Honest non-fanboy question. Why do PS3 exclusives look so amazing?

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

Lems are on full on delusional, I can link to Halo 4 forum threads where even the most hardcore Halo fans say Killzone 3 looks much better.

Then again SW lems are the most delusional fanboys on the web.

If you want to self own yourself just keep pushing on.

TheDidact

I've been noticing a phenomena that has been affecting both gamers as critics alike i.e. every new good looking game that comes around is "better" than the best good looking game before it

the same happened with Crysis 2 where every critic out there and their mother called it graphics king on consoles

BUT then a closer technical analysis said otherwise

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/

Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs toGuerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphicallybetter, the performance its more stable throughout.Vatusus

I have the feeling the same is happening with Halo 4 and the same will happen to The Last of Us. Its a never-ending cicle

And dont even come saying LensOfTruth is bias. Fanboys had no problem quoting it when in 90% of comparissons they gave the edge to the 360 version of multiplats

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Wow, good job cherry picking one of the worst Halo 4 screens you could find.

Here's a better comparison.

Halo 4

Killzone 3

jun_aka_pekto

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

[QUOTE="ziggyww"]

[QUOTE="greensand24"] Halo 4 stomps Killzone 3 in the visual department. I suspected this when I first saw early shots but after actually playing it there is no doubt. As far as GOW and uc3 I find it hard to compare because they're different genres and use different artstyles. But to be honest uc3 has a cartoony style I don't really prefer compared to Halo 4. Not to mention the fact that uc3 suffers from jags I don't see Halo 4 have a problem with. They both have poor anisotropic filtering but halo 4 in addition to having less jags has superior lighting. The lighting in uc3 looks fake and forced. It doesnt look natural at all. Also Halo 4 looks great in SP and MP footage while uc3 mp visuals at times looks like sh*t. I think if I touched my flat screen I'd cut my finger from all the jags.The_Game21x

Halo to me doesn't look anywhere near as good as the technical killzone 3

Wow, good job cherry picking one of the worst Halo 4 screens you could find.

Here's a better comparison.

Halo 4

Killzone 3

Hitman Absolution beats them both.

Sorry gents but the console title belongs to a multiplat now.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

I've been noticing a phenomena that has been affecting both gamers as critics alike i.e. every new good looking game that comes around is "better" than the best good looking game before it

the same happened with Crysis 2 where every critic out there and their mother called it graphics king on consoles

BUT then a closer technical analysis said otherwise

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/

Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs toGuerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphicallybetter, the performance its more stable throughout.greensand24

I have the feeling the same is happening with Halo 4 and the same will happen to The Last of Us. Its a never-ending cicle

And dont even come saying LensOfTruth is bias. Fanboys had no problem quoting it when in 90% of comparissons they gave the edge to the 360 version of multiplats

Wut? do you even know how to read?

game producing effects

you must lack reading comprehension skills if by that phrase you thought they said "its the best looking console game". Graphics arent just "effects".

learn2read before calling others fanboys. DF doesnt even have an tech analysis comparing K3 and Crysis 2. I looked for it. LensOfTruth is the only one. You're gonna take words without fundaments over a f*ckin TECH ANALYSIS?

do so fanboy

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Wow, good job cherry picking one of the worst Halo 4 screens you could find.

Here's a better comparison.

Halo 4

Killzone 3

Vatusus

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Wow, good job cherry picking one of the worst Halo 4 screens you could find.

Here's a better comparison.

Halo 4

Killzone 3

Vatusus

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

greensand24

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

The_Game21x

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

I also played both and I think Killzone 3 looks better. I prefer effects over textures *shrug*

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="Vatusus"]

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Vatusus

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="greensand24"] Crysis 2 and Halo 4 each look better than any ps3 exclusive right now.greensand24

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

At least I gave you somethin more credible than "words", unlike the petty fanboy you are

keep the butthurt m8

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Vatusus

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

Funny, I dont see any Killzone 3 in there

http://gamercards.exophase.com/psn/user/The_Game21x/

In case you dont believe I played Halo 4

http://gamercards.exophase.com/xbl/user/QuantaEVOL/

thats my best friend profile. I dont have a 360 but I played all halos besides Halo 3 ODST in his house. I guess you could argue you also played Killzone 3 in someones house but since you do have a PS3 I'm gonna say its suspicious to say the least

Didn't play it on my profile. I can prove that I own it though, if you want to go there.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Vatusus

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

I also played both and I think Killzone 3 looks better. I prefer effects over textures *shrug*

Good for you. Opinions are wonderful, aren't they?

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Wow, good job cherry picking one of the worst Halo 4 screens you could find.

Here's a better comparison.

Halo 4

Killzone 3

Vatusus

That looks like a more accurate comparison. I found Halo 4 looking better overall than any of the KZ games as well.

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

I have KZ3 and I agree it looks good in motion. It sounds great too. But, I still think it falls short (*arguably*: aka not much) of what I've seen so far of Halo 4 in the looks department. Perhaps it's the cleaner-looking screen in Halo 4 that sways me.

I have my own screen captures of KZ3 (SDTV-res only though) from video footage that I made...and yep. Halo 4 looks just a tad bit better.

Killzone 2 and 3 looks wwwwwaaaaayyyyyyy better than Halo 4...

poor halo lol in my opinion Killzone 2 looks the best.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

The_Game21x

Funny, I dont see any Killzone 3 in there

http://gamercards.exophase.com/psn/user/The_Game21x/

In case you dont believe I played Halo 4

http://gamercards.exophase.com/xbl/user/QuantaEVOL/

thats my best friend profile. I dont have a 360 but I played all halos besides Halo 3 ODST in his house. I guess you could argue you also played Killzone 3 in someones house but since you do have a PS3 I'm gonna say its suspicious to say the least

Didn't play it on my profile. I can prove that I own it though, if you want to go there.

no need. I've good faith in people.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Meh, played both and I think Halo 4 looks better. *shrug*

The_Game21x

I also played both and I think Killzone 3 looks better. I prefer effects over textures *shrug*

Good for you. Opinions are wonderful, aren't they?

yes, they are :)

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="Vatusus"]

Killzone is a game that looks WAY better in motion than in screenshots due to its phenomenal post-ptocessing effects

compare that screenshot with this video and you'll know what I mean

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmPzt75UQ0

Vatusus

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="greensand24"] Crysis 2 and Halo 4 each look better than any ps3 exclusive right now.Stefan91x

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

SUBJECTIVE? In a TECH ANALYSIS??? Are you f*ckin kidding me? Has the world gone mad???

edit: Unless you really meant better looking wich is subjective and not better graphics wich is factual. In that case I apologize. But going by that tech analysis Killzone 3 HAS better graphics than Crysis 2 on consoles

They look pretty much on par with 360 exclusives...

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

Cant say about Halo 4 but I already proved Crysis 2 doesnt. Get over it

Vatusus

SUBJECTIVE? In a TECH ANALYSIS??? Are you f*ckin kidding me? Has the world gone mad???

edit: Unless you really meant better looking wich is subjective and not better graphics wich is factual. In that case I apologize. But going by that tech analysis Killzone 3 HAS better graphics than Crysis 2 on consoles

Anyways Crysis 2 is technically more advanced than Killzone 3, it's clearly obviously.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]But you haven't proved anything. All what you have showed is a subjective opinion from a guy who believes that Killzone 3 looks better than Crysis 2, which is also ridiculous.

Stefan91x

SUBJECTIVE? In a TECH ANALYSIS??? Are you f*ckin kidding me? Has the world gone mad???

edit: Unless you really meant better looking wich is subjective and not better graphics wich is factual. In that case I apologize. But going by that tech analysis Killzone 3 HAS better graphics than Crysis 2 on consoles

Anyways Crysis 2 is technically more advanced than Killzone 3, it's clearly obviously.

/faceplam

1. Or you're trolling me

2. Or I just met a dumber poster than SNIPER. Congratulations!

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

SUBJECTIVE? In a TECH ANALYSIS??? Are you f*ckin kidding me? Has the world gone mad???

edit: Unless you really meant better looking wich is subjective and not better graphics wich is factual. In that case I apologize. But going by that tech analysis Killzone 3 HAS better graphics than Crysis 2 on consoles

Vatusus

Anyways Crysis 2 is technically more advanced than Killzone 3, it's clearly obviously.

/faceplam

1. Or you're trolling me

2. Or I just met a dumber poster than SNIPER. Congratulations!

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]Tech Analysis = Subjective Opinion

Anyways Crysis 2 is technically more advanced than Killzone 3, it's clearly obviously.

Stefan91x

/faceplam

1. Or you're trolling me

2. Or I just met a dumber poster than SNIPER. Congratulations!

My argument is: you're definitely dumb

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

Did you even read some of those ridiculous quotes you posted? F*cking hilarious.

Master_ShakeXXX

I posted?? Lol no, buddy, reviewers posted. You are free to disagree, though :)

So you agree that Halo 4 looks like it's running on a state of the art gaming PC? You don't find that at all to be an outrageously dumbass thing to say?

Come on man, that's like something that would come out of a cow's mouth.

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

/faceplam

1. Or you're trolling me

2. Or I just met a dumber poster than SNIPER. Congratulations!

Vatusus

My argument is: you're definitely dumb

:lol:

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I posted?? Lol no, buddy, reviewers posted. You are free to disagree, though :)

PAL360

So you agree that Halo 4 looks like it's running on a state of the art gaming PC? You don't find that at all to be an outrageously dumbass thing to say?

Come on man, that's like something that would come out of a cow's mouth.

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]I quess you have no arguments.

Stefan91x

My argument is: you're definitely dumb

:lol:

nope, because you're dumb

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

My argument is: you're definitely dumb

Vatusus

:lol:

nope, because you're dumb

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]Because I'm right?

:lol:

Stefan91x

nope, because you're dumb

calling you dumb = you're dumb

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]Because I'm right?

:lol:

Stefan91x

nope, because you're dumb

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="planbfreak4eva"] haha. joke quote of the day?Eddie-Vedder

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"][QUOTE="mitu123"] No, at least for Halo 4 since it looks better than most PS3 exclusives and is around the best ones that came out to this day.

mitu123

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] Your on some strong drugs. Halo 4 looks nowhere near as good Uncharted, Killzone, God of War, MLB etc... ziggyww

Halo to me doesn't look anywhere near as good as the technical killzone 3

-Claims ownage with a better pic of Killzone 3 which isn't that great

Lol what?

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

nope, because you're dumb

Vatusus

calling you dumb = you're dumb

Because the Cell-Processor can handle more simultaneous, parallel processes than any i7 can. It still pumps out more GFLOPS than any entire PC does. It can process graphics about as good as the GTX 460 naturally. Combine this with the RSX, which is about equal to a GTX 660Ti...you will never go back to PC gaming again...k01mx

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

Because the games are ultra-linear?

emgesp

[QUOTE="emgesp"][QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

Because the games are ultra-linear?

cainetao11

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

So you agree that Halo 4 looks like it's running on a state of the art gaming PC? You don't find that at all to be an outrageously dumbass thing to say?

Come on man, that's like something that would come out of a cow's mouth.

k01mx

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

For fanboys who still live under a Sony's giant enemy crab, i believe they are. For those who prefer the real world, it's a matter of opinion, since both consoles have equally good looking games.

[QUOTE="emgesp"][QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

Because the games are ultra-linear?

cainetao11

Bluray seems to be the reason PS3 came one year after! This late in the gen and hundreds of games later, i think it's ridiculous to think that PS3 is even slightly more powerful than 360.

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]calling me dumb = lack of arguments.

Stefan91x

calling you dumb = you're dumb

Its so obvious :roll:

why do cows feel so threatened by halo 4? it's like crysis 2 all over again. it's amazing how mad they get when they fail to confuse us with their delusions. :lol:

[QUOTE="k01mx"]Because the Cell-Processor can handle more simultaneous, parallel processes than any i7 can. It still pumps out more GFLOPS than any entire PC does. It can process graphics about as good as the GTX 460 naturally. Combine this with the RSX, which is about equal to a GTX 660Ti...you will never go back to PC gaming again...adamosmaki

[QUOTE="k01mx"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

PAL360

For fanboys who still live under a Sony's giant enemy crab, i believe they are. For those who prefer the real world, it's a matter of opinion, since both consoles have equally good looking games.

For fanboys who still live under a Sony's giant enemy crab, i believe they are. For those who prefer the real world, it's a matter of opinion, since both consoles have equally good looking games.

PAL360

Cows can't accept that the games/systems are roughly equal, let alone the possibility that the 360 has the advantage.

My bbq of facts proved this.

---

Forza Horizon and Halo 4 we're shining examples of MS's 1st-party abilities. Next year we'll see Gears:Judgement and Crysis 3, which will easily match Last of Us.

Last of Us(directfeed via DF):

GearsJ(videocapture via Gamersyde):