I haven't done one of these in a while....

In regards to Resident Evil 5.........

For anyone who thinks that all this game has to offer is just amazing graphics, you will be proven wrong once we see more of the game. Capcom will also utilize the next-gen CPUs to make a more enriching game.

Why do people, particularly the Wii fanboys, always think that the only thing that Xbox360/PS3 games have over the Wii is just graphics? Time and time again you see that this isn't true, yet you keep on spewing the same nonsense. The Wii is outdated tech. It can't deliver the "WoW" (IMO) factor that every new generation usually ushers in. I look at Wii games and I always ask myself "Haven't I seen or played this game before?"

Who is seriously "WOWed" by Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles? I doubt many people are. How many people are "WOWed" by RE 5? Well, the number of new threads just on this game says it all.

All the Wii has is just the Wii-mote, and even with it, it doesn't have any significant edge over conventional controllers. The Xbox360/PS3 have considerably more to offer than the Wii in just about every area of gaming. In terms of value, the Wii is the most expense console on the market.

You Wii owners could just stick with your low standard games, while the Xbox360/PS3 owners keep getting their WOW-inducing, next-gen games. All I'm just asking from you is to just stop lying to yourselves.

Tell me, when you see more characters online, better animation, more intense action, is that the game's graphics you're looking at?

When I see a bigger playing area (instead of narrow corridors), is that the game's graphics I'm looking at?

This game will most likely have better AI than RE4....Is that the game's graphics I'm looking at?

If RE5 was to come on the Wii, it would be extremely toned down to look more or less like RE4. Now how many of you would choose that game over a next-gen RE5?

To choose RE4 over RE5 is like choosing a Smart Foretwo over a Honda Accord, assuming the price difference is only $1000.

Think about what you get for your money.

That's how I see the Wii when compared to the Xbox360/PS3.

If RE5 was to come on the Wii, it would be extremely toned down to look more or less like RE4. Now how many of you would choose that game over a next-gen RE5?

emawk

You couldn't. Honestly I do not want any of my favorite franchises to become Wii-exclusives. Wii is meant for new IPs

What is System Wars?...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF GENERALIZATIONS.
Dracula has spoken and is ashamed of you.Svarthek

I heard Dracula never has good arguments; now I see for myself that he doesn't.

[QUOTE="Svarthek"]What is System Wars?...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF GENERALIZATIONS.
Dracula has spoken and is ashamed of you.emawk

I heard Dracula never has good arguments; now I see for myself that he doesn't.

dracula wil suck ur blood

[QUOTE="Svarthek"]What is System Wars?...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF GENERALIZATIONS.
Dracula has spoken and is ashamed of you.emawk

I heard Dracula never has good arguments; now I see for myself that he doesn't.

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

[QUOTE="emawk"]

[QUOTE="Svarthek"]What is System Wars?...A MISERABLE LITTLE PILE OF GENERALIZATIONS.
Dracula has spoken and is ashamed of you.Svarthek

I heard Dracula never has good arguments; now I see for myself that he doesn't.

So do you agree with these generalizations or what? And why?

Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

Shadow_Link50

They shouldn't. All we ask is that sheep stop claiming that they do.

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

Shadow_Link50

if wii wants to be taken seriously like 360/PS3, those 50 dollar games should match

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

TOTAL_DEFENSE_0

if wii wants to be taken seriously like 360/PS3, those 50 dollar games should match

Well it is an opinion. For some people the Wii may be the best choice of a console (if they can only afford one), for others it may be a 360, PS3, or PC. As for me, personally I would rather play SSBB than any other "next-gen" fighter, and SMG instead of Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction or Banjo Kazooie 3... but that's just me.

Well it is an opinion. For some people the Wii may be the best choice of a console (if they can only afford one), for others it may be a 360, PS3, or PC. As for me, personally I would rather play SSBB than any other "next-gen" fighter, and SMG instead of Ratchet and Clank 3 or Banjo Kazooie 3... but that's just me. Shadow_Link50

How would you know you want to play Mario Galaxy more than Banjo Kazooie 3 if you don't know anything about that game? Are you a fanboy?

I don't get wowed for Wii graphics, I get wowed for the controls and smart implimentations of it, that show it being or working better than standard conventional controllers.yoshi_64

It's just not about the graphics.

Who is seriously "WOWed" by Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles?emawk

Nobody.

How many people are "WOWed" by RE 5? Well, the number of new threads just on this game says it all.emawk

Problem with this is, thewow factor you're talking about has to do with graphics. "Wow that game looks good!".

Wii has wow'd me with WarioWare. In the minigame where you had to hold the Wiimote like a champaigne bottle, shake it up, and then only when you moved your thumb would the cork burst open. That made me say "wow" out loud.

Of course, WarioWare wasn't all that great of game, but the wow factor is still there.

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

Shadow_Link50

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Well it is an opinion. For some people the Wii may be the best choice of a console (if they can only afford one), for others it may be a 360, PS3, or PC. As for me, personally I would rather play SSBB than any other "next-gen" fighter, and SMG instead of Ratchet and Clank 3 or Banjo Kazooie 3... but that's just me. emawk

How would you know you want to play Mario Galaxy more than Banjo Kazooie 3 if you don't know anything about that game? Are you a fanboy?

Oh the irony...

As to answer your question I would like to play them more as they interest me alot more.

EDIT: Also, its not as if I don't know anything about either of the games. Looking at Banjo Kazooie's and Tooie's gameplay, I'm far less interested in the game than SMG.

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

funnymario

Its far different from any standard platformer. Sure, you could call going from planet to planeta gimmick but it is still new. It may have been done before to some slight degree in other games (Ratchet and Clank) but the concept is still rather original.

[QUOTE="emawk"] Who is seriously "WOWed" by Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles?nyoroism

Nobody.

How many people are "WOWed" by RE 5? Well, the number of new threads just on this game says it all.emawk

Problem with this is, thewow factor you're talking about has to do with graphics. "Wow that game looks good!".

Wii has wow'd me with WarioWare. In the minigame where you had to hold the Wiimote like a champaigne bottle, shake it up, and then only when you moved your thumb would the cork burst open. That made me say "wow" out loud.

Of course, WarioWare wasn't all that great of game, but the wow factor is still there.

When I looked at that trailer, I saw more than just graphics.Refer to my posts on the first page.

I think more people here are wowed by how real the game looks.This is not just determined by graphics. They just don't realize this.

I'm more wowed by gameplay than graphics. RE5 looks to play the same as RE4. Now, Super Mario Galaxy, that is wow inducing.Sir-Marwin105

I can't see how Mario Galaxy is WoW-inducing, but it is your preference.

[QUOTE="funnymario"][QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

Shadow_Link50

Its far different from any standard platformer. Sure, you could call going from planet to planeta gimmick but it is still new. It may have been done before to some slight degree in other games (Ratchet and Clank) but the concept is still rather original.

I can't really see how that's original. It's pretty much like jumping from one platform to another. It's not as if the planets were huge or something.

[QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"][QUOTE="funnymario"][QUOTE="Shadow_Link50"]

Ok first off, 4 posts in a row? Learn how to use the edit button. Or were you trying to disguise your bumps?

Second of all, how about Super Mario Galaxy? It's innovative and has great graphics, despite it being on a far weaker system. Certainly it doesn't have anywhere near the technical specs of a 360 or PS3 game, but does that makes the graphics bad? No, and to say they are bad shows a very narrow minded way of thinking. Just because the Wii is a weaker console doesn't mean you can't enjoy games on it. In the end, you get what you pay for. Why should $50 games on a $250 system be expected to match $60 games on $400 or $500 systems?

emawk

Its far different from any standard platformer. Sure, you could call going from planet to planeta gimmick but it is still new. It may have been done before to some slight degree in other games (Ratchet and Clank) but the concept is still rather original.

I can't really see how that's original. It's pretty much like jumping from one platform to another. It's not as if the planets were huge or something.

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word innovative. Honestly the only innvoative platformer coming out that is known about would be Little Big Planet.

P.S. There are supposed to be some larger planets, by the way.

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]I'm more wowed by gameplay than graphics. RE5 looks to play the same as RE4. Now, Super Mario Galaxy, that is wow inducing.emawk

I can't see how Mario Galaxy is WoW-inducing, but it is your preference.

[QUOTE="emawk"]

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]I'm more wowed by gameplay than graphics. RE5 looks to play the same as RE4. Now, Super Mario Galaxy, that is wow inducing.Sir-Marwin105

I can't see how Mario Galaxy is WoW-inducing, but it is your preference.

It's a personal preference that I'd say most people share, making it almost fact. I can't say the same about Mario Galaxy.

If RE5 was to come to the Wii unaltered, I could gurantee you that most Wii-fanboys would say WoW! In fact, I would go as far as to say that, deep down inside, most Wii-fanboys did say WoW! when they saw RE5 but are too fanboyish to admit it. I mean think about, most of them were jumping for joy when a last-gen RE4 was released on their console, but when they see a vastly improved iteration (RE5), they're not WoWed?

Are you sure you're not one of these Wii fanboys I just mentioned?

I think this game will be good enough to convert many sheep into buying a PS3/360. There are only a handful of system sellers and this is easily one of them.

Whenever they say it looks like RE4 but with updated visuals and than brush it off, I have to laugh when the Wii is getting the most PS2 ports and rehashes (how are you enjoying that Prince of Persia Wii?) with ZERO visual upgrades, and they have the nerve to laugh at RE5? :lol:

I think this game will be good enough to convert many sheep into buying a PS3/360. There are only a handful of system sellers and this is easily one of them.

Whenever they say it looks like RE4 but with updated visuals and than brush it off, I have to laugh when the Wii is getting the most PS2 ports and rehashes (how are you enjoying that Prince of Persia Wii?) with ZERO visual upgrades, and they have the nerve to laugh at RE5? :lol:

PhoebusFlows

They're just lieing to themselves, that's all.

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="emawk"]

[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]I'm more wowed by gameplay than graphics. RE5 looks to play the same as RE4. Now, Super Mario Galaxy, that is wow inducing.emawk

I can't see how Mario Galaxy is WoW-inducing, but it is your preference.

It's a personal preference that I'd say most people share, making it almost fact. I can't say the same about Mario Galaxy.

If a game RE5 was to come to the Wii unaltered, I could gurantee you that most Wii-fanboys would say WoW! If fact, I would go as far as to say that, deep down inside, most Wii-fanboys did say WoW! when they saw RE5 but are too fanboyish to admit it. I mean think about, most of them were jumping for joy when a last-gen RE4 was released on their console, but when they see a vastly improved iteration (RE5), they're not WoWed?

Are you sure you're not one of these Wii fanboys I justed mentioned?

Ok, I can admit that the graphics are insanely good. And I can say that I will probably get it. I like RE4. Overrated, but still good. But I can say that I am easily more impressed by SMG. RE5 doesn't look to change the gameplay.:(Sir-Marwin105

We're getting somewhere...

Also, I think all you're seeing is not just the greatly improved graphics. Take a closer look.