@kinectthedots: multiplat vs a exclusive.
Boom thread still alive and well.
Just because WD was delayed doesn't mean shit. Games are delayed all the time. Sony would have less control over a multiplat just to hype up a launch.
That is the point.
lol damn are you really to simple to understand why that is important? It kills his whole argument.
Watch Dogs!!!
1. Was Watch Dogs suppoed to be a lunch title? Check
2. Was it the first big next gen game to be seen for next gen? Check
3. Was there a lot of hype and press announcements surrounding the game leading up to the launch of next gen consoles? Check
4. Did it get delayed and is still currently delayed? Check
5. Is Watch Dogs a Sony exclsuve IP for PS4 which would some how boost PS4 sales by lying about it being a launch title then suddely delaying it because the game was never supposed to come out? Hell no, only an idiot would come to that conclusion which any person who did should step out of their conspiriacy theory toll booth and back into reality.
Boom, just like that, this thread is debunked.
Under The Eroica's warped logic, a hyped game that was supposed to launch with a system (Watch Dogs) would only be delayed if someone was purposefully "lying" about it to boost hype and sales for a specific system (in this case Sony for PS4). The fail part of this is that Watch dogs falls into EVERY category he is trying to use to say Sony was laying to boost system sales...except Watch dogs is a multiplatform game and the Developers had no console/system to boost sales for, so why was it delayed?
If you can't come out with the same conclusion The Eroica did for Drive Club then his argument failed.
There is no way Watch dogs could have been delayed unless someone was "lying" to promote a system right? This is the logic you are defending. I know you lemmings try hard to promote your dumb and desperate arguments but this is over.
Log in to comment