DF: PS4 VS Xbone Sniper Elite Framerate test

#1 Edited by killzowned24 (7286 posts) -

PS4 pretty much destroys it with around a 15 fps advantage. The worst part tho, xbone screen tears constantly!

This one must be seen in 1080p. Xbones screen tearing is sooo bad!!!

#2 Posted by R3FURBISHED (10026 posts) -

@killzowned24: Cause when we think best example of video game design, we think Sniper Elite.

#3 Edited by killzowned24 (7286 posts) -

Some more info.

"On the other hand, things appear a little more ropey on Xbox One, with Rebellion making a number of graphical sacrifices, perhaps in order to achieve native 1080p while targeting 60fps. These mainly come down to a reduction in texture filtering and use of lower-resolution artwork deployed upon surfaces on the ground. Indirect shadowing is also limited to screen-space ambient occlusion, while the PS4 and PC appear to utilise a more advanced implementation known as obscurance fields. This effect takes into account the radius between objects across the entire scene to produce a steady fall off with the indirect shadowing between light and dark areas, whereas SSAO creates a simpler black halo around objects that doesn't take into account such properties."

So not only does it perform way worse, it also looks worse too.

The PS4 game holds up rather well in approaching a 60fps set-up while featuring almost identical graphical quality to the PC game running with ultra settings enabled.

:D

#4 Posted by lglz1337 (3012 posts) -

XposBone you looking so sad ATM

#5 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -

Are we really gonna be doing PS4 vs XB1 threads for the rest of this gen?

We all know it goes PC>PS4>XB1>Wii U.

Leave it there.

#6 Posted by R3FURBISHED (10026 posts) -

Destiny runs at 1080p and 30FPS on both PS4 and Xbox One

#7 Posted by lglz1337 (3012 posts) -
#8 Posted by lglz1337 (3012 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED: XposBone also with screentearing so bad like this ?

#9 Posted by gpuking (2656 posts) -

This reminds me so much of the blood bath match today it's not funny.

Sony7 - MS1

#10 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -
@lglz1337 said:

@scottpsfan14: this is SW!

Does that mean we have to make shit threads comparing how high res textures are on each platform for every single game?

Boring.

#11 Edited by freedomfreak (38182 posts) -

I guess this proves the Ps4 is stronger than the X1.

#12 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -

I guess this proves the Ps4 is stronger than the X1.

Which has been proven with every multiplat release thus far.

#13 Edited by lglz1337 (3012 posts) -

@scottpsfan14: boring ? don't click on it ? close browser ?

every win should be noted so lemmings can stfu and stop their cloud BS

#14 Posted by Heirren (15975 posts) -

@killzowned24: Cause when we think best example of video game design, we think Sniper Elite.

How do you mean? It is better designed than most on rail fps games. Or, were you talking graphically?

#15 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -
@gpuking said:

This reminds me so much of the blood bath match today it's not funny.

Sony7 - MS1

Quick gpuking! Make a graphics thread! Shits boring :(

#16 Edited by aroxx_ab (9128 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:

Destiny runs at 1080p and 30FPS on both PS4 and Xbox One

Ok but how much had they have to downgrade the graphics on Xboner to get that...

#17 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -
@lglz1337 said:

@scottpsfan14: boring ? don't click on it ? close browser ?

every win should be noted so lemmings can stfu and stop their cloud BS

Look, one more thread confirming PS4's higher power will not shut up lemmings. Are you that stupid?

#18 Posted by intotheminx (356 posts) -

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

#19 Posted by CrownKingArthur (3744 posts) -

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

well, what would it take to let one blow you?

its a shame neither has a three and a half inch floppy.

#20 Posted by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -
@intotheminx said:

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

well, what would it take to let one blow you?

its a shame neither has a three and a half inch floppy.

crazy ole fool.

#21 Posted by lglz1337 (3012 posts) -
#22 Posted by Snugenz (11409 posts) -

I guess this proves the Ps4 is stronger than the X1.

Shockhorror.jpg

#23 Posted by parkurtommo (25383 posts) -

Some more info.

"On the other hand, things appear a little more ropey on Xbox One, with Rebellion making a number of graphical sacrifices, perhaps in order to achieve native 1080p while targeting 60fps. These mainly come down to a reduction in texture filtering and use of lower-resolution artwork deployed upon surfaces on the ground. Indirect shadowing is also limited to screen-space ambient occlusion, while the PS4 and PC appear to utilise a more advanced implementation known as obscurance fields. This effect takes into account the radius between objects across the entire scene to produce a steady fall off with the indirect shadowing between light and dark areas, whereas SSAO creates a simpler black halo around objects that doesn't take into account such properties."

So not only does it perform way worse, it also looks worse too.

The PS4 game holds up rather well in approaching a 60fps set-up while featuring almost identical graphical quality to the PC game running with ultra settings enabled.

:D

HAHAHA WOW are those screens actually legit? That's embarrassing!

#24 Posted by parkurtommo (25383 posts) -

You'd think we would have vsync in 2014.

#25 Posted by killzowned24 (7286 posts) -

@killzowned24 said:

Some more info.

"On the other hand, things appear a little more ropey on Xbox One, with Rebellion making a number of graphical sacrifices, perhaps in order to achieve native 1080p while targeting 60fps. These mainly come down to a reduction in texture filtering and use of lower-resolution artwork deployed upon surfaces on the ground. Indirect shadowing is also limited to screen-space ambient occlusion, while the PS4 and PC appear to utilise a more advanced implementation known as obscurance fields. This effect takes into account the radius between objects across the entire scene to produce a steady fall off with the indirect shadowing between light and dark areas, whereas SSAO creates a simpler black halo around objects that doesn't take into account such properties."

So not only does it perform way worse, it also looks worse too.

The PS4 game holds up rather well in approaching a 60fps set-up while featuring almost identical graphical quality to the PC game running with ultra settings enabled.

:D

HAHAHA WOW are those screens actually legit? That's embarrassing!

yup. Just shows how weak xbone is when devs don't purposely downgrade everyone else for parity.

#26 Edited by SolidTy (41494 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:

Destiny runs at 1080p and 30FPS on both PS4 and Xbox One

True, but Destiny is designed for PS360. I'll say this as well. After playing Destiny Alpha, the graphics were far from impressive. There were VERY last generation, but that was expected with a game tailored for PS360 install bases. It looked okay, but certainly not a pretty game...other than a few effects. It's definitely not a game that designed to push next gen hardware.

Another reason why Destiny is a terrible example? Bungie themselves have gone on record stating their goal for Destiny was graphical parity.

  1. PS360 cross gen game
  2. Devs goal for Destiny was graphic Parity

There you have it.

I'm looking forward to Batman which will not be cross gen PS360 and future games that ARE NOT designed for old hardware (PS360) in mind. Those games will take advantage of the PS4/Xbone hardware as right now they are being held back by 2005 geometry/physics/AI, etc.

#27 Posted by blangenakker (2060 posts) -

a weaker machine not performing as well, who would of known

#28 Posted by DEadliNE-Zero0 (641 posts) -

So what this shows is, if you care about resolution, frame rates and texture quality, you build a PC. Genius.

#29 Posted by Ben-Buja (2713 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:

I guess this proves the Ps4 is stronger than the X1.

Which has been proven with every multiplat release thus far.

Yup, 99% of PS4s multiplat versions will be better a whole gen long, it's just more powerful.

The tearing in the XB1 version would annoy me a lot, can you at least cap the framerate to 30?

#30 Posted by btk2k2 (344 posts) -

Ron Ron Ron, you were so wrong about this game. Here is what he said about it in the Xbox 10% GPU boost thread.

@ronvalencia: My theory roughly matches Snipper Elite 3's (proper tiling example) results i.e. both are at 1920x1080p shooter type game with X1 having slightly less frame rate than PS4.

It does have a slightly lower frame rate, if you consider 10-15 FPS slight but it also has decreased IQ. As with a lot of other games that have been released the overall difference is around 50% in favour of the PS4, and this is in a game you touted as matching your theory regarding using proper tiling. Face it Ron, you are completely wrong on this.

#31 Edited by HitmanActual (311 posts) -

Xboned.

#32 Posted by btk2k2 (344 posts) -

@Ben-Buja said:

@scottpsfan14 said:
@freedomfreak said:

I guess this proves the Ps4 is stronger than the X1.

Which has been proven with every multiplat release thus far.

Yup, 99% of PS4s multiplat versions will be better a whole gen long, it's just more powerful.

The tearing in the XB1 version would annoy me a lot, can you at least cap the framerate to 30?

The day 1 patch adds a v-sync option on Xbox 1, still some screen tearing when it drops below 30fps though but much less than without v-sync. DF are updating the article to include a video with the v-sync option turned on.

#33 Edited by misterpmedia (3362 posts) -

#34 Posted by StormyJoe (4577 posts) -

@killzowned24: In other news, forumites like "killzowned24" continue to scour the internet in an attempt to find articles to ease their insecurity over their console choice; and hopefully, in their minds, convince others to buy what they have.

#35 Posted by Ben-Buja (2713 posts) -

@btk2k2 said:

@Ben-Buja said:

Yup, 99% of PS4s multiplat versions will be better a whole gen long, it's just more powerful.

The tearing in the XB1 version would annoy me a lot, can you at least cap the framerate to 30?

The day 1 patch adds a v-sync option on Xbox 1, still some screen tearing when it drops below 30fps though but much less than without v-sync. DF are updating the article to include a video with the v-sync option turned on.

Well that's at least something, but it's sad that compromises like this have to be made already. The XB1 is seriously underpowered

#36 Edited by scottpsfan14 (2382 posts) -

@killzowned24: In other news, forumites like "killzowned24" continue to scour the internet in an attempt to find articles to ease their insecurity over their console choice; and hopefully, in their minds, convince others to buy what they have.

In terms of hardware, you do realize that in practice, the PS4 is barely 8% more powerful than the Xbox One? I smell SONY paying for more dev time. It's just annoying how cows listen to all the bullshit about 'teh power ov PS4z' when the Xbox has the cloud, DX12, tiled recources, secret hidden GPU, etc. Just watch as games start being exactly the same on consoles. Look at Alien Isolation. Keep hiding behind dat 8% power difference that could easily change with DX12 SDK update. Be warned cows.

Don't worry Joseph.

#37 Posted by donalbane (16139 posts) -

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

I second that emotion. The PS4 is more powerful than the Xbox One. We get it. Imagine how tedious it would be to post a thread for every multiplatform title entitled, "My PC plays this game better than the PS4 - details inside."

#38 Posted by TheRealBigRich (691 posts) -

@StormyJoe said:

@killzowned24: In other news, forumites like "killzowned24" continue to scour the internet in an attempt to find articles to ease their insecurity over their console choice; and hopefully, in their minds, convince others to buy what they have.

In terms of hardware, you do realize that in practice, the PS4 is barely 8% more powerful than the Xbox One? I smell SONY paying for more dev time. It's just annoying how cows listen to all the bullshit about 'teh power ov PS4z' when the Xbox has the cloud, DX12, tiled recources, secret hidden GPU, etc. Just watch as games start being exactly the same on consoles. Look at Alien Isolation. Keep hiding behind dat 8% power difference that could easily change with DX12 SDK update. Be warned cows.

Don't worry Joseph.

More dev time I doubt that . Its a simple as ps4 is more powerful than the done nothing more than that to me . It would be nice if they could of helped with screen tearing

#39 Posted by tormentos (16453 posts) -

@btk2k2 said:

Ron Ron Ron, you were so wrong about this game. Here is what he said about it in the Xbox 10% GPU boost thread.

@ronvalencia: My theory roughly matches Snipper Elite 3's (proper tiling example) results i.e. both are at 1920x1080p shooter type game with X1 having slightly less frame rate than PS4.

It does have a slightly lower frame rate, if you consider 10-15 FPS slight but it also has decreased IQ. As with a lot of other games that have been released the overall difference is around 50% in favour of the PS4, and this is in a game you touted as matching your theory regarding using proper tiling. Face it Ron, you are completely wrong on this.

Is even bigger at times is 20FPS the difference the xbox one should stay away from 1080p in FPS,like i have been saying it can run the games but at what quality,the PS4 not only has a frame advantage it also has a quality advantage as well.

Poor Ronvalencia he used this games and quoted that developers like 100 times..hahahaha

Remember when i say the games wasn't even that great looking how anal he went.? hahaha

Scratch tiling from the parity chart...hahahaha

@killzowned24: In other news, forumites like "killzowned24" continue to scour the internet in an attempt to find articles to ease their insecurity over their console choice; and hopefully, in their minds, convince others to buy what they have.

In other news butthurt fan who claimed the difference would be 5 FPS in game,fill 2 rivers with its tears..hahahahaa

Now where is Blackace,B4X,slowrobby,and several other trolls who argue against me on this sh**...

Like i say the xbox one can run 1080p but quality will suffer and it is proven here,an up to 20FPS gap with better textures and effects..

#40 Posted by PrincessGomez92 (3225 posts) -

And the PS4 version still dips quite a bit. Guess it's not as strong as we thought.

#41 Posted by StormyJoe (4577 posts) -

@btk2k2 said:

Ron Ron Ron, you were so wrong about this game. Here is what he said about it in the Xbox 10% GPU boost thread.

@ronvalencia: My theory roughly matches Snipper Elite 3's (proper tiling example) results i.e. both are at 1920x1080p shooter type game with X1 having slightly less frame rate than PS4.

It does have a slightly lower frame rate, if you consider 10-15 FPS slight but it also has decreased IQ. As with a lot of other games that have been released the overall difference is around 50% in favour of the PS4, and this is in a game you touted as matching your theory regarding using proper tiling. Face it Ron, you are completely wrong on this.

Is even bigger at times is 20FPS the difference the xbox one should stay away from 1080p in FPS,like i have been saying it can run the games but at what quality,the PS4 not only has a frame advantage it also has a quality advantage as well.

Poor Ronvalencia he used this games and quoted that developers like 100 times..hahahaha

Remember when i say the games wasn't even that great looking how anal he went.? hahaha

Scratch tiling from the parity chart...hahahaha

@StormyJoe said:

@killzowned24: In other news, forumites like "killzowned24" continue to scour the internet in an attempt to find articles to ease their insecurity over their console choice; and hopefully, in their minds, convince others to buy what they have.

In other news butthurt fan who claimed the difference would be 5 FPS in game,fill 2 rivers with its tears..hahahahaa

Now where is Blackace,B4X,slowrobby,and several other trolls who argue against me on this sh**...

Like i say the xbox one can run 1080p but quality will suffer and it is proven here,an up to 20FPS gap with better textures and effects..

Really? You are going to again bring up something I said a year ago that I already admitted I was wrong about? Have you ever heard of the phrase "broken record"? Be that as it may, I stick by my claim that your assessment is only true of the first gen of games for these consoles. So, when parity is reached, I will be happy to remind you of your incorrect "analysis".

Now that I think of it, keep it up! Of all the points I have made over the past year, you have one - and only one - point that I was wrong on. That's actually quite a complement. Thanks, Tormentos!

#42 Posted by tormentos (16453 posts) -

@intotheminx said:

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

I second that emotion. The PS4 is more powerful than the Xbox One. We get it. Imagine how tedious it would be to post a thread for every multiplatform title entitled, "My PC plays this game better than the PS4 - details inside."

And we would not care because our consoles don't get a new GPU each year.

Man you have a 2003 join date like me,you know how many thread lemmings make last gen about the superior 360 version of their games.?

Man in anything pro PS4 you always show up with some DC trying to spin things,PC has nothing to do here and like always we can count on Butthurt fanboys who bring it...

Just enjoy the thread..lol

#43 Posted by shawn30 (4290 posts) -

The PS4 has better performance, but still some tearing too. I don't count fps as I play, lol. The only thing your video has done is actually build some interest in me for the game, so thanks for that. The Xbox One version looks fine, issues and all, to me.

PS4 pretty much destroys it with around a 15 fps advantage. The worst part tho, xbone screen tears constantly!

This one must be seen in 1080p. Xbones screen tearing is sooo bad!!!

#44 Edited by DEadliNE-Zero0 (641 posts) -
@donalbane said:

@intotheminx said:

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

I second that emotion. The PS4 is more powerful than the Xbox One. We get it. Imagine how tedious it would be to post a thread for every multiplatform title entitled, "My PC plays this game better than the PS4 - details inside."

It's the dumbest debate there is.

If console gamers actually cared about resolution and frame rates, they'd buy a PC. But they don't. Sure, it's system wars, but when you realize they're not even fighting to prove which system is the best of the best, one realizes how idiotic this argument is.

Atleast PC gamers that have proper rigs give a fuck. Among other thing, i do want to have 60 stable frames per second, in certain games, liek first person view. Console gamers on the other hand only care long enough to prove they're better on the internet. Sad.

"PS4 has better res and frames". Still 45fps on average. "I care about frame rates". *rolls eyes*

#45 Edited by AzatiS (6986 posts) -

@R3FURBISHED said:

@killzowned24: Cause when we think best example of video game design, we think Sniper Elite.

Cause when i think that X1 costs as much as PS4 and every single game costs THE SAME price , i will go with the console that provides the best version of same games i want to play . And this is another example out of many is not only SE

#46 Posted by edwardecl (1778 posts) -

Was this before or after the new SDK?

If it's before then LOL, if it's after then LMAO. This game is written on the Unreal engine is it not, so is this what we can expect from every Unreal engine game? I just hope Unreal Engine 4 is better I assume Sniper Elite is using UE3.

#47 Posted by sts106mat (18758 posts) -

@donalbane said:

@intotheminx said:

Neither console is blowing my hair back.

I second that emotion. The PS4 is more powerful than the Xbox One. We get it. Imagine how tedious it would be to post a thread for every multiplatform title entitled, "My PC plays this game better than the PS4 - details inside."

Man you have a 2003 join date like me,you know how many thread lemmings make last gen about the superior 360 version of their games.?

Just enjoy the thread..lol

You full on know that all those lemming threads were in response to the hundreds of cow threads like

"PS3 is a super computer and is curing cancer"

"Xbox 360 will never be able to touch PS3 graphics"

"UC2 makes every other game look like gen 3"

etc etc, every time a new multiplat looked better, it flew in the face of the cows arguments...hence threads were made.

On topic, too bad the game is rather dull

#48 Edited by AzatiS (6986 posts) -
@scottpsfan14 said:

Are we really gonna be doing PS4 vs XB1 threads for the rest of this gen?

We all know it goes PC>PS4>XB1>Wii U.

Leave it there.

Didnt we have 8 years straight thousands of thousand of topics about how bad is PS3 vs X360 and so many other things that PS3 did bad/wrong ?!!

So you want cows to stop now ? No way !! I say to them to bring it up even harder so lems take a taste of their own pity game that they kept it going for 8 years straight. Payback people , payback.

#49 Edited by sts106mat (18758 posts) -

@edwardecl said:

Was this before or after the new SDK?

If it's before then LOL, if it's after then LMAO. This game is written on the Unreal engine is it not, so is this what we can expect from every Unreal engine game? I just hope Unreal Engine 4 is better I assume Sniper Elite is using UE3.

you really think they made this game inside a couple of months? LMAO the game doesn't look good...even on PS4

#50 Posted by SYSTEM-REBOOT (430 posts) -

On topic, too bad the game is rather dull

no its not. its really a great game on PC.