@FreedomFreeLife: DC is better, better more detailed environments, better lighting and better physical accurate lighting on DC then Forza, Forza Horizon doesn't even look that good. DC defitnetly looks better, espcially when the weather effects come in, there is nothing graphically great about Forza, yeah its open world but the detail isn't anything remarkable
the 2 screens from DC are real time, the 2 screen from FH2 are bullshots unless they are somehow using 16x MSAA and downsampled resolution in the actual game. And not to mention the over-exaggerated blur. XD
Driveclub does not look like that on my 1080p monitor, way to handpick terrible pictures, Driveclub looks better then Forza Horizon in every single way possible, the only thing Horizon got on DC is being open-world, that's it
Driveclub does not look like that on my 1080p monitor, way to handpick terrible pictures, Driveclub looks better then Forza Horizon in every single way possible, the only thing Horizon got on DC is being open-world, that's it
the 2 screens from DC are real time, the 2 screen from FH2 are bullshots unless they are somehow using 16x MSAA and downsampled resolution in the actual game. And not to mention the over-exaggerated blur. XD
Those are not bullshots. It´s all from gameplay we made from direct feed.
I don't care about racers, but looking at the vids I think it's obvious Drive Club looks better (not based on these screens, but real time vids I've seen).
However, Horizon seems to be the better game according to the critics.
horizon has the better art style but dc looks more realistic. forza is a lot more consistent though i havnt seen a bad screenshot but some tracks in dc like india look garbage.
the 2 screens from DC are real time, the 2 screen from FH2 are bullshots unless they are somehow using 16x MSAA and downsampled resolution in the actual game. And not to mention the over-exaggerated blur. XD
None of them are bullshots. Also FH2 uses 4X MSAA.
"Digital Foundry: Hands-on with the Forza Horizon 2 demo
Further inspection of the demo shows that Forza Horizon 2 delivers its visual punch with a crisp native 1080p resolution, as promised by the developers earlier in the year. The anti-aliasing solution is also given a boost over that of Forza 5 via the use of 4x MSAA (multi-sampling anti-aliasing) - a bandwidth-heavy choice that we rarely see in use on console."
I've played both games, and visually both look very good. DF articles can provide us with a deeper analysis of the visual make-up of both games. DF has already done so for DC, but strangely still waiting on one FH2. I personally prefer the overall look and presentation of FH2 over DC. The technical improvements from last-gen are clearly evident in both games. After all the hype with DC, I'm impressed with the IQ present here, not quite what Sony/Evolution had been showing off but not far off. I think the dramatic/stylised camera angles during their presentations made it look better than it actually is to play. More over once the weather effects are patched in it will look even more impressive no doubt. So looking forward to that.
However, FH2 impressed me more. Anyone comparing visuals needs to keep in mind FH2 is a true open world racing game, this is by far a more challenging technical accomplichment that designing a circuit based racer. In a circuit racer the designers have full control of the in-game camera and can manage the performance levels more readily. The cars you are controlling are essentially in a invisible tunnel. This is why you are banging up against barriers in DC, this is not the case with FH2. In addition you have non player traffic in certain types of racers, as well as in general across the map when you are in online free-roam and many other modes. All this additional visual elements tax the CPU/GPU even more, so as I said both are very impressive in looks department, but FH2 for me even more so
I own and have played both games for many hours, and both have very distinct look to them. Horizon 2 has a very saturated look to it, all the colors pop, and gives the game a very nice look to it. Driveclub has a more realistic look to it, the lighting is the best I've seen in a racing game. So while both games look very different, they both end up looking very good. The edge does go to driveclub though, the lighting is just phenomenal. The cars in both games are also very detailed, but again the cars in driveclub overall again end up looking better. One area where Horizon 2 is better is in picture quality, the 4XAA gives the game of the nicest IQ I've seen this gen on any console. Driveclub in the other hand is very inconsistent in that regard, sometimes it looks great, other times you can see all the flaws of the AA solution used by Evolution.
Driveclub looks better (the only thing in competes in) by a fair margin but horizon is still a pleasant looking game that's really well put together visually and perhaps artistically more sound than DC.
But you can read comments and they say that DriveClub is best looking game ever, most realistic game ever and DriveClub is race king. THIS IS WHY PS4 OWNERS SAYS.
But you can read comments and they say that DriveClub is best looking game ever, most realistic game ever and DriveClub is race king. THIS IS WHY PS4 OWNERS SAYS.
Do they lie or not?
Cows lie and/or exaggerate all the time. They are the absolute worst of the fanboys.
Drive Club looks no better than FH2, and is a shitty game. End of story. It got a 5/10...people need to suck it up and deal. Cows are saying "Bu... bu... but it looks so great" to try and come to grips with the fact that they got another shitty exclusive.
Log in to comment