From the article:
'Crytek says that the press build is not representative of the final build performance-wise, and pretty much the only exercise it prohibited on the build it released was benchmarking.'
And the 'very high' graphics option from this build is missing.
http://www.crytek.com/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/images/6afdcf032d148bceeb95d07b5caa3106.png
#rekt
From the article:
'Crytek says that the press build is not representative of the final build performance-wise, and pretty much the only exercise it prohibited on the build it released was benchmarking.'
And the 'very high' graphics option from this build is missing.
http://www.crytek.com/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/images/6afdcf032d148bceeb95d07b5caa3106.png
#rekt
Even on low on PC you can see it is sharper than the xbox one and has more things on it look at the ground the xbox one is missing grass even vs low...
It is the animation, lighting, and transparencies that make ryse look so good, not the resolution.
@m3dude1 You are correct in stating that most pc fanboys were, and still are apparently, blind to what goes into image quality. I do remember the visual hype for this game and how the pc crowd would do everything they could to downplay the visuals.
It is likely that the bump in resolution does bring out the details in the higher resolution textures. On the other hand, this same increase likely brings out the faults of the game, as well--those straight line "seams" that become more apparent at higher resolutions.
So, almighty graphics expert, who apparently knows more than people who have been altering graphic settings for years (decades in my case). Please explain in more depth, how you came to the conclusion that higher resolution does not make a game look good but in actual fact makes a game look worse because you can see more detail!
Altering settings makes one an expert?
This is what I'm referring to. Instances where low quality textures meet higher quality textures creating breakups in the overall visual aesthetic--inconsistency. It isn't only on pc, but increases in resolution only heighten the effect.
It is the animation, lighting, and transparencies that make ryse look so good, not the resolution.
@m3dude1 You are correct in stating that most pc fanboys were, and still are apparently, blind to what goes into image quality. I do remember the visual hype for this game and how the pc crowd would do everything they could to downplay the visuals.
It is likely that the bump in resolution does bring out the details in the higher resolution textures. On the other hand, this same increase likely brings out the faults of the game, as well--those straight line "seams" that become more apparent at higher resolutions.
So, almighty graphics expert, who apparently knows more than people who have been altering graphic settings for years (decades in my case). Please explain in more depth, how you came to the conclusion that higher resolution does not make a game look good but in actual fact makes a game look worse because you can see more detail!
Altering settings makes one an expert?
This is what I'm referring to. Instances where low quality textures meet higher quality textures creating breakups in the overall visual aesthetic--inconsistency. It isn't only on pc, but increases in resolution only heighten the effect.
If you wish to find the optimum settings for your own self built PC, then absolutely you need to understand what various graphical effects do to an image at any given time. For instance I hate motion blur and depth of field, so I switch them off. If I didn't understand what these do, I would never be able to locate what I don't like occurring and therefore disable them. You'll find a lot more knowledge in the PC gaming community than with console gamers. Don't allow yourself to get confused by system wars trolls.
Still, even with the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. images you posted, I have never encountered a problem where a game running at 1080p is visually worse than a game running at 720p or 900p. The only time where I've found running a game at 1080p is with older games where they have no native support for HD resolutions, KOTR for example. This is not an issue Ryse will have, being a 2014 game and supporting up to 4k.
Oh , light source doesn't cast shadow but Infamous DOES have dynamic shadows , gotcha . On other hand, Ryse may have been up scaled on Xbox (but other than that , it was the most impressive game on consoles) but now it's 4K native , so PC got that covered .
As for Order , sorry I didn't know that black bars and sub 1080p was their to make it more cinematic . i thought black bars were covering the environment . I thought it was technical limitation , but now I know that PS4 is more than capable of handling it and it was artistic choice. Thanks for enlightening me dude .
No learn to read not all light sources cast a shadows others do.
It is upscale to 1080p and runs poorly performance wise,while been completely enclosed something reviews slam the game for,it felt basically like a corridor shooter of the 90's but without the corridors or shooting.
The level of interaction was null,compare to Infamous where you can create your own incredible explosions and the game stays abode Ryse in frames while been open.
Once again hyping Ryse is a joke the PS4 would run it faster period there is no doubt about that,now The order i am sure it would run on xbox one probably on 720p with some effects hold back.
No the problem is that you are to dumb to actually know the difference between 16.9 and 2.40.1 without blackbars 2.40.1 requires higher resolution than 1080p so without blackbars the game would have not been 1080p either.
1080p movies are presented with black bars on that screen ratio and they are 1080p because the image you are getting with black bars included is 1080p and there is no blowing of pixels.
So Ryse introduced blur and object from pixel blowing something The Order will not introduce because it has no scaling is not blowing up pixels,and Ryse still has lower resolution than The order while lacking MSAAx4 which the order has.
Since day 1 the order was say to be 1920x800p as a choice,Ryse was downgraded because the xbox one could not handle it...hahahaha
Look at the hand armor on the xbox one even vs low setting on PC it look worse that is because the PC version is 1080p the xbox one 900p blown to 1080p so the image get blur,it would be fun seeing the 7770 running Ryse at 1080p 30FPS in low and beat the xbox one silly....
Oh , light source doesn't cast shadow but Infamous DOES have dynamic shadows , gotcha . On other hand, Ryse may have been up scaled on Xbox (but other than that , it was the most impressive game on consoles) but now it's 4K native , so PC got that covered .
As for Order , sorry I didn't know that black bars and sub 1080p was their to make it more cinematic . i thought black bars were covering the environment . I thought it was technical limitation , but now I know that PS4 is more than capable of handling it and it was artistic choice. Thanks for enlightening me dude .
No learn to read not all light sources cast a shadows others do.
It is upscale to 1080p and runs poorly performance wise,while been completely enclosed something reviews slam the game for,it felt basically like a corridor shooter of the 90's but without the corridors or shooting.
The level of interaction was null,compare to Infamous where you can create your own incredible explosions and the game stays abode Ryse in frames while been open.
Once again hyping Ryse is a joke the PS4 would run it faster period there is no doubt about that,now The order i am sure it would run on xbox one probably on 720p with some effects hold back.
No the problem is that you are to dumb to actually know the difference between 16.9 and 2.40.1 without blackbars 2.40.1 requires higher resolution than 1080p so without blackbars the game would have not been 1080p either.
1080p movies are presented with black bars on that screen ratio and they are 1080p because the image you are getting with black bars included is 1080p and there is no blowing of pixels.
So Ryse introduced blur and object from pixel blowing something The Order will not introduce because it has no scaling is not blowing up pixels,and Ryse still has lower resolution than The order while lacking MSAAx4 which the order has.
Since day 1 the order was say to be 1920x800p as a choice,Ryse was downgraded because the xbox one could not handle it...hahahaha
Look at the hand armor on the xbox one even vs low setting on PC it look worse that is because the PC version is 1080p the xbox one 900p blown to 1080p so the image get blur,it would be fun seeing the 7770 running Ryse at 1080p 30FPS in low and beat the xbox one silly....
It's funny how that works right, if an X1 dev said they chose 1920x800p as an "artistic choice", you still would say it's just because it's not powerful enough. You do know they had builds running at 1080p for Ryse right? They chose the settings/resolution that they thought was best for the job. Regardless of what you or anyone else said, The Order chose better performance at a lower resolution(if they removed the black bars and played at a full 1080p resolution the framerate would drop). They are no better because they announced it as an artistic choice, at least X1 devs don't need to lie to us to make us feel like its ok. Both Ryse and Sunset Overdrive are 900p, out of choice. Not because the X1 isn't powerful enough, but because 900p and more AI, more particles and better textures beats out 1080p with no significant advantages.
Maybe if they "downgraded" Infamous to 900p the city wouldn't be so empty and lifeless...idk it's just one mans opinion. Gameplay>Resolution and FPS combined.
Also you're comparing a launch game to a game coming out over a year later, I should expect that The Order looks better than Ryse. Regardless of what you say Ryse was the best looking launch game (KZ looked pretty as well). I would wait until The Order is released before you start praising, Sony has a knack for downgrading games from their reveals (look back to The Last of Us reveal)
Log in to comment