Is the PS3 comeback to beat the 360 in sales the greatest in gaming history?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#201 Posted by MW2ismygame (2183 posts) -

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Why, because you say so? Fiscal reports have Sony ahead. Youre just gonna have to deal with it.

maxon27

makes you feel better to throw bs info around and call it fact eh? last place has really gotten into you cows :lol:

What I find hilarious is, you xbots rent your own games. Plus you rent your own dlc. So it's come down to this. Ps3 has the better exclusive games. The ps3 also has the most content in multiplats. Psn offers more then xbl. Ps+ offers so many full games that it makes a mocker of xbl. So ps3 has the games, exclusive multiplat content, the better online service and now outselling xbox360 hand over fist. Ouch it's gotta hurt supporting a system that has nothing left. Never mind lets hope Microsoft try to remain as loyal to it's users as its users are to Microsoft. LMAO

Ok let me point out how moronic your statement is.

1) Games are rented on ALL PLATFORMS

2) You dont own DLC on ANY PLATFORM anymore thanks to DRM

3) Games are subjective and both have great ones

4) Better online service is also subjective and both have lots of content

5) THE PS3 IS STILL IN LAST PLACE the 70 mil figure WAS A MISTAKE someone posted on here, that figure is PS3 AND PS2 sales

God you cows are frenzied at the moment because you hear a sliver of (fictional) positive news. :roll:

#202 Posted by TheDidact (3981 posts) -
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="NineTailedGoku"]

Why, because you say so? Fiscal reports have Sony ahead. Youre just gonna have to deal with it.

maxon27

makes you feel better to throw bs info around and call it fact eh? last place has really gotten into you cows :lol:

What I find hilarious is, you xbots rent your own games. Didact: I don't rent games often but what are people supposed to do, pay $60 for every single game that comes out? Maybe they have sense and don't just pay $60 for every game out of blind loyalty like you probably do for Sony? Plus you rent your own dlc. Didact: What? Ps3 has the better exclusive games. Didact: It has more exclusives but the only great ones are the Uncharted and LBP games, MGS4, TLoU, and maybe GOW3. It all comes down to preference, and I prefer Halo and Gears over most PS3 games. The ps3 also has the most content in multiplats. Psn offers more then xbl. Ps+ offers so many full games that it makes a mocker of xbl. Didact: Only in recent Ubisoft and EA games. How about games people care about like CoD and Skyrim? the better online service Didact: Not at all. Have you ever used XBL? and now outselling xbox360 hand over fist. Didact: It's been proven on both here and GAF that this is false. And who cares anyway? Ouch it's gotta hurt supporting a system that has nothing left. Didact: Gears Judgement? Multiplats? Halo 4's fantastic multiplayer which actually has replay value? Never mind lets hope Microsoft try to remain as loyal to it's users as its users are to Microsoft. Didact: Lets hope Sony doesn't discontinue more stuff cows have bought out of blind loyalty. Didact: LMAO

#203 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
every second that ticks off the clock, the 360 goes even deeper into 3rd place, everyone can feel it :lol::lol:
#204 Posted by charizard1605 (55496 posts) -
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]No, that's still Nintendo with the Wiikhoofia_pika
That wasn't a comeback

Yes it was :| After the Gamecube, they came back with the Wii, how is that not a comeback?
#205 Posted by TheDidact (3981 posts) -
every second that ticks off the clock, the 360 goes even deeper into 3rd place, everyone can feel it :lol::lol:PinnacleGamingP
So what games are you playing right now?
#206 Posted by SkyRaid (2001 posts) -
Really? Another thread about the same thing? You got owned so hard you just left the old one eh?
#207 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaSkyRaid
take it easy bro is just a gaming site
#208 Posted by KarateeeChop (4590 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

makes you feel better to throw bs info around and call it fact eh? last place has really gotten into you cows :lol:

MW2ismygame

What I find hilarious is, you xbots rent your own games. Plus you rent your own dlc. So it's come down to this. Ps3 has the better exclusive games. The ps3 also has the most content in multiplats. Psn offers more then xbl. Ps+ offers so many full games that it makes a mocker of xbl. So ps3 has the games, exclusive multiplat content, the better online service and now outselling xbox360 hand over fist. Ouch it's gotta hurt supporting a system that has nothing left. Never mind lets hope Microsoft try to remain as loyal to it's users as its users are to Microsoft. LMAO

Ok let me point out how moronic your statement is.

1) Games are rented on ALL PLATFORMS

2) You dont own DLC on ANY PLATFORM anymore thanks to DRM

3) Games are subjective and both have great ones

4) Better online service is also subjective and both have lots of content

5) THE PS3 IS STILL IN LAST PLACE the 70 mil figure WAS A MISTAKE someone posted on here, that figure is PS3 AND PS2 sales

God you cows are frenzied at the moment because you hear a sliver of (fictional) positive news. :roll:

:lol: not sure why cows feel obligated to lie for sony. they've been doing it for years now. whenever a bad news for sony comes out, they just make up bs info like turning 70 million into 70.2 million out of nowhere to claim a fake victory.

this forum is known for its raging cows and their delusions :lol:

#209 Posted by TecmoGirl (3965 posts) -
#210 Posted by delta3074 (17797 posts) -
[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

[QUOTE="BringABong"] How can you say that.. Read what the article stated again... Sales of the console have been high in France, too, (((( with the new PlayStation 3 model selling over four million units since being made available )))) . Since being made available would be from 28 Sept & Article date was 3rd Oct ). This is stating that 4 Million NEW PS3's selling SINCE being available.. Simple as that really. I'm also from thee UK, and GameStation ( now GAME ) talk crap anyway ( Gamestation even told me that PSN wasn't free to play online ) just to try and sell me a 360 S-Slim. LOL. So take what they state with a pinch of salt. After everything being said and done the PS3 is now about too( if not already done so ) outsell the Xbox 360 no matter what people believed, and STILL has loads of support coming to the Platform ( while 360's gaming support has gone more towards entertainment more than gaming nowadays ). This is just the way it is. PS, i own more than one console on both platforms.BringABong

At least try to apply some commonsense before posting.

You are claiming that a console sold 4 million units in France between Sep 28 and Oct 3rd.

Think about that for a moment.

I'll give you two hints:

1. How many games for a new release AAA game sell 4 million units in the first week on a worldwide basis? Not too many. How many sell 4 million in Fance in a week? None.

2. How many IPADs sell worldwide in launch week? How many of those do you think are in France?

Have you read the article? http://bit.ly/SE0Xr2 Now tell me that's not what it's stating. IE "Sales of the console have been high in France, too, with the NEW PlayStation 3 model selling over four million units since being made available" ... The Article stated the console up by 138 percent 28th sept- while article was published 3rd Oct.

This is what the article ACTUALLY says, this is QUOTED from the ARTICLE that YOU linked too 'We just hit 4 million PS3 sales in France and can state that the PS3 is and will remain the leading platform in 2012.' That is Exactly what it says in the article And a console shipping 4 million in that timeframe is Either A)a miracle or, B)SONY is channel stuffing Because in the middle of a global depression i doubt The French bought that many Ps3's in that timeframe.
#211 Posted by Phazevariance (10932 posts) -
[QUOTE="BringABong"][QUOTE="SUD123456"]

At least try to apply some commonsense before posting.

You are claiming that a console sold 4 million units in France between Sep 28 and Oct 3rd.

Think about that for a moment.

I'll give you two hints:

1. How many games for a new release AAA game sell 4 million units in the first week on a worldwide basis? Not too many. How many sell 4 million in Fance in a week? None.

2. How many IPADs sell worldwide in launch week? How many of those do you think are in France?

delta3074
Have you read the article? http://bit.ly/SE0Xr2 Now tell me that's not what it's stating. IE "Sales of the console have been high in France, too, with the NEW PlayStation 3 model selling over four million units since being made available" ... The Article stated the console up by 138 percent 28th sept- while article was published 3rd Oct.

This is what the article ACTUALLY says, this is QUOTED from the ARTICLE that YOU linked too 'We just hit 4 million PS3 sales in France and can state that the PS3 is and will remain the leading platform in 2012.' That is Exactly what it says in the article And a console shipping 4 million in that timeframe is Either A)a miracle or, B)SONY is channel stuffing Because in the middle of a global depression i doubt The French bought that many Ps3's in that timeframe.

note they are talking shipped to manufacturers not sold to consumers. Also, don't forget 360 sales figures are from 2 months ago. 360 still second place.
#212 Posted by mariokart64fan (19348 posts) -

um if im not mistaken the standings are still like this

1-ds-160 m

2 wii -97.0 m

3 psp 84m

4 xbox360 70 m plus(wheres oct nov numbers)

5 ps3 70.2m

8th gen

3dsxl/3ds-23.2 m

psvita 3.2 m

wii u i can bet on a 5 million by jan world wide

#213 Posted by Caseytappy (2128 posts) -

um if im not mistaken the standings are still like this

1-ds-160 m

2 wii -97.0 m

3 psp 84m

4 xbox360 70 m plus(wheres oct nov numbers)

5 ps3 70.2m

8th gen

3dsxl/3ds-23.2 m

psvita 3.2 m

wii u i can bet on a 5 million by jan world wide

mariokart64fan

But you are mistaken , you included the PS2 sales in your Ps3 number .

#214 Posted by Meeeper282 (1602 posts) -

[QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

um if im not mistaken the standings are still like this

1-ds-160 m

2 wii -97.0 m

3 psp 84m

4 xbox360 70 m plus(wheres oct nov numbers)

5 ps3 70.2m

8th gen

3dsxl/3ds-23.2 m

psvita 3.2 m

wii u i can bet on a 5 million by jan world wide

Caseytappy

But you are mistaken , you included the PS2 sales in your Ps3 number .

What the hell is going on here, ps3 and 360 are both at 70m, why cant people get this through there heads

#215 Posted by Caseytappy (2128 posts) -

But the 360 reached the 70 million some weeks before PS3, did MS suddenly stopped producing any console's right there and then to wait for the PS3 or what ?

#216 Posted by balfe1990 (6747 posts) -

[QUOTE="Caseytappy"]

[QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

um if im not mistaken the standings are still like this

1-ds-160 m

2 wii -97.0 m

3 psp 84m

4 xbox360 70 m plus(wheres oct nov numbers)

5 ps3 70.2m

8th gen

3dsxl/3ds-23.2 m

psvita 3.2 m

wii u i can bet on a 5 million by jan world wide

Meeeper282

But you are mistaken , you included the PS2 sales in your Ps3 number .

What the hell is going on here, ps3 and 360 are both at 70m, why cant people get this through there heads

Clearly they're NOT at both exactly 70mill. Don't be ridiculous.

#217 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

makes you feel better to throw bs info around and call it fact eh? last place has really gotten into you cows :lol:

MW2ismygame

What I find hilarious is, you xbots rent your own games. Plus you rent your own dlc. So it's come down to this. Ps3 has the better exclusive games. The ps3 also has the most content in multiplats. Psn offers more then xbl. Ps+ offers so many full games that it makes a mocker of xbl. So ps3 has the games, exclusive multiplat content, the better online service and now outselling xbox360 hand over fist. Ouch it's gotta hurt supporting a system that has nothing left. Never mind lets hope Microsoft try to remain as loyal to it's users as its users are to Microsoft. LMAO

Ok let me point out how moronic your statement is.

1) Games are rented on ALL PLATFORMS

2) You dont own DLC on ANY PLATFORM anymore thanks to DRM

3) Games are subjective and both have great ones

4) Better online service is also subjective and both have lots of content

5) THE PS3 IS STILL IN LAST PLACE the 70 mil figure WAS A MISTAKE someone posted on here, that figure is PS3 AND PS2 sales

God you cows are frenzied at the moment because you hear a sliver of (fictional) positive news. :roll:

Right so I go to a game shop, buy my game then go home and play online with no extra cost. How is that rented?. I purchase some map packs for a fps game but don't get charged any extra cost. How is that rented?. Xbox360 gamer goes to a shop and buys a game. Gets home and goes online.. he then realises that you NEED a a gold account on xbl. So he now has to pay extra for gold to play his game online. Months later he purchase some map packs but his paid subscription runs out. He still tries to play the new maps he just purchased but wait, he can't play his new maps because he NEEDS to pay extra for gold to use them. You buy a pre owned game that requires a pass key at extra cost. You xbox360 gamers should be ok because you already paying for online...but wait no, you also have to pay this price as well. This means paying twice. You pay for Netflix (like we all would) so we want to enjoy its range of movies. Not on xbox360, you must have a gold account just to access a service you are already paying for. So no. On ps3 once you purchase one cost of that game, their is NO extra cost. If I chose to by it's dlc I pay once and still have the FULL use of it. Psn is FREE and allows me to play all my purchased content with NO additional cost. If you use your free xbl silver? your purchased games are NOT fully functional. Lol talk about deluded.
#218 Posted by Heil68 (43244 posts) -
Naw, with all the world class, high scoring exclusives it enjoys, it was to be expected. Thank you Sony.
#219 Posted by SecretPolice (21371 posts) -

Just wow is the PS3 last place butthurt getting to the cows more than ever, evah !!! :o

Oh well, take heart cows because....

ricky-bobby-if-you-aint-first.jpeg:P

#220 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

But the 360 reached the 70 million some weeks before PS3, did MS suddenly stopped producing any console's right there and then to wait for the PS3 or what ?

Caseytappy
But ps3 reached this target quicker then 360 as its been on the market 1 year less. This alone proves for a FACT that ps3 sells MORE then xbox360. To all ps3 gamers who use only the free service psn. What happens when you put your online game on?. Answer: it works. This is evidence of ps3 gamers own their games. Xbox360 gamers, what happens if you do the same on xbl silver membership?. Answer: online game doesn't work. Evidence that your games require an additional monthly or yearly cost to get full access to your own games. This applies to Dlc as well. Ouch so no 360 has no games, you rent your own paid for content. Your service offers no value as a customer (as in, you get very little back for your loyalty). Plus the over priced bluray play not only catches up but beats your poor little dvd player. Whats even worse? You got just under 2 years of this lack of support. Pmsl
#221 Posted by StormyJoe (4751 posts) -

This puts Sony at the top with one of the greatest sales achievements in gaming history, has there been anything greater than this feat in terms of sales? Sure some will argue the PS2, but this could be a right up there with PS2 sales, if not better.

PinnacleGamingP

Sony went from a 4 1/2 to 1 sales advantage to being tied. I don't see this as a huge Sony win...

#222 Posted by StormyJoe (4751 posts) -

[QUOTE="Caseytappy"]

But the 360 reached the 70 million some weeks before PS3, did MS suddenly stopped producing any console's right there and then to wait for the PS3 or what ?

maxon27

But ps3 reached this target quicker then 360 as its been on the market 1 year less. This alone proves for a FACT that ps3 sells MORE then xbox360. To all ps3 gamers who use only the free service psn. What happens when you put your online game on?. Answer: it works. This is evidence of ps3 gamers own their games. Xbox360 gamers, what happens if you do the same on xbl silver membership?. Answer: online game doesn't work. Evidence that your games require an additional monthly or yearly cost to get full access to your own games. This applies to Dlc as well. Ouch so no 360 has no games, you rent your own paid for content. Your service offers no value as a customer (as in, you get very little back for your loyalty). Plus the over priced bluray play not only catches up but beats your poor little dvd player. Whats even worse? You got just under 2 years of this lack of support. Pmsl

Does it matter? Sony's Playstation brand dominated console sales for years, and now it is slugging it out for second place against a brand that it outsold by almost 5:1 last gen.

How is this a great thing for Sony?

#223 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="Caseytappy"]

But the 360 reached the 70 million some weeks before PS3, did MS suddenly stopped producing any console's right there and then to wait for the PS3 or what ?

StormyJoe

But ps3 reached this target quicker then 360 as its been on the market 1 year less. This alone proves for a FACT that ps3 sells MORE then xbox360. To all ps3 gamers who use only the free service psn. What happens when you put your online game on?. Answer: it works. This is evidence of ps3 gamers own their games. Xbox360 gamers, what happens if you do the same on xbl silver membership?. Answer: online game doesn't work. Evidence that your games require an additional monthly or yearly cost to get full access to your own games. This applies to Dlc as well. Ouch so no 360 has no games, you rent your own paid for content. Your service offers no value as a customer (as in, you get very little back for your loyalty). Plus the over priced bluray play not only catches up but beats your poor little dvd player. Whats even worse? You got just under 2 years of this lack of support. Pmsl

Does it matter? Sony's Playstation brand dominated console sales for years, and now it is slugging it out for second place against a brand that it outsold by almost 5:1 last gen.

How is this a great thing for Sony?

Because it proves what ps3 gamers have been saying for years. That ps3 actually sellls more then the 360 despite what the media publish. All the time ps3 was selling more, it still wasn't enough because 360 had the higher total (because of being on the market longer). Now 360 gamers have got no excuse and just have to except that all this time it was ps3 that is the most popular system. What you fail to realise is, ps3 has even had that sweet spot price cut yet. Whilst 360 has been at this point for years. Just under 2 years left of this gen so....their is still time. As for domination for years? Yeah with ps1 and ps2 it was the most popular cd rom and dvd rom on the market and had no competition. So it's pretty unfair to compare ps2 sales with ps3. After all, it's not much of a challenge for 360 to beat the original xbox is it lol. Still the fact remains, ps3 is the best system on the market. Caters for all gamers and gets full support for the entire life cycle and beyond. ...unlike Microsoft.
#224 Posted by brennanhuff (990 posts) -

Cows are so pathetic. The PS3 is still in last place. You are ignoring over a month of Xbox 360 sales prior to Sony's announcment. The sales numbers for the PS3 also include PS2 sales. Sad. You moos want it so bad and it's so close. Let me taste those sweet tears.

#225 Posted by delta3074 (17797 posts) -
[QUOTE="maxon27"] Still the fact remains, ps3 is the best system on the market. Caters for all gamers and gets full support for the entire life cycle and beyond. ...unlike Microsoft.

It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox
#226 Posted by StormyJoe (4751 posts) -

[QUOTE="StormyJoe"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] But ps3 reached this target quicker then 360 as its been on the market 1 year less. This alone proves for a FACT that ps3 sells MORE then xbox360. To all ps3 gamers who use only the free service psn. What happens when you put your online game on?. Answer: it works. This is evidence of ps3 gamers own their games. Xbox360 gamers, what happens if you do the same on xbl silver membership?. Answer: online game doesn't work. Evidence that your games require an additional monthly or yearly cost to get full access to your own games. This applies to Dlc as well. Ouch so no 360 has no games, you rent your own paid for content. Your service offers no value as a customer (as in, you get very little back for your loyalty). Plus the over priced bluray play not only catches up but beats your poor little dvd player. Whats even worse? You got just under 2 years of this lack of support. Pmslmaxon27

Does it matter? Sony's Playstation brand dominated console sales for years, and now it is slugging it out for second place against a brand that it outsold by almost 5:1 last gen.

How is this a great thing for Sony?

Because it proves what ps3 gamers have been saying for years. That ps3 actually sellls more then the 360 despite what the media publish. All the time ps3 was selling more, it still wasn't enough because 360 had the higher total (because of being on the market longer). Now 360 gamers have got no excuse and just have to except that all this time it was ps3 that is the most popular system. What you fail to realise is, ps3 has even had that sweet spot price cut yet. Whilst 360 has been at this point for years. Just under 2 years left of this gen so....their is still time. As for domination for years? Yeah with ps1 and ps2 it was the most popular cd rom and dvd rom on the market and had no competition. So it's pretty unfair to compare ps2 sales with ps3. After all, it's not much of a challenge for 360 to beat the original xbox is it lol. Still the fact remains, ps3 is the best system on the market. Caters for all gamers and gets full support for the entire life cycle and beyond. ...unlike Microsoft.

Great consolation prize, I guess. Still, as far as Western gamers are concerned, the 360 still out performs the PS3.

#227 Posted by blue_hazy_basic (27326 posts) -

This puts Sony at the top with one of the greatest sales achievements in gaming history, has there been anything greater than this feat in terms of sales? Sure some will argue the PS2, but this could be a right up there with PS2 sales, if not better.

PinnacleGamingP
Do cows think if they repeat it often enough it will become real? :o
#228 Posted by KarateeeChop (4590 posts) -

[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]

This puts Sony at the top with one of the greatest sales achievements in gaming history, has there been anything greater than this feat in terms of sales? Sure some will argue the PS2, but this could be a right up there with PS2 sales, if not better.

blue_hazy_basic

Do cows think if they repeat it often enough it will become real? :o

apparently so...

sony - we've sold 70 million ps3's

cows - THEY SAID 70.2 MILLION WE WIN THE CONSOLE WARS

:lol:

#229 Posted by ShadowMoses900 (17081 posts) -

Both systems did well this gen, I don't see why this matters to people so much. We should be happy everyone got good games to play, unless if you are a share holder then this stuff shouldn't matter to you.

Whichever system you had the most fun with wins.

#230 Posted by lundy86_4 (42867 posts) -

Both systems did well this gen, I don't see why this matters to people so much. We should be happy everyone got good games to play, unless if you are a share holder then this stuff shouldn't matter to you.

Whichever system you had the most fun with wins.

ShadowMoses900

Enough with the hippie routine. Oh man, is it boring.

#231 Posted by ShadowMoses900 (17081 posts) -

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Both systems did well this gen, I don't see why this matters to people so much. We should be happy everyone got good games to play, unless if you are a share holder then this stuff shouldn't matter to you.

Whichever system you had the most fun with wins.

lundy86_4

Enough with the hippie routine. Oh man, is it boring.

Lol.

#232 Posted by delta3074 (17797 posts) -

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Both systems did well this gen, I don't see why this matters to people so much. We should be happy everyone got good games to play, unless if you are a share holder then this stuff shouldn't matter to you.

Whichever system you had the most fun with wins.

lundy86_4

Enough with the hippie routine. Oh man, is it boring.

He's right though, hippies usually are:)
#233 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="maxon27"] Still the fact remains, ps3 is the best system on the market. Caters for all gamers and gets full support for the entire life cycle and beyond. ...unlike Microsoft.

It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox

So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go.
#234 Posted by sonic1564 (3265 posts) -

Yes, I like to lie to myself in the mirror too. I keep saying that The Room is the best film ever everyday.

#235 Posted by ShadowMoses900 (17081 posts) -

Yes, I like to lie to myself in the mirror too. I keep saying that The Room is the best film ever everyday.

sonic1564

Compared to Birdemic, The Room is a masterpiece.

Honestly, as bad as The Room is, I think Tommy Wiesu has his heart in the right place. I think if he had more experience, and probably more knowledge of film and writing, I think he could make a good film.

#236 Posted by sonic1564 (3265 posts) -

[QUOTE="sonic1564"]

Yes, I like to lie to myself in the mirror too. I keep saying that The Room is the best film ever everyday.

ShadowMoses900

Compared to Birdemic, The Room is a masterpiece.

Honestly, as bad as The Room is, I think Tommy Wiesu has his heart in the right place. I think if he had more experience, and probably more knowledge of film and writing, I think he could make a good film.

Tommy Wiseau needs a brain before doing anything.

#237 Posted by KarateeeChop (4590 posts) -

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="maxon27"] Still the fact remains, ps3 is the best system on the market. Caters for all gamers and gets full support for the entire life cycle and beyond. ...unlike Microsoft.maxon27
It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox

So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go.

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

#238 Posted by lundy86_4 (42867 posts) -

He's right though, hippies usually are:)delta3074

I know, i'm just joshing :P

#239 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="delta3074"]It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XboxKarateeeChop

So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go.

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Earnings/Kpi/FY13/Q1/Detail.aspx .http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html. Now compare the same 2012 Q2 figures. PS3 is over Million in front. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps3_sale_e.html. = 63 Million.. Now add . http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdata_ces_sale_e.html. = 6.3 Million... TOTAL = 70.2 Million. THIS MEANS that by this proof ( http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html ) the figures are NOT including PS2 sales?
#240 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="delta3074"]It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XboxKarateeeChop

So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go.

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

Sony have said that they have sales of 70 million PS3's? well if you look at the 2nd link add the two together and you have 70 million 200, thousand?.This is proof that what Sony is showing is in fact to do with PS3 sales then?.
#241 Posted by superclocked (5823 posts) -
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go. maxon27

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Earnings/Kpi/FY13/Q1/Detail.aspx .http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html. Now compare the same 2012 Q2 figures. PS3 is over Million in front. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps3_sale_e.html. = 63 Million.. Now add . http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdata_ces_sale_e.html. = 6.3 Million... TOTAL = 70.2 Million. THIS MEANS that by this proof ( http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html ) the figures are NOT including PS2 sales?

Nah, Sony started combing PS2 and PS3 sales in Q1 2012...
#242 Posted by KarateeeChop (4590 posts) -

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go. maxon27

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Earnings/Kpi/FY13/Q1/Detail.aspx .http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html. Now compare the same 2012 Q2 figures. PS3 is over Million in front. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps3_sale_e.html. = 63 Million.. Now add. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdata_ces_sale_e.html. = 6.3 Million... TOTAL = 70.2 Million. THIS MEANS that by this proof ( http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html ) the figures are NOT including PS2 sales?

u notice how the first link says

PlayStation®3 Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales (Unit: million)

and the second link says

Computer Entertainment System Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales Unit: Million

but i'm sure u already know that the second link isn't restricted to just ps3 sales. man if sales makes you so miserable that u need to start making up numbers maybe you need to take a break from this place. :lol:

#243 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="delta3074"]It's not a fact, it's a subjective opinion because which sytem is better is purely down to personal preference, and the 360 caters for all gamers, the myth that the 360 lacks variety was blown out of the water months ago Here on GS, Alos, Microsoft supported the original Xbox until April 2009 and they didn't drop support for XBL on the original Xbox until april 2010, you really should do your reaearch before Posting nonsense sunshine, Rethink what you THINK you know. 'Support for out-of-warranty Xbox consoles was discontinued on March 2, 2009, stating that any in-warranty repair now needed will not be undertaken. Xbox Live support was discontinued on April 15, 2010.' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XboxKarateeeChop

So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go.

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. So ps3 has sold 70.2 million.
#244 Posted by superclocked (5823 posts) -
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go. maxon27

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. So ps3 has sold 70.2 million.

To be consistent, Sony pulled a similar stunt with the PS3 and PS2, and only told us that combined the two systems shipped 2.8 million units worldwide during the quarter, which is down from 3.2 million units during the same period in the prior year. http://brutalgamer.com/2012/08/02/sonys-game-division-reports-q1-operating-loss-hides-vita-sales-data/
#245 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -

[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

KarateeeChop

http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Earnings/Kpi/FY13/Q1/Detail.aspx .http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html. Now compare the same 2012 Q2 figures. PS3 is over Million in front. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps3_sale_e.html. = 63 Million.. Now add. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdata_ces_sale_e.html. = 6.3 Million... TOTAL = 70.2 Million. THIS MEANS that by this proof ( http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html ) the figures are NOT including PS2 sales?

u notice how the first link says

PlayStation®3 Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales (Unit: million)

and the second link says

Computer Entertainment System Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales Unit: Million

but i'm sure u already know that the second link isn't restricted to just ps3 sales. man if sales makes you so miserable that u need to start making up numbers maybe you need to take a break from this place. :lol:

So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. The 200 thousand will be included in the next announcement. Again if them sales included psp, ps2 and ps vita? The sales would be alot more. Deal with it. You are WRONG!. POOR desperate xbot holding on so tight to 2nd place but snatched by ps3 lol.
#246 Posted by StormyJoe (4751 posts) -

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] So when I post Wikipedia links with 360 sales at 70million as of September and ps3 at 70.2 million I was told that I can't use that as anyone could write it. Hmm now hear you are using Wikipedia links. Lol yep typical double standards. I guess only 360 people can use Wikipedia links when it suits hey. Well as we're using Wikipedia links again. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360 http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3 Don't you find it funny that when you see sales charts, they include ps2 and not xbox? Wonder why that is?. Xbox360 and variety? yeah sorry but the two don't go. maxon27

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. So ps3 has sold 70.2 million.

Why are you people arguing this? Seriously... http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/16/playstation-3-sales-70-million-units/

As of November 4th,Sony shipped 70 million PS3s. They do not say 70.2, or that they have shipped "over 70 million". They sid " Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCE) today announced that the cumulative sales of the PlayStation®3 (PS3®) computer entertainment system reached a milestone of 70 million units* worldwide as of November 4, 2012 less than six years after the platform launched in 2006."

Saying "well, it's actually 70.2" is garbage. If it was 70.2, they would have said so; or released the 70 million press release earlier.

#247 Posted by maxon27 (76 posts) -
[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

that wiki link puts ps3 at 70.2 million in SEPTEMBER. :lol: not to mention the whole 200k is made up by u delusional cows, as it was never in sony's official statement. :lol:

you think you can just edit the wikipedia entries and immediately post it before someone changes it back? :lol: you have no shame do you? :lol: damn son if sales mean so much to you maybe you should get checked out by a doctor/ :lol:

superclocked
So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. So ps3 has sold 70.2 million.

To be consistent, Sony pulled a similar stunt with the PS3 and PS2, and only told us that combined the two systems shipped 2.8 million units worldwide during the quarter, which is down from 3.2 million units during the same period in the prior year. http://brutalgamer.com/2012/08/02/sonys-game-division-reports-q1-operating-loss-hides-vita-sales-data/

LMAO Oh so now that OFFICIAL figures ain't good enough? You have to revert to some dodgy website Aaaaaaaaaaaaahajahahahahaha bloody classic!.
#248 Posted by Bruce_Benzing (1742 posts) -

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="maxon27"] http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Earnings/Kpi/FY13/Q1/Detail.aspx .http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html. Now compare the same 2012 Q2 figures. PS3 is over Million in front. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdataps3_sale_e.html. = 63 Million.. Now add. http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/data/bizdata_ces_sale_e.html. = 6.3 Million... TOTAL = 70.2 Million. THIS MEANS that by this proof ( http://scei.co.jp/corporate/release/121116_e.html ) the figures are NOT including PS2 sales?maxon27

u notice how the first link says

PlayStation®3 Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales (Unit: million)

and the second link says

Computer Entertainment System Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales Unit: Million

but i'm sure u already know that the second link isn't restricted to just ps3 sales. man if sales makes you so miserable that u need to start making up numbers maybe you need to take a break from this place. :lol:

So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. The 200 thousand will be included in the next announcement. Again if them sales included psp, ps2 and ps vita? The sales would be alot more. Deal with it. You are WRONG!. POOR desperate xbot holding on so tight to 2nd place but snatched by ps3 lol.

The sales wouldn't include either Viata or PSP. There's a seperate tabe under FY2012 specifically under Computer Entertainment System Worldwide Hardware Unit Sales. It's called Portable Entertainment System. So in your world, they combine sales of both handhelds, but don't combine sales of PS3 and PS2, even though other links specifically state that Sony does it. Then you call everyone else desperate...oh the irony.

#249 Posted by PinnacleGamingP (5208 posts) -
how does it feel to be in last place lems? :lol:
#250 Posted by superclocked (5823 posts) -
[QUOTE="maxon27"][QUOTE="superclocked"][QUOTE="maxon27"] So if sony announces that PS3 has sold 70 million and its fiscal report (when added up) shows Q2 2012 seventy million two hundred thousand. That is proof that them sales do not include other devices. If it did include them? That figure would be more. Ps vita sales alone would have taken that over the 200 thousand. So ps3 has sold 70.2 million.

To be consistent, Sony pulled a similar stunt with the PS3 and PS2, and only told us that combined the two systems shipped 2.8 million units worldwide during the quarter, which is down from 3.2 million units during the same period in the prior year. http://brutalgamer.com/2012/08/02/sonys-game-division-reports-q1-operating-loss-hides-vita-sales-data/

LMAO Oh so now that OFFICIAL figures ain't good enough? You have to revert to some dodgy website Aaaaaaaaaaaaahajahahahahaha bloody classic!.

I'll find a couple more links if you want, but anyone can lookup the facts and see that nearly every reputable site on the internet is reporting that Sony is using the same shady tactic with both the PS3 and Vita...