@delta3074 said:
@Telekill said:
@delta3074: They, like every other company are exactly that. They patent something in case they use it so they don't have to pay royalties to someone like Microsoft.
Just because they patent something doesn't mean that using it is on the table. It's simply a business tactic.
That's why I always find it weird that you guys bring up patents as system wars material.
so they are Patent trolls then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll
And i am Sorry, but Patenting Anti used game DRM does not equate to 'never considered it' so in that context it isn't strange for me to bring up Patents at all
It's all speculation.
They could be patent trolls, they could have considered directly using it, etc. It could be anything, you don't know, I don't know, and people will only lose time imagining what the market as a whole would be like if the X1 succeded in implementing anti used games policies (which are not DRM, since DRM is strictly an anti-piracy measure, and used games are not piracy, they are private property - of course, if bought, not licensed, since then it could be only a right of use, which means you can't sell it, like in Steam, but even then, it's not piracy).
Log in to comment