@kinectthedots said:
1. You can't debate without proof
2. We have seen the upgrades 343 has hyped for HaloMCC and they are just barely making 360 standards.
3. Halo 4 will look like Halo 4 runing at 1080P/60fps with less graphical defects, maybe less improvements than we will see in TLOU R. There is a reason why they haven't shown any of it off.
The only gameplay footage shown to promote the game is from Halo 1 and Halo 2 and that is where the upgrades in actual graphics are to be seen.
1) It looks better. Deal with it.
Where did I say it wouldn't look better? Damn get your argument together kiddo.
2) The upgrades are still far bigger than TLOU R is over the PS3 version. There is improved world geometry, character models, lighting, and everything (a full remake).
I agree.
3) That is your conjecture and nothing more. I doubt they will keep the same resolution textures and draw distance as the 360 version on a machine several times the power. Don't be stupid.
Ok, Show me, or are you so stupid you hype things you can't prove?
And ever thought they might want to suprise the players when they see Halo 3 and 4 on XB1? Or is your bias sadistic Sony fanboy persona desparate for them to fail?
There is no agenda moron. I speak based off of everything that have been proven. Is the basis of your criticism of my logical viewpoint idiocy? Don't bring a stance of fanboyism unless you have something concrete to solidify your trash talk.
Fact is, Halo MCC is far more for the money than TLOU Remastered. Simple as that.
That's not really the argument that's being presented here though. Someone can easily determine that TLOU R is of higher value than Halo MCC. They are both reintroduction's of past released games so no need to change the subject here.
Log in to comment