Call of Duty Ghost next gen engine (!!!) Pictures

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

cod_ghosts_jungle_environment_custom.jpg

cod_ghosts_deep_dive_custom.jpg

cod_ghosts_in_the_weeds_custom.jpg

cod_ghosts_somethings_burning_custom.jpg

(right click to view in full resolution) 

 

 

Sorry for the low resolution. But what do you think ?

Will upload higher resolution ones when available.

Trailer: 

edit: updated with better quality screenshots

#2 Posted by catasaurus (241 posts) -

very underwhelming

#3 Posted by Ackad (3183 posts) -

If this is next gen graphics, then this is pretty embarrasing 

#4 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

Need I remind you people how this is a next gen engine !!!!

#5 Posted by Epak_ (6951 posts) -

Need higher resolution pictures to see anything. Not really impressed at this point, but at least it's still 60 frames per second.

#6 Posted by ipod_360_gamer (288 posts) -

Looks really good to me. I try to be positive.

#7 Posted by Goyoshi12 (9687 posts) -

Need I remind you people how this is a next gen engine !!!!

R4gn4r0k

Need we remind you it's Call of Duty.

#8 Posted by BPoole96 (22811 posts) -

It's like a PC game from 2005

#9 Posted by Wasdie (50585 posts) -

It's a good upgrade to CoD sure, but that only puts it on par with current games on the market. Nothing fancy.

They are going overboard with the lighting though. It's flashy, not natrual.

#10 Posted by sHaDyCuBe321 (4244 posts) -

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

Need I remind you people how this is a next gen engine !!!!

Goyoshi12

Need we remind you it's Call of Duty.

It actually looks worse in motion...sad.
#11 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

Need I remind you people how this is a next gen engine !!!!

Goyoshi12

Need we remind you it's Call of Duty.

Yeah it looks like it's still running on an updated Quake 3 engine.

UPDATED FOR NEXT GEN !!!!!

#12 Posted by cfisher2833 (2150 posts) -

If this is next gen graphics, then this is pretty embarrasing 

Ackad

 

You have to remember that CoD always shoots for 60fps, and that necessitates a cut in visuals. 

#13 Posted by danjammer69 (4141 posts) -

If they are not using that tired old engine, then I may give COD another chance.

#14 Posted by lilnazar (1923 posts) -

Congratulations for implementing a new engine, IW or who ever is making this game. This could have been done a long time ago.

#15 Posted by Sushiglutton (5480 posts) -
Don't like it. It looks muddy rather than sharp.
#16 Posted by wis3boi (31942 posts) -

If this is next gen graphics, then this is pretty embarrasing 

Ackad

#17 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

The underwater level looks nice.

#18 Posted by Goyoshi12 (9687 posts) -

[QUOTE="Goyoshi12"]

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

Need I remind you people how this is a next gen engine !!!!

R4gn4r0k

Need we remind you it's Call of Duty.

Yeah it looks like it's still running on an updated Quake 3 engine.

UPDATED FOR NEXT GEN !!!!!

Oh, you're doing one of those things, aren't you?

*sigh*

And people wonder why I call hate the ridiculous hate for Call of Duty.

#19 Posted by SchnabbleTab (1243 posts) -

Graphcially, looks like Far Cry 2, Far cry 3 looks way better and Crysis 1...well of course.

 

So it looks worse than a 2007 PC game? Ouch, and what happened to their next gen face stuff?

 

activision_rd_next-gen-human-face-001.jp

 

Not actual gameplay, so why show it at all? It's some pre-rendered bullshIt that no one wants.

#20 Posted by dobzilian (2817 posts) -
Nothing to see. Its IW. Maybe next year i'll care.
#21 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

Oh, you're doing one of those things, aren't you?

*sigh*

And people wonder why I call hate the ridiculous hate for Call of Duty.

Goyoshi12

See the comment above yours. -_-

I can't say anything bad about call of duty without being labeled a hater lol. Why don't you grow up and face how this game has flaws.

I will also give it credit for when it does things good or great. I am interested to see more of this game.

#22 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38219 posts) -

It looks very underwhelming. Not at all a gen jump. BF4's visuals are far more impressive

#23 Posted by Goyoshi12 (9687 posts) -

[QUOTE="Goyoshi12"]

Oh, you're doing one of those things, aren't you?

*sigh*

And people wonder why I call hate the ridiculous hate for Call of Duty.

R4gn4r0k

See the comment above yours. -_-

I can't say anything bad about call of duty without being labeled a hater lol. Why don't you grow up and face how this game has flaws.

I will also give it credit for when it does things good or great. I am interested to see more of this game.

Sorry, this thread reminded me a lot of the other Call of Duty threads like Ghosts reveal and Call of Duty Modern Warfare 7 (joke) thread where they were all pretty much circle jerks for laughing at CoD.

Also, we posted at the same time so I didn't see your comment, sadly. Sorry.

#24 Posted by xhawk27 (7506 posts) -

Those Underwater pics looks like Arma 3. :o

#25 Posted by Badosh (12741 posts) -
Is that Black Ops 2?
#26 Posted by xhawk27 (7506 posts) -

[QUOTE="Ackad"]

If this is next gen graphics, then this is pretty embarrasing

wis3boi

It looks almost like Arma 3!

#27 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

Sorry, this thread reminded me a lot of the other Call of Duty threads like Ghosts reveal and Call of Duty Modern Warfare 7 (joke) thread where they were all pretty much circle jerks for laughing at CoD.

Also, we posted at the same time so I didn't see your comment, sadly. Sorry.

Goyoshi12

I think the night time levels look cool too. But as others have said the bloom is a little overdone.

Will post better pictures once they are available, but my first impressions aren't that great. :P

#28 Posted by Mrmedia01 (1917 posts) -

Not too impressed even PS4 Killzone: Shadowfall Alpha Gameplay looked better.

#29 Posted by Goyoshi12 (9687 posts) -

Is that Black Ops 2?Badosh

Looks more like a muddier Modern Warfare 3; at least BLOPS 2 attempted to have some color.

#30 Posted by Wasdie (50585 posts) -

[QUOTE="Badosh"]Is that Black Ops 2?Goyoshi12

Looks more like a muddier Modern Warfare 3; at least BLOPS 2 attempted to have some color.

It's like MW3 with more polygons and textures but smeared with World at War's use of bloom. 

#31 Posted by freedomfreak (42934 posts) -
Game will be awesome.
#32 Posted by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -
:lol: Looks worse than Crysis 1.
#33 Posted by dobzilian (2817 posts) -
Game will be awesome.freedomfreak
Are you on Drugs? lol...
#34 Posted by scoots9 (3252 posts) -

I wonder if it's a totally new engine or just another coat of paint on the Quake III engine. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the latter, as IW has been modifying that engine since Medal of Honor: Allied Assault.

#35 Posted by ultimate-k (2348 posts) -

BF3 looks better.

#36 Posted by Wasdie (50585 posts) -

:lol: Looks worse than Crysis 1.I_can_haz

Not really.

People overestimate how good Crysis 1 looks. Crysis 1 has big environments but the lighting and object quality are quite low compared to modern games.

#37 Posted by harry_james_pot (11162 posts) -
For a next-gen game, it looks terrible!
#38 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

People wanted better graphics for Call of Duty and they DID get them. I'm sure this will be loved by the fans so in a way Activision/IW totally delivered on this.

It's not like the majority of SW is the target audience anyway. Can't say I'm surprised by how it looks.

Sorry, this thread reminded me a lot of the other Call of Duty threads like Ghosts reveal and Call of Duty Modern Warfare 7 (joke) thread where they were all pretty much circle jerks for laughing at CoD.

Also, we posted at the same time so I didn't see your comment, sadly. Sorry.

Goyoshi12

No need for sorry. I was being overly sarcastic :)

#39 Posted by freedomfreak (42934 posts) -
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Game will be awesome.dobzilian
Are you on Drugs? lol...

I would've announced it if I was.
#40 Posted by Obviously_Right (5320 posts) -

Looks bad. But it is running at 60FPS I suppose.

#41 Posted by psymon100 (6835 posts) -

Probably too hard to appreciate from stills, and sub60fps raw footage. Video compression, dropping the frame rate etc - shift the render output towards a lower quality. 

#42 Posted by Goyoshi12 (9687 posts) -

[QUOTE="dobzilian"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Game will be awesome.freedomfreak
Are you on Drugs? lol...

I would've announced it if I was.

Nice new sig and avy.

#43 Posted by sweeten16 (2872 posts) -
I think some current gen games looked way better.
#44 Posted by dobzilian (2817 posts) -
here is a Q. If its being run a new engine does this mean the PS360U Version will be at a lower frame rate or just at a lower resolution?
#45 Posted by Supabul (3863 posts) -

Thats not next gen COD, thats a port of the Xbox 360 version

Looks crap

#46 Posted by Michael0134567 (28651 posts) -

Pretty. Gonna be awesome.

#47 Posted by R4gn4r0k (17471 posts) -

here is a Q. If its being run a new engine does this mean the PS360U Version will be at a lower frame rate or just at a lower resolution?dobzilian

worse graphics (comparable to or better than BLOPS2), lower res (again probably the same as BLOPS2) compared to PS4/One but at 60 FPS.

That is my guess anyway.

#49 Posted by jhonMalcovich (5131 posts) -

Will be better on PC :P

#50 Posted by freedomfreak (42934 posts) -

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="dobzilian"] Are you on Drugs? lol...Goyoshi12

I would've announced it if I was.

Nice new sig and avy.

Thanks man.