KZ: Shadow Fall looks amazing

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#151 Edited by JangoWuzHere (17865 posts) -

@KHAndAnime said:

@JangoWuzHere said:

@KHAndAnime said:

Being a hermit, I find Shadow Fall to be very impressive looking. It's definitely the best looking PS4 launch title, as well as one of the best looking next-gen games out. Ryse? Not so much.

I don't understand how someone could enjoy Shadow Fall's visuals but find Ryse unimpressive. Ryse has far superior facial expressions, character animation, and lighting. It's also consistent all the way through. ShadowFall can easily look like an early PS3 game at times.

Killzone's SP looks extremely good 95% of the time, lacking things on the screen that I'd consider ugly. Ryse always looks ugly outside of the cinematics. Always some poor texture, unimpressive shaders, etc. It only has impressive cinematics really.

Shadow Fall's Single player takes a serious drop in quality as soon as you reach chapter 5. ShadowFall can look ugly in both its cinematics and its gameplay.

#152 Posted by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

@KHAndAnime said:

@JangoWuzHere said:

@KHAndAnime said:

Being a hermit, I find Shadow Fall to be very impressive looking. It's definitely the best looking PS4 launch title, as well as one of the best looking next-gen games out. Ryse? Not so much.

I don't understand how someone could enjoy Shadow Fall's visuals but find Ryse unimpressive. Ryse has far superior facial expressions, character animation, and lighting. It's also consistent all the way through. ShadowFall can easily look like an early PS3 game at times.

Killzone's SP looks extremely good 95% of the time, lacking things on the screen that I'd consider ugly. Ryse always looks ugly outside of the cinematics. Always some poor texture, unimpressive shaders, etc. It only has impressive cinematics really.

and DF said they were prerendered lol.

#153 Posted by gpuking (3219 posts) -

@JangoWuzHere

The hell? Looks pretty awesome to me.

#154 Posted by zeeshanhaider (3052 posts) -

@gpuking said:

I think it's time to put zeeshanhaider on my ignore list, this dude is constantly regurgitating his BS and living in denial even when we present facts, repeating the same shit 100times is not gonna fool anyone so I'll leave you in peace.

In other words. g-puking is owned again. Anywhere Crapzone is mentioned, I'll be bringing Ryse right up as ownage. You know, only cows are to be blamed for this mess.

@super600 said:

@shurns said:

@zeeshanhaider said:

@gpuking said:

Sorry but KZ shits on Crysis 2 dx11, C2 doesn't even have physically based lighting, area lights, very low poly models, it's simply not in the same league.

Look it's from the horse's mouth so if you don't believe him then whatever, adding something like this would only cause fanboy war which is what he's trying to avoid in the comment section. I'm just here to correct your misinformation or spread of FUD.

Sorry I would believe what DF has to say rather than a random Sony drone but you are right Crapzone: Shadow Fail isn't even in the same league as Crysis 2 since it was beaten by Ryse. Crysis 2 is on a level up from there.

Okay then in your terms perhaps. User zeeshanhaider on Gamespot is Richard Leadbetter the author of the DF's Ryse analysis. Here's what he defined in the end. In your ignorant face gpuking.

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/kz-shadow-fall-looks-amazing-31129955/?page=3

Ryse shits on Crapzone: Shadow Fail and Crysis 2 from 2011 just craps on anything 900pStation will going to produce. So people are better off buying calculators than next-gen consoles. Hell even tablets would be a better choice in few years.

Dark10x is Richard Leadbetter from DF. Don't know why you're in denial.

That neogaf user is someone else on DF.His real name is John Linneman

Ouch!

#155 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@gpuking said:

@JangoWuzHere

The hell? Looks pretty awesome to me.

once again i am forced to ask "Are you fucking serious?"

Look at the character models and say that again. I've seen more detail in fucking pacman.

Ryse looks better 900p or not.. saying the game is blurry proves you haven't played it.

#156 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

@KHAndAnime said:

@JangoWuzHere said:

@KHAndAnime said:

Being a hermit, I find Shadow Fall to be very impressive looking. It's definitely the best looking PS4 launch title, as well as one of the best looking next-gen games out. Ryse? Not so much.

I don't understand how someone could enjoy Shadow Fall's visuals but find Ryse unimpressive. Ryse has far superior facial expressions, character animation, and lighting. It's also consistent all the way through. ShadowFall can easily look like an early PS3 game at times.

Killzone's SP looks extremely good 95% of the time, lacking things on the screen that I'd consider ugly. Ryse always looks ugly outside of the cinematics. Always some poor texture, unimpressive shaders, etc. It only has impressive cinematics really.

and DF said they were prerendered lol.

and that matters how? the cutscenes are glorious and the in-game graphics >>>>> killzone, hell ryse has more far more detailed character models.

Considering you apparently have some Uber PC, i am not sure why it bothers you so much that Ryse graphically >>>>>> anything on PS4.....or maybe it's because you are I_can_Spaz, and you now realise what a dick you look like after having blathered on about how much killzone is going to a AAA Graphics king masterpiece lol

stay butthurt

#157 Posted by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@gpuking said:

@JangoWuzHere

The hell? Looks pretty awesome to me.

once again i am forced to ask "Are you fucking serious?"

Look at the character models and say that again. I've seen more detail in fucking pacman.

Ryse looks better 900p or not.. saying the game is blurry proves you haven't played it.

#158 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

@sts106mat said:

@gpuking said:

@JangoWuzHere

The hell? Looks pretty awesome to me.

once again i am forced to ask "Are you fucking serious?"

Look at the character models and say that again. I've seen more detail in fucking pacman.

Ryse looks better 900p or not.. saying the game is blurry proves you haven't played it.

funny that's what everyone looks like when they read every single one of your posts.

you got licked, Ryse graphically >>>> killzone... I_can_haz is inconsolable

#159 Posted by gpuking (3219 posts) -

The level of butthurt lems has endure here is simply delicious

#160 Posted by IMAHAPYHIPPO (2753 posts) -

@mrxboxone said:

Do you want the facts about graphics? PS4 fans are butthurt that There system doesn't have the best graphics. Ryse graphics are untouched and unmatched.

You will have a lot of cows claim KZSF is some how better. But the fact is......

IGN, euro gamer, game trailer, rev3gaming, Adam Sessler, tech gamer, digital foundry, Machinima all proclaim Ryse as having BY FAR the best graphics of next gen consoles.

Gamespot, the site we are all posting on is on record as saying "of all next gen titles, Ryse by far has the best visuals. It's not even close. Killzone Shadow Fall looks good, but Ryse is incredible in the graphics department."

When that video was posted I thought all the PS4 users were gonna commit suicide. They were in serious damage control and raging. After a few days denial set in and they all went back to proclaiming KZ as having the best graphics. Until you post them the facts. Then they resort to one image from a beta build as if that means anything. Graphically Ryse is superior. In every way visually.

An even more fun fact is that both games kind of suck. So, I take it back. It's a much less fun fact.

#161 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@gpuking said:

The level of butthurt lems has endure here is simply delicious

not a single lem is butthurt.

The industry has spoken Ryse >>> Killzone in graphics. ( If you provide credible articles to the contrary, be our guest. )

Gamespot has spoken, Ryse >>>> Killzone graphically

System wars has spoken Ryse >>>> Killzone graphically

I am not surprised you've gone a bit "few good men on us" all those threads and posts you made pre-launch, it's not surprising

#162 Posted by gpuking (3219 posts) -

You can deny it all you want but in the end it's you who are watching a blurry 900p frame with 24fps lag fest, must be really satisfying ey lol? Oh and while you're pretending this >> that, maybe sit just a liiiiittle further back to get that feel of 1080p in Ryse, do move closer when you need to read the text tho.

#163 Posted by sukraj (24391 posts) -

@gpuking said:

The level of butthurt lems has endure here is simply delicious

butt hurt when Ryse is more superior than killzone yar.

#164 Posted by gpuking (3219 posts) -

SHow me proof, I'm still waiting for some beautiful screenshots.

#165 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@gpuking said:

You can deny it all you want but in the end it's you who are watching a blurry 900p frame with 24fps lag fest, must be really satisfying ey lol? Oh and while you're pretending this >> that, maybe sit just a liiiiittle further back to get that feel of 1080p in Ryse, do move closer when you need to read the text tho.

@gpuking said:

SHow me proof, I'm still waiting for some beautiful screenshots.

I sit at approximately the recommended distance for viewing games on my TV.

Ryse looks superb, I just enjoyed the 3D version of Gravity on Blu-ray yesterday, it too looked amazing too, i have a great TV and i know what looks good / bad on it.

I dont play laggy games and Ryse performs well IMO.

why should we waste our time providing screenshots for you to just blindy deny ?

How about you provide some credible industry articles that catagorically state Killzone looks better than RYSE.

but you've been owned by your own stupid rules, Killzone is a subHD blurry mess according to cows.

stay upset dude, with every post you make our laughter intensifies.

#166 Posted by zeeshanhaider (3052 posts) -

@gpuking said:

SHow me proof, I'm still waiting for some beautiful screenshots.

You must be kidding. Beautiful screenshots of Crapzone: Shadow Fail just don't exist, where would he get them to show you? Oh, I get it, you are talking about the pre-replease 4K bullshots, no?

Oh and I'm still waiting for a single credible source. :D

#167 Posted by MrXboxOne (799 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

@mrxboxone said:

@I_can_haz: LOL remember that poll you posted asking who had better graphics and Ryse dominated? You still butthurt your own poll, IGN, Gamespot, Adam Sessler, Euro Gamer, Rev3, Tech Gaming, Digital Foundry, Game Trailers and others all disagree with you.

Your pathetic.

Not really. There are other threads tha came after that with polls showing KZSF won. Cry moar.

Ryse is a mediocre game with mediocre 900p textures and small corridors. It can't even be mentioned in the same sentence as KZSF without chuckling.

Not really huh? BTW there was no more polls after that. They were all locked after a few post. You even started another one that got locked because you couldn't handle it. No one outside you is crying. Ryse is mediocre in game play. Killzone is a crappy shooter. Whats your point?

The fact is, you keep lying about media proclaiming KZSF has better graphics. You even said Richard Leadbetter admit this..... AFTER someone already posted a link too him saying Ryse is lol. Yes I am calling you a liar btw.

Tell you what...... Post one credible article from a media outlet that chooses KZSF over Ryse in visuals. We already kknow what IGN, Gamespot, Eurogamer, Tech games, Digital Founndry, Adam Sessler, Rev3, Game trailers and machinima amng others. so please. Find us one source link that says otherwise. Hell most people think BF4 looks better then Killzone.

#168 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (17905 posts) -

This sucks. A graphics whorefest with so few user screenies.

#169 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@jun_aka_pekto I dont normally like/do screenshots, because they are static, you cannot get a true impression of how a game looks, but just for comparison, these screens are closer to how the actual games looks than the ones that cows like to post. but IMO they still don't do the game justice, it looks great in person.

#170 Posted by gpuking (3219 posts) -

The 2nd shot is pre rendered cutscene, don't even pretend to fool me with that lol. But yeah the actual gameplay shots look terrible, blurry and muddy. If you have a small 42 or 46" TV then it might still be fine but on my 65" it's very noticeably blurrier than KZSF. Seriously, just expand these shots to fullscreen and you'll see it's way better looking than Ryse.

#171 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (17905 posts) -

@sts106mat: That's much better. Tough call for me on which looks better without my preferences (sci-fi) playing a part. I'll sit on the fence with this one.

As for games looking good in motion.....That applies equally to most games. From my own eyes, most games look good during the action. It's when I slow down that I notice the flaws.

I like comparing screenies here for fun. But once I start playing, I don't really notice the graphics blemishes (until I slow down).

#172 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@gpuking said:

The 2nd shot is pre rendered cutscene, don't even pretend to fool me with that lol. But yeah the actual gameplay shots look terrible, blurry and muddy. If you have a small 42 or 46" TV then it might still be fine but on my 65" it's very noticeably blurrier than KZSF. Seriously, just expand these shots to fullscreen and you'll see it's way better looking than Ryse.

funny how you only ever use the same pictures. Like i said dude, they dont do the game justic. Once again show us your TV with your Xbox one and copy of Ryse, gamertag and GS username.

Also still waiting for you to prove us wrong with those articles saying KZ looks better, haven't seen a single one yet.

#173 Posted by napo_sp (345 posts) -

Cryengine > KZSF engine

fact.

#174 Posted by MiiiiV (589 posts) -
@topgunmv said:

@miiiiv:

Mediocre textures?

Some are better than others, just like every game.

Yes, most games have inconsistent textures. But even KZSF's best textures are not nearly as hi-res as the textures of some of the best looking pc games. By pc standards they are mediocre, by console standards they are above average.

#175 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6357 posts) -

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

#176 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

#177 Edited by ronvalencia (15782 posts) -
@gpuking said:

Sorry but KZ shits on Crysis 2 dx11, C2 doesn't even have physically based lighting, area lights, very low poly models, it's simply not in the same league.

Look it's from the horse's mouth so if you don't believe him then whatever, adding something like this would only cause fanboy war which is what he's trying to avoid in the comment section. I'm just here to correct your misinformation or spread of FUD.

I guess you missed Crysis2's DX11 NVIDIA edition patch when it over applied the tessellation feature on flat walls/flat surface objects.

From http://www.behardware.com/articles/838-6/tessellation-loupe.html

Notice the "over the top" triangle density with PC's Crysis 2 NVIDIA edition. In terms of triangle count, it would murder your Killzone SF.

From http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/crysis-3-pc-version-is-even-more-beautiful-and-realistic-than-crysis-2-with-directx-11.452662560/

Producers of Crytek Michael "Mike", Tiago Sousa, Marco Corbetta and Sean Tracy reveals these new details to the site PC Games Hardware and ensured that the PC version is even more beautiful and realistic than Crysis 2 with DirectX 11 Ultra Upgrade.

According to them, Crysis 3 since the release of the PC version will already have DirectX 11 technology, high definition textures and tessellation.

The Pixelparten advanced and high resolution Crysis 3 will bring some new graphics, plus the tessellation, displacement mapping and Parallax Occlusion Mapping (POM), we also Screen Space Directional Occlusion (SSDO) and reflexes in real time on certain surfaces, also with shadows smooth contours that were named by Crytek as "Penumbras variables."

Other improvements include volumetric clouds, mist and shadow of illuminated particles (dust and smoke) and area lights. Crytek also spoke of the third generation of global illumination (Global Illumination), these are simply an extension of the "Glossy Reflections", there will also be a new technology in water reflections in real time. The latter are in principle known from Crysis 2 (Realtime Local Reflections), however in Crysis 2 were not used wet pixels. New luminous particles, which create new effects of alien weaponry when the blue balls explodes, creating a spectacular effect!

-----------

4th gen CryEngine powered Star Citizen. http://wccftech.com/ryse-polygon-count-comparision-aaa-titles-crysis-star-citizen/

"PC will remain the Graphics King in terms of brute power". PC's DirectX 12 will merge brute force with "console like" efficiency.

#178 Edited by mavven (557 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@jun_aka_pekto I dont normally like/do screenshots, because they are static, you cannot get a true impression of how a game looks, but just for comparison, these screens are closer to how the actual games looks than the ones that cows like to post. but IMO they still don't do the game justice, it looks great in person.

First: An image is like a thousand words, that means beautiful gfx can be seen through screenshots because in motion is hard to see the details. And if a game is beautiful in motion doesn't mean automatically has the best gfx, because in motion you apply a lot features such as Animations, which Ryse unfortunately lacks.

Second: A game has to be playable in every section (steady 30fps; norm), has to offer varied open areas not just corridors and have to be fullHD (1080p new console norm) to achieve technical / visual design superiority. Creating a game visually stunning as Ryse is easy for most developers but at what cost??!!

All I'm saying that Ryse may be visually better than the rest but doesn't stand above the rest as graphics department (Visuals, technical and animations)

PS: I see you play the game in deutsch language?! So you are German (or Austrian) that's why you favor Crytek :P (even if those are Turkish). No I'm kidding in this last. I respect your preferences.

#179 Edited by GrenadeLauncher (6357 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

#180 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@mavven said:

@sts106mat said:

@jun_aka_pekto I dont normally like/do screenshots, because they are static, you cannot get a true impression of how a game looks, but just for comparison, these screens are closer to how the actual games looks than the ones that cows like to post. but IMO they still don't do the game justice, it looks great in person.

First: An image is like a thousand words, that means beautiful gfx can be seen through screenshots because in motion is hard to see the details. And if a game is beautiful in motion doesn't mean automatically has the best gfx, because in motion you apply a lot features such as Animations, which Ryse unfortunately lacks.

Second: A game has to be playable in every section (steady 30fps; norm), has to offer varied open areas not just corridors and have to be fullHD (1080p new console norm) to achieve technical / visual design superiority. Creating a game visually stunning as Ryse is easy for most developers but at what cost??!!

All I'm saying that Ryse may be visually better than the rest but doesn't stand above the rest as graphics department (Visuals, technical and animations)

PS: I see you play the game in deutsch language?! So you are German (or Austrian) that's why you favor Crytek :P (even if those are Turkish). No I'm kidding in this last. I respect your preferences.

Hi

nice to hear from you, I haven't seen you post before.

I completely agree with everything you said. What we are arguing about here is "what the best looking game is" the sony fans seem upset that quite a few places chose Ryse over Killzone. they can't seem to accept it, probably because if they admit they are wrong, they will look even more stupid having said hundreds of times before the games came out that Killzone is going to be "graphics king".

Personally i dont care if one game looks better than the other, i just find it funny watchin them try and convince us, with the industry and gamers on our side, that we are all some how wrong....just because they said so.

I also dont particularly favour crytek, I enjoy Ryse, but that doesn't make me a crytek fanboy. If the order 1886 comes out and has better graphics according to most review sites and gamers, you wont see me arguing that it doesn't.

I am english, i got the screens from a german website since it was one that popped up when i searched.

#181 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

#182 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6357 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

PS4 has a better and more diverse game selection, obviously.

Nah, I'll be here for your bitch tears when you finally get bored of grinding and you realise you have NO GAMES until November. :)

#183 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

PS4 has a better and more diverse game selection, obviously.

Nah, I'll be here for your bitch tears when you finally get bored of grinding and you realise you have NO GAMES until November. :)

really? dont be a titanfool

I can see titanfall lasting a hell of a lot longer than most other games this year put together. It has something sorely lacking in many games these days......the fun factor. It doesn't feel at all like a grind. and respawn and microsoft are commited to the title, i expect it to be the game which keeps on giving..

#184 Posted by happyduds77 (1652 posts) -
@sts106mat said:

@gpuking said:

@JangoWuzHere

The hell? Looks pretty awesome to me.

once again i am forced to ask "Are you fucking serious?"

Look at the character models and say that again. I've seen more detail in fucking pacman.

Ryse looks better 900p or not.. saying the game is blurry proves you haven't played it.

#185 Edited by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

So much lem asshurt in this thread. I guess Titanfall underperforming in preorders and the fact XBone is gonna get knocked the F out in March is making them worried.

#186 Posted by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

So much lem assault in this thread. I guess Titanfall underperforming in preorders and the fact XBone is gonna get knocked the F out in March is making them worried.

err no. Titanfall just got a 9/10 from gamespot....did you miss it or were your eyes full of tears from the fact that RYSE >>>> Killzone.

If you want to prove us all wrong, all you have to do is provide us with credible articles stating the Killzone >>> ryse in graphics..

#187 Posted by SolidGame_basic (19762 posts) -

lol this has become one of my favorite threads of all time. didn't see it coming at all when I made it

#188 Posted by speedfog (3503 posts) -

@I_can_haz said:

So much lem asshurt in this thread. I guess Titanfall underperforming in preorders and the fact XBone is gonna get knocked the F out in March is making them worried.

Buhu go cry in a corner.

Titanfall is fantastic

#189 Edited by Cyberdot (3926 posts) -

@FoxbatAlpha said:

Sure it looks good but it was already decided by Gamespot and IGN that Ryse is the best looking next gen console game.

lol

#190 Posted by topgunmv (10418 posts) -

@miiiiv said:
@topgunmv said:

@miiiiv:

Mediocre textures?

Some are better than others, just like every game.

Yes, most games have inconsistent textures. But even KZSF's best textures are not nearly as hi-res as the textures of some of the best looking pc games. By pc standards they are mediocre, by console standards they are above average.

Then tell me what games you're playing, because that's up there with anything I've seen playing crysis 2 with the MaldoHD mod.

#191 Posted by danlevm (289 posts) -

RYSE really does look amazing... but so does Killzone... I like the art style in Ryse though.. I find killzone a bit generic

#192 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (28600 posts) -

Since Sheen's are in overdrive bubububbu metacritic mode....

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/killzone-shadow-fall

73 lololololololol

#193 Posted by darkangel115 (2410 posts) -

why is this even a thread? the game is 3 months old and dead. Nobody denies its a pretty game, regardless if they lied about the resolution or not. Only people that say its ugly is the hardcore lems. Still doesn't make it true. Sadly its a poor game which is why people don't play it. even after weeks of free multiplayer, nobody purchased it to play online. it spiked to 30k people then right back down to 2k people after it wasn't free. I think that speaks volumes. So why does any of this matter? Ryse probably has more people online playing it then killzone

#194 Edited by super600 (31241 posts) -

@zeeshanhaider said:

@gpuking said:

I think it's time to put zeeshanhaider on my ignore list, this dude is constantly regurgitating his BS and living in denial even when we present facts, repeating the same shit 100times is not gonna fool anyone so I'll leave you in peace.

In other words. g-puking is owned again. Anywhere Crapzone is mentioned, I'll be bringing Ryse right up as ownage. You know, only cows are to be blamed for this mess.

@super600 said:

@shurns said:

@zeeshanhaider said:

@gpuking said:

Sorry but KZ shits on Crysis 2 dx11, C2 doesn't even have physically based lighting, area lights, very low poly models, it's simply not in the same league.

Look it's from the horse's mouth so if you don't believe him then whatever, adding something like this would only cause fanboy war which is what he's trying to avoid in the comment section. I'm just here to correct your misinformation or spread of FUD.

Sorry I would believe what DF has to say rather than a random Sony drone but you are right Crapzone: Shadow Fail isn't even in the same league as Crysis 2 since it was beaten by Ryse. Crysis 2 is on a level up from there.

Okay then in your terms perhaps. User zeeshanhaider on Gamespot is Richard Leadbetter the author of the DF's Ryse analysis. Here's what he defined in the end. In your ignorant face gpuking.

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/kz-shadow-fall-looks-amazing-31129955/?page=3

Ryse shits on Crapzone: Shadow Fail and Crysis 2 from 2011 just craps on anything 900pStation will going to produce. So people are better off buying calculators than next-gen consoles. Hell even tablets would be a better choice in few years.

Dark10x is Richard Leadbetter from DF. Don't know why you're in denial.

That neogaf user is someone else on DF.His real name is John Linneman

Ouch!

Richard Leadbetter has no actual neogaf account if I recall so I don't get why people think that user is richard leadbetter.A bunch of news articles awhile ago revealed who john linneman was on neogaf and that is why I knew his real name. Anyway I don't care about killzone shadow falls graphics because the game's graphics is not enough to save a game that is really unappealing for most people.

#195 Edited by Heil68 (48743 posts) -

Beyond stunning that's for sure. True next gen game.

#196 Edited by j2zon2591 (2466 posts) -

Both looks fantastic but I think CryTek's faces are more convincing/less uncanny and may be a harder feat.

Can't wait to own both consoles or have a buddy to stay over with that have both consoles :D

#197 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6357 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

PS4 has a better and more diverse game selection, obviously.

Nah, I'll be here for your bitch tears when you finally get bored of grinding and you realise you have NO GAMES until November. :)

really? dont be a titanfool

I can see titanfall lasting a hell of a lot longer than most other games this year put together. It has something sorely lacking in many games these days......the fun factor. It doesn't feel at all like a grind. and respawn and microsoft are commited to the title, i expect it to be the game which keeps on giving..

They'll be fleeing back to BF4 within weeks. In a month the same "what went wrong?" threads that popped up with Bioshock Infinite will start appearing for Tituhfuhh. The rest will move to COD or Destiny by the end of the year.

#198 Posted by zeeshanhaider (3052 posts) -

@super600 said:

@zeeshanhaider said:

@gpuking said:

I think it's time to put zeeshanhaider on my ignore list, this dude is constantly regurgitating his BS and living in denial even when we present facts, repeating the same shit 100times is not gonna fool anyone so I'll leave you in peace.

In other words. g-puking is owned again. Anywhere Crapzone is mentioned, I'll be bringing Ryse right up as ownage. You know, only cows are to be blamed for this mess.

@super600 said:

@shurns said:

@zeeshanhaider said:

@gpuking said:

Sorry but KZ shits on Crysis 2 dx11, C2 doesn't even have physically based lighting, area lights, very low poly models, it's simply not in the same league.

Look it's from the horse's mouth so if you don't believe him then whatever, adding something like this would only cause fanboy war which is what he's trying to avoid in the comment section. I'm just here to correct your misinformation or spread of FUD.

Sorry I would believe what DF has to say rather than a random Sony drone but you are right Crapzone: Shadow Fail isn't even in the same league as Crysis 2 since it was beaten by Ryse. Crysis 2 is on a level up from there.

Okay then in your terms perhaps. User zeeshanhaider on Gamespot is Richard Leadbetter the author of the DF's Ryse analysis. Here's what he defined in the end. In your ignorant face gpuking.

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/kz-shadow-fall-looks-amazing-31129955/?page=3

Ryse shits on Crapzone: Shadow Fail and Crysis 2 from 2011 just craps on anything 900pStation will going to produce. So people are better off buying calculators than next-gen consoles. Hell even tablets would be a better choice in few years.

Dark10x is Richard Leadbetter from DF. Don't know why you're in denial.

That neogaf user is someone else on DF.His real name is John Linneman

Ouch!

Richard Leadbetter has no actual neogaf account if I recall so I don't get why people think that user is richard leadbetter.A bunch of news articles awhile ago revealed who john linneman was on neogaf and that is why I knew his real name. Anyway I don't care about killzone shadow falls graphics because the game's graphics is not enough to save a game that is really unappealing for most people.

Any link to the articles would be greatly appreciated. Not that i doubt you but rubbing in the faces of cows is just so much fun. :D

#199 Edited by sts106mat (20671 posts) -

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

PS4 has a better and more diverse game selection, obviously.

Nah, I'll be here for your bitch tears when you finally get bored of grinding and you realise you have NO GAMES until November. :)

really? dont be a titanfool

I can see titanfall lasting a hell of a lot longer than most other games this year put together. It has something sorely lacking in many games these days......the fun factor. It doesn't feel at all like a grind. and respawn and microsoft are commited to the title, i expect it to be the game which keeps on giving..

They'll be fleeing back to BF4 within weeks. In a month the same "what went wrong?" threads that popped up with Bioshock Infinite will start appearing for Tituhfuhh. The rest will move to COD or Destiny by the end of the year.

well your previous titanfall predictions were wrong, newsflash......nobody gives a shit what you think about titanfall or anything.

#200 Posted by GrenadeLauncher (6357 posts) -

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@sts106mat said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

Bless his heart, Mr Shitbox Done is still trying. Those underperforming Tituhfuhh pre-orders must be worrying him.

I'll bet your arse is opening and closing fast as hell right now.....not long to go until titanfall reviews start to appear. hope you got your life-jacket ready you huge crybaby.

Yeah, I can't wait for those 7s with the occasional 9 and 10 to bump up the metacritic number.

Infamous 600,000, Tituhfuhh 575,000, taste the rainbow, bitch. :)

So what if Infamous has more pre-orders? It has a bigger install base....which going by your logic means PS4 gamers have less interest in Infamous than XB1 gamers have in titanfall....so...

The link for those numbers isn't even a credible source FFS, you are potentially going to look such a massive dickhead tomorrow (and for the next month or so). Bet you'll avoid GS all together....prat.

PS4 has a better and more diverse game selection, obviously.

Nah, I'll be here for your bitch tears when you finally get bored of grinding and you realise you have NO GAMES until November. :)

really? dont be a titanfool

I can see titanfall lasting a hell of a lot longer than most other games this year put together. It has something sorely lacking in many games these days......the fun factor. It doesn't feel at all like a grind. and respawn and microsoft are commited to the title, i expect it to be the game which keeps on giving..

They'll be fleeing back to BF4 within weeks. In a month the same "what went wrong?" threads that popped up with Bioshock Infinite will start appearing for Tituhfuhh. The rest will move to COD or Destiny by the end of the year.

well your previous titanfall predictions were wrong, newsflash......nobody gives a shit what you think about titanfall or anything.

I said Titanflop would underperform with reviews and it has: sub-90 on Metacritic despite all the manufactured hype, beaten by a JRPG and an indie game and got a remake of a 12 year old game breathing down its neck.