Battlefield 4 on PS4 is pretty shaweet

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
#1 Posted by SolidGame_basic (21093 posts) -

dem next gen graphics, looks even better than I expected. 10X better than last gen versions. anyone else very pleased? (aside from the launch problems)

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#2 Posted by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

looks last gen compared to "PC"

Avatar image for Blabadon
#3 Edited by Blabadon (32740 posts) -

I wanna see a direct comparison of new gen Battlefield to last gens in real life.

Avatar image for silversix_
#4 Posted by silversix_ (24382 posts) -

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
#5 Posted by SolidGame_basic (21093 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

lets see what infamous looks like with 64 player multiplayer

Avatar image for silversix_
#6 Posted by silversix_ (24382 posts) -

@SolidGame_basic said:

@silversix_ said:

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

lets see what infamous looks like with 64 player multiplayer

that's why i said i'd be VERY impressed. infamous is also an open world game and BF4 isn't. Burning fire and particle effects are super low rez in BF4/ps4 while they're stellar in Infamous.

Avatar image for mems_1224
#7 Posted by mems_1224 (55499 posts) -

lol 900p 30fps

Avatar image for silversix_
#8 Posted by silversix_ (24382 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#9 Posted by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

lmao multiplats on consoles

Avatar image for mems_1224
#10 Posted by mems_1224 (55499 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
#11 Posted by freedomfreak (48925 posts) -
@mems_1224 said:

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

It is.

Avatar image for Cranler
#12 Posted by Cranler (8809 posts) -
@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Find something better to troll about. BF 4 being 60fps on ps4/xone is common knowledge here.

Avatar image for m3dude1
#13 Posted by m3dude1 (2225 posts) -

bf4 looks like piss on all platforms, even PC. adding AA to a piss looking game doesnt make it not look like piss.

Avatar image for Dire_Weasel
#14 Posted by Dire_Weasel (16676 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Battlefield is 900p, 60fps on the Playstation 4. It looks pretty good, actually.

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
#15 Edited by GTSaiyanjin2 (6017 posts) -

BF4 does actually look very good... best way I can describe would be the game has a very clean image, with smooth frame rate. Which is odd considering the game is 900p. I still give the edge to Killzone in the graphics department, but BF4 is the better game.

Avatar image for m3dude1
#16 Posted by m3dude1 (2225 posts) -

the very act of shooting people is completely broken and random in bf4 but yep, its the better game.

Avatar image for mems_1224
#17 Posted by mems_1224 (55499 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@mems_1224 said:

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

It is.

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Avatar image for silversix_
#18 Posted by silversix_ (24382 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

I heard CoD Ghosts is also 30fps but im not sure, would mems_1224 be kind and confirm it for me?

Avatar image for freedomfreak
#19 Edited by freedomfreak (48925 posts) -
@mems_1224 said:

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

Avatar image for GotNugz
#20 Posted by GotNugz (681 posts) -

@mems_1224: so how did you get 30? Caught with your pants down.

Avatar image for mems_1224
#21 Posted by mems_1224 (55499 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@mems_1224 said:

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

lol well i was talking about multiplayer. only lunatics play battlefield's single player :P

Avatar image for kingjazziephiz
#22 Posted by kingjazziephiz (2573 posts) -

Its good. Not a fan of the new maps though

Avatar image for Kaze_no_Mirai
#23 Posted by Kaze_no_Mirai (11753 posts) -

The game annoyed me when I was trying to complete the single player ( I know, BF games are meant to be multiplayer, but I like completing the campaigns). It crashed on me five or six times while doing it. And it was that annoying glitch that corrupted your save.

The game itself looks ok. I don't think it's anything amazing.

Avatar image for Vatusus
#24 Posted by Vatusus (6486 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Its actually 60fps fyi

Avatar image for Cranler
#25 Posted by Cranler (8809 posts) -

@freedomfreak said:
@mems_1224 said:

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

Mp is 60 also.

Avatar image for xhawk27
#26 Posted by xhawk27 (8956 posts) -

Too bad it never works right.

Avatar image for m3dude1
#27 Edited by m3dude1 (2225 posts) -

@Vatusus said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Its actually 60fps fyi

bf4 MP on ps4 is 900p w/ no deferred AA, all settings excluding terrain decoration/effects quality/mesh quality/shadow quality on ultra(the first is custom setting probly close to the low setting on pc, the latter 3 are very near to the high setting on pc). fps avg is 47 to 48 factoring in the more demanding scenarios. other than lack of AA, it looks very similar to the pc version. effects quality on ultra in pc version does provide a solid improvement when looking at vegetation through smoke, but effects quality on ultra is also performance destroyer on even the fastest single gpu money can buy.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
#28 Edited by Midnightshade29 (5918 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

looks last gen compared to "PC"

not really. I have bf3 on pc and bf4 on ps4 and they both look great. I actually perfer the new gens battlefields on ps4 more. (Although i loved bf2 on pc back in the day).

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
#29 Posted by Midnightshade29 (5918 posts) -

@Kaze_no_Mirai said:

The game annoyed me when I was trying to complete the single player ( I know, BF games are meant to be multiplayer, but I like completing the campaigns). It crashed on me five or six times while doing it. And it was that annoying glitch that corrupted your save.

The game itself looks ok. I don't think it's anything amazing.

I didn't get the game until X-mas (got killzone and AC at launch) so all those issues were ironed out and I never had any issue at all with bf4 on ps4.

Avatar image for Kaze_no_Mirai
#30 Posted by Kaze_no_Mirai (11753 posts) -

@Midnightshade29: well you're lucky and I believe you. I've been very unlucky with it. I've tried it as recently as January and still got my file corrupted.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#31 Posted by NFJSupreme (6301 posts) -

It's the best looking console version but I play at 1080p on ultra settings at true 60fps not the average of 40 something that ps4 gets so no I wasn't really impressed. But if all you know are consoles it doesn't matter. You will be amazed and the differences probably won't be that noticeable to you if at all.

Avatar image for Rage010101
#32 Posted by Rage010101 (5470 posts) -

Your OP doesnt even have enough material to make this a decent discussion me thinks. Also, no 900p lol

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#33 Edited by NFJSupreme (6301 posts) -

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Avatar image for Sharp-Shooter89
#34 Posted by Sharp-Shooter89 (128 posts) -

i love how back in BF3 days, console peasants would say LOL barely a difference because they are watching youtube video's, now that they can see a ps4 version compared to a ps3 version in real life they actually see a difference... hmm its almost like youtube compresses video or something... its too bad most peasants have never seen an actual gaming computer with maxed out settings in real life, they just watch video comparisons and say, "barely a noticeable difference" like titanfall LOL

Avatar image for lostrib
#35 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@Sharp-Shooter89 said:

i love how back in BF3 days, console peasants would say LOL barely a difference because they are watching youtube video's, now that they can see a ps4 version compared to a ps3 version in real life they actually see a difference... hmm its almost like youtube compresses video or something... its too bad most peasants have never seen an actual gaming computer with maxed out settings in real life, they just watch video comparisons and say, "barely a noticeable difference" like titanfall LOL

herp derp master race

Avatar image for Cranler
#36 Posted by Cranler (8809 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for lostrib
#37 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@Cranler said:

@NFJSupreme said:

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

...so your average is based on something you can't know

Avatar image for I_can_haz
#38 Posted by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

Yea it looks pretty good especially in Single Player.

Avatar image for lostrib
#40 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@summerparadise: bad

Avatar image for I_can_haz
#41 Edited by I_can_haz (6511 posts) -

@summerparadise said:

PS4 VERSION:

PC VERSION:

MP vs SP?

Are you fucking serious? You do realize the second screen is from BF3 not BF4 right? Something tells me you've never touched BF3 or BF4.

Avatar image for DA1M0Z
#42 Posted by DA1M0Z (34 posts) -

The PS4 community automatically makes it better than PC.

PC BF4 community is pretty much dead...

Avatar image for Cranler
#43 Posted by Cranler (8809 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@NFJSupreme said:

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

...so your average is based on something you can't know

You must be new to gaming or never seen or done a benchmark. A 60 fps average will typically consist of a fluctuation from roughly 40-80 fps.

You really think an uncapped framerate would have as small a fluctuation as 60-44? Link some benches to prove it.

See here for an example of how the fps fluctuates http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/

Avatar image for Cranler
#44 Edited by Cranler (8809 posts) -

@DA1M0Z said:

The PS4 community automatically makes it better than PC.

PC BF4 community is pretty much dead...

Lol there's 23,000 people playing pc version right now. http://bf4stats.com/

Avatar image for PAL360
#45 Edited by PAL360 (28206 posts) -

It's one of the best looking 8th gen games, so far! Also the jump to 60fps and 64 players was very welcomed.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
#46 Posted by ReadingRainbow4 (18733 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
#47 Posted by ShoTTyMcNaDeS (2767 posts) -

BF4 is a great looking game on PS4 for sure. The problem with it is that it is not noob friendly! Anyone who starts playing now better just accept getting turned inside out for about 30 levels. You start with crap guns and crap gear in this game. You have no chance against a guy that has had the game since launch. BF4 is far too gear dependant!!

Avatar image for stationplay_4
#48 Posted by stationplay_4 (444 posts) -

it looked so good that it gave me ptsd.