Infamous SS is polygon count king 11 million per frame.

#301 Edited by edgeofreality45 (9 posts) -

@m3dude1: this guy. If they had so many ships your game would run at like 2 fps

#302 Posted by lostrib (37606 posts) -

@edgeofreality45 said:

@CrownKingArthur: I dont get it. You guys make big deala about how good the game looks but is it out yet? Have you played it? No. Dark Souls II looked insane too until they released it. It looks 20 times worse. Not to mention the framerate. Graohics like that come at a price. Its not just going to magically happen. Go buy yourself a 3000 dollar pc to play one game and have to update it in a year because you cant play battlefield 5 while the consoles still run it at 60 fps 1080p. Your arguementa are invalid when your shits fried in a year buddy

...the consoles don't even run BF4 at 1080p/60fps

#303 Posted by edgeofreality45 (9 posts) -

@lostrib: ? Go check again. PS4 runs the game at exactly 60 fps. Not sure about the xbox one

#304 Posted by wis3boi (31462 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@edgeofreality45 said:

@CrownKingArthur: I dont get it. You guys make big deala about how good the game looks but is it out yet? Have you played it? No. Dark Souls II looked insane too until they released it. It looks 20 times worse. Not to mention the framerate. Graohics like that come at a price. Its not just going to magically happen. Go buy yourself a 3000 dollar pc to play one game and have to update it in a year because you cant play battlefield 5 while the consoles still run it at 60 fps 1080p. Your arguementa are invalid when your shits fried in a year buddy

...the consoles don't even run BF4 at 1080p/60fps

this is what console arguments come down to at GS. Making shitty alt accounts and pretending to have the mental capacity of lettuce

#305 Posted by gamecubepad (6117 posts) -

@edgeofreality45 said:

@lostrib: ? Go check again. PS4 runs the game at exactly 60 fps. Not sure about the xbox one

PS4 has drops down into the mid 40s. It performs as well, or worse than a 260x without mantle.

#306 Edited by KillzoneSnake (1749 posts) -

lol PC gaming already gets owned by Infamous. Wait until the real big hitters The Order, Uncharted 4 for even bigger owning :)

#307 Posted by RimacBugatti (1287 posts) -

@GabranthXIII:

They forget that a GTX 690 can push 235 billion polygons per second. 1.8 Teraflops is ok but pretty weak in comparison.

#308 Posted by Lulu_Lulu (13654 posts) -

Just another day in System Whores

#309 Posted by CrownKingArthur (4894 posts) -
@wis3boi said:

@lostrib said:

@edgeofreality45 said:

@CrownKingArthur: I dont get it. You guys make big deala about how good the game looks but is it out yet? Have you played it? No. Dark Souls II looked insane too until they released it. It looks 20 times worse. Not to mention the framerate. Graohics like that come at a price. Its not just going to magically happen. Go buy yourself a 3000 dollar pc to play one game and have to update it in a year because you cant play battlefield 5 while the consoles still run it at 60 fps 1080p. Your arguementa are invalid when your shits fried in a year buddy

...the consoles don't even run BF4 at 1080p/60fps

this is what console arguments come down to at GS. Making shitty alt accounts and pretending to have the mental capacity of lettuce

i reckon. plus my answers would be

no its not out

yes i have the hanger module and have seen impressive graphics.

not going to magically happen? we saw pre-release dynamic footage of dark souls 2 with more advanced lighting than was released. it happened, and they took it out - who slouched? also durante's analysis suggests DS2's performance scales well with hardware.

3000 is over triple what i like to spend (and i achieve 1080p60 bf4 on high)

running this 450w psu hard for ages

so edgeofreality the dude is 100% wrong. it gets boring facing arguments built on scurrilous lies.