Digital Foundry vs The Last of Us: Remastered

  • 183 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
#151 Posted by lostrib (37797 posts) -

@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: ...except for those of us who have already played it"

Which obviously you aren't one...otherwise you would have known about joels conversation at the beginning of the game.

I beat the game, I didn't memorize it

#152 Edited by SambaLele (5424 posts) -

Guess I'll wait until the price drops or will buy an used copy.

#154 Edited by LadyBlue (3929 posts) -

@LegatoSkyheart said:

@ladyblue said:

@LegatoSkyheart said:

It seems like the answer is clear.

If you haven't played it and have a PS4, get This Re-release. If you have a PS3, don't bother getting this game for the PS4, just grab a PS3 copy.

Terrible advice. Why would you advice someone to get a ps3 copy over the ps4, for the same price?

ps3 $30+$20(dlc) =$50

ps4 All dlc included with all of the improvements = $50

I already discussed this with people using Amazon. You can get a much cheaper copy on the PS3. Of course you got users defending left and right over this version so whatever floats your boat.

Not defending either version. If you think it sucks, or that it isn't worth it, then so be it, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

I'm against terrible advice. In what world does someone recommend the lesser version , when the superior alternative is the same price.

I've checked everywhere the cheapest($18-25 range) are all used. New copy will run you at least $20. Even then It's $40 vs $50 if you want to experience the complete story(dlc is $20), a whopping difference of $10.

As for you shitty attitude, if you don't feel like having a discussion on a message board, then perhaps you should switch to twitter or Instagram.

#155 Posted by GamersJustGame (322 posts) -

@bldgirsh said:

So it does dip even when locked on 30 FPS... well played sony.

Does it matter? seriously.

#156 Edited by scatteh316 (4961 posts) -

@gamersjustgame said:

@bldgirsh said:

So it does dip even when locked on 30 FPS... well played sony.

Does it matter? seriously.

Yes it does.. It's a PS3 game for fuck sake....

#157 Edited by MirkoS77 (7633 posts) -

A few more hours, wooooooooooot!!! Can't wait to play this in full 60fps glory.

#158 Edited by Krelian-co (11234 posts) -

@MirkoS77 said:

A few more hours, wooooooooooot!!! Can't wait to play this in full 60fps glory.

#159 Posted by santoron (7775 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

For the love of f*ck, don't buy this and support milking. Zero effort went into this... I bet they locked like 6 devs in a basement for 2 months to make this version while the rest are working on UC4.

So bringing a game to a new platform is now milking? I can run with that...

STOP SUPPORTING MULTIPLATS YOU FOOLS!!!! Buy for the first platform announced or ignore the game all together!

#160 Posted by silversix_ (14816 posts) -

@santoron said:

@silversix_ said:

For the love of f*ck, don't buy this and support milking. Zero effort went into this... I bet they locked like 6 devs in a basement for 2 months to make this version while the rest are working on UC4.

So bringing a game to a new platform is now milking? I can run with that...

STOP SUPPORTING MULTIPLATS YOU FOOLS!!!! Buy for the first platform announced or ignore the game all together!

so lets just put all three Uncharted titles in 1080p on ps4 n call it a day since its a new platform? No thanks, not here to play the same games two generations in a row.

#161 Posted by Krelian-co (11234 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@santoron said:

@silversix_ said:

For the love of f*ck, don't buy this and support milking. Zero effort went into this... I bet they locked like 6 devs in a basement for 2 months to make this version while the rest are working on UC4.

So bringing a game to a new platform is now milking? I can run with that...

STOP SUPPORTING MULTIPLATS YOU FOOLS!!!! Buy for the first platform announced or ignore the game all together!

so lets just put all three Uncharted titles in 1080p on ps4 n call it a day since its a new platform? No thanks, not here to play the same games two generations in a row.

there is a simple solution: don't buy it. There, problem solved, thank me later.

#162 Posted by silversix_ (14816 posts) -

@Krelian-co said:

@silversix_ said:

@santoron said:

@silversix_ said:

For the love of f*ck, don't buy this and support milking. Zero effort went into this... I bet they locked like 6 devs in a basement for 2 months to make this version while the rest are working on UC4.

So bringing a game to a new platform is now milking? I can run with that...

STOP SUPPORTING MULTIPLATS YOU FOOLS!!!! Buy for the first platform announced or ignore the game all together!

so lets just put all three Uncharted titles in 1080p on ps4 n call it a day since its a new platform? No thanks, not here to play the same games two generations in a row.

there is a simple solution: don't buy it. There, problem solved, thank me later.

WOW thank you

#163 Posted by Sollet (7395 posts) -

ITT: People telling each other what they should do with their money.

WTF SW?? Seriously?

#164 Posted by nutcrackr (12646 posts) -

Guess they didn't fix the ugly motion blur

for the record last of us looks good, just that motion blur can sometimes look very bad

#165 Edited by PAL360 (26943 posts) -

@freedomfreak:

Ground Zeroes on PS4 and X1 is looked at 60fps. Going by frame rate tests, TLoU is not, but is surprisingly consistant!

#166 Edited by getyeryayasout (7606 posts) -

@Krelian-co said:

@MirkoS77 said:

A few more hours, wooooooooooot!!! Can't wait to play this in full 60fps glory.

#167 Posted by LegatoSkyheart (25631 posts) -

@ladyblue said:

Not defending either version. If you think it sucks, or that it isn't worth it, then so be it, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

I'm against terrible advice. In what world does someone recommend the lesser version , when the superior alternative is the same price.

I've checked everywhere the cheapest($18-25 range) are all used. New copy will run you at least $20. Even then It's $40 vs $50 if you want to experience the complete story(dlc is $20), a whopping difference of $10.

As for you shitty attitude, if you don't feel like having a discussion on a message board, then perhaps you should switch to twitter or Instagram.

Better Version? It's hardly better than the PS3 version. This is like if Nintendo were to release WindWaker HD and do absolutely NOTHING to enhance the game. The Visuals aren't changed, the Boat Sails haven't changed, The Tingle stuff hasn't changed, just straight up Gamecube quality Windwaker. OH BUT WAIT YOU CAN SWITCH BETWEEN 30 FPS TO 60 FPS! WHAT A DEAL!

That's The Last of Us "Remastered" or we should really be considering it "Re-Release" for another platform. It's a simple Cash Grab, considering Microsoft is offering a "Remaster" of the same caliber, bringing Halo 4 to the Xbox One, BUT it's BETTER because it's coming with 3 other games, one that happens to be getting a Remaster and it looks GREAT considering that game came out 10 years ago.

So consider the following. In another thread I offered the price points for all the games, the main thing people are pointing out is the story DLC is $15. Guess what you can get The Last of Us for the PS3 for at least $20 now. Add that $15 and you got yourself the Remaster for $35.

$35 vs $50 The Answer's pretty clear.

It's just that simple.

Of course this is assuming you have a PS3. If you don't, then that's a shame because PS3 has some pretty cool titles. Other than that I think many of you should feel a little bit cheated out, because this game does not offer more than what the PS3 title gives, Thankfully it doesn't also Lessen the Value either, I just think people should go for the Cheaper option because who doesn't want to save money? and I don't want the industry to think that These types remasters are what WE want. This gives companies a GREATER excuse to skimp out on Backwards Compatibility.

While Nintendo is constantly trying find a good medium to where we can play ALL of our Nintendo games, Sony (the freakin' company that pretty musch started today's backwards compatibility) is backing off from the entire thing just so they can pull stuff LIKE THIS. Resell Last Generation games for a quick buck because you want it. It's all nice and dandy when it's a game that's not in the market anymore and becomes readily available again, like Earthbound or Sonic Adventure or Marvel vs Capcom, but when it starts to become games that were available JUST a year ago and it's still readily available, I go against that. It's why I avoided Batman Arkham City for WiiU, It's why I was against Tomb Raider "Definitive" Edition, and it's why I'm against this Remaster. The only reason I'm not totally against GTA V "Remaster" or whatever it is because I'm considering that the PC release which is what usually happens, PC always have to wait a year for Rockstar stuff.....unless it's like Max Payne or something.

#168 Posted by Dire_Weasel (16000 posts) -

@LegatoSkyheart said:

Better Version? It's hardly better than the PS3 version. This is like if Nintendo were to release WindWaker HD and do absolutely NOTHING to enhance the game. The Visuals aren't changed, the Boat Sails haven't changed, The Tingle stuff hasn't changed, just straight up Gamecube quality Windwaker. OH BUT WAIT YOU CAN SWITCH BETWEEN 30 FPS TO 60 FPS! WHAT A DEAL!

That's The Last of Us "Remastered" or we should really be considering it "Re-Release" for another platform. It's a simple Cash Grab, considering Microsoft is offering a "Remaster" of the same caliber, bringing Halo 4 to the Xbox One, BUT it's BETTER because it's coming with 3 other games, one that happens to be getting a Remaster and it looks GREAT considering that game came out 10 years ago.

So consider the following. In another thread I offered the price points for all the games, the main thing people are pointing out is the story DLC is $15. Guess what you can get The Last of Us for the PS3 for at least $20 now. Add that $15 and you got yourself the Remaster for $35.

$35 vs $50 The Answer's pretty clear.

It's just that simple.

Of course this is assuming you have a PS3. If you don't, then that's a shame because PS3 has some pretty cool titles. Other than that I think many of you should feel a little bit cheated out, because this game does not offer more than what the PS3 title gives, Thankfully it doesn't also Lessen the Value either, I just think people should go for the Cheaper option because who doesn't want to save money? and I don't want the industry to think that These types remasters are what WE want. This gives companies a GREATER excuse to skimp out on Backwards Compatibility.

While Nintendo is constantly trying find a good medium to where we can play ALL of our Nintendo games, Sony (the freakin' company that pretty musch started today's backwards compatibility) is backing off from the entire thing just so they can pull stuff LIKE THIS. Resell Last Generation games for a quick buck because you want it. It's all nice and dandy when it's a game that's not in the market anymore and becomes readily available again, like Earthbound or Sonic Adventure or Marvel vs Capcom, but when it starts to become games that were available JUST a year ago and it's still readily available, I go against that. It's why I avoided Batman Arkham City for WiiU, It's why I was against Tomb Raider "Definitive" Edition, and it's why I'm against this Remaster. The only reason I'm not totally against GTA V "Remaster" or whatever it is because I'm considering that the PC release which is what usually happens, PC always have to wait a year for Rockstar stuff.....unless it's like Max Payne or something.

Wow, be a little bit more mad about it.

I'll be sure to think of your post tonight when I'm playing TLoU on my Playstation 4. Well, no, not really.

#169 Posted by LegatoSkyheart (25631 posts) -

@Dire_Weasel said:

Wow, be a little bit more mad about it.

I'll be sure to think of your post tonight when I'm playing TLoU on my Playstation 4. Well, no, not really.

Power to you I guess.

Be sure to pick up God of War Complete when Sony decides to put that on PS4 too.

#170 Posted by MirkoS77 (7633 posts) -

@LegatoSkyheart said:

Better Version? It's hardly better than the PS3 version. This is like if Nintendo were to release WindWaker HD and do absolutely NOTHING to enhance the game. The Visuals aren't changed, the Boat Sails haven't changed, The Tingle stuff hasn't changed, just straight up Gamecube quality Windwaker. OH BUT WAIT YOU CAN SWITCH BETWEEN 30 FPS TO 60 FPS! WHAT A DEAL!

That's The Last of Us "Remastered" or we should really be considering it "Re-Release" for another platform. It's a simple Cash Grab, considering Microsoft is offering a "Remaster" of the same caliber, bringing Halo 4 to the Xbox One, BUT it's BETTER because it's coming with 3 other games, one that happens to be getting a Remaster and it looks GREAT considering that game came out 10 years ago.

So consider the following. In another thread I offered the price points for all the games, the main thing people are pointing out is the story DLC is $15. Guess what you can get The Last of Us for the PS3 for at least $20 now. Add that $15 and you got yourself the Remaster for $35.

$35 vs $50 The Answer's pretty clear.

It's just that simple.

Of course this is assuming you have a PS3. If you don't, then that's a shame because PS3 has some pretty cool titles. Other than that I think many of you should feel a little bit cheated out, because this game does not offer more than what the PS3 title gives, Thankfully it doesn't also Lessen the Value either, I just think people should go for the Cheaper option because who doesn't want to save money? and I don't want the industry to think that These types remasters are what WE want. This gives companies a GREATER excuse to skimp out on Backwards Compatibility.

While Nintendo is constantly trying find a good medium to where we can play ALL of our Nintendo games, Sony (the freakin' company that pretty musch started today's backwards compatibility) is backing off from the entire thing just so they can pull stuff LIKE THIS. Resell Last Generation games for a quick buck because you want it. It's all nice and dandy when it's a game that's not in the market anymore and becomes readily available again, like Earthbound or Sonic Adventure or Marvel vs Capcom, but when it starts to become games that were available JUST a year ago and it's still readily available, I go against that. It's why I avoided Batman Arkham City for WiiU, It's why I was against Tomb Raider "Definitive" Edition, and it's why I'm against this Remaster. The only reason I'm not totally against GTA V "Remaster" or whatever it is because I'm considering that the PC release which is what usually happens, PC always have to wait a year for Rockstar stuff.....unless it's like Max Payne or something.

Hardly better than the PS3 version? You have played it?

If you haven't played the remaster, how do you know? I don't know if you've played the PS3 version, I'll assume by the way you're talking you have. If you have, you'd know that if you've spent any amount of time that the framerate is not a minor improvement, it is a major one. Not only does the game run smoother, it plays much better. In addition, the textures have been upgraded. The DLC is included. Load times are faster. There is in-game commentary in cutscenes. There is photo-mode (this is not a small inclusion, it's amazing), it includes "Grounded: the making of TLoU", a 1+ hour documentary that takes us through the creation of the game. You can tweak controls, there's new audio options, the DS4 speaker is used.

$50.

How is all of that a "simple cash grab"? I'm so sick of hearing this bullshit, as if ND and Sony simply threw this on the PS4 with nary a care and are asking full price. THAT would be a cash grab. No, I'm sorry, there is great value there and you don't get to tell me otherwise. TLoU arrived at a time in the PS3's life that would not enable it to live a full life at retail. It makes business sense to maximize on their investment, they are giving a discount on it (more than Nintendo does) and to help introduce the IP to a new audience while at the same time helping fully realize its potential on new hardware.

There's nothing wrong with what they're doing, in fact I'm glad Sony is allowing this IP to get the treatment it deserves.

#171 Posted by LegatoSkyheart (25631 posts) -

@MirkoS77 said:

Hardly better than the PS3 version? You have played it?

If you haven't played the remaster, how do you know? I don't know if you've played the PS3 version, I'll assume by the way you're talking you have. If you have, you'd know that if you've spent any amount of time that the framerate is not a minor improvement, it is a major one. Not only does the game run smoother, it plays much better. In addition, the textures have been upgraded. The DLC is included. Load times are faster. There is in-game commentary in cutscenes. There is photo-mode (this is not a small inclusion, it's amazing), it includes "Grounded: the making of TLoU", a 1+ hour documentary that takes us through the creation of the game. You can tweak controls, there's new audio options, the DS4 speaker is used.

$50.

How is all of that a "simple cash grab"? I'm so sick of hearing this bullshit, as if ND and Sony simply threw this on the PS4 with nary a care and are asking full price. THAT would be a cash grab. No, I'm sorry, there is great value there and you don't get to tell me otherwise. TLoU arrived at a time in the PS3's life that would not enable it to live a full life at retail. It makes business sense to maximize on their investment, they are giving a discount on it (more than Nintendo does) and to help introduce the IP to a new audience while at the same time helping fully realize its potential on new hardware.

There's nothing wrong with what they're doing, in fact I'm glad Sony is allowing this IP to get the treatment it deserves.

Defending your purchase, I see.

Have fun with the game. The Last of Us is enjoyable, but I find it very hard to justify this Remaster's Existence. Better Frames or not, it's still a crappy way to deal with the Lack of Backwards compatibility.

Paying $50 for a Year Sub of PS+ is a better deal considering this game will eventually become free on there anyway.

#172 Posted by MirkoS77 (7633 posts) -

@LegatoSkyheart said:

@MirkoS77 said:

Hardly better than the PS3 version? You have played it?

If you haven't played the remaster, how do you know? I don't know if you've played the PS3 version, I'll assume by the way you're talking you have. If you have, you'd know that if you've spent any amount of time that the framerate is not a minor improvement, it is a major one. Not only does the game run smoother, it plays much better. In addition, the textures have been upgraded. The DLC is included. Load times are faster. There is in-game commentary in cutscenes. There is photo-mode (this is not a small inclusion, it's amazing), it includes "Grounded: the making of TLoU", a 1+ hour documentary that takes us through the creation of the game. You can tweak controls, there's new audio options, the DS4 speaker is used.

$50.

How is all of that a "simple cash grab"? I'm so sick of hearing this bullshit, as if ND and Sony simply threw this on the PS4 with nary a care and are asking full price. THAT would be a cash grab. No, I'm sorry, there is great value there and you don't get to tell me otherwise. TLoU arrived at a time in the PS3's life that would not enable it to live a full life at retail. It makes business sense to maximize on their investment, they are giving a discount on it (more than Nintendo does) and to help introduce the IP to a new audience while at the same time helping fully realize its potential on new hardware.

There's nothing wrong with what they're doing, in fact I'm glad Sony is allowing this IP to get the treatment it deserves.

Defending your purchase, I see.

Have fun with the game. The Last of Us is enjoyable, but I find it very hard to justify this Remaster's Existence. Better Frames or not, it's still a crappy way to deal with the Lack of Backwards compatibility.

Paying $50 for a Year Sub of PS+ is a better deal considering this game will eventually become free on there anyway.

I'm not insecure with my purchase by any means, it's because I'm satisfied with my purchase that I take issue with your post. I just find it frustrating when people claim it's only done barely anything to improve it and then use that as ironclad proof that it's barely better when in reality there are numerous improvements that drastically impact the enjoyment. I'll assume by your lack of response you've not played the remaster. Well I have, it's quite a bit better, and your statement really comes off as nothing more than ignorant fanboy dribble, tbh, and I take issue with ignorance and the spreading of misinformation. The game is out. We're past that point now.

"It's hardly better than the PS3 version. This is like if Nintendo were to release WindWaker HD and do absolutely NOTHING to enhance the game."

"Absolutely NOTHING"? Again, on what basis do you claim this? I see you conveniently ignored everything else I noted it includes which certainly don't amount to nothing. If you're going to criticize this, at least attempt to be fair in your knowledge of what you're criticizing. You seem to be fundamentally against cash-grabs (of which I agree with you) and are using that here without actually taking into account specifics, but this is not what I'd consider a cash-grab at all. Effort has been put in, and this becomes apparent when you play it.

#173 Posted by LegatoSkyheart (25631 posts) -

@MirkoS77 said:

I'm not insecure with my purchase by any means, it's because I'm satisfied with my purchase that I take issue with your post. I just find it frustrating when people claim it's only done barely anything to improve it and then use that as ironclad proof that it's barely better when in reality there are numerous improvements that drastically impact the enjoyment. I'll assume by your lack of response you've not played the remaster. Well I have, it's quite a bit better, and your statement really comes off as nothing more than ignorant fanboy dribble, tbh, and I take issue with ignorance and the spreading of misinformation. The game is out. We're past that point now.

"It's hardly better than the PS3 version. This is like if Nintendo were to release WindWaker HD and do absolutely NOTHING to enhance the game."

"Absolutely NOTHING"? Again, on what basis do you claim this? I see you conveniently ignored everything else I noted it includes which certainly don't amount to nothing. If you're going to criticize this, at least attempt to be fair in your knowledge of what you're criticizing. You seem to be fundamentally against cash-grabs (of which I agree with you) and are using that here without actually taking into account specifics, but this is not what I'd consider a cash-grab at all. Effort has been put in, and this becomes apparent when you play it.

Windwaker HD added a Red Sail that makes it faster to go to island to island. It also adds the locations of the Triforce Pieces to your map so it makes that quest easier to go by and it changes the Tingle stuff to Miiverse integration. Not to mention the over all look of the game.

The Equivalent to The Last of Us on PS3 and PS4 is about the same as playing it on either system. It just seems like a waste. I already stated my reasons and you apparently can't shake off that I don't really care for this version of the game, in fact I don't a REASON to even get this game. All it does (to me) is show that People are more willing to buy stuff like this so Companies can do less and less to satisfy your wants. Uncharted Trilogy could come out and you would gobble it all up. Why? Because they promised 1080p and 60 fps.

Now you may go ahead and play your game and justify your purchase and that's fine and dandy many of us rebuy and replay a lot of games, I just don't like how they're saying this is a "Remaster" when it's really not, at all.

#174 Edited by WallofTruth (1761 posts) -

@b4x said:

@lostrib said:

@b4x said:

Says the lonely guy. :P

Wrong, yet again

Okay, Captain Shill, I have to go to work so you will have to share your crazy with somebody else

You mean shopping right?

EDIT: Those are all hard facts. I wouldn't post that, If I didn't believe it to be true.

You can always test your luck?

What happened to the other thread where you said that 1x HL2 game sold means 1x Windows copy sold? You said the same crap there, that you're 100% right and there's nothing to prove you wrong blah blah, and then I proved that those 6.4 million HL2 sales also included the Xbox version that came out in 2005, which clearly proved that 6.4 million HL2 sales =/= 6.4 million Windows sales. The thing is, you suddenly vanished after I made that post, how come? I thought you were 100% right and we were all just clueless idiots?

#175 Posted by WallofTruth (1761 posts) -
@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: ...except for those of us who have already played it"

Which obviously you aren't one...otherwise you would have known about joels conversation at the beginning of the game.

Nah, he's just a PC gamer, they so many good games every month that it's hard to remember some game from last year. I know you still remember it though, right xboxdone74? I know you can remember all that stuff because you only get a good game every few month, greatness just keeps waiting, huh? :)

#176 Posted by scottpsfan14 (5588 posts) -
@walloftruth said:
@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: ...except for those of us who have already played it"

Which obviously you aren't one...otherwise you would have known about joels conversation at the beginning of the game.

Nah, he's just a PC gamer, they so many good games every month that it's hard to remember some game from last year. I know you still remember it though, right xboxdone74? I know you can remember all that stuff because you only get a good game every few month, greatness just keeps waiting, huh? :)

*golfclap* Well done. You owned his tits son!1

#177 Posted by Ballroompirate (23052 posts) -

@Heil68 said:

Naughty GODS.

This ^^

#178 Edited by AmazonAngry (945 posts) -
@walloftruth said:
@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: ...except for those of us who have already played it"

Which obviously you aren't one...otherwise you would have known about joels conversation at the beginning of the game.

Nah, he's just a PC gamer, they so many good games every month that it's hard to remember some game from last year. I know you still remember it though, right xboxdone74? I know you can remember all that stuff because you only get a good game every few month, greatness just keeps waiting, huh? :)

No I totally agree. So many good games to play.

#179 Edited by lostrib (37797 posts) -

@amazonangry said:
@walloftruth said:
@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: ...except for those of us who have already played it"

Which obviously you aren't one...otherwise you would have known about joels conversation at the beginning of the game.

Nah, he's just a PC gamer, they so many good games every month that it's hard to remember some game from last year. I know you still remember it though, right xboxdone74? I know you can remember all that stuff because you only get a good game every few month, greatness just keeps waiting, huh? :)

No I totally agree. So many good games to play.

...you actually took the time to edit out any of the games rated 7+?

well at least you didn't challenge the fact that I've played TLOU

#180 Posted by EducatingU_PCMR (739 posts) -

LOL the so called Remaster even lacks AO in plants and some buildings, and it doesn't seem to use the character models from cut-scenes according to DF's Face-off.

GG Lying Dog, idiots running to the stores with $50 on their hands like brainless morons.

#181 Posted by AmazonAngry (945 posts) -

@lostrib: what are you talking about? And I already said I'm not gifting you anymore games. You wanna play TLOU, buy it yourself.

#182 Posted by lostrib (37797 posts) -

@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: what are you talking about? And I already said I'm not gifting you anymore games. You wanna play TLOU, buy it yourself.

I already own it and beaten it.

#183 Edited by Krelian-co (11234 posts) -

@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: what are you talking about? And I already said I'm not gifting you anymore games. You wanna play TLOU, buy it yourself.

on one hand we have someone who has a gaming pc and console, on the other hand we have a peasant who can only afford a console, thus spends his time making bs on the internet about gaming pc because he can't afford it. Yeah....stay jelly dear peasant.

#184 Posted by lostrib (37797 posts) -

@Krelian-co said:

@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: what are you talking about? And I already said I'm not gifting you anymore games. You wanna play TLOU, buy it yourself.

on one hand we have someone who has a gaming pc and console, on the other hand we have a peasant who can only afford a console, thus spends his time making bs on the internet about gaming pc because he can't afford it. Yeah....

For anyone wondering, i'm this one-->"someone who has a gaming pc and console"

#185 Edited by santoron (7775 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@santoron said:

@silversix_ said:

For the love of f*ck, don't buy this and support milking. Zero effort went into this... I bet they locked like 6 devs in a basement for 2 months to make this version while the rest are working on UC4.

So bringing a game to a new platform is now milking? I can run with that...

STOP SUPPORTING MULTIPLATS YOU FOOLS!!!! Buy for the first platform announced or ignore the game all together!

so lets just put all three Uncharted titles in 1080p on ps4 n call it a day since its a new platform? No thanks, not here to play the same games two generations in a row.

But that's just it: you aren't the market for for this type of release. You've played the popular first party titles from the PS3, and have no desire to replay. That's cool, and if I had played this game I'd pass too. I passed on Tomb Raider for the same reason.

Sony's polling is showing about 1/3 of PS4 owners owned a different brand of console last gen, and about one in six skipped gen 7 all together. That's an audience of 4 million+ gamers already that had no chance to play this game. Add in those that had a PS3 but never grabbed the game the first time around (like me and ~90% of PS3 owners) and it's easy to find a sizable audience that Does want the game for PS4 without even thinking about anyone "double dipping". It's the same reason publishers go multiplat with games even a year or more after release. It's part of why Asteroids™ still sells today.

The manpower and money needed to port an existing title to another system is insignificant compared to creating a AAA title from scratch. It isn't like they stopped making new games to make this happen, nor is this some new phenomenon that will bring gaming to ruin. I just see no reason to be anymore upset about this than any other multiplat or GoTY release. It's like screaming at them for making a Vita version of The Show insert Vita joke here.

#186 Posted by Sollet (7395 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@Krelian-co said:

@amazonangry said:

@lostrib: what are you talking about? And I already said I'm not gifting you anymore games. You wanna play TLOU, buy it yourself.

on one hand we have someone who has a gaming pc and console, on the other hand we have a peasant who can only afford a console, thus spends his time making bs on the internet about gaming pc because he can't afford it. Yeah....

For anyone wondering, i'm this one-->"someone who has a gaming pc and console"

Sorry, I don't understand peasant tongue.

I kid :P

#187 Posted by RR360DD (11997 posts) -

Don't see much of an improvement.

Think i'll stick with the PS3 version. Not going to be milked by Sony

#188 Posted by donalbane (16363 posts) -

@nutcrackr said:

Guess they didn't fix the ugly motion blur

for the record last of us looks good, just that motion blur can sometimes look very bad

Yeah, that's the only thing that really stands out when I fired it up last night. Looks really bad... wish you could turn it off.

#189 Posted by GamersJustGame (322 posts) -

@scatteh316 said:

@gamersjustgame said:

@bldgirsh said:

So it does dip even when locked on 30 FPS... well played sony.

Does it matter? seriously.

Yes it does.. It's a PS3 game for fuck sake....

Whats your point?