 can hold a solid 60fps, but I have my doubts.

it's a GOTY edition in terms of content. (all dlc)

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#65 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11513 Posts

That was the worst comparison video ever. Of course the cutscenes aren't going to look much different. In the original version, the visuals took a noticeable step up when it hit a cutscene so it's not surprising there isn't much difference there. We need a comparison of the gameplay to actually see the improvements.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

I recently beat TLOU for the 1st time on my PS3. Fantastic game. Really deserved all the GOTY awards imo. On the PS3 the game was uneven when it comes to graphics. Some parts looked really good, others looked washed out and somewhat average. However when the game looked good, it looked really really good. The great artsyle did help. Cant imagine how it'll look on the PS4 with 1080p/60fps. To whomever never played TLOU on the PS3, should definitely grab it for the PS4

Avatar image for CanYouDiglt
CanYouDiglt

8474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By CanYouDiglt
Member since 2009 • 8474 Posts

I do not remember TLoU being that much of a blurry mess on the PS3.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68  Edited By deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@speedfog said:

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

On paper, it is big. But when you look at it, it isn't realy impressive.

Those are cutscenes. At least wait until gameplay footage is shown.

Pre-rendered cut scenes too iirc.

Wait for the gameplay imo.

Avatar image for bigblunt537
bigblunt537

6907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 bigblunt537
Member since 2003 • 6907 Posts

It makes me laugh when I hear people saying it's made for people who haven't played the game yet hence the $50 price tag. It is made for anyone willing to shell out $50 for the game. Naughty Dog wants as much money as possible. Not just the few that have't played before.

Avatar image for Qixote
Qixote

10843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 Qixote
Member since 2002 • 10843 Posts

It's hilarious that people who already bought the PS3 game are buying it again on the PS4. Seriously, you have nothing better to do with that money?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@bigblunt537 said:

It makes me laugh when I hear people saying it's made for people who haven't played the game yet hence the $50 price tag. It is made for anyone willing to shell out $50 for the game. Naughty Dog wants as much money as possible. Not just the few that have't played before.

Talking only new: the current PS3 version is $30 from amazon, it would then be another $20 for the Season pass or $15 just for left behind

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

the best game of the last generation with over 200 GOTY making everyone mad because it's being ported only to the PS4. So what's new?

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Gue1 said:

the best game of the last generation with over 200 GOTY making everyone mad because it's being ported only to the PS4. So what's new?

why would people be mad?

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#74 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38035 Posts

@Slimmin360 said:

@lostrib said:

@chikenfriedrice said:

I thought they added a bunch of shit? If it's just a resolution bump then that sucks.

I think they upgraded other aspects as well

Point is, after nearly a year of the PS4 being on the market there is still very little reason to choose a multiplat on PS4 over PS3, so unless something blows me away as far as graphical performance, res and framerate, i'm just getting the lesser PS3 version, which will most likely be lesser on the wallet too.

Especially if I can play the MP for free on PS3.

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#75  Edited By Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@speedfog said:

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

On paper, it is big. But when you look at it, it isn't realy impressive.

Those are cutscenes. At least wait until gameplay footage is shown.

yeah, they always said that they were aiming on making the gameplay look like the pre-rendered, so a comparison between pre-rendered images at 1080p vs 720p will not show much differences beside looking a bit cleaner. On top of it I don't think this video comparison is even 60 frames either.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

You cannot change people's perceptions with a bunch of numbers. Some people feel there is a minor difference based on what they see with their eyes, while others feel there is a big difference. TC is just stating his opinion based on what he is seeing, that's as valid as any response, regardless of the technicality of it.

While it may seem obvious and significant to you based on a bunch of numbers(and probably what you see as well), at the end of the day what really matters is what people see and perceive when they see the game in action themselves.

Despite saying this, I do agree with you myself.....these numbers do represent a large difference technically speaking and should translate into a nice difference onscreen, a lot of times it is just too hard to see all the differences in these online compressed videos.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20103 Posts

They're comparing cutscenes. I'd like to see gameplay, since ND said that gameplay was on the level of custscenes. So comparing both cutscenes won't do much.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Looks like a big difference to me. High resolution textures and 60 fps+1080p!

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

Funny thing is hermits pay 4x for the cost of a console for there rigs to see these types of advantages. The sad thing is they usually show a much smaller difference then this.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#80  Edited By pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

If i cared enough to buy this game twice then id be hoping the biggest difference in the two versions to be that the AI isnt stupid and buggy in the PS4 version.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#81  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

Yeah that looks like it's worth 50 bones...lmfao.

EDIT: People actually justified this money grab for 10 pages in a thread I made......That shit is weak sauce.

Same exact game....with less blur. The POWER!!!!

That's 50 dollars of power baby!!

Shit should be backwards compatible with that weak ass money grab showing...scums.

My God, you are stupid. If you are rebuying this, that's one thing. But if it's for the first time, it's more than worth it. The PS3 version is 30 bucks still and the DLC is 10-15 bucks. This comes with all of that and enhanced graphics/frame rate. Try harder.

And that is a pretty big difference in graphics.

Used at Gamefly $25+10 dlc =35

That is a hack job. It's the same game. If you have never owned it. More power to ya. Buy it.

There is nothing in that comparison that makes me say...OMG BBQ sauce, that shit is 50 dollar next-gen right there baby!!! It's a money grab. No need to white knight it. It is what it is. A fucking joke on the gaming industry. IN My opinion.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@StrongDeadlift: Ya, as others have already posted...you can go away now.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#84  Edited By Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

@Alucard_Prime said:

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

You cannot change people's perceptions with a bunch of numbers. Some people feel there is a minor difference based on what they see with their eyes, while others feel there is a big difference. TC is just stating his opinion based on what he is seeing, that's as valid as any response, regardless of the technicality of it.

While it may seem obvious and significant to you based on a bunch of numbers(and probably what you see as well), at the end of the day what really matters is what people see and perceive when they see the game in action themselves.

Despite saying this, I do agree with you myself.....these numbers do represent a large difference technically speaking and should translate into a nice difference onscreen, a lot of times it is just too hard to see all the differences in these online compressed videos.

It just proves diminishing returns. This is also why the current gen console aren't "weak" and will be fine for the next few years. Diminishing returns has hit gaming hard. The difference of throwing a $500 GPU into a PS4/Xbox One and jacking up the price to $700-800 wouldn't be worth it as the benefits would almost solely be in framerate and resolution, not a massive improvement in overall image quality. Rendering and assets wouldn't change much, you would just get more frames and a slightly higher resolution.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

LOL YouTube.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#86 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#88 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

Am I?

You're the one that just said a used game and new game are somehow different? The game was on sale at gamefly last week for 15 dollars used. At 15 it must be totally different? /amiright?

Keep insulting. You're on fire baby.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#89 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@faizan_faizan said:

LOL YouTube.

YouTube would degrade both games equally. I understand what you're saying though.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

Am I?

You're the one that just said a used game and new game are somehow different? The game was on sale at gamefly last week for 15 dollars used. At 15 it must be totally different? /amiright?

Keep insulting. You're on fire baby.

So it wasn't intentional? That's sad.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

it sucks for you guys who have already bought and played the inferior version of this game. Me i have yet to play this game and will be glad to pay only $50 for the definitive version. Good things come to those who wait. I saw the remastered version of TLOU coming from a mile away which is why I skipped out on it last year.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

@speedfog said:

@Wasdie said:

Not very major? Not only is it a slight increase to the assets and the rendering (lighting/shading) it's also rendering at 1080p60.

The PS3 version runs at 720p and 30fps with frequent dips.

1280x720 = 921,600

1920x1080 = 2,073,600

921,600 x 30 = 27,648,000 pixels per second

2,073,600 x 60 = 124,416,000 pixels per second

That's a 450% increase in the amount of pixels rendered within 1 second. Then you have to include noticeably better assets and rendering used.

That's not a "small" increase.

On paper, it is big. But when you look at it, it isn't realy impressive.

60fps vs 30fps is though.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95  Edited By Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

I swear this is just B4X. This is him. A complete idiot lol.

He'll flag me now thou :(

Heh, he doesn't strike me as someone to use the flag button.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96  Edited By Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

I swear this is just B4X. This is him. A complete idiot lol.

He'll flag me now thou :(

It's ok for x1 though ^^

Seroiusly though, I don't care about that anymore. It'll raise the price of the systems too much. Pass. 360 and PS3 will be available for a very long time and be much, much cheaper.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#98 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@scottpsfan14 said:
@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

I swear this is just B4X. This is him. A complete idiot lol.

He'll flag me now thou :(

Your insult campaign with zero insight on anything I say. Is getting old. It's everyday like clock-work.

You need to find a new hobby. I would pull the same immature stunts. I'm not a twunt though?

I flag no-one. You just love t3h B4X. You're like that girl in school always irritating me, only secretly wanting to swallow my load.

All in due time Baby. There's plenty for all you bitches.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#99  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@tormentos said:

@b4x said:

Yeah that looks like it's worth 50 bones...lmfao.

EDIT: People actually justified this money grab for 10 pages in a thread I made......That shit is weak sauce.

Same exact game....with less blur. The POWER!!!!

That's 50 dollars of power baby!!

Shit should be backwards compatible with that weak ass money grab showing...scums.

At least is a 2013 game that happen with Tomb Raider and several other games that arrived before the PS4 was here,how about Halo recycle crap that is on all xbox platforms.

You don't like recycle games do what i do don't buy them.

Here is a thread I made... Stating the exact same things you just said. You have no case.

Read and bump it.. It's my views on this BS.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50556 Posts
@b4x said:

@scottpsfan14 said:
@Chutebox said:

@b4x said:

@Chutebox said:

@b4x:

Comparing a new game price with used game? B4X logic!

Used and New = Different game.

I wasn't aware. Thanks.

You're being intentionally dense. Or so I hope.

I swear this is just B4X. This is him. A complete idiot lol.

He'll flag me now thou :(

Your insult campaign with zero insight on anything I say. Is getting old. It's everyday like clock-work.

You need to find a new hobby. I would pull the same immature stunts. I'm not a twunt though?

I flag no-one. You just love t3h B4X. You're like that girl in school always irritating me, only secretly wanting to swallow my load.

All in due time Baby. There's plenty for all you bitches.

You um...your whole post was just that bud lol