console fanboys..explain why Battlefield 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Edited by Bosskiller500 (334 posts) -

looks worse on ps4 then max settings high end pc?

#2 Posted by MonsieurX (30008 posts) -

I'll explain one thing:

Your threads are completely trash. Stop creating them

#3 Edited by Gue1 (9782 posts) -

it depends on the PC though. I don't think everybody with a PC would be able to run the game at max settings.

#4 Posted by NFJSupreme (5302 posts) -

How are you not permanently banned?

#5 Posted by lundy86_4 (43230 posts) -

For obvious reasons? Go away.

#6 Edited by Bosskiller500 (334 posts) -

@NFJSupreme: cause i make good threads, laughing at consolelites

#7 Posted by Muffin2020 (527 posts) -

How are you not permanently banned?

Also because a high end PC does not cost £350.00

#8 Posted by Netherscourge (16328 posts) -

looks worse on ps4 then max settings high end pc?

-30/10

All your thread did was make the forums run slower than they already are.

#9 Edited by tormentos (17713 posts) -

looks worse on ps4 then max settings high end pc?

Because EA and Dice knew that if they use all the PS4 power and actually make the game better looking on PS4,PC lover would commit collective suicides all over the world so they gimped the PS4 on purpose..

Either that or PC have stronger GPU and CPU than the PS4 so it look better.

#11 Posted by psymon100 (6138 posts) -

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

#12 Posted by MonsieurX (30008 posts) -

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

You mean quintuple?

#13 Edited by comptonst88 (276 posts) -

Depends on the hardware running in your PC. Obviously if your rockin a GTX 780 or R9 290, your gonna be able to run the game at higher resolutions and possibly better texture quality, etc. But for the $400 asking price of the PS4, im getting a beautiful lookin Battlefield game at 60fps which is a really awesome deal.

#14 Posted by treedoor (7648 posts) -

I'll explain one thing:

Your threads are completely trash. Stop creating them

#15 Posted by Telekill (4527 posts) -

My PC can't run the game. Period. Thus, I have it onmy PS4. I think the graphics are great and my TV maxes out at 720p/1080i. Oh, and I still have fun with it. *shock* /sarcasim.

#16 Posted by MonsieurX (30008 posts) -

@Telekill said:

My PC can't run the game. Period. Thus, I have it onmy PS4. I think the graphics are great and my TV maxes out at 720p/1080i. Oh, and I still have fun with it. *shock* /sarcasim.

720P games and having fun?

How dare you!!!

#17 Posted by psymon100 (6138 posts) -

@psymon100 said:

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

You mean quintuple?

I mean quadruple.

#18 Posted by MonsieurX (30008 posts) -

@MonsieurX said:

@psymon100 said:

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

You mean quintuple?

I mean quadruple.

I mean,OP should try running the game on quintuple crossfirex for super fps!

#19 Edited by psymon100 (6138 posts) -

@MonsieurX said:

@psymon100 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@psymon100 said:

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

You mean quintuple?

I mean quadruple.

I mean,OP should try running the game on quintuple crossfirex for super fps!

oh yes of course. quintuple crossfirex would be pretty sweet.

but then again, why not just go from a potato, to a sweet potato?

can't wait for intel's 18nm sweet potato in Q4 2014.

#20 Edited by silversix_ (14301 posts) -

You make the worst threads in SW. Im starting to wonder if you felt on your head or something

#21 Posted by Phazevariance (10944 posts) -

@Telekill said:

My PC can't run the game. Period. Thus, I have it onmy PS4. I think the graphics are great and my TV maxes out at 720p/1080i. Oh, and I still have fun with it. *shock* /sarcasim.

720P games and having fun?

How dare you!!!

Why, could this be why x1 owners still enjoy the x1?

#22 Edited by Jankarcop (9287 posts) -

@Gue1 said:

it depends on the PC though. I don't think everybody with a PC would be able to run the game at max settings.

stop changing the subject.

PC version look and runs better, we are talking about gaming pcs

#23 Posted by turtlethetaffer (16722 posts) -

Explain why you make threads.

#24 Posted by Motokid6 (5444 posts) -

Good to see the mods fail at their job. Congrats GS. Quality stuff you got here.

#25 Edited by kingtito (4910 posts) -
#26 Posted by MonsieurX (30008 posts) -

@MonsieurX said:

@psymon100 said:

@MonsieurX said:

@psymon100 said:

the real question is - why does battlefield 4 running on a potato look so much better than when it runs on 4x r9 290x quadruple crossfirex?

You mean quintuple?

I mean quadruple.

I mean,OP should try running the game on quintuple crossfirex for super fps!

oh yes of course. quintuple crossfirex would be pretty sweet.

but then again, why not just go from a potato, to a sweet potato?

can't wait for intel's 18nm sweet potato in Q4 2014.