Everybody's lining up to prove how shallow they are......
Must be residual hate left over from Ubisofts Online DRM.
and define Far Worse ? What over exaggeration will I here now, another PS2 Reference maybe ?
To be honest I though they were slightly better. You should also use the word "slightly" once in a while. Just to be fair.
It's not a matter of opinion that Far Cry 3, even at max settings on a beast PC, doesn't look as good as the original, alleged gameplay demos. This is fact, and if you don't see it, you're blind. At some point, Ubisoft even admitted it. The lighting system is downgraded, there's about half as much foliage/trees, the draw distance is cut down, the textures are lower resolution, the explosion and fire effects are completely different. It's night and day. I'm starting to think that you're trolling.
Also, get down off your "graphics don't matter" high horse. Obviously, a good game is defined by the gameplay, but that doesn't mean graphics are pointless. Graphics create a game's atmosphere, and are key to immersion. There's a reason that both software and hardware companies invest billions in constantly trying to push better graphics. It matters. And the reason people are so pissed at Ubisoft is NOT that their games look bad. It's that they constantly show these alleged demos that look great, and then severely downgrade the final product, even though a good PC could easily run the games looking the way they did in the demos, and Ubisoft could just as easily have let them run it like that, with an "ultra" graphic setting or something.