DriveClub HQ gameplay (FORZALOL)

#201 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -
@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

clearly the best looking racing game ever made. slightly mad studios should take note of what a developer achieved limited to 400$ hardware

slightly mad has much more power invested into physics calculations. Much easier to make a good looking arcade game

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

#202 Posted by Snugenz (11822 posts) -

So good looking it makes Flopza 5 look like a PS2 game. This is easily the best looking driving game ever made....

No.

#203 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

and lol @ people ragging on driveclubs 30 fps, a 780ti(3x or so more powerful than ps4s gpu) cant even maintain 60fps in pcars(which looks substantially worse than driveclub) with ZERO aa without lowering several settings

edit - the 780ti 60fps comment refers to 1080p resolution.

#204 Edited by MonsieurX (29737 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

and lol @ people ragging on driveclubs 30 fps, a 780ti(3x or so more powerful than ps4s gpu) cant even maintain 60fps in pcars(which looks substantially worse than driveclub) with ZERO aa without lowering several settings

lol 1500$ av cabinet,your opinion is invalid

And considering Project Cars is still far from release

#205 Edited by FastRobby (1324 posts) -

Haha, the cows immediately trying to save this game by saying it looks better than Forza, don't mind gameplay, who cares about that in racing games? Haha silly cows

#206 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

and lol @ people ragging on driveclubs 30 fps, a 780ti(3x or so more powerful than ps4s gpu) cant even maintain 60fps in pcars(which looks substantially worse than driveclub) with ZERO aa without lowering several settings

lol 1500$ av cabinet,your opinion is invalid

And considering Project Cars is still far from release

1500 av cabinet? oh thats right you like fabricating statements that dont actually exist. still waiting on you to quote the post where i allegedly say something about plasma tvs

#207 Posted by MonsieurX (29737 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@m3dude1 said:

and lol @ people ragging on driveclubs 30 fps, a 780ti(3x or so more powerful than ps4s gpu) cant even maintain 60fps in pcars(which looks substantially worse than driveclub) with ZERO aa without lowering several settings

lol 1500$ av cabinet,your opinion is invalid

And considering Project Cars is still far from release

1500 av cabinet? oh thats right you like fabricating statements that dont actually exist. still waiting on you to quote the post where i allegedly say something about plasma tvs

Now your acting like you never had that other alt

lol

#208 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

this is the only act ive ever made on gamespot kiddo. ill take your deflection as acceptance that driveclub does indeed look better than pcars. after the latest videos even the staunchest pc fans can no longer argue it.

#209 Posted by MonsieurX (29737 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

this is the only act ive ever made on gamespot kiddo

http://www.gamespot.com/profile/m3Boarder32/

lol sure,you confirmed it several times

#210 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

awaiting link to this confirmation. im not sure how much information admins have access to, but perhaps they could dispell this silly claim of yours.

#211 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4077 posts) -

LOL when people are calling it out for being 30fps, it's 'you can't compare them' [with Forza]. Which is what I said in the first place. Now cows are back to comparing them.

You guys ever going to learn?

Also, Forza 5 might look like that at 30fps too.

#212 Edited by MonsieurX (29737 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

awaiting link to this confirmation

just did it,cry more

#213 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4077 posts) -

So good looking it makes Flopza 5 look like a PS2 game. This is easily the best looking driving game ever made....

Drive Club looks good, but I haven't seen the PS4 impress me at 60fps either tbh.

Dude, Forza is a driving game, GT is a driving game. This thing is more TDU or whatever. It's not a driving game, I'm pretty sure arcade games aren't called driving games.

#214 Edited by lglz1337 (3232 posts) -
#215 Edited by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -

@HalcyonScarlet said:

@I_can_haz said:

So good looking it makes Flopza 5 look like a PS2 game. This is easily the best looking driving game ever made....

Drive Club looks good, but I haven't seen the PS4 impress me at 60fps either tbh.

Dude, Forza is a driving game, GT is a driving game. This thing is more TDU or whatever. It's not a driving game, I'm pretty sure arcade games aren't called driving games.

LOL, dat damage control.

More GIFs of the best looking driving game to date. LOL @ lems' salty tears filling this thread.

#216 Edited by NathanDrakeSwag (5127 posts) -

Wow that puts Forza to shame. Can't wait to see how good the next GT looks.

#217 Edited by lglz1337 (3232 posts) -

LOL @people thinking Forza 5 looks better, such claims really makes you look stupid!

i enjoy the butthurt this footage has caused! LOL

#218 Posted by Opus_Rea-333 (963 posts) -

imagine Forza Horizon 2 running at 30FPS !! 30FPS use less GPU so they can apply lots of rendering effects... etc..

#219 Edited by lglz1337 (3232 posts) -

@Opus_Rea-333: forza horizon runs 30fps what makes you think forza horizon 2 wont ?

#220 Posted by HalcyonScarlet (4077 posts) -

@HalcyonScarlet said:

@I_can_haz said:

So good looking it makes Flopza 5 look like a PS2 game. This is easily the best looking driving game ever made....

Drive Club looks good, but I haven't seen the PS4 impress me at 60fps either tbh.

Dude, Forza is a driving game, GT is a driving game. This thing is more TDU or whatever. It's not a driving game, I'm pretty sure arcade games aren't called driving games.

LOL, dat damage control.

More GIFs of the best looking driving game to date. LOL @ lems' salty tears filling this thread.

LOL firstly, I'm not a lem anymore.

Second do you REALLY want this thread to become about how it's 30fps. That didn't go too well for the cows the last time it happened. It was the cows who were like 'bu bu bu you can't compare dem'.

#221 Edited by lglz1337 (3232 posts) -
#222 Edited by HalcyonScarlet (4077 posts) -

@lglz1337 said:

@HalcyonScarlet: so what are you now ?

Honestly, I don't know. Since MS owned me with the latest Kinect thing, IDK. It's not even just about Kinect, they sold me an X1 on a particular vision they had and didn't have the balls to follow through with it for more than six months.

I have a really nice PC which literally just needs me to choose a graphics card (it's running off the i5 GPU right now). I may keep the X1 for a while, partly because I can't be bothered to get rid of it and partly because I wouldn't get the money back since it's cheaper now and Fifa 14 and KI are locked to my account.

#223 Posted by WallofTruth (1574 posts) -
#224 Edited by FoxbatAlpha (6192 posts) -

This is the best looking arcade racer I have ever seen. Project Cars or Forza sim killer? Awe hell no.

#225 Posted by Heirren (16659 posts) -

This is the best looking arcade racer I have ever seen. Project Cars or Forza sim killer? Awe hell no.

How much of an arcade racer is this supposed to be? I had thought it was leaning more towards realism.

#226 Posted by GiantAssPanda (1605 posts) -

Hopefully the game will deliver. Would be nice to have some proper racing game since GT7 is probably still some years away..

#227 Posted by Couth_ (10036 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:
@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

clearly the best looking racing game ever made. slightly mad studios should take note of what a developer achieved limited to 400$ hardware

slightly mad has much more power invested into physics calculations. Much easier to make a good looking arcade game

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

#228 Posted by Fizzman (9869 posts) -

I'm having fun playing Forza right now. Cows are having fun posting about Driveclub on SW.

You know Driveclub is going to end up being an abysmal flop.

#229 Posted by Couth_ (10036 posts) -

@Heirren said:

@FoxbatAlpha said:

This is the best looking arcade racer I have ever seen. Project Cars or Forza sim killer? Awe hell no.

How much of an arcade racer is this supposed to be? I had thought it was leaning more towards realism.

CoD/BF ttier realism.. It's not as fantasy as a Halo but it's no where near ARMA realism either... DriveClub looks realistic in gifs and videos but they just don't have the advanced physics engine that a sim would have.

#230 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:
@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

clearly the best looking racing game ever made. slightly mad studios should take note of what a developer achieved limited to 400$ hardware

slightly mad has much more power invested into physics calculations. Much easier to make a good looking arcade game

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

#231 Posted by Couth_ (10036 posts) -

@m3dude1 said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

stay blind dude

#232 Edited by ttboy (276 posts) -

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

stay blind dude

Project Cars is overrated in visuals as are most PC games. Have a look at what it really looks like in game play :

Source

PC in Ultra settings

#233 Edited by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

yeah it rly is very poor looking outside of the car models. people love to post 8k bullshots where everything except the car is massively blurred thru DOF tho. and again, a 780ti cant even play it at 60fps at 1080p w/ no aa on the highest settings with no other cars in the race lmao.

the lighting and materials system for everything except the cars looks like a ps360 game. the tracks and especially the trees look abysmal when compared to driveclub.

#234 Posted by I_can_haz (6551 posts) -

@ttboy said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

stay blind dude

Project Cars is overrated in visuals as are most PC games. Have a look at what it really looks like in game play :

Source

PC in Ultra settings

Those are some fugly ass paper trees and 2D audience.

#235 Posted by ghostwarrior786 (4001 posts) -

lems are setting themselves up for ownage with all this 30fps talk, do lems realise forza horizon was 30fps?? and very high chance of its sequel of being 30 fps too

#236 Posted by Couth_ (10036 posts) -

@ttboy said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

stay blind dude

Project Cars is overrated in visuals as are most PC games. Have a look at what it really looks like in game play :

Source

PC in Ultra settings

Those are some fugly ass paper trees and 2D audience.

Wow that looks like shit compared to what they have shown

#237 Posted by Spitfire-Six (501 posts) -

Don't sweat it, the "cows" as they are called pick the ugliest shots of a game to compare it to whatever game they are hyping. In Fact are you all hyping this to a AAA game? lets get that out of the way also, why don't the cars in Drive club have any suspension? when they press brakes they don't move, the don't roll in the corners they just float above the pretty road. SO can anyone really expect this game to be any good? You guys are falling for the shiny toy trick again....

#238 Posted by mbrockway (3401 posts) -

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:
@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

clearly the best looking racing game ever made. slightly mad studios should take note of what a developer achieved limited to 400$ hardware

slightly mad has much more power invested into physics calculations. Much easier to make a good looking arcade game

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

Slightly Mad can eat a ****. Shift 2 was unplayable on PS3 or PC. Good god, they didn't make this game, did they? They already killed my favorite new franchise, are they out to kill entirely new ones as well?

#239 Edited by GTSaiyanjin2 (5828 posts) -

Lighting looks bad as well, I hope thats not how it looks in stock settings. PCars is a completely different game anyways, I'm looking forward to both.

@Couth_ said:
@I_can_haz said:

@ttboy said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

@Couth_ said:

@m3dude1 said:

they also have cpus orders of magnitude more powerful than a 1.6ghz jaguar they can target. thats no excuse. they just have untalented artists and a horribly outdated dx9 engine sloppily ported to dx11.

? The PC version of P.CARS will destroy this game.. If you are comparing it to the console version then no they are using the same 1.6ghz jaguar

not in graphics, quite the other way around in that regard

stay blind dude

Project Cars is overrated in visuals as are most PC games. Have a look at what it really looks like in game play :

Source

PC in Ultra settings

Those are some fugly ass paper trees and 2D audience.

Wow that looks like shit compared to what they have shown

#240 Edited by kinectthedots (1634 posts) -

@spitfire-six said:

Don't sweat it, the "cows" as they are called pick the ugliest shots of a game to compare it to whatever game they are hyping. In Fact are you all hyping this to a AAA game? lets get that out of the way also, why don't the cars in Drive club have any suspension? when they press brakes they don't move, the don't roll in the corners they just float above the pretty road. SO can anyone really expect this game to be any good? You guys are falling for the shiny toy trick again....

It's a racing game not an open world RPG or sandbox game.

There aren't many variation of showing a racing game other than with different vehicles and locations which are paths that aren't exactly open for exploration lol.

If those GMAEPLAY screens are from PC on ultra settings then you have to settle for either PC sucking or that the game itself is not as spiffy graphically as "hermits"...as they are called...hyped them to be. Take your pick.

Project Cars: PC on ultra

Drive Club PS4

#241 Edited by FreedomFreeLife (2160 posts) -

So much jaggies... and also very shitty gameplay.

6 out of 10 rating!

#242 Posted by lostrib (35079 posts) -

So much jaggies... and also very shitty gameplay.

6 out of 10 rating!

I'm sure you were very objective about this

#243 Posted by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

Don't sweat it, the "cows" as they are called pick the ugliest shots of a game to compare it to whatever game they are hyping. In Fact are you all hyping this to a AAA game? lets get that out of the way also, why don't the cars in Drive club have any suspension? when they press brakes they don't move, the don't roll in the corners they just float above the pretty road. SO can anyone really expect this game to be any good? You guys are falling for the shiny toy trick again....

its AAA graphics. the game will likely suck

#244 Edited by Spitfire-Six (501 posts) -

@m3dude1: I thought they judged the game as a whole not in separate portions?

I seriously want to know whats up with the physics why aren't the cars reacting to the environment? Why are the car bodies floating? Whats the deal with that steering wheel? Its almost like they rushed through the foundation of a good racing game to put things like lens flares time lapse, smudges on windshield.... you know those important racing bits.

#245 Posted by m3dude1 (1220 posts) -

@spitfire-six im simply judging the graphics. graphically drive club shits on pcars

#246 Posted by PhazonBlazer (11650 posts) -

Ahh yes, hermits feeling the need to justify their $2000 rigs.

We all know that Drive Club looks much better than Project Bores.

#247 Edited by Gue1 (9590 posts) -

@Heirren said:

@FoxbatAlpha said:

This is the best looking arcade racer I have ever seen. Project Cars or Forza sim killer? Awe hell no.

How much of an arcade racer is this supposed to be? I had thought it was leaning more towards realism.

just look at the video. The game's clearly not a sim. You can't take corners in a sim going that fast or wait to the very last moment only to tap the brakes and pass it unharmed. The acceleration is quite ridiculous too.

#248 Edited by Ghost120x (3751 posts) -

I can't wait for the downgrade before launch.

#249 Edited by lglz1337 (3232 posts) -

@Ghost120x: you mean upgrade like evolution studio always do

#250 Posted by jessejay420 (3751 posts) -

@lglz1337: You mean sub par games like Evolution studios always does?

Turn 10 >>> Evolution

its not even up for debate.

now go ahead and continue your "Graphics" Conversation.